Scribd
Upload
36 views

Data Science Project

This project aimed to build a predictive model to classify iris flowers into species based on their sepal and petal measurements. The Iris dataset was analyzed using pandas for data exploration and preprocessing. A decision tree classifier was chosen, trained on preprocessed data, and evaluated using various metrics. Further exploratory data analysis was conducted to understand feature relationships and the model's performance. Areas for improvement and future work were also identified.

Uploaded by

chandramoulibogala43
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
36 views

Data Science Project

This project aimed to build a predictive model to classify iris flowers into species based on their sepal and petal measurements. The Iris dataset was analyzed using pandas for data exploration and preprocessing. A decision tree classifier was chosen, trained on preprocessed data, and evaluated using various metrics. Further exploratory data analysis was conducted to understand feature relationships and the model's performance. Areas for improvement and future work were also identified.

Uploaded by

chandramoulibogala43
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Data Science Project: Analyze Iris Data

Title: Analyze Iris Data


Domain: Data Science
Level: Easy (Basic)

Project Objectives
The goal was to build a predictive model to classify
iris flowers based on their features.
I. Introduction
The task was to build a predictive model to classify iris flowers based on four
features: Sepal Length, Sepal Width, Petal Length, Petal Width. The Iris dataset
was sourced from a CSV file.
II. Data Exploration
We started with loading the dataset using pandas and displayed initial rows to
understanding the content and format of the dataset.We checked for missing
values and anomalies in the data.
III. Data Preprocessing
The dataset was well-structured, so no explicit data cleaning was required. We
split the data into features (X) and target (y).
IV. Model Selection and Training
We chose the Decision Tree classifier for its simplicity and interpretability. The
data was split into training and testing sets, and the model was trained on the
training set.
V. Model Evaluation
The model was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, confusion matrix,
and classification report. These metrics were chosen to provide insights into
different aspects of classification performance.
VI. Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA)
We conducted EDA to understand the distribution of individual features and
their relationships. We used histograms, box plots, pair plots, violin plots, and a
correlation matrix heatmap.

VII. Methodologies

1. Algorithm Choice (Decision Tree):


Decision Trees were chosen for their simplicity, interpretability, and ability to
handle classification tasks.
2. Feature Selection:
All available features were used for both model training and EDA.
3. Evaluation Metrics:
We selected accuracy, precision, and recall to assess model performance
comprehensively.
VIII. Challenges Faced

1. Handling Categorical Data:


Some visualizations required excluding the categorical 'Species' column to
avoid errors.
2. Interpretability of Results:
Interpreting results, especially in the context of visualizations, required a
balance of domain knowledge and understanding of machine learning concepts.
3. Optimal Model Selection:
While Decision Trees were chosen for simplicity, future considerations may
involve experimenting with other algorithms for potential performance
improvements.
IX. Future Considerations
We plan to experiment with different algorithms such as Random Forests or
Support Vector Machines, use feature engineering or dimensionality reduction
techniques to improve model performance, and apply cross-validation for a
more robust evaluation.

You might also like