REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES

COLLEGE OF INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION
Professional Industrial Education
Ayala Boulevard, Manila

Rubrics for Understanding Data Collection and Sampling Techniques

Directions: Review the rubric scores ranging from 1 to 5 to gauge your performance level across specific criteria. Assess your
understanding based on the depth, clarity, and relevance of your work in relation to data collection and sampling techniques.
Consider feedback provided based on your scores to identify strengths and areas for improvement. Your overall performance is
evaluated holistically across all criteria.

Assessment
Criteria 5 (Excellent) 4 (Very Good) 3 (Good) 2 (Fair) 1 (Poor)
Demonstrates thorough Shows strong Demonstrates basic Shows limited Fails to demonstrate
Understanding of understanding of understanding of key understanding of understanding; understanding;
Data Collection and foundational concepts; terms and principles. concepts; explanations lack explanations are
Sampling Concepts provides clear, accurate explanations are clarity. inaccurate or irrelevant.
explanations. somewhat unclear.

Clearly understands Demonstrates solid

various quantitative data understanding of Shows basic Demonstrates limited Fails to demonstrate
collection and sampling quantitative methods; understanding of understanding of understanding of
techniques; provides provides relevant quantitative methods; quantitative methods; quantitative methods;
Comprehension of insightful examples and examples and examples and examples and examples and
Quantitative discusses applications discusses applications discussions lack discussions are discussions are irrelevant
Research Methods and considerations and considerations. depth. unclear or incorrect. or absent.
effectively.

Shows basic
Clearly understands Demonstrates solid understanding of Demonstrates limited Fails to demonstrate
different qualitative data understanding of qualitative methods, understanding of understanding of
collection and sampling qualitative methods; analysis lacks depth. qualitative methods; qualitative methods;
techniques; analyzes analyzes applications analysis is unclear or analysis is irrelevant or
Comprehension of their applications effectively. lacking. absent.
Qualitative Research effectively.
Methods

Demonstrates thorough Shows strong Demonstrates basic Demonstrates limited Fails to demonstrate
understanding of understanding of understanding of understanding of understanding of
integrating quantitative integrating integrating integrating integrating quantitative
and qualitative quantitative and quantitative and quantitative and and qualitative
techniques; discusses qualitative techniques; qualitative qualitative techniques; techniques; discussion is
examples and identifies discusses examples techniques, discussion is unclear irrelevant or absent.
advantages and and identifies discussion lacks or lacking.
Understanding of challenges effectively. advantages and depth.
Mixed Method challenges.
Research
Approaches

Reflects deeply on data Reflects on data Shows basic Demonstrates limited Fails to demonstrate
collection and sampling collection and reflection on data reflection on data reflection on data
Reflective Analysis techniques; effectively sampling techniques; collection and collection and collection and sampling
and Application of considers their considers their sampling techniques; sampling techniques; techniques; application in
Learned Concepts application in various application in application in application in research scenarios is

1
RESOURCE MATERIALS ARE FOR THIS COURSE USED ONLY & NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
CHERRYPYN B. BARBACENA, Ed. D
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION
Professional Industrial Education
Ayala Boulevard, Manila

Assessment
Criteria 5 (Excellent) 4 (Very Good) 3 (Good) 2 (Fair) 1 (Poor)
research scenarios research scenarios. research scenarios research scenarios is irrelevant or absent
lacks depth unclear or lacking

Scoring Rubric: Data Collection and Sampling Techniques Simulation

Criteria 5 - Excellent 4 - Very Good 3 - Good 2 - Fair 1 - Poor
The research
The research proposal is proposal is detailed, The research The research
comprehensive, well- well-structured, and proposal is proposal is The research proposal
developed, and clearly effectively aligns with adequate, sufficiently somewhat is incomplete, lacking
aligned with the objectives of the objectives of the structured, and incomplete or structure, and poorly
the study. study. mostly aligns with the lacking in detail and aligned with the
objectives of the may have minor objectives of the study.
Finalization of study. misalignment with
Mixed Method the objectives of the
Research study.
Proposal
The chosen
The chosen techniques are techniques are The chosen The chosen The chosen techniques
highly appropriate, well- appropriate, well- techniques are techniques are are inappropriate,
justified, and effectively justified, and adequate, somewhat poorly justified, and do
support the research generally support the reasonably justified, appropriate, not support the
Selection of objectives and population research objectives and partially support minimally justified, research objectives
Data characteristics. and population the research and marginally and population
Collection and characteristics. objectives and support the research characteristics.
Sampling population objectives and
Techniques characteristics. population
characteristics.

The group provides

The group provides thorough clear and coherent The group provides The group provides The group provides
and insightful discussion, discussion, adequate discussion, basic discussion, minimal or no
demonstrating a deep demonstrating a demonstrating an demonstrating a discussion,
understanding of the strong understanding understanding of the limited demonstrating a lack of
Discussion selected techniques and their of the selected selected techniques understanding of the understanding of the
and alignment with research techniques and their and their alignment selected techniques selected techniques
Justification of objectives, population alignment with with research and their alignment and their alignment
Choices characteristics, and practical research objectives, objectives, with research with research
constraints. population population objectives, objectives, population
characteristics, and characteristics, and population characteristics, and
practical constraints. practical constraints. characteristics, and practical constraints.
practical constraints.
2
RESOURCE MATERIALS ARE FOR THIS COURSE USED ONLY & NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
CHERRYPYN B. BARBACENA, Ed. D
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION
Professional Industrial Education
Ayala Boulevard, Manila

Criteria 5 - Excellent 4 - Very Good 3 - Good 2 - Fair 1 - Poor

The group gathers and The group gathers The group gathers The group gathers The group fails to
presents highly relevant and and presents and presents and presents limited gather or present any
insightful case studies or relevant case studies adequate case or irrelevant case case studies or
research articles that or research articles studies or research studies or research research articles to
Use of Case effectively justify their chosen that justify their articles that articles that justify their chosen
Studies or techniques and enhance chosen techniques minimally justify their marginally justify techniques.
Research understanding. and contribute to chosen techniques. their chosen
Articles understanding. techniques.

The group articulates their The group articulates

selections and reasoning their selections and The group articulates The group The group fails to
with exceptional clarity, reasoning with their selections and articulates their articulate their
engaging the audience clarity, engaging the reasoning selections and selections and
Sharing effectively and fostering audience and adequately but may reasoning with reasoning effectively,
Selections insightful discussion. facilitating lack some clarity in limited clarity, resulting in confusion
and meaningful presentation or hindering audience and lack of discussion.
Reasoning discussion. audience understanding and
engagement. discussion.

3
RESOURCE MATERIALS ARE FOR THIS COURSE USED ONLY & NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
CHERRYPYN B. BARBACENA, Ed. D