Scribd
Upload
33 views2 pages

LLM Aiml

Transformer models have achieved state-of-the-art performance on NLP tasks. For code summarization, approaches include using encoder-decoder frameworks to encode code into a hidden space and decode into text, graph neural networks to model code structure, and tree-LSTMs to understand code hierarchy. Challenges include handling diverse coding styles and complexity, which may be addressed through larger training datasets, more advanced techniques, and human feedback mechanisms.

Uploaded by

powerites009
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
33 views2 pages

LLM Aiml

Transformer models have achieved state-of-the-art performance on NLP tasks. For code summarization, approaches include using encoder-decoder frameworks to encode code into a hidden space and decode into text, graph neural networks to model code structure, and tree-LSTMs to understand code hierarchy. Challenges include handling diverse coding styles and complexity, which may be addressed through larger training datasets, more advanced techniques, and human feedback mechanisms.

Uploaded by

powerites009
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Literature review :

In the NLP domain, models based on Transformer architectures have shown


state-of-the-art performance on a broad set of NLP tasks. These models can be
categorized into three groups: encoder-only models such as BERT, RoBERTa, and
ELECTRA, decoder-only models like GPT, and encoder-decoder models such as
MASS, BART, and T5.
On the other hand, pre-training on the programming language is a nascent field
where recent work attempts to extend the NLP pre-training methods to source code.
Two pioneering models in this field are CuBERT and CodeBERT. CuBERT employs
BERT’s powerful masked language modeling objective to derive generic
code-specific representation, and CodeBERT further adds a replaced token
detection task to learn NL-PL cross-modal representation.
Despite these advancements, there are still challenges in the field of autonomous
code summarization. One of the main challenges is the complexity of code and the
difficulty of understanding the semantics of different programming constructs.

Approaches for Autonomous Code Summarization:


Encoder-Decoder Framework: As described earlier, this is a common approach
where the code is encoded into a hidden space and then decoded into natural
language space. However, this approach may suffer from the limitation of
considering only the sequential content of the code, ignoring the tree structure which
is also critical for code summarization.
Graph Neural Networks (GNN): Some studies propose using Graph Neural Networks
to capture the structural information of the Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) of the code.
This approach can handle the hierarchical nature of the code and might perform
better in capturing the semantic meaning of the code.
Tree-LSTM: Another approach is to use Tree-LSTM, which can handle the
hierarchical structure of the code more effectively. This approach treats each node in
the AST as a time step in the LSTM, allowing the model to understand the code in a
more structured manner.
Neural Attention Models: Some models utilize neural attention mechanisms to focus
on important parts of the code when generating the summary.
This approach is based on using an attention mechanism to assign weights to
different parts of the code based on their importance.
Implementation Strategy (using CodeT5) :
For a given programming language generate its AST.
Now we need to pass the root of AST tree to a summarize_function
We initialise CodeT5 model and build a pipeline for our summarization task.
The AST is traversed and functions are extracted using a parser.
The CodeT5 summarization pipeline is used to generate a summary for each
function text.

Future Challenges/Solutions :
Future challenges in the field of autonomous code summarization are as follows:
1. Handling Diverse Coding Styles: Different programmers have different coding
styles, which can make the code difficult to read and summarise. Future
models should be able to handle code written in various styles.
2. Increasing code complexity: Code can become increasingly complex as
software development practices evolve. Future models will need to be able to
understand and summarise complex code structures including recursion, and
advanced data structures.

Possible solutions to these challenges could include:


1. Larger Datasets: Training models on larger datasets could help them better
understand and handle diverse coding styles.
2. Advancements in Deep Learning and evolution of LLMs: With evolving
techniques like MoE (Mixture of experts) and further advancements in deep
learning and computing power, the ability to understand and summarise code
could increase.
3. Feedback Mechanism (RHLF): Reinforcement Learning with Human
Feedback (RLHF) is a promising approach to tackle the challenges in
autonomous code summarization. It combines the power of reinforcement
learning with human feedback to improve the quality of generated summaries.

Credits:
CodeT5: Identifier-aware Unified Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Models for Code
Understanding and Generation.
A Transformer-based Approach for Source Code Summarization

You might also like