3 Techniques of Exploratory Research Design - Qualitative Research
3 Techniques of Exploratory Research Design - Qualitative Research
3 Techniques of Exploratory Research Design - Qualitative Research
5-1
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Child Behavior Study towards a New Toy
5-2
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Urban Green Landscape and Health Behavior
5-3
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
SI’s Fading Jeans and Market Share
5-4
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The marketing research decision
5-5
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Qualitative Vs. Quantitative Research
Qualitative Research
Procedures
Projective
Depth Interviews Techniques
Focus Groups
5-7
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Characteristics of Focus Groups
5-8
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Procedure for Planning and Conducting
Focus Groups
1. Misuse
2. Misjudge
3. Moderation
4. Messy
5. Misrepresentation
5-12
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Online Versus Traditional Focus Groups
Group composition Anywhere in the world Drawn from the local area
Physical setting Researcher has little control Under the control of the researcher
Respondent attentiveness Respondents can engage in other tasks Attentiveness can be monitored
5-13
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Online Versus Traditional Focus Groups
Respondent recruiting Easier. Can be recruited online, e-mail, Recruited by traditional means
panel, or by traditional means (telephone, mail, mail panel)
Openness of respondents Respondents are more candid Respondents are candid, except for
due to lack of face-to-face contact sensitive topics
Nonverbal communication Body language cannot be observed. Body language and emotions
Emotions expressed by using symbols observed
Use of physical stimuli Limited to those that can be displayed A variety of stimuli (products,
on the Internet advertising demonstrations, etc.) can be used
5-14
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Online Versus Traditional Focus Groups
Observers’ communication Observers can communicate with the Observers can manually send notes
with moderator the moderator on a split-screen to the focus group room
Turnaround time Can be set up and completed Takes many days for setup and in a few days
completion
Basic focus group costs Much less expensive More expensive: facility rental, food,
taping, transcript preparation
5-15
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Advantages of Online Focus Groups
5-16
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Disadvantages of Online Focus Groups
5-17
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Interviewing
Interviews as a
Data Collection Tool
5-24
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Definition of Projective Techniques
5-25
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
MINI CASE
5-26
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Consumer Behaviour Dimensions
Do not return and keep excess money given by shopkeeper
Inflated and false insurance claim
Hiding major fault in online selling
Eating inside crowded shop without getting noticed
Misrepresentation of age to get discount
Misrepresentation of child’s age to get discount
Sharing wrong information with shopkeeper to get better price deal
5-28
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Word Association
EXAMPLE
STIMULUS MRS. SHARMA MRS. VERMA
washday everyday ironing
fresh and sweet clean
pure air soiled
scrub don't; husband does clean
filth this neighborhood dirt
bubbles bath soap and
water
family squabbles children
towels dirty wash
5-29
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Completion Techniques
5-31
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Construction Techniques
5-33
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
A Cartoon Test
Let’s see if we
can pick up some
house wares from
this mall
5-34
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Advantages of Projective Techniques
5-35
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Disadvantages of Projective Techniques
5-36
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Guidelines for Using Projective Techniques
5-37
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Comparison of Focus Groups, Depth
Interviews, and Projective Techniques
5-39
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Objective: To understand the perception towards ‘G’
in Parle and ‘Total’ in Colgate logo
Respondents: Children below 12 years of age to
encourage them to express them freely
Sample Size: 50
How would you design this study?
You are free to make suitable assumptions.
5-40
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Mini Research –Class Activity
5-41
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall