A00F204e Audit Report - Stage 1

Audit Report (Stage 1) ----
Organisation: Kiran Udyog UNIT 2

Audits (ZA):
Master Data of Organisation

Name of Organisation Kiran Udyog UNIT 2
Name of corporate group

(in case of group certification)
Street UNIT 1 Plot No.40, Naubad Industrial Area, Naubad, Bidar, Karnataka,
585403
Unit2 : Survey No 61 , Halledkeri, Osman Gunj
Postcode / Town / Country
Karnataka 584402 TS India
Contact Mr Harish Joshi,
E-Mail [email protected]
Phone/Fax 08484-232821,
Language Eng Hindi
Scope Description Conversion of Polyester Tapes to circular Tube form
Industry / Scope (EA, TA, …) 14.2

Audit profile
Standards under contract / ISO 9001:2015 :
Audit type Certification audit ---
: :
--- ---
System documentation: Revision / KU-QM Issue No.: 01 Issue date: 09-09-21 Rev Date: 21-07-22
Issue
Surveillance mode Yearly surveillance
Audit team leader / responsible A K Chatterejee
Audit team
Technical expert
Trainee
Multisite-organisation All sites are listed in:

Audit Reference Data Sheet separate Listing
Audit program/ATEA
Multisite-certification (Sample)
Shift operation no shift operation
Page1of5 Rev. 08/04-2018

Audits (ZA):
Details for Stage 1 – Audit

Stage 1 –Audit on site visit.
Duration Stage 1 - Audit ISO 9001:2015 1.00person-day (s)
: 0,00 person-day (s)
1.00 total
Date Stage 1 - Audit 27.8.2022
Audit Result
System documentation
The system documentation was reviewed with the following result:

ISO 9001:2015
not fulfilled not applicable not applicable not applicable
q.v. enclosed checklist(s) for system documentation
Readiness
Relevant areas of the organisation were visited during a tour of the site and individual employees were
asked about their activities and the management system on a random sample basis in order to gain an
impression of employee awareness.
ISO 9001:2015
fulfilled not applicable not applicable not applicable
Internal audits and assessments of the management system
Planning and implementation of the internal audit and the management system reviews were checked
using the available documented informations.
ISO 9001:2015
not fulfilled not applicable not applicable not applicable
If individual requirements have been assessed as "identified areas of concern", the areas of con-
cern are described in more detail in the "detailed results" section.
Page2of5 Rev. 08/04-2018

Audits (ZA):
Recommendation of audit team: Result
The audit team is convinced that the Stage 2 - Audit can be performed as planned without limitations.
The audit team is convinced that the Stage 2 audit can be performed as planned - the organisation
must ensure, however, that the areas of concern which have been identified have been effectively
corrected at the planned date.
The audit team is convinced that effective correction of the areas of concern which have been identi-
fied must be verified before the Stage 2 - Audit (repeat Stage 1 - Audit).
Recommendation of audit team: Plan for stage 2 (duration, team, sites etc..)
The comments regarding the Stage 2 - Audit and the surveillance program were drawn up based on the
results of the above audit activities.
The audit team is convinced that the comments on the Stage 2 - Audit are correct
(No certification decision is required).
The audit team identifies any significant changes which would impact the management system during
the Stage 1 - Audit. The Certification Body decides whether the entire stage 1 or part of stage 1 has
to be repeated.
Review and approval by Certification Body / / /

Further comments in annex
Date: 27.8.2022
Name: A K Chatterjee
Signature
Page3of5 Rev. 08/04-2018

Audits (ZA):
Statement of the Certification Body
Statement regarding the proposals of audit team for the Stage 2 Audit
The recommendations of audit team are accepted
Continued in an annex
Date:
Name:
Signature
Page4of5 Rev. 08/04-2018

Audits (ZA):
Detailed results
The evaluation of the audit results basically follows the scheme shown below:
Stage Classification Meaning

IAC Identified areas of concern Areas of concern that have been identified during stage 1 audit
and could be classified as a nonconformity during stage 2 audit.
CM Comments Special situation and information to be traced in next audit.
No. IAC Area / Process Standard:clause

1 Unit 2 requirements are not adequately addressed MR ISO 9001:2015 7.5
in Quality Manual. Ex : ISO 9001:2015 6.1
 Risk & opportunities are not addressed ISO 9001:2015 5.3
 Responsibility – Authority not covered ISO 9001:2015 9.2
 IA and MRM not addressed ISO 9001:2015 9.3
2 Internal Audit and Management not conducted for MR ISO 9001:2015
Unit 2 9.2/ 9.3
No. CM Area / Process Standard:clause

--
. Ex.
Page5of5 Rev. 08/04-2018

A00F204e Audit Report - Stage 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

A00F204e Audit Report - Stage 1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

A00F204e Audit Report - Stage 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Audit Report (Stage 1) ----

Organisation: Kiran Udyog UNIT 2

Master Data of Organisation

Name of corporate group

Industry / Scope (EA, TA, …) 14.2

Multisite-organisation All sites are listed in:

Page1of5 Rev. 08/04-2018

Details for Stage 1 – Audit

The system documentation was reviewed with the following result:

Internal audits and assessments of the management system

Page2of5 Rev. 08/04-2018

Recommendation of audit team: Result

Review and approval by Certification Body / / /

Page3of5 Rev. 08/04-2018

Statement of the Certification Body

The recommendations of audit team are accepted

Page4of5 Rev. 08/04-2018

Stage Classification Meaning

No. IAC Area / Process Standard:clause

No. CM Area / Process Standard:clause

Page5of5 Rev. 08/04-2018

You might also like