Struggling with your thesis on euthanasia? You're not alone.

Writing a thesis on such a complex and

Exploring the ethical, legal, and moral dimensions of euthanasia demands a deep understanding of
various perspectives and philosophical frameworks. Additionally, navigating through the vast array of
literature and scholarly articles on the subject can be overwhelming.

Moreover, crafting a coherent and compelling thesis statement that encapsulates your stance on
euthanasia while addressing counterarguments requires expertise and precision. It's a task that
demands dedication, patience, and analytical prowess.

If you find yourself grappling with the complexities of writing a thesis on euthanasia, fret not. Help
is at hand. Consider seeking assistance from professionals who specialize in academic writing
services. By entrusting your thesis to experts, you can alleviate the stress and uncertainty associated
with the process.

Among the plethora of options available, ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ stands out as a reliable and
reputable platform. With a team of experienced writers well-versed in diverse subject matters,
including euthanasia, ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ can provide personalized assistance tailored to your
specific requirements.

From formulating a compelling thesis statement to conducting in-depth research and refining your
arguments, the experts at ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ can guide you every step of the way. With their
meticulous attention to detail and commitment to excellence, you can rest assured that your thesis on
euthanasia will meet the highest academic standards.

Don't let the complexities of writing a thesis on euthanasia overwhelm you. Take advantage of
professional assistance and ensure your thesis shines with clarity, coherence, and academic rigor.
Order your thesis on euthanasia from ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ today and embark on a journey
towards academic success.
Yet in respect of euthanasia, this needs to be said. The secular views are that the decision of mercy
killing affects and rests mostly on their kith and kin. It would be hard to keep control of the
legalization of euthanasia. If you have DIFFICULTY downloading the whole of this page (for
instance, if. Utilitarians equate happiness with good, so a morally right act is one which creates the
greatest good for the greatest number of people. When Sir Thomas Moore, the literary genius
published his work Utopia- he wrote about Euthanasia being possible for people who were suffering
from terminal illness in his ideal community. The last few months of a patient's life are often the
most expensive in medical and other care. Nowadays the word is more often used to describe the
deliberate ending of life. The second reason that utilitarian principles do not work very well when
applied to acts of behaviour is that most people are very biased in their judgement of happiness. In
this way the doctor has done the right thing by telling the truth to the patient and. Browse through
our library of thousands of premium and free essays below. It is out of the moral rules to assume that
some lives worth much less or do not worth at all ( Arguments against euthanasia, n.d.). The main
thing is that everybody including people with disabilities is equal and has the same rights to live. The
majority of population understand the sacredness of human life even not in the philosophical view.
Moreover, many people devote a particular meaning to suffering. The multi professional medical
team who assessed her also claims that she is not living a miserable life. Her death allowed her
husband to move on in his life, remarrying 10 months later. In treatment decisions at the end of life
the dilemma in applying these principles often revolves around what course of action will promote
the patient's best interests. Those who are against believe in ethical values of human life, refer not
only to words from the Hippocratic Oath but also to influential medical and religious factors,
whereas defenders of the assisted suicide struggle for the freedom of individuality and reducing
sufferings. As the study showed 74% of the questioned medics, who were against euthanasia,
thought that physician’s role is incompatible with homicide (Cohen et al, 1994). Ultimately the
argument was biological: 'The rights to death. Some terminal pain cannot be controlled, even with the
best of care and the strongest of drugs. Legalising of euthanasia in Australia would benefit terminally
ill patients in allowing them to end their lives when they have welcomed their passing. In very broad
terms one can say that in relation to patients who are dying or incurably ill the legal duty to act in a
patient's best interest means preventing or retarding a deterioration in their condition, and the relief
of pain and suffering. Every one deserves respect, freedom and the power to control their own
destiny. Such thoughts come from those able-bodied people who believe that handicapped can not
enjoy living; they always suffer and feel an extreme pressure from the public. Killing vulnerable
disabled human beings will only show that they have no value. Therefore, approaches towards
euthanasia require caution, since it can lead to legal repercusions. We humans are noble when we
continue in the face of the death. Human life is sacred, as it is a gift from God, so it should not be
ruined. It is therefore not surprising that various professional bodies have issued comprehensive
guidance on the basic moral principles that should guide practice.
Involuntary euthanasia (without asking consent or against the patient's will) is also illegal in all
countries and is usually considered murder. Some societies have regarded people with disabilities as
second-rate, or as a burden on society. But the family members, her brother has a different opinion as
he wanted her to have a peaceful death so that it gives an end to her unending ordeal (Raghuram,
2011). This person is gone and many people come to terms with it, but often a larger trauma, which
causes more grief, is having to watch that person suffer while you look on hopelessly with no chance
of easing their pain. The essential rule always to tell the truth may place an individual in an
impossible situation, for example, being told something in confidence by one person then instructed
to tell the truth about the confidence by another. Very often the group most targeted by physician-
assisted suicide is the disabled community because the 'quality of life' of its members is deemed to
be 'poor' by people outside the community. A deontological view (Immanuel Kant, 1742-1804)
argues that the same rules should apply to all people and that knowledge comes from a process of
reasoning. Example Of Self Introduction Essay For Job read more. To kill oneself, or to get someone
else to do it for us, is to deny God. Nevertheless case law has made it clear that a DNAR. No hidden
charges: the price you see is the final cost for all custom papers. Nowadays, thanks to the internet,
with just a few clicks, one can easily discover numerous methods to peacefully escape pain. It is in
these kinds of situations that the distinction between foreseeing and intending death - the so called
double effect principle - may be relevant. For this reason doctors should be able to provide their
patients a safe way out and enable them to enjoy their last days. Personally, I agree with the idea that
euthanasia is unacceptable. Legalising of euthanasia in Australia would benefit terminally ill patients
in allowing them to end their lives when they have welcomed their passing. Of course, nobody likes
to see a creature suffer, especially when the creature has requested a halt to the suffering. Thus, even
though the law clearly prohibits taking active steps to terminate life, it does not require every patient
to be resuscitated. Laws Should Be Flexible Enough To Take Account Of Various Circumstances,
Times, And Places - With A Free Essay Review. E. Which do you prefer and why. If the ill have their
lives stolen what will happen to the blind. It would divert efforts and would discourage people with
disabilities to live independently and efforts to find a for cure diseases. In the Netherlands and
Belgium, where euthanasia has been legalized, it still remains homicide although it is not prosecuted
and not punishable if the perpetrator (the doctor) meets certain legal conditions. Another very
persuasive objection to euthanasia is the so-called 'slippery slope' argument. Doctors too might start
thinking taking a person’s life as a typical procedure. Doctors often make misdiagnoses, as
mentioned in medical textbooks that feature cases where one condition is frequently mistaken for
another. This test is based on what the patient would have wanted, regardless of what others may
think is a 'good' outcome. Non-maleficence requires you not to harm patients intentionally. Top
reasons were a loss of dignity, and a fear of burdening others. What is more, Rachels (1986) points
out that scientists are still inventing new medications and ways of curing diseases. Kemp, the origin
of the contemporary debate on euthanasia started in 1.
However, in neither case was it recommended that the use should be to hasten death. In 1. 87. 0
Samuel Williams, a schoolteacher, initiated the contemporary euthanasia debate through a speech
given at the Birmingham Speculative Club in England, which was subsequently published in a one-
off publication entitled Essays of the Birmingham Speculative Club, the collected works of a
number of members of an amateur philosophical society. Which service project are you most proud of
and why. These differences were independent of other risk factors. It is therefore not surprising that
various professional bodies have issued comprehensive guidance on the basic moral principles that
should guide practice. There might be concerns that people may advance theories against euthanasia,
but taking into account the deterioration of the person both mentally and physically, the traumatizing
pain and the dejected solitary life- it must be put to an end in a dignified manner. It seems that
virtually every family has at least one member who strongly avoids hospitals. Meanwhile, in one of
the Baltimore clinics the study of J. One of the essential characteristics of physicians is an ability to
help; therefore, people rely on them. Sue died slowly and painfully of Lou Gehrig’s disease. A similar
petition had been sent to the New York State Legislature in 1. Of course, nobody likes to see a
creature suffer, especially when the creature has requested a halt to the suffering. Argumentative
essay topics for writing assignments. Favorite novels, favorite non- fiction books, favorite movies,
favorite contemporary political leaders, favorite historical political leaders. Overall, the principle of
independence gives a person a power over his body and the chance to make choice. Those opposed
to active euthanasia argue that it lacks proper oversight and regulation, leading to a high risk of
abuse (Bernards 72). A motion to reject the bill outright was voted down, but the bill failed to pass,
7. The most important current guidelines are Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (1997),
General Medical Council (2002) and British Medical Association (2001a, b). In his work, Euthanasia
medica, he chose this ancient Greek word and, in doing so, distinguished between euthanasia
interior, the preparation of the soul for death, and euthanasia exterior, which was intended to make
the end of life easier and painless, in exceptional circumstances by shortening life. The probability of
doctor’s mistake, which includes misdiagnosis, unsuitable treatment, unnecessary or wrongly
performed surgeries, and also an inaccuracy in prognosis of the future passing of an illness (
Arguments against euthanasia, n.d.), is one of the several things that can influence a person’s choice.
An alternative to the years of suffering and pain, is an assisted suicide. This is the question that is
commonly associated with euthanasia. The strangulation led to a hypoxic damage to her brain cells
resulting in a cut off in oxygen supply to her brain. It would be difficult, and perhaps impossible, to
stop people using persuasion to get people to request euthanasia when they don't really want it. The
ward boy however walked free after some years of imprisonment leaving the lady’s state in utter
despair. In todays world, medical technology has advanced so much that it is now possible to sustain
life through formerly life ending injuries or illness. We need to put an end to this inhumane and
barbaric law. Compare And Contrast Essay Topics Middle School on this page. Another argument
against active euthanasia relates to medical errors. For example, judging by the results of the research
on attitudes towards euthanasia among physicians, out of 938 respondents 48% were in the
agreement that euthanasia is unethical proceeding while 42% opposed (Cohen et al, 1994). In short,
doctors must not perform euthanasia because their duty is to save human lives but not take them
away.
We would all agree that every human being has the right to life; it is the most basic and fundamental
of all our rights, and with every right comes a choice. Many people would rather end their life rather
than live it with pain and this has led to the notion. We humans are noble when we continue in the
face of the death. May the good soul rest in peace who has lived and pained through the battle of
life. Doctors who opt to provide this procedure are not actively causing anyone’s death; they are
simply presenting a choice while leaving the moral dilemma up to the patient. Vulnerable patients
would be pressured to choose death when they would rather live for a few more weeks. In case the
writer failed to follow your instructions in their entirety, you should request a revision (log in to your
account to do that). If we accept euthanasia now we could delay research and new treatments for
decades. Approximately 5. 5% would not, and for the remaining 2. Every one deserves respect,
freedom and the power to control their own destiny. Nowadays the word is more often used to
describe the deliberate ending of life. It can be classified into different types: voluntary, non-
voluntary, active, or passive. Almost all fatal diseases are accompanied by awful twinges. Very often
the group most targeted by physician-assisted suicide is the disabled community because the 'quality
of life' of its members is deemed to be 'poor' by people outside the community. By continuing we’ll
assume you’re on board with our cookie policy. If vets are willing to put animals down, that are in an
incredible pain, then if a human in a similar situation that cannot commit suicide themselves should
also have the same option if that is what they would really wish. Some terminal pain cannot be
controlled, even with the best of care and the strongest of drugs. Please define B. C., A. D., B. C. E.,
and C. BROWSE ESSAYS AND TERM PAPERS Know your essay topic. The most important
current guidelines are Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (1997), General Medical
Council (2002) and British Medical Association (2001a, b). Several options are therefore lawful,
these include, withdrawing life-sustaining treatment; withholding life-sustaining treatment; DNAR
orders; and given pain killing drugs that may shorten life. How do you plan to use your studies to
achieve your future career plans. FREE Outline, FREE Title page, FREE Bibliography, FREE E-
mail delivery, FREE Formatting. Obviously, the pain of losing a close relative or loved one is
indescribable. Seedhouse argues that when an ethical decision needs to be taken, care workers
should weigh up the facts of the situation, for example, workers collecting all relevant details about
client need, legal rights and so on, the. Doctors and hospital staff have the advantage of being used
to seeing such things and having clinical detachment, friends and family do not. When a terminally ill
patient has decided they are ready to pass away, we should respect this decision and assist them.
Zedlers Universallexikon: Euthanasia: a very gentle and quiet death, which happens without painful
convulsions. This explication might seem mysterious to many who are against euthanasia but it is
always better than having an excruciated life with unlimited vexation and worry. Of course, nobody
likes to see a creature suffer, especially when the creature has requested a halt to the suffering. If
someone genuinely did not desire to fight a futile battle, they would not necessarily require the
assistance of a physician.
For example, in a discussion of euthanasia presented in 2. If we had allowed euthanasia it would not
have been so urgent to discover new treatments. In fact, religions see good and dignified point of it,
as a person can achieve remuneration for himself and realize that he has become closer to Christ
(Bishop Sullivan, as cited in Rachels, 1986). To deal with such cases a different definition of death
was developed, namely brainstem death. This is downgrading the status of the disabled and the sick.
Active voluntary euthanasia is legal in Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands. Nevertheless case
law has made it clear that a DNAR. It seems that virtually every family has at least one member
who strongly avoids hospitals. A farmer in Holland is living proof that miracles do happen in real life.
Laws Should Be Flexible Enough To Take Account Of Various Circumstances, Times, And Places -
With A Free Essay Review. E. Which do you prefer and why. In short, doctors must not perform
euthanasia because their duty is to save human lives but not take them away. To legalise Euthanasia
will put disabled people at the risk of being killed. This test is based on what the patient would have
wanted, regardless of what others may think is a 'good' outcome. Allowing active euthanasia could
worsen these problems if Dr. These cover withholding and withdrawing treatment as well as
cardiopulmonary resuscitation. He had had repeated infections and had also been operated on for
various genitourinary problems. With constant care he could be kept alive for many years but he
would never regain consciousness. The key point is that lack of access to a doctor does not prevent
people from ending their own lives or obtaining a prescription for suicide. However, the Iowa
legislation was broader in scope than that offered in Ohio. I'm always suspicious of applicants who
need to go all the way back to high school to find someone who can say something good about them.
Therefore, this research paper will critically analyze the ethical aspects of euthanasia. Even though
medical sciences have improved a lot in terms of new drugs none of them promises a better life for
Aruna since three and a half decades. Right now there are only two places in the world that it is legal
to have an assisted suicide, or a physician assisted suicide where a medical doctor assists in directing
the suicide of a dying patient. In special cases, you can even request a new writer, but be sure to
report any problems to the management first (support center). I reiterate; pain is not the key issue-
quality of life is. Pure logic and absolute trust seem a good idea at first, but when used as a basis for
day-to-day decision making the idea does not lead to acceptable practice on its own. Pub: March
2011. Available at: (Accessed: 14 May 2013). Consider the major arguments for and against
voluntary, involuntary and non. Moreover, how euthanasia is described—whether passive, active, or
physician-assisted—depends on the level of involvement from the doctor in causing death (Levine
84). Involuntary euthanasia (without asking consent or against the patient's will) is also illegal in all
countries and is usually considered murder. Select Committee on Medical Ethics defines euthanasia
as.