Similar Triangles
Similar Triangles
Triangles
Developed by: M. Fahy, J. O’Keeffe, J. Cooper
For the lesson on 1/3/2016
At Chanel College, Coolock
Teacher: M. Fahy
Lesson plan developed by: M. Fahy, J. O’Keeffe, J. Cooper.
To help students to realise the relationship between angles, and sides of similar triangles.
To help the students come up with a definition of similar triangles; why triangles are similar.
Long-range/thematic goals:
The students will be able to work in groups and develop group problem solving skills.
The students will become confident and competent presenters.
The students will know what similar triangles are
The students will be able to identify similar triangles.
4. Learning Outcomes:
In a typical lesson on similar triangles students are told why triangles are similar. We hope that students will
discover the properties themselves by experiential learning. Students will be asked to recreate a pattern on
the board and we hope that from that they discover the relationship between sides, angles and similar
triangles. We also hope the students will get a better grasp of proportionality and slope.
6. Research
5. Summing up 5 minutes
Discussion about similar triangles. Angles,
sides, slopes. Work towards definition of Use the summary of the lesson to reinforce
similar triangles. idea of similar angles, proportionality of sides
and definition of similar triangles.
8. Evaluation
12 cm
4 cm 4 cm 4 cm 4 cm
Students all grasped the problem as put to them to “ recreate the pattern on the board”. The following
anticipated responses were offered by the students who were then able to explain their work at the board.
The first anticipated response of “pillars” was used by all the students.
It was then necessary for the teacher to suggest the idea of repeating the problem using more than one type
of shape. This led onto the idea of using rectangles and triangles. This led to the students using terms such
as “getting bigger” and “the same”. Students produced the second and third anticipated responses.
Students then came to the board to show and discuss their work. This led to the use of some expected terms.
These included “same size”, “getting bigger”, “same shape”, and “more”.
The lesson lasted 40 minutes which, with this particular level of student, was not enough time to achieve the
goal as set out in the lesson plan. We felt, however, that they were making excellent progress and in the post
class discussion it was decided to try one more class with the group to see if they could come up with the
overlapping triangles idea. It was suggested that with this group that the word “overlap” be used as a nudge.
We feel that with a stronger group the task would be completed fully in a single class.
The second class began with a recap of where we had finished. The problem was set again with the focus
now on using one type of shape only. It was also suggested to students that they consider overlapping
shapes to create the pattern.
One of the expected outcomes “ using the same size triangles” was used.
Again the idea of overlapping shapes was put to the group and this lead to them recreating the pattern in the
desired way, using “ similar triangles”, but with several “variations” along the way.
Students were brought to the board to show their developing ideas, ultimately leading to the final answer.
Terms such as “increase in size”, “same shape” and “proportion” were all mentioned by the students and
discussed by the class as a group.
While the pattern was completed in the anticipated way we did not have the opportunity to build on the idea
of similar triangles. We feel this was down to the level of the group and that the lesson worked in the way it
was designed to work.
Overall, we were happy with how well the lesson worked. As stated above the lesson should be taught over a
double period, or in two consecutive lessons, with an ordinary level group. With a higher level group we feel
that they would achieve the goal in a single lesson.