Probability calculations

This worksheet and all related files are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,
version 1.0. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/, or send a
letter to Creative Commons, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, California 94305, USA. The terms and
conditions of this license allow for free copying, distribution, and/or modification of all licensed works by
the general public.

1
 Questions
Question 1
Apply the concepts of dependability, security, PFD, and RSA to the context of a firearm. Label each
quadrant of the following chart with these terms (note: some of them may be synonymous, and not all
quadrants may have an appropriate term in this list!):

Trigger pulled, Safety "on",

safety "off" trigger untouched

Gun discharges

Gun does not

discharge

Which of these quadrants represents desirable conditions, and which represent undesirable conditions?
Are there any laws of probability applicable to the quadrants, assuming we had probability values associated
with each?

Suggestions for Socratic discussion

• Label each of the quadrants with the Boolean terms D, S, D, and S as appropriate.
file i03021

2
Question 2
Perform an experiment where you roll a set of dice to simulate a test of component reliability. Each
die represents a single component being tested, with a random chance of failure following each roll. This
experiment works better the more dice you have to roll (10 dice is a good minimum).
The purpose of this experiment is to contrast the scenarios of no component replacement versus
immediate repair of any failed components, and also to gain a more intuitive understanding of MTBF
(or MTTF). Count any die landing on “1” as a failed component, and landing on any other number as a
surviving component.

First, perform successive rolls, removing any failed components after each roll so that the group of failed
components grows over time while the group of surviving components (the only dice being rolled the next
throw) dwindles over time. Record the sizes of the “failed” and “surviving” groups after each roll. For
example:

Roll Total number failed Number surviving

0 0 15
1 2 13
2 3 12
3 5 10

Plot the results on a graph, noting the number of rolls required until 63.2% of the original components
had failed.

Next, perform successive rolls, “repairing” any failed components after each roll so that each roll begins
with the same number of total components. Record an accumulating total of “failures” after each roll. For
example:

Roll Total number failed Number surviving

0 0 15
1 2 15
2 4 15
3 7 15

Plot the results on a graph, noting the number of rolls required until the accumulated number of failed
components equals the total number of components maintained.
file i02497

3
Question 3
In this high-temperature safety shutdown system, fuel shuts off to the burner only if both high-
temperature switches and shutoff valves properly function. Both switches have the same trip point, and
both solenoid valves work identically. The dependability rating for each switch/valve set is 0.6, which means
each one is known to properly shut off fuel flow in the event of a high-temperature condition 60% of the
time:

Dependability =0.6
TSH
Furnace
Dependability =0.6
TSH

Fuel supply

A technician decides to calculate the probability of this system failing on demand. That is, he intends
to calculate how likely it will be that gas could continue to flow to the furnace even when the temperature
was too high. This is the technician’s work to solve the problem:

If Dependability = 0.6 then PFD = 0.4 0.4

OR 0.8 Therefore, PFDsystem = 0.8
If Dependability = 0.6 then PFD = 0.4 0.4

Identify both what is correct and what is incorrect in this technician’s analysis of the system.

file i03599

4
Question 4
All devices fail – it is not a question of “if,” but “when.” Given this fact, it is logical to provide
dangerous processes with redundant control components, so that system safety is never dependent on any
single component.
For example, suppose we wished to equip a furnace with a high-temperature safety shutdown system,
to shut off fuel to the burner if ever the furnace temperature reached some critical value. Here, two high-
temperature switches control two fuel shutoff valves. Both switches have the same trip point, and both
solenoid valves work identically:

TSH
Furnace

TSH

S S

Fuel supply

5
 Here is another high-temperature shutdown system using redundant sensors and redundant safety valves.
However, this system will not function the same as the previous system:

TSH
Furnace

TSH

Fuel supply

Determine which of these two redundant shutdown systems provides the greatest level of dependability
(i.e. preventing over-temperature of the furnace), and which of them provides the greatest level of security
(i.e. the ability to continue running the furnace when there is no overtemperature condition).
file i02487

Question 5
A team of instrument technicians is salvaging differential pressure transmitters from an abandoned
process unit at an old facility. Upon removal, each transmitter is tested for proper operation. At the end of
this salvage operation, 53 transmitters were found to be good and 8 were found to be defective.
Unfortunately, all 61 transmitters were placed in the same crate, with no markings to designate which
were good and which were defective. Suppose you were to randomly grab a transmitter from this crate:
what is the probability that the transmitter will be good? Now, supposing the first transmitter you found
was good; what is the probability that the next one you grab will be good?
Finally, calculate the probability that the first two transmitters you grab from this bin will both be
good.
file i02498

6
Question 6
Two emergency isolation valves are installed in a process line between two chemical reactor vessels:

Logic solver

Reactor S S
1

Reactor
2

These safety shutdown valves normally spend their time in the wide-open position. Only during
emergencies are they expected to close shut. Two are placed in series so that even if one isolation valve
fails to shut when needed there will be another available to do the job.
Suppose the probability of each isolation valve failing on demand (PFD) is equal to 1.5 × 10−4 , given
the age of the valves and actuators, and the frequency of partial-stroke testing. (Note, the PFD value will
be different for valves of different age, and for different testing intervals.)
Calculate the probability of failure on demand of the two isolation valves together: the chance that
neither valve will shut when needed during an emergency. Next, calculate the probability that this isolation
system will work properly when needed (i.e. the probability that at least one of the two isolation valves will
function properly on demand).

Suggestions for Socratic discussion

• Does placing two isolation valves in series prioritize dependability or does it prioritize security?
• Identify at least one important assumption implicit in the probability calculations shown here.
file i02502

7
Question 7
The probability calculation for a logical two-input OR function follows this formula, where A and B are
probability values ranging between 0 and 1 inclusive:

A
B

Two-input OR function probability = A + B − AB

Derive a probability value formula for a three-input logical OR function:

file i01174

8
Question 8
An intrinsic safety barrier circuit is essential for making loop-powered 4-20 mA instrument systems
“intrinsically safe.” Explain what intrinsic safety means for an instrument system such as this, and also how
the components inside the barrier circuit make the circuit intrinsically safe:

Classified area Non-classified area

Intrinsic safety barrier Process controller

Two-wire cable Two-wire cable

−
+
+24 VDC

ADC
X

250 Ω ADC
Y
Gnd
H L

Output
Loop-powered field Out
4-20
instrument Gnd mA

Supposing the resistor inside this intrinsic safety barrier has a probability of 2.4 × 10−6 of failing open,
and the diode has a probability of 1.3 × 10−4 of failing shorted, calculate the probability that either of these
two failures will interrupt the transmitter’s signal from getting to the controller.

Supposing the fuse inside the barrier has a probability of 5.8 × 10−4 of failing open. How does this affect
the probability of signal interruption for any barrier component failure?

Suggestions for Socratic discussion

• A good reasoning technique to apply if you are having difficulty explaining the purpose of something
is to explain the converse: what things would be like it that something were not present. In this case,
explain why the circuit could be unsafe without the barrier in place, assuming certain circuit faults such
as opens and shorts in the classified field location.
• Will the presence of an intrinsic safety barrier guarantee safe operation for any device installed in a
classified area, or must the field devices themselves also be designed and rated for intrinsic safety?
• Would the loop-powered transmitter circuit still be considered intrinsically safe if the barrier were not
present? Would it be considered non-incendive?
• Which of the two components inside the barrier poses the greatest risk to reliability, based on the failure
probabilities?
file i02471

9
Question 9
A water-cooled generator at a power plant has two sources of cooling water flow, each source equipped
with a flow switch that returns to its normal status (open) if the water flow through the pipe drops to too
low of a rate:

L1 L2
Cooling water
flow (source A) CR1
TP1 TP2

Cooling water
flow (source B) CR2
TP3 TP4

CR1 Warning light

TP5 TP6

CR2

TP7

Shut-down
CR1 CR2 solenoid
TP8 TP9 TP10

Classify the alarm and the shutdown functions, each using MooN notation.

Given the following component dependabilities (and neglecting all other dependabilities in the system
such as the power source), calculate the dependability of the alarm function and also the dependability of
the shutdown function:
• Dependability of each flow switch = 0.993
• Dependability of each control relay = 0.9991
• Dependability of lamp = 0.998
• Dependability of shutdown solenoid = 0.965

Supposing you were assigned the task of testing this alarm/shutdown system as thoroughly as possible
without actually interrupting water flow through either of the cooling water pipes, or actually shutting
the generator down, design a testing procedure to determine as much as possible the readiness of this
alarm/shutdown system. Points to identify in your procedure:
• Any electrical connections you would need to temporarily break
• Any temporary “jumper” connections you would need to make
• What you would detect or measure as confirmation that the system works as designed
• The order in which all steps would need to be done

10
Suggestions for Socratic discussion

• Identify any safety precautions to follow when working on a “live” 120 VAC circuit (e.g. the one-hand
rule).
• Are the flow switches’ normal state the same as their typical state when the system is running as it
should? Explain the distinction between “normal” and “typical” in this context.
file i03198

11
Question 10
A triple-redundant temperature control system is implemented using FOUNDATION Fieldbus
technology. A general P&ID of the control scheme is shown here, followed by the Fieldbus function block
diagram:

TT
101a

Furnace
Median TT
select
101b

TT
101c

TC
101

TV
101
Fuel

TT-101a
OUT_D

AI OUT
(TV-101)
BKCAL_IN BKCAL_OUT

CAS_IN
TT-101b (TT-101a)
OUT_D IN_1 FF_VAL OUT

IN_2 OUT IN PID

AI OUT
IN_3 TRK_IN_D

IN_4 TRK_VAL

TT-101c DISABLE_1 ISEL

OUT_D
DISABLE_2 SELECTED TV-101
AI DISABLE_3 CAS_IN BKCAL_OUT
OUT
DISABLE_4 AO OUT

OP_SELECT

The ISEL function block selects the median signal from the three temperature transmitters, and is able
to operate even if only one of those temperature signals is good.

12
 Calculate the probability of system failure given the following device failure probabilites:
• TT-101a = 0.001
• TT-101b = 0.001
• TT-101c = 0.001
• TV-101 = 0.003

Now, suppose the ISEL function block were moved from TT-101a to TV-101. Re-calculate the
probability of system failure given the same device failure probabilities.
file i02133

Question 11
Suppose a safety valve (a “chopper” valve) used to shut off flow during emergency conditions has a
probability of failing to shut off when commanded to shut of 0.00014, and a probability of shutting off
needlessly when commanded to stay open of 0.00033. Determine the following quantities in relation to this
valve:
• Dependability (D) =

• Undependability (D)=

• Security (S) =

• Unsecurity (S) =

Next, calculate the RSA and PFD values for this valve.

Finally, calculate the reliability of this valve: the probability that it will act as commanded under all
conditions.
file i02559

13
Question 12
Each of the electric-driven pumps in this distillation process is backed up by a redundant steam-driven
pump, automatically started by a system using redundant pressure switches to sense low discharge pressure
from the electric pump:

E-5, E-6, E-7 E-8 E-9 P-10 P-11 P-12 P-13 P-14 P-15 C-5 V-13
FEED HEAT RECOVERY EXCHANGERS OVERHEAD PRODUCT CONDENSER BOTTOMS REBOILER MAIN CHARGE FEED PUMP BACKUP CHARGE FEED PUMP MAIN BOTTOMS PRODUCT PUMP BACKUP BOTTOMS PRODUCT PUMP MAIN OVERHEAD PRODUCT PUMP BACKUP OVERHEAD PRODUCT PUMP MAIN FRACTIONATION TOWER OVERHEAD ACCUMULATOR
80 MM BTU/hr 55 MM BTU/hr 70 MM BTU/hr 2100 GPM @ 460 PSID 1900 GPM @ 460 PSID 2880 GPM @ 70 PSID 2880 GPM @ 70 PSID 2350 GPM @ 55 PSID 2350 GPM @ 55 PSID Dia 10’-3" Height 93’ DP 81 PSIG
Shell 500 PSIG @ 650 oF Shell 120 PSIG @ 650 oF Shell 630 PSIG @ 800 oF DP 57 PSIG DT 650 oF
Tube 660 PSIG @ 730 oF Tube 165 PSIG @ 400 oF Tube 600 PSIG @ 880 oF DT 650 oF top, 710 oF bottom

NC

Note 2
RTD FO To LP flare
Dwg. 62314
IAS
FT TT PV
33b
68 PT 68 3 to 9 PSI PG
H
PY PIC PY
68 PG 135
33a 33 L 33b
110
NOTES: PAH PV
FY Modbus RS-485 FIQ 33a
1. Backup (steam-driven) pumps automatically started by 2oo2 trip 66 9 to 15 PSI
logic, where both pressure switches must detect a low-pressure 68 68 PR
Cooling water
condition in order to start the backup pump. 33 return
FO Dwg. 11324
2. Transit-time ultrasonic flowmeter with pressure and temperature
compensation for measuring overhead gas flow to flare line. PSH PG PT
NC
66 108 33

FIR
67

FOUNDATION Fieldbus
PG
109 FT
E-8
67

HP cooling water
M
Dwg. 11324
Set @ 52 PSI Set @ 52 PSI FOUNDATION Fieldbus

PG RTD Overhead product

111 Dwg. 28542
Set @ 55 PSI Set @ 55 PSI
H
IAS FC LIC FOUNDATION Fieldbus
FOUNDATION Fieldbus FOUNDATION Fieldbus FT FT TT
31 31 30 L
FV Set @ 69 PT 69
P 31 73 PSI 69

FO

NC
LG LT FY FIR
V-13
32 30 69 69
AIC FY
42 40c

Lead/Lag Lead/Lag

FY FY
40a 40b
FOUNDATION Fieldbus FC FY
34 34
FT PG
40 134 FT IAS
AIC FV
34
36 34
IAS P
Distillate product
FIC FY FC Dwg. 28543
35 35
PG AT
136 36 FT NC

35 FV
35
FOUNDATION Fieldbus FFC PG
Sidedraw product
41 127
Dwg. 28545
C-5
FOUNDATION Fieldbus PG PG
NC

FT IAS 130 131

41 FV
41
P
600 PSI steam
Dwg. 10957 FC

NC
AIT
42 TT TIR
FT
53 53 37
PG PG
138 137
Bottoms product TIR TT
Dwg. 28544 50 50

LAH
E-5 58 Radar Magnetostrictive (float) PG
LT LT 132
TIR TT TT TIR 38b 38c PG
LSH HLL = 7’-2"
51 51 54 54 133
58 E-9
Fractionator feed LT
from charge heater LG NLL = 5’-4"
38a
Dwg. 27004 39
E-6 LSL LLL = 3’-8" Condensate return
57 Median
select
Dwg. 10957
LY H
TIR TT TT TIR LIC FIC
52 52 55 55 38 38 L 37
IAS
FV
E-7 37
LAL P
57
TT TIR FO

56 56
NC
PG TIR TT
106 PG 59 59 PG PG
107 HC 140 HC 141 HC
142 143 144
Set @ Set @ Set @
410 PSI IAS PG 500 PSI IAS 100 PSI IAS
139

S
S

PSL PSL PSL

60 62 64

PSL I PSL I PSL I

S
S

61 63 65
R

R
R

Note 1 Note 1 Note 1

PG PG PG PG PG PG
123 124 119 113 116 118
FO FO FO

RO RO RO RO RO RO

PG PG PG PG PG PG
M M M
122 125 120 112 115 117

P-10 P-11 P-12 P-13 P-14 P-15

PG
114

PG Condensate return
121 Dwg. 10957

1000 PSI steam

Dwg. 10957

Suppose PSL-62 has a PFD value of 0.0051 and PSL-63 has a PFD value of 0.0048. Calculate the
dependability of these two redundant pressure switches (i.e. the probability that together they will provide
the necessary signal(s) to the auto-start system of pump P-13 if the discharge pressure falls below their trip
points).

Suggestions for Socratic discussion

• A very helpful problem-solving technique when working with probabilities is to sketch a logic function
diagram with each line in that diagram labeled with an easy-to-understand description of its real-life
meaning. Sketch such a diagram for this problem, and then explain how that diagram is helpful.
• What other component or susbsystem PFD values would need to be considered in order to calculate the
reliability of the entire auto-start system for pump P-13?
• What are the pressure relief valves at the top of the main fractionation tower set to different “lift”
pressures?
file i02036

14
Question 13
Two different level transmitters are used as redundant sensing devices for a critical vessel in a
petrochemical refining process where a high level condition is dangerous but a low level condition is safe. A
“high select” voting algorithm ignores the lowest-reading transmitter signal. The reliability rating (R) for
each transmitter – describing its probability of faithfully sensing liquid level inside the vessel – is shown on
the diagram:

High
select

LT LT
215a R = 0.985 215b
R = 0.990
magnetostrictive radar

To SIS logic solver

Process vessel

Determine the MooN ratings for this redundant transmitter system, from the perspective of dependability
(i.e. the MooN rating describing its ability to detect a dangerous (high) level condition), as well as from the
perspective of security (i.e. the MooN rating describing its ability to keep the process running).

MooN (dependability) = MooN (security) =

Next, calculate the overall reliability that this two-transmitter system will be able to initiate a shutdown
if needed, based on the individual reliability ratings given:

Rshutof f =
file i00225

15
Question 14
Four solenoid-actuated block valves are used as safety shutoff devices for a petroleum pipeline, all of
them signaled simultaneously by one “logic solver” controller. The reliability rating (R) for each block valve
– describing its probability of faithfully obeying the signal from the logic solver – is shown on the diagram:

S S

R = 0.912 R = 0.905
Pump
From source To pipeline
S S

R = 0.944 R = 0.918

Determine the MooN ratings for this four-valve block system, from the perspective of dependability (i.e.
the MooN rating describing its ability to guarantee a shut-off pipeline), as well as from the perspective of
security (i.e. the MooN rating describing its ability to guarantee a flowing pipeline).

MooN (dependability) = MooN (security) =

Next, calculate the overall reliability that this four-valve block system will be able to guarantee shut-off
of the pipeline, based on the individual reliability ratings given:

Rshutof f =
file i00218

16
Question 15
The following circuit controls the starting and stopping of a motor-driven air compressor. The “M” coil
is the coil of a three-phase contactor relay sending 480 VAC to the compressor’s electric motor. The “OL”
contact is a thermal overload contact (similar to a “51” time-overcurrent protective relay) which forces the
contactor to de-energize and cut power to the motor if the motor draws too much current over time:

Control circuit schematic

L1 L2

Cut-out switch B D Hand M OL

A F G
Off
E H
(trips at 110 PSI rising)
Auto

Control switch
(trips at 90 PSI rising, resets at 80 PSI falling)

Pictorial diagram of system

PS Cut-out switch PS Control switch

(trips at 110 PSI rising) (trips at 90 PSI rising, resets at 80 PSI falling)

Intake filter
Receiver tank

Compressor
Compressed air

Condensate drain valve

Suppose you were asked to test the high-pressure “cut-out” switch for proper operation without shutting
the compressor down to perform the test. Explain how you could perform this test safely while the compressor
was running.

Also, calculate the PFD for unchecked overpressure (substantially above 110 PSI) given the following
pressure switch dependability values, assuming the hand switch is left in the “Auto” position:
• Dependabilitycontrol = 0.947
• Dependabilitycutout = 0.981

Suggestions for Socratic discussion

• Identify any safety precautions to follow when working on a “live” 120 VAC circuit (e.g. the one-hand
rule).
• How would the PFD of this system be affected if the hand switch were left in the “Hand” position?
file i02110

17
Question 16
A very common form of schematic used to represent large-scale electric power systems is the single-line
diagram, where all three phase conductors in a circuit are represented by single lines in the diagram. A
single-line diagram showing a power plant sending power to a substation for distribution to business and
residential loads is shown here:

Power plant generators

Gen Gen Gen

A B C
13.8 kV 13.8 kV 13.8 kV

115 kV 115 kV 115 kV

D E F

Bus
G H

Transmission line Transmission line

J Substation K
115 kV Bus A Bus B 115 kV

2 6
13.8 kV 13.8 kV
Load A Load B Load C
11
1 3 7
Load D Load E Load F 8
4 9
Load G Load H Load I
12

5 10
Bus C
Load J Load K Load L

A concern in electric power grids is breaker failure: when a circuit breaker fails to open as it should
when given a “trip” signal. Suppose breaker #5 fails to open all its contacts when manually tripped.
Identify which other substation breakers must be tripped in order to isolate the failed breaker #5 from
all power, after the breaker failure has been detected by a “breaker failure” relay monitoring breaker #5.
How many loads (power customers) are affected by this subsequent action?

18
 Suppose the PFD for each of breaker #5’s three power contacts is 0.000273. Calculate the probability
of any of these contacts failing to open when the breaker mechanism is tripped.

Also, how do you think a breaker failure might be detected by electronic devices? What diagnostic data
would a breaker-failure detection circuit “look for” in order to determine a breaker had indeed failed to open
all its contacts when tripped? Examine this photograph of a 125 kV SF6 gas circuit breaker for clues:

Suggestions for Socratic discussion

• Why do you suppose single-line diagrams are popular within the electrical power industry, rather than
full schematic diagrams showing all power conductors?
• What would happen in this power system if breaker “F” were to trip?
• Suppose the dependability of each breaker in this system (i.e. the probability it will trip when called to
trip) is 0.99918, and the security of each breaker in this system (i.e. the probability it won’t trip when
it’s not supposed to) is 0.99993. Based on these figures, calculate the following probabilities:
→ The probability that the right-hand transmission line cannot be isolated in the event of a fault.
→ The probability that the left-hand transmission line will be unnecessarily removed from service (i.e.
opened so it no longer carries load current).
→ The probability that one particular generator will be taken off-line unnecessarily.
→ The probability that any of the generators will be taken off-line unnecessarily.
→ The probability that the high-voltage bus cannot be isolated in the event of a fault.
→ The probability that the left-hand substation bus cannot be isolated in the event of a fault.
→ The probability that the left-hand substation bus will become unnecessarily isolated.
→ The probability that the entire substation will suffer an unnecessary outage.
file i02116

19
Question 17
A high-voltage circuit breaker is manually operated from a remote location using a pair of pushbutton
switches, connected to “trip” and “close” solenoid coils within the breaker:

3-phase line 3-phase load

(power in) (power out)
Circuit breaker

Trip Close
52a

4 TC1 1 23

52a
24
5 TC2 2
25
52b
22
6 CC 3

26

27 125 VDC Fuse

station battery
Fuse
28 29 30

Note: the “52a” and “52b” contacts wired in series with the solenoid coils within the breaker are auxiliary
contacts, actuated by the same mechanism as the three power contacts (i.e. 52a contacts are open when the
power contacts are open, and closed when the power contacts are closed. 52b contact always exhibits the
opposite state as the power contacts). The two trip coils are redundant: only one of them needs to energize
in order to trip the circuit breaker.

Given the following dependability figures for each component, and assuming all other elements in the
system are 100% reliable, calculate the probability of failure for breaker tripping (i.e. the probability that
the breaker will not trip when the “Trip” pushbutton is pressed), and also the probability of failure for
breaker closing (i.e. the probability that the breaker will not close when the “Close” pushbutton is pressed).
• Pushbutton contact = 0.991 (each) PFDclose =
• Coil = 0.99987 (each)
• Fuse = 0.9971 (each) PFDtrip =
• Battery = 0.9984

Suggestions for Socratic discussion

• Which function, tripping or closing, has the least probability of failure? Why do you think the system
is designed this way?
• What is the purpose for having auxiliary contacts in the trip and close circuits?
file i01894

20
Question 18
Examine this schematic diagram for this protective relay system, where a pair of parallel circuit breakers
are controlled by two redundant overcurrent relays:

125 VDC
A B C

Overcurrent
relay
#1

Overcurrent
relay
#2

TC Breaker #1 Breaker #2 TC
1 2 3 4

52a 52a

Identify the switch closure positions necessary to have relay #1 control breaker #2, and have relay #2
control both breakers #1 and #2.

Explain why the diodes are in this circuit. Hint: these are sometimes referred to as voting diodes.
They are not used for current-measurement (as in 4-20 mA circuits), nor do they suppress transient voltages
(commutating diodes across inductive loads).

Given a dependability value of 0.99982 for each relay and a dependability value of 0.99961 for each
circuit breaker, calculate the probability that the breakers will fail to trip in an overcurrent condition with
all four relay/breaker selection switches in the closed position (assume all other system components are 100%
reliable).

Suggestions for Socratic discussion

• A very useful problem-solving technique for figuring out the purpose of a particular device in a system
is to analyze that system’s behavior without the device in question. In this example, consider how the

21
system would function if the voting diodes were not installed in the trip circuitry.
file i02112

22
 Answers
Answer 1

Trigger pulled, Safety "on",

safety "off" trigger untouched

Dependability
Gun discharges (RSA) S
D

PFD Security
Gun does not
discharge
D S

Probability values in the same column but in different rows (e.g. RSA versus PFD) are mathematical
complements of each other, because their sum must be equal to 100% (1). For example, an RSA of 99.98% is
equivalent to a PFD of 0.02% because there are only two (exclusive) possibilities of what will happen when
the trigger is pulled and the safety is off: either the gun will fire or it will not fire.

Answer 2

Answer 3
The technician was correct to apply the logical OR function here: the system will fail to protect against
high temperature if either switch/valve set A or switch/valve set B fails. However, this is an inclusive OR
function rather than exclusive, which means the proper equation to use is:

P = A + B − AB

P = 0.4 + 0.4 − (0.16)

P = 0.64

Another way to solve this is to calculate based on dependability rather than PFD. We can say that
the system requires both switch/valve set A and switch/valve set B to function properly in order for the
shutdown system to shut the furnace down. Thus:

Dependability = 0.6
AND Dependabilitysystem = 0.36
Dependability = 0.6

If Dependabilitysystem = 0.36 then PFDsystem = 0.64

23
Answer 4
The first (series valves) system provides 1oo2 dependability and 2oo2 security. The second (parallel
valves) system provides 2oo2 dependability and 1oo2 security.

Answer 5
53
P (1st good) = 61 = 0.86885
52
P (2nd good|1st good) = = 0.86667
60

53 52



P (1st and 2nd good) = 61 60 = 0.75301

Answer 6
Since this is a series (double) block valve system, the probability that the safety function fails will be
the probability that both block valves fail to shut on demand. Thus, the PFD for both valves together =
2.25 × 10−8

1.5 × 10-4
PFDvalve fails 2.25 × 10-8
PFDsystem fails
PFDvalve fails
1.5 × 10-4

The probability that this safety function will perform as designed and shut off the flow when needed
(i.e. that is will be dependable) is the complement of its PFD:

1.5 × 10-4 2.25 × 10-8

PFDvalve fails PFDsystem fails 0.9999999775
Dependability
PFDvalve fails
1.5 × 10-4

An alternative method for calculating the dependability of this system is to begin with the dependability
figures for each block valve. If the PFD for each valve is 1.5 × 10−4 , then the dependability of each valve
(i.e. the probability that it will shut off when it is supposed to) will be the complement of this value, or
0.99985. Since the dependability of the whole safety function is the probability that either or both of these
block valves operates properly, we may model this as an OR function:

0.99985
Dependabilityvalve 0.9999999775
Dependabilitysafety function
Dependabilityvalve
0.99985

Note: if you are having trouble seeing the relationship between individual PFD’s and the overall PFD
of the system, try simplifying the problem. Consider each valve to be a 6-sided die, where rolling a “1”
is equivalent to failing, and rolling anything else (2 through 6) is considered success. Now calculate the
probability of failure for the whole system (i.e. both dice rolling “1”).

24
Answer 7
We may use DeMorgan’s Theorem to translate the three-input OR gate into a three-input AND gate
with inverted inputs and outputs, then express the probability values accordingly:

Three-input OR function probability = 1 − [(1 − A)(1 − B)(1 − C)]

Three-input OR function probability = 1 − [(1 − B − A + AB)(1 − C)]

Three-input OR function probability = 1 − [1 − C − B + BC − A + AC + AB − ABC]

Three-input OR function probability = 1 − 1 + C + B − BC + A − AC − AB + ABC

Three-input OR function probability = A + B + C − AB − BC − AC + ABC

25
Answer 8
The intrinsic safety barrier protects against potential ignition resulting from short-circuits in the field
wiring, and from over-voltage from the process controller power supply. I’ll let you explain how the barrier
circuit’s components do this!

The probability of either the resistor or the diode interrupting the signal is a logical “OR” function, and
so the calculation of probability takes this form:

2.4 × 10-6
Presistor fail 1.324 × 10-4
Pbarrier fail
Pdiode fail
1.3 × 10-4

P (A or B) = P (B) + P (A) − P (A) × P (B)

Pinterruption = (2.4 × 10−6 ) + (1.3 × 10−4 ) − [(2.4 × 10−6 )(1.3 × 10−4 )]

Pinterruption = 1.324 × 10−4

Adding the fuse’s fault probability into the mix is another “OR” function:

2.4 × 10-6
Presistor fail 1.324 × 10-4
Pdiode fail
7.123 × 10-4
1.3 × 10-4
Pbarrier fail
5.8 × 10-4
Pfuse fail

Pinterruption = (1.324 × 10−4 ) + (5.8 × 10−4 ) − [(1.324 × 10−4 )(5.8 × 10−4 )]

Pinterruption = 7.123 × 10−4

26
Answer 9
This system provides 1oo2 alarm and 2oo2 shutdown functions.

Probability calculations using logic symbols:

Dependability values 0.9921063

0.993 (switch) 0.9999377
0.9991 (relay)

0.993 (switch)
(alarm)
0.9979378
0.9991 (relay)
Rlamp
0.9921063
0.998

Dependability values 0.9921063

0.993 (switch) 0.984275
0.9991 (relay)

(shutdown)
0.993 (switch)
0.9498253
0.9991 (relay)
Rsolenoid
0.9921063
0.965

Trip test procedure (in order):

• Disconnect wire at TP9 or TP10 (disables shutdown solenoid)
• Connect voltmeter between TP9 and TP10
• Disconnect wire at either TP1 or TP2 – alarm light should come on
• Reconnect wire (TP1 or TP2) – alarm light should turn off
• Disconnect wire at either TP3 or TP4 – alarm light should come on
• Disconnect wire at either TP1 or TP2 – voltmeter should register supply voltage
• Reconnect wires (TP1 or TP2; TP3 or TP4)
• Remove voltmeter from circuit
• Reconnect wire at TP9 or TP10 (enables shutdown solenoid)

27
Answer 10
Probability of system failure with ISEL block located in TT-101a = 0.003997001

0.001 ISEL fails

0.001 TT-101a
0.000000001
0.001 TT-101b All 3 TT’s fail

0.001 TT-101c 0.003997001

Valve fails
0.003 TV-101
0.003000001

Probability of system failure with ISEL block located in TV-101 = 0.003000001

0.001 TT-101a
0.000000001
0.001 TT-101b All 3 TT’s fail

0.001 TT-101c
Valve fails 0.003000001
0.003 TV-101

Answer 11
The given figures of 0.00014 and 0.00033 represent the valve’s undependability and unsecurity,
respectively. Dependability and security will be the mathematical complements of these values:
• Dependability (D) = 0.99986

• Undependability (D) = 0.00014

• Security (S) = 0.99967

• Unsecurity (S) = 0.00033

RSA (Required Safety Availability) is a synonym for dependability, and is equal to 0.99986. PFD
(Probability of Failure on Demand) is a synonym for undependability, and is equal to 0.00014.

Reliability is the overall probability that the valve will do as commanded. This includes shutting off
when commanded to shut (Dependability) and remaining open when not commanded to shut (Security). If
we take all possible conditions of response to both command states and sum those probabilities together,
we get a total of two (0.99986 + 0.00014 + 0.99967 + 0.00033 = 2). Since any probability is defined as
the ratio of specific outcomes to total possible outcomes, in order to calculate reliability we must divide the
probabilities of all correct actions (D + S) by the total value of all possible actions (2):
D+S 0.99986 + 0.99967
R= = = 0.999765
2 2

28
Answer 12
According to Note 1 in the P&ID, this is a 2oo2 trip system: both pressure switches must trip in order
to start pump P-13. This means the dependability of the two switches taken together is less than the
dependability of either switch on its own.

PFDP SL−62 = 0.0051 RP SL−62 = 0.9949

PFDP SL−63 = 0.0048 RP SL−63 = 0.9952

Since both switch PSL-62 ans PSL-63 must successfully trip on demand, the dependability for both in
this 2oo2 system is an “AND” function (the mathematical product) of their individual dependabilities:

(RP SL−62 )(RP SL−63 ) = (0.9949)(0.9952) = 0.99012448

Answer 13
MooN (dependability) = 1oo2 MooN (security) = 2oo2

Rshutof f = 0.99985

Answer 14
MooN (dependability) = 3oo4 MooN (security) = 3oo4

Rshutof f = 0.98709

29
Answer 15
In order to test the high-pressure cutout switch, we could first jumper its terminals electrically so that
the circuit will remain powered when the switch contacts open. Next, we can shut the block valve for that
PSH and disconnect it from the circuit (as well as remove it from the vessel) and bring the switch back to
the shop for testing.

Since this is a 1oo2 trip system, the probability that the system will reliably trip when needed is an
OR function of the two switches’ dependabilities (in other words, either one switch or the other needs to be
dependable in order to avoid an overpressure condition):

P (A or B) = P (B) + P (A) − P (A) × P (B)

Dependability1oo2 = 0.947 + 0.981 − (0.947)(0.981)

Dependability1oo2 = 0.998993
Since we are looking for the probability that both these switches will fail to stop an overpressure
condition, the PFD will be the complement of this 1oo2 reliability:

P F D = 1 − Dependability

PFD1oo2 = 0.001007

All blue figures are dependabilities

(control)
0.947 0.998993
PFDsystem
0.001007
(cutout)
0.981

30
Answer 16
After a failure has been detected in breaker #5, the following circuit breakers need to be tripped in
order to isolate breaker #5:
• Breakers #1, #2, #3, and #4 (isolates Bus A from all power sources)
• Breaker #10 (isolates breaker #5 from Bus B)
This protective action cuts power to all loads on the bottom distribution line, while maintaining power
(from Bus B) to all other loads.

PFD calculation:

Probability that each of the breaker’s

three contacts could fail to open
0.000273 Probability of breaker failure
0.000273 0.000818776

0.000273

One way to detect a failed breaker is by monitoring the current through it in the “tripped” state.
Obviously, a tripped circuit breaker should have no current going through its contacts at all! The question
now becomes, how to measure current through the circuit breaker, and this is where the photo proves its
value: the numbered cylinders at the base of each insulator bushing on the circuit breaker each houses one
current transformer (CT). This is standard on high-voltage circuit breaker construction: each terminal into
and out of the circuit breaker has its own dedicated CT to be used for current monitoring, and these current
signals may be used to detect a failed breaker condition.

31
 The Socratic Questions on probability may be answered by first organizing the given information on
breaker dependability and security (as well as the complementary measures of undependabilty (PFD) and
unsecurity, shown in italic font):

Breaker told to trip Breaker not told to trip

Breaker trips 0.99918 0.00007
Breaker does not trip 0.00082 0.99993

In general terms, this is what each of the cells in the table mean:

Breaker told to trip Breaker not told to trip

Breaker trips Dependability (RSA) Un-security
Breaker does not trip Un-dependability (PFD) Security

Any given scenario may then be drawn as a logic gate diagram with appropriate values pulled from the
table:
→ The probability that the left-hand transmission line will be unnecessarily removed from service (i.e.
opened so it no longer carries load current). (i.e. the probability that either breaker G or J or 1
will trip when it’s not supposed to.)

0.00007 0.00007

0.00007 0.00007 0.00020999

0.00007 0.00007

32
Answer 17
Probability calculation for “closing” PFD using logic symbols:

All blue figures are dependabilities

0.992618
0.9971 (fuse)
0.983556
0.9984 (battery)

0.9971 (fuse) 0.991 (pushbutton) PFDclose

0.0164438
0.99987 (coil)

Probability calculation for “tripping” PFD using logic symbols:

All blue figures are dependabilities

0.992618
0.9971 (fuse)
0.992535
0.9984 (battery)

0.9971 (fuse) PFDtrip

0.990871 0.007465
0.991 (pushbutton)

0.99987 (coil)

0.991 (pushbutton)

0.99987 (coil)
0.9999167
0.990871

Answer 18
Switch positions (#2 through #4 closed, #1 open):

1 2 3 4

33
 125 VDC
A B C

Overcurrent
relay
#1

A
B

Overcurrent
relay
#2

E F

TC Breaker #1 Breaker #2 TC

52a 52a

If not for the diodes, trip signal current would “backfeed” in such a way that one relay might end up
tripping both circuit breakers even though you only intended it to trip one circuit breaker.

Dependability/PFD calculation:

All blue figures are dependabilities

0.99922012
0.99961 (breaker)

0.99961 (breaker) PFDtrip

0.99982 (relay) 0.00077988
0.99982 (relay)

0.999999968

34