0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views

Lecture - 8 Real Analysis IBA

(1) The document establishes rules for evaluating limits algebraically without using epsilon-delta arguments. It defines operations on sequences such as sum, difference, product, and quotient of sequences. (2) It proves theorems showing that limits preserve algebraic operations; for example, the limit of a sum is the sum of the limits. (3) It also proves that limits preserve inequalities; if terms of a convergent sequence are non-negative, then its limit is also non-negative.

Uploaded by

Wisha Ahmed
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views

Lecture - 8 Real Analysis IBA

(1) The document establishes rules for evaluating limits algebraically without using epsilon-delta arguments. It defines operations on sequences such as sum, difference, product, and quotient of sequences. (2) It proves theorems showing that limits preserve algebraic operations; for example, the limit of a sum is the sum of the limits. (3) It also proves that limits preserve inequalities; if terms of a convergent sequence are non-negative, then its limit is also non-negative.

Uploaded by

Wisha Ahmed
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Lecture - 8 (14)

Limits Theorems : In this section we establish some basic rules that allow us to evaluate
limits algebraically, without resorting to  and K arguments .

Algebra of Sequences

If X = ( xn ) and Y = ( y n ) are sequence of real numbers, then we define their

Sum to be the sequence X + Y = ( xn + yn )

Difference to be the sequence X − Y = ( xn − yn )

Product to be the sequence X  Y = ( xn yn ) ,

X x 
Quotient to be the sequence =  n  , yn  0
Y  yn 

Scalar Multiple to be the sequence c X = ( c xn ) , for c  .

1 1 1 1 
• For example, if X = ( 2 , 4 , 6 , ….., 2n , … ) , Y =  , , , . . . , , . . .  are
1 2 3 n 
sequences, then

1 1 1 1   1 7 17 2n 2 − 1 
X+Y =  , , , . . . , , . . . , X−Y =  , , , . . . , , . . . ,
1 2 3 n  1 2 3 n 
X
XY = (2,2,2,2,...,2,...), = ( 2 , 8 , 18 , . . . , 2 n 2 , . . . ) ,
Y

And 3 X = ( 6 , 12 , 18 , ….. , 6n , … ) .

• Note that if we take a sequence Z = ( 0 , 2 , 0, . . . , 1 + ( − 1) n , . . . ) , then we can

define X + Z , X – Z and X . Z but X is not defined since some of the terms


Z

of Z are zero.
(15)

Theorem – 3.1 : ( Algebra of limits )

Suppose ( x n ) and ( y n ) are convergent sequences and c . Then

(a) lim ( c x n ) = c  lim ( x n )

(b) lim ( x n + yn ) = lim ( xn ) + lim ( yn )

(c) lim ( x n − yn ) = lim ( xn ) − lim ( yn )

(d) lim ( x n yn ) = lim ( xn )  lim ( yn )

 1  1
(e) lim   = , Provided yn  0 and lim ( yn )  0 .
 yn  lim ( yn )

x  lim ( xn )
(f) lim  n  = , Provided yn  0 and lim ( yn )  0 .
 yn  lim ( yn )

(g) lim ( xn )= lim ( x n ) , Provided xn  0 .

Remark : Some of the results of above Theorem can be extended by Mathematical Induction, to

a finite number of sequences. So if X 1 = ( xn ) , X 1 = ( yn ) , . . . , X n = ( zn ) are convergent

sequences , then

(I) lim ( xn + yn + . . . + zn ) = lim ( xn ) + lim ( yn ) + . . . + lim ( zn )

(II) lim ( xn − yn − . . . − zn ) = lim ( xn ) − lim ( yn ) − . . . − lim ( zn )

(III) lim ( xn yn    zn ) = lim ( xn )  lim ( yn )  . . .  lim ( zn ) and hence

(IV) lim ( xnk ) = ( lim ( xn ) )


k

Limits Preserve Inequalities

Theorem – 3.2 : If ( x n ) is a convergent sequence of real numbers such that

for all n xn  0 , then x = lim ( x n )  0 .


(16)

Proof : Let Suppose the conclusion is not true and that x  0 ; then  = − x is positive. Since

( x n ) converges to x , therefore by definition there is a natural number K (  ) such that

x −   xn  x +  , for all n  K (  ) .

In particular, we have xK  x +  = x + ( − x ) = 0 .

But this contradicts the hypothesis that xn  0 , for all n  .

Therefore, this contradiction implies that x  0.

Theorem – 3.3 : Suppose ( x n ) and ( y n ) are convergent sequences of real numbers such that

for all n , xn  yn , then lim ( x n )  lim ( y n ) .

Proof : Let y n  xn  y n − xn  0 , for all n  . It follows from above Theorem

that lim ( y n − xn )  0 . Which asserts that lim ( xn )  lim (y n ).

Corollary – 3.4 : Suppose ( x n ) is a convergent sequence of real numbers such that

for all n , a  xn  b , then a  lim ( x n )  b .

Proof : a  xn  b  a  xn and x n  b . Use Thm-3.3 with ( y n ) = ( a ) and ( y n ) = ( b ).

Sequeeze Theorem : Suppose ( x n ) , ( y n ) and ( z n ) are sequences of real numbers such that

for all n , xn  yn  z n and lim ( x n ) = lim ( z n ) , lim ( x n ) = lim ( y n ) = lim ( z n ) .

Proof : Let w = lim ( xn ) = lim ( z n ) . If  > 0 is given, then it follows from the convergence of

( x n ) and ( z n ) to w that there exists a natural number K such that if n  K then

xn − w <  and zn − w < 

Now xn  yn  z n  xn − w  y n − w  z n − w , for all n  .

It follows that −  < yn − w <  , for all n  K .

Since  > 0 is arbitrary, this implies that lim ( y n ) = w .

You might also like