0% found this document useful (0 votes)
414 views6 pages

BAJAJ

This Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (PFMEA) document summarizes potential failures and their causes and effects related to the manufacturing of emblem parts for Bajaj motorcycles. The core team, including representatives from moulding, quality, tooling, plating, and other functions, identified potential failures from raw material receipt through final testing. Some key potential failures included packing damage to received raw materials, supplier documentation not matching materials, and improper packing. The team analyzed each failure's severity, occurrence, and current detection controls to calculate a risk priority number and identify recommended actions to reduce failure risks.

Uploaded by

Subrat barik
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
414 views6 pages

BAJAJ

This Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (PFMEA) document summarizes potential failures and their causes and effects related to the manufacturing of emblem parts for Bajaj motorcycles. The core team, including representatives from moulding, quality, tooling, plating, and other functions, identified potential failures from raw material receipt through final testing. Some key potential failures included packing damage to received raw materials, supplier documentation not matching materials, and improper packing. The team analyzed each failure's severity, occurrence, and current detection controls to calculate a risk priority number and identify recommended actions to reduce failure risks.

Uploaded by

Subrat barik
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Galva POTENTIAL FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (PFMEA)

Format / Doc. No. : GD3-F-QA-04


Rev No : 00
Rev. Date : 01.01.2019
Process Responsibility: Mr.Rajesh Bhutada (Moulding) PFMEA No.: GDPL/PFMEA/MLD/BAJAJ
Item: EMBLEM BAJAJ Mr. D Dinesh Prepared by:Mr.Sambhu Pr. Sahu

Model Year(s)/Vehicle(s) : BAJAJ Key Date:12.10.2021 Date (Orig.):12.10.2021

Mr. V Ramesh(Quality Functions), Mr. Dinesh/ Mr. Ashish P ( Mld. Quality/Moulding),Mr. Surendra Saini (Tooling) , Mr. Avanish Kumar Up /Mr. Pawan Th/ Mr. Sujit(Plating), Mr. Raghuvir (Jigging),
Core Team: Rev No/ Date :01/25.10.2023
Mr. Manish (Jig Mfg.), Mr. Hanumanth/ Ms. Priyanka (Testing), Mr. Ankit/Mr. Chandan T (PPC/SCM) , Mr. Ravi B/Mr. Lokesh /Mr. Abhishek (New Projects),Mr. C.S. Rawat (Operation Head)

Occurance (O)

Occurance (O)
Detection ( D)

Detection ( D)
Potential Responsiblity

Severity ( S )

Severity ( S )
Current Process Action taken R

=S*O*D
Op. Potential Potential Effect(s) of Cause's)/ Current Process Control Recommended & Target

RPN
Class
Process Step / function Requirements Control & Eeffective P
No. Failure Mode Failure Mechanism's) Prevention Actions completion
Detection Date N
of Failure Date

01. Poor Packing


Raw Material
1. Packing Damage of Material used by
Free from packing NP : RM bag rejected Inspection Report
R/M Bag received from supplier
damage of R/M Bag CE: Part Rejected 7 2 (GD1-F-QA-13). Visual inspection 7 98
RM Supplier during 2.Improper Handling
during receipt UE :N.A.
receipt of RM Bag during
transist

2.Supplier MTC not


NP : RM bag rejected RM material received
Raw material received matched with material verification of supplier
CE: Part Rejected 7 from supplier with 2 Feedback to Supplier 6 84
with right Supplier TC name of supplier MTC
UE :N.A. wrong MTC
Invoice

NP : RM bag rejected
3. Not in proper Wrong packing from
Proper Packing CE: Part Rejected 7 2 Inform to RM Supplier Visual inspection 6 84
packing raw material supplier
UE :N.A.

NP : RM bag rejected Training given to


Proper Handling of RM 4.Not proper handling 04. Wrong method of
CE: Part Rejected 6 2 loading/un loading Visual inspection 6 72
during receipt of RM during receipt handling
UE :N.A. person

NP: Unable to meet


production plan
5 Wrong grade RM Wrong grade suplied
Grade of RM as per PO (Delay in production) 7 2 Verify with supplier TC Visual inspection 7 98
receipt against PO by supplier
CE:Dealy in despatch
UE :N.A.

Verification of Raw Material


NP : Part rejected supplier Raw Material Inspection Report
Wrong grade suplied
Raw material Grade Wrong RM Grade CE: Part Rejected 7 2 Test Certificate as per (GD3-F-QA-06). 7 98
by supplier
UE : N.A. RM In-coming Quality
Plan
Raw material receipt
10
& Inspection
Verification of Raw Material
NP : Part rejected supplier Raw Material Inspection Report
Wrong MFI RM
MFI as per TC MFI not as per TC CE: Part Rejected 7 2 Test Certificate as per (GD3-F-QA-06). 7 98
suplied by supplier
UE : N.A. RM In-coming Quality
Plan
Verification of Raw Material
NP : Part rejected Wrong HDT-Heat supplier Raw Material Inspection Report
HDT-Heat Deflection HDT-Heat Deflection
CE: Part Rejected 7 Deflection temp RM 2 Test Certificate as per (GD3-F-QA-06). 7 98
temp as per TC temp not as per TC
UE : N.A. suplied by supplier RM In-coming Quality
Plan

Verification of Raw Material


NP : Part rejected Wrong IZOD Impact supplier Raw Material Inspection Report
IZOD Impact Strength IZOD Impact Strength
CE: Part Rejected 7 Strength suplied by 2 Test Certificate as per (GD3-F-QA-06). 7 98
as per TC not as per TC
UE : N.A. supplier RM In-coming Quality
Plan

Raw Material
NP : Part rejected Wrong Specify Gravity Inspection Report
Specify Gravity not as
Specify Gravity CE: Part Rejected 7 RM supplied by 2 (GD1-F-QA-13). 7 98
per TC
UE : N.A. supplier

Raw Material
NP : Part rejected Verification of Inspection Report
Free from Moisture
Moisture Content CE: Part Rejected 7 Due to wet of RM Bag 2 supplier Raw Material (GD1-F-QA-13). 7 98
Content
UE : N.A. Test Certificate

Verification of Raw Material


Raw Material
NP : Part rejected supplier Raw Material Inspection Report
Other parameter , if Parameters out of
Other, if any CE: Part Rejected 7 2 Test Certificate as per (GD1-F-QA-13). 7 98
any specification ( MFI, Ash
UE : N.A. RM In-coming Quality
content etc.)
Plan

NP : Part rejected
Proper storage of Raw Improper Storage of No define loaction for Skill matrix of store
CE: Part Rejected 6 2 Visual Inspection 7 84
Material at location RM at location each raw material person
UE : N.A.
NP : Part rejected
No FIFO System in raw Skill matrix of store
Storage of RM as FIFO FIFO not followed. CE: Part Rejected 7 2 Visual Inspection 6 84
material storage person
UE : N.A.
NP : Part rejected
Free from Mix up of No identification on
Mix up grades CE: Part Rejected 7 2 Identification on Racks Visual Inspection 6 84
grade each racks
UE : N.A.
NP : Part rejected
20 Raw Material Storage Free from used of No FIFO System in raw Proper Location for
expired material used CE: Part Rejected 6 2 Visual Inspection 6 72
expired material material storage storage
UE : N.A.
NP : Part rejected
Free from used of No identification on
wrong grades used. CE: Part Rejected 7 2 Identification on Racks Visual Inspection 6 84
wrong grade Material each racks
UE : N.A.

NP:Delay in production No identification on Proper Identification


RM Storage in define RM storage in wrong 7 2 Visual Inspection 7 98
CE:N.A. Racks on Racks
location location
UE: N.A.
6 Area not identified 2 Area to be identified Visual Inspection 6 72
Due to not mention
Correct grade Raw Visual inspection on
1. Wrong grade Raw NP : Part rejected the Raw materail Material issue
Material to be issued 7 2 raw material bags for 7 98
Material issued CE & UE: Part Rejected grade in Material Requisition slip
as per requisition slip RM grade
issued Requisition slip
Raw Material to be
issued as per NP: Unable to meet Counting issue due to
Issue of Material From requirement/requisitio Short / Excess Qty. production plan not followed RM Skill matrix of store
30 7 2 Counting 7 98
store to shop n slip issued CE : Delay in despatch requirement/requisitio person
(No short / Excess UE:N.A. n slip
Qty.)
1. Proper handling of
NP : RM bag rejected
RM Bags 1. Im-proper handling
(7) CE: Untrained store Skill matrix of store
2. No damage bag to of RM Bags 7 2 Visual insepction 7 98
Part (7) Rejected person person
be issued for 2. Damage bag issued
UE :N.A.
production
N.P : part rejected due
to silver streaks visible
Visual inspection on
on the parts. (7)
No Moisture in RM Moisture in RM after Process parameter temperature controller
C.E : Customer dis- 7 Less preheating time 2 7 98
after pre-heating pre-heating sheet of Hoper dryer and
satisfaction (7)
de-humididifier
U. E : Customer dis-
satisfaction (7)
NP:Parts get rejected
due to poor asthetic
defecrts like silver
Visual inspection on
streaks (7) Excess Preheating Process parameter
No Excess pre-heating Excess pre-heating 7 2 temperature controller 7 98
C.E : Customer dis- temperature sheet
and de-humidifier
satisfaction (7)
Preheating of raw U. E : Customer dis-
40 satisfaction (7)
material
NP : part rejected due
to Loss of part
strength (7) Visual inspection on
Free from any Mosisture get calibration of temp Process parameter
C.E : Customer dis- 7 2 temperature controller 7 98
Mosisture entraped . entraped . controller sheet
satisfaction (7) and de-humidifier
U. E : Customer dis-
satisfaction (7)
NP: Part rejected due
to Shade/colour
variation (7) Visual inspection on
Excess Preheating Process parameter
Even processing un even processing C.E : Customer dis- 7 2 temperature controller 7 98
temperature sheet
satisfaction (7) and de-humidifier
U. E : Customer dis-
satisfaction (7)
Process parameter
7 1. Low injection speed 2 Visual inspection 7 98
sheet
N.P: Part rejected due 2. Low injection Process parameter
7 2 Mould Flow analysis 7 98
to asthetic defect (7) pressure sheet
C.E : Customer dis- 7 3. Improper get size 2 CAD Data of Mould Visual inspection 7 98
No Short mould Short mould
satisfaction (7) 4. Improper material
7 2 MFI Visual inspection 7 98
U. E : Customer dis- flow
satisfaction (7) 7 6. Less Melt temp. 2 RM data sheet/ PPS Visual inspection 7 98
7. Wrong Mould
7 2 CAD Data of Mould Visual inspection 7 98
design
NP: Part rejected due
to to asthetic defect
(7) C.E :
1. Improper material
Free from Weld lines Weld line Customer dis- 7 2 MFI Visual inspection 7 98
flow
satisfaction (7)
U. E : Customer dis-
satisfaction (7)
1. Improper Tooling
condition
Preventive Maintence
7 2. Due to Improper 2 Visual inspection 7 98
Record'
N.P: Part rejected due packing of moulded
to asthetic defect (7) part
Free from dent mark/ C.E : Customer dis- 2. Contamination/
Dent Mark/ Damage RM to be check before
Damage satisfaction (7) 7 forign particals in the 2 Visual inspection 7 98
loading on M/C
U. E : Customer dis- RM
satisfaction (7) 3. Improper Handling Proper Handling of the
7 2 Handling WI 7 98
of the parts parts
7 4. Improper Packaging 2 Packing std. Visual Insepction 7 98
Process parameter
7 1. Less Cooling time 2 Visual Inspection 7 98
sheet
N.P: Part rejected due 2. Wrong Mould
7 2 CAD Data of Mould Visual Inspection 7 98
to Fitment issue (7) design
C.E : Customer dis- Process parameter
No warpage Warpage 7 3. High mould temp. 2 Visual Inspection 7 98
satisfaction (7) sheet
U. E : Customer dis- Process parameter
7 4. Less Cycle time 2 Visual Inspection 7 98
satisfaction (7) sheet
Process parameter
7 5. Less Holding time 2 Visual Inspection 7 98
sheet
Process parameter
7 1. High injection speed 2 Visual inspection 7 98
sheet
2. High injection Process parameter
N.P: Part rejected due 7 2 Visual inspection 7 98
pressure sheet
to Poor Asthetical
5. Wrong Mould
defects/ Fittment
7 design/ Improper 2 CAD Data of Mould Visual inspection 7 98
problem (7)
Free from Flash Flash Mould condition
C.E : Customer dis-
Process parameter
satisfaction (7) 7 6. High Mould temp. 2 Visual inspection 7 98
sheet
U. E : Customer dis-
satisfaction (7) 7 7. High MFI 2 RM data sheet As per RM Data Sheet 7 98

7 8. High Melt temp. 2 PPS Monitoring sheet Shade Variation part 7 98


Process parameter
7 1. Low injection speed 2 Visual inspection 7 98
sheet
2. Low injection Process parameter
7 2 Mould Flow analysis 7 98
N.P: Part rejected due pressure sheet
to to asthetic defect 7 3. Improper gate size 2 CAD Data of Mould Visual inspection 7 98
(7) C.E : 4. Improper material
7 2 MFI Visual inspection 7 98
Free from sink mark Sink Mark Customer dis- flow
satisfaction (7) 7 5. Less Melt temp. 2 RM data sheet/ PPS Visual inspection 7 98
U. E : Customer dis- 7 6. High Melt temp. 2 RM data sheet/ PPS Visual inspection 7 98
satisfaction (7) Process parameter
7 6. High Mould temp. 2 Visual inspection 7 98
sheet
7. Wrong Mould
7 2 CAD Data of Mould Visual inspection 7 98
design
1. Less Preheating Process parameter
7 2 Visual inspection 7 98
temp. time sheet

N.P: Part rejected due We are using


to to asthetic defect the standard
Process parameter
(7) C.E : 7 2. High speed 3 Visual inspection 7 147 nozzle size and 7 1 7 49
Free from Silver sheet
Silver streaks Customer dis- replace the
streaks
satisfaction (7) nozzle
U. E : Customer dis-
satisfaction (7) Process parameter
7 3. High Barrel temp. 2 Visual inspection 7 98
sheet
4. Improper Mould Process parameter Visual inspection (Air
7 2 6 84
design sheet Vent)
N.P: Part rejected due Process parameter
7 1. High speed 2 Visual inspection 7 98
50
Injection Moulding, First piece to to asthetic defect sheet
approval & in process inspection
(7) C.E : 2. Improper Mould Replace the
Free from flow marks Flow marks 7 3 CAD Data of Mould Visual inspection 7 147 7 1 7 49
Customer dis- temp MTC
satisfaction (7) Process parameter
7 3. Less Mould temp 2 Visual inspection 7 98
U. E : Customer dis- sheet
N.P: Part rejected due
1.Wrong grade Process parameter
to to asthetic defect 7 2 Visual inspection 7 98
material use sheet
(7) C.E :
Free from Shade
Shade Variation Customer dis-
Variation
satisfaction (7)
Process parameter
U. E : Customer dis- 7 2. Mixup Grade Use 2 Visual inspection 7 98
sheet
satisfaction (7)
Process parameter
7 1. High injection speed 2 Visual inspection 7 98
sheet
2. High injection Process parameter
N.P: Part rejected due 7 2 Visual inspection 7 98
pressure sheet
to Poor Asthetical
5. Wrong Mould
defects/ Fittment
7 design/ Improper 2 CAD Data of Mould Visual inspection 7 98
Free from Parting line problem (7)
Parting line flashFlash Mould condition
flash C.E : Customer dis-
Process parameter
satisfaction (7) 7 6. High Mould temp. 2 Visual inspection 7 98
sheet
U. E : Customer dis-
satisfaction (7) 7 7. High MFI 2 RM data sheet As per RM Data Sheet 7 98

7 8. High Melt temp. 2 PPS Monitoring sheet Shade Variation part 7 98


N.P: Part rejected due
to asthetic defect (7)
C.E : Customer dis- 1.Improper Mould
Free from Rib Damage Rib Damage 7 2 CAD Data of Mould Visual inspection 7 98
satisfaction (7) condition
U. E : Customer dis-
satisfaction (7)

N.P: Part rejected due Preventive


7 1. Improper Handling 2 Visual inspection 7 98
to asthetic defect (7) maintenance of mould
C.E : Customer dis-
Free from scratches Scratches 7 2. Improper Packaging 2 Packing std. Visual inspection 7 98
satisfaction (7)
U. E : Customer dis-
satisfaction (7) 7 3. Improper Storage 2 Skill Matrix Visual inspection 7 98

1. Insufficient holding
7 2 PPS Monitoring sheet Visual inspection 7 98
pressure
N.P: Part rejected due
to Poor Asthetical
defects/ Fittment
problem (7)
Free From Pitting Mark Pitting 7 2. Less Mould temp 2 PPS Monitoring sheet Visual inspection 7 98
C.E : Customer dis-
satisfaction (7)
U. E : Customer dis-
satisfaction (7)

7 3.Low injection speed 2 PPS Monitoring sheet Visual inspection 7 98

7 1. Less Mould temp 2 PPS Monitoring sheet Visual inspection 7 98

N.P: Part rejected due


to Poor Asthetical
defects/ Fittment
problem (7)
Free from Dust Mark Dust Mark
C.E : Customer dis- 2. Less Preheating Process parameter
satisfaction (7) 7 2 Visual inspection 7 98
temp. time sheet
U. E : Customer dis-
satisfaction (7)

Lifter polished
3. Wrong Mould
and mtc
7 design/ Improper 3 CAD Data of Mould Visual inspection 7 147 7 1 7 49
corrected
Mould condition

N.P: Part rejected due


to asthetic defect (7)
Proper C.E : Customer dis- As per WI(GD3-WI-
Deflashing 7 Not as per limit sample 2 Visual inspection 7 98
Deflashing satisfaction (7) MLD-01)
U. E : Customer dis-
satisfaction (7)

60 Molding Inprocess Inspection

Free from Moulding N.P: Part rejected due


defects to asthetic defect (7)
Proper Degating & C.E : Customer dis- Process Parameter
Moulding defects 7 Not as per limit sample 2 Visual Insp. 7 98
Deflashing satisfaction (7) Sheet
Moulding Poor surface U. E : Customer dis-
finish satisfaction (7)
A FPA / LPA
NP : Part rejcted due
to Fitment issue (7)
Part weight as per C.E : Customer dis- Parts not as per Process Parameter
Excess / less weight 7 2 Weight monitoring 7 98
specifcation satisfaction (7) drawing Sheet
U. E : Customer dis-
satisfaction (7)
Free from Moulding N.P: Part rejected due
Moulding defects
defects to asthetic defect (7)
Im-Proper Degating &
Hourly Running Proper Degating & C.E : Customer dis- Process Parameter
B Deflashing 7 Not as per limit sample 2 Visual Insp. 7 98
Report Deflashing , satisfaction (7) Sheet
Moulding Poor surface
Moulding Poor surface U. E : Customer dis-
finish
finish satisfaction (7)

N.P: Part Returned to


Less Qty. 7 No Packing Std. 2 Packing Std. Visual Insp. 7 98
mould shop. (7)

Std.Quanity per each


box as per Packing Std.
Packaging , Labelling
70 N.P: Part Returned to
& Send to store Excess Qty. 7 No Packing Std. 2 Packing Std. Visual Insp. 7 98
mould shop. (7)

Std. Labelling on ok Non-Std. Labelling on


C.E: Wrong supply (7) 7 No.Labelling Std. 2 Labeling ing Std. Visual Insp. 7 98
box ok box

REVISION HISTORY
Revision Level Revision Date Reason of revision Review by
0 12.10.2021 Initial Release CFT
1 25.10.2023 Inhouse Top 3 deffect action plan taken CFT

Prepared by: Nayan Approved by :- Dinesh Kumar

You might also like