Lecture08 Student
Lecture08 Student
◦
Proof. 1 Denote An×n = aij , Bn×n = bij and AB = Cn×n = cij .
Then cij = Σnk=1aik bkj for all 1 ≤ i, j ≤ n.
2◦ Let Sn be the collection of all permutations of Jn = {1, 2, . . . , n}.
By definition of determinant, we have
det (C) = Σσ∈Sn ǫ(σ)c1σ(1)c2σ(2) · · · cnσ(n)
= Σσ∈Sn ǫ(σ)(Σnk1=1a1k1 bk1σ(1))(Σnk2=1a2k2 bk2σ(2)) · · · (Σnkn=1ankn bknσ(n))
= Σσ∈Sn ǫ(σ)Σnk1,k2,...,kn=1(a1k1 bk1σ(1))(a2k2 bk2σ(2)) · · · (ankn bknσ(n))
= Σnk1,k2,...,kn=1Σσ∈Sn ǫ(σ)(a1k1 a2k2 · · · ankn )(bk1σ(1)bk2σ(2) · · · bknσ(n))
= Σnk1,k2,...,kn=1(a1k1 a2k2 · · · ankn )(Σσ∈Sn ǫ(σ)(bk1σ(1)bk2σ(2) · · · bknσ(n))).
Linear Algebra lecture 8−2
Rowk1 (B)
Row (B)
k2
Proof. 3◦ For each fixed k1, k2, . . . , kn, let D = dij =
. Then the term
.
.
Rowkn (B)
Σσ∈Sn ǫ(σ)(bk1σ(1)bk2σ(2) · · · bknσ(n)) = Σσ∈Sn ǫ(σ)(d1σ(1)d2σ(2) · · · dnσ(n)) = detD.
When any two of numbers k1, k2, . . . , kn are equal,
one has det(D)= 0 as D has two equal rows.
Furthermore, when all k1, k2, . . . , kn are not equal,
then k1 = τ (1), k2 = τ (2), . . . , kn = τ (n) for some τ ∈ Sn.
It follows that det(D)= ǫ(τ )det(B)
because the determinant changes sign whenever two rows are exchanged
and ǫ(τ ) tells even or odd transpositions needed to obtain the permutation τ .
4◦ By 2◦ and 3◦, one gets
det (C) = Στ ∈Sn (a1τ (1)a2τ (2) · · · anτ (n))(ǫ(τ )det(B))
= det(B)Στ ∈Sn ǫ(τ )(a1τ (1)a2τ (2) · · · anτ (n))
= det(B)det(A).
We complete the proof.
Linear Algebra lecture 8−3
1
Corollary 3.1.2. If A is nonsingular, then det(A)6= 0 and det(A−1 )= .
det(A)
Proof. Skip.
3 −1 2
Example 3.2.1. Let A = 4 5 6. Then, for example,
7 1 2
4 6 3 −1 −1 2
(1) the submatrices M12 = , M23 = , and M31 = .
7 2 7 1 5 6
(2) The minor of a12 is det(M12)= −34, the minor of a23 is det(M23)= 10, and the minor of
a31 is det(M31)= −16.
(3) Also the cofactor of a12 is A12 = (−1)1+2det(M12) = (−1)(−34) = 34, the cofactor of
a23 is A23 = (−1)2+3det(M23) = (−1)(10) = −10, and the cofactor of a31 is A31 =
(−1)3+1det(M31) = (+1)(−16) = −16.
Linear Algebra lecture 8−5
Theorem 3.2.9. (Cofactor expansion, Laplace expansion) Let A = aij be an n × n
matrix. Then
(a) (expansion of det(A) along the rth row)
for each 1 ≤ r ≤ n, det(A) = ar1Ar1 + ar2Ar2 + · · · + arnArn.
(b) (expansion of det(A) along the sth column)
for each 1 ≤ s ≤ n, det(A) = a1sA1s + a2sA2s + · · · + ansAns.
" #! " #!
2 −3 4 1 2 −3
det(A) = 3 det 2 1 3 − (−3) det −4 2 1 ←− expansion along 3rd row
0 −2 3 2 0 −2
= 3 −(−2) det 22 43 + 3 det 22 −31 ←− expansion along 3rd row
+3 −2 det −4 1 + 2 det 1 −3
2 −2 2 −2
↑ expansion along 2nd column
Remark. The Cramer’s rule is applicable only to the case where we have the same number
of equations and unknowns as well as the determinant of the coefficient matrix is nonzero.
Furthermore, it is much less efficient than the Gaussian elimination or the Gauss-Jordan
reduction. However, the Cramer’s rule yields a formula for finding the solution sometimes
which may be useful for further manipulating the solution.