HOI 6 Exam Notes - 2018, 2019
HOI 6 Exam Notes - 2018, 2019
HOI 6 Exam Notes - 2018, 2019
INTRODUCTION:
NEO-REVISIONISTS:
CONTINUITY VS CHANGE:
● Thus, we can clearly see that 18th century polity, economy and
society are characterized by trends that reflect both change and
continuity.
● This debate becomes more intense and pertinent for the second
half of the 18th century, which saw the beginnings of British
colonial expansion in northern India and its impact on the local
society and economy.
● Here again, the contention is over whether 1757 marked a decisive
break with pro-colonial past, or whether, as the Revisionists have
argued, the basis for colonialism was already present in India and
these elements were simply initiated by colonialism.
● Continuity and change in the field of music, architecture,
economic systems and culture is also debatable.
● The artists shifted to other regional centres as the Mughal Empire
became insufficient to support their patronage; this change was
juxtaposed with an element of continuity as the patron-client
relationship remained same.
● Politically, the same structure remained; the Mughal Empire was
still the head even though the same process of administration and
economic system was now followed in the regional areas without
any direct control from the Mughal throne of Delhi.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Stokes, Eric, The English Utilitarians and India, Oxford University Press, 1989
5 TWICE
● The new society was to be based on the twin pillars of reason & the Vedas &
Upanishads.
● Most of all it based itself on human reason which was to be the ultimate
criterion for deciding what was worthwhile & what was useless in the past or
present religious principles & practices.
● Followers of Samaj were Keshab Chandra Sen ,Debendra Nath Tagore, Ishwar
Chandra Vidyasagar, Ashwani Kumar Datta, Derozians , Prasanna Kumar
Tagore, Chandrashekhar Deb & Tarachand Chakravarty, 1st secretary of the
Brahmo Sabha
● Samaj denied the need for a priestly class for interpreting religious writings.
● Apart from the Brahmo Samaj, which has branches in several parts of the
country, the Paramahansa Mandali and the Prarthana Samaj in Maharashtra
and the Arya Samaj in Punjab and North India were some of the prominent
movements among the Hindus.
PRARTHNA SAMAJ
Founded by Dadoba Tarkhadkar and his brother Atmaram Pandurang in 1867 at
Bombay,when Keshub Chandra Sen visited Maharashtra, with an aim to make people
believe in one God & worship only one God.
● Although the adherents of Samaj were devoted theists, they didn’t regard the Vedas
as divine or infallible.
● The emphasis was on monotheism, but on the whole, the samaj was more concerned
with social reforms than with religion.
● They drew their nourishment from the Hindu scriptures & used the hymns of the old
Marathi "poet-saints" like Namdev, Tukaram in their prayers.
○ Its success was guided by Sir Ramakrishna Gopal Bhandarkar, a noted Sanskrit
scholar, Narayan Chandavarkar, & Justice Mahadev Govind Ranade.
The main reformers were the intellectuals who advocated reforms of the social
system of the Hindus.
○ Along with Dhondo Keshav Karve, Ranade founded the Widow Remarriage
Movement as well as Widows’ Home Association with the aim of providing education
and training to widows
○ It was spread to southern India by noted Telugu reformer & writer, Kandukuri
Veeresalingam.
● There were several other regional and caste movements like the Kayastha
Sabha in Uttar Pradesh and the Sarin Sabba in Punjab.
● The backward castes also started the work of reformation with the Satya
Sodhak Samaj in Maharashtra and the Sri Narayana Dharma Paripalana
Sabha in Kerala.
● The Aligarh movements, the Singh Sabha and the Rehnumai Mazdeyasan
Sabha represented the spirit of reform among the Muslims, the Sikhs and the
Parsees respectively.
● Despite being regional in scope and content and confined to a particular
religion, their general perspectives were remarkably similar; they were
regional and religious manifestations of a common Consciousness.
● Although religious reformation was a major concern of these movements,
none of them were exclusively religious in character.
● Strongly humanist in inspiration, the idea of otherworldliness and salvation
were not a part of their agenda; instead their attention was focused on
worldly existence. Bankim Chandra Chatterjee and Vivekananda emphasized
the secular use of religion and used spirituality to take cognizance of the
material conditions of human existence.
● Given the inter-connection between religious beliefs and social practices,
religious reformation was a necessary pre-requisite for social reform.
● Religion was the dominant ideology of the times and it was not possible to
undertake any social action without coming to grips with it.
● Indian society in the nineteenth century was caught in a vicious web created
by religious superstitions and social obscurantism.
● Hinduism, as Max Weber observed, had ‘become a compound of magic,
animism and superstition’ and abominable rites like animal sacrifice and
physical torture had replaced the worship of God.
● The priests exercised an overwhelming and, indeed, unhealthy influence on
the minds of the people. Idolatry and polytheism helped to reinforce their
Position.
● As suggested by Raja Ram Mohan Roy, their monopoly of scriptural
knowledge and of ritual interpretation imparted a deceptive character to all
religious systems.
● The faithful lived in submission, not only to God, the powerful and unseen,
but even to the whims, fancies and wishes of the priests.
● There was nothing that religious ideology could not persuade people to
do—women even went to the extent of offering themselves to priests to
satisfy their carnal pleasures.
● Social conditions were equally depressing. The most distressing was the
position of women. The birth of a girl was unwelcome, her marriage a
burden and her widowhood inauspicious. Attempts to kill girl infants at birth
were not unusual. Those who escaped this initial brutality were subjected to
the violence of marriage at a tender age. Often the marriage was a device to
escape social ignominy and, hence, marital life did not turn out to be a
pleasant experience.
● When their husbands died they were expected to commit Sati which Ram
Mohan described it as murder. If they succeeded in overcoming this social
coercion, they were condemned, as widows, to life-long misery, neglect and
humiliation.
● Another debilitating factor was caste; it sought to maintain a system of
segregation, hierarchically ordained on the basis of ritual status.
● The rules and regulations of caste hampered social mobility, fostered social
divisions and sapped individual initiative. Above all was the humiliation of
untouchability which militated against human dignity.
● There were innumerable other practices marked by constraint, credulity,
status, authority, bigotry and blind fatalism.
● Rejecting them as features of a decadent society, the reform movements
sought to create a social climate for modernization. In doing so, they
referred to a golden past when no such malaise existed.
● The nineteenth century situation was the result of an accretionary process; a
distortion of a once ideal past.
● The reformers’ vision of the future, however, was not based on this
idealization. It was only an aid and an instrument —since practices based
on faith cannot be challenged without bringing faith itself into question.
Hence, Raja Ram Mohan Roy, demonstrated that sati had no religious
sanction
● Dayanand Saraswati based his anti-casteism on Vedic authority.
● To Ram Mohan Roy demonstrability was the sole criterion of truth. In
proclaiming that rationalism is our only preceptor,Akshay Kumar went a
step further.
● All natural and social phenomena, he held, could be analyzed and
understood by purely mechanical processes.
● This perspective not only enabled them to adopt a rational approach to
tradition but also to evaluate contemporary socio-religious practices from the
standpoint of social utility and to replace faith with rationality.
● In the Brahmo Samaj, it led to the repudiation of the infallibility of the
Vedas, and in the Aligarh Movement, to the reconciliation of the teachings
of Islam with the needs of the modern age.
● Holding that religious tenets were not immutable, Syed Ahmed Khan
emphasized the role of religion in the progress of society: if religion did not
keep pace with and meet the demands of the time.
● It would get fossilized as in the case of Islam in India.
● Faced with the challenge of the intrusion of colonial culture and ideology, an
attempt to reinvigorate traditional institutions and to realize the potential of
traditional culture developed during the nineteenth century. (**imp)
● All intrusions into the cultural realm were more intensely felt. Therefore, a
defence of indigenous culture developed almost simultaneously with the
colonial conquest.
● This concern embraced the entire cultural existence, the way of life and all
signifying practices like language, religion, art and philosophy.
● Two features characterized this concern; the creation of an alternate
cultural-ideological system and the regeneration of traditional institutions.
● The cultivation of vernacular languages, the creation of an alternate system
of education, the efforts to regenerate Indian art and literature, the emphasis
on Indian dress and food, the defence of religion and the attempts to
revitalize the Indian system of medicine, the attempt to probe the
potentialities of pre-colonial technology and to reconstruct traditional
knowledge were some of the expressions of this concern.
● The early inklings of this can be discerned in Raja Ram Mohan Roy’s
debates with the Christian missionaries, in the formation and activities of
Tattvabodhini Sabha, in the memorial on education signed by 70,000
inhabitants of Madras and in the general resentment against the Lex Loci
Act (the Act proposed in 1845 and passed in 1850 provided the right to
inherit ancestral property to Hindu converts to Christianity).
● A more definite articulation, however, was in the ideas and activities of later
movements generally characterized as conservative and revivalist. Strongly
native in tendency, they were clearly influenced by the need to defend
indigenous culture against colonial cultural hegemony.
● In this specific historical sense, they were not necessarily retrogressive, for
underlying these efforts was the concern with the revival of the cultural
personality, distorted, if not destroyed, by colonial domination.
● More so because it formed an integral element in the formation of national
consciousness. Some of these tendencies however, were not able to
transcend the limits of historical necessity and led to a sectarian and
obscurantist outlook.
● This was possibly a consequence of the lack of integration between the
cultural and political struggles, resulting in cultural backwardness, despite
political advance.
●
● The cultural-ideological struggle, represented by the socio-religious
movements, was an integral part of the evolving national consciousness.
● This was so because it was instrumental in bringing about the initial
intellectual and cultural break which made a new vision of the future
possible.
● Second, it was a part of the resistance against colonial cultural and
ideological hegemony.
● Out of this dual struggle evolved the modern cultural situation: new men,
new homes and a new society.
●
● Much significant contributions were made by these reform movements in the
evolution of modern India.
● They stood for the democratization of the society, removal of superstitions
and decadent customs, spread of enlightenment and development of a
rational and modern outlook. This led to the national awakening in India.
● Barelvi & Aziz gave the movement a political color & aimed at
creating a Muslim homeland.
● Aziz set out a fatwa (ruling) declaring that India was Dar-ul-harb
& the need was to make it Dar-ul-Islam.
● Jihad was initially declared against the Sikhs of Punjab then ruled
by Ranjit Singh
● In 1870, the term 'sedition' was added in the IPC to outlaw speech
that attempted to ‘excite disaffection towards the government
established by law in India’; thus, this movement marked the
beginning of sedition law in India
FARAIZI MOVEMENT
Introduction
Since the grant of diwani for Bengal, Bihar and Orissa in 1765, the
major concern of the east india company's administration in india was
to collect as much revenue as possible.
● Agriculture was the main basis of the economy and the main source
of income and hence, although the nawabi administration was
retained, several land land revenue experiments were introduced in
haste to maximize extraction.
● So the main purpose of introducing all new settlements was to extract
maximum revenue and gain huge profit out of it.
● European officers of the company who were given supervisory
authority over them, their corruption and lack of understanding of the
local situation led to complete disorganization of the agrarian
economy and society in the diwani provinces within a few years.
● The devastating famine of 1769-1770, in which one third of the
bengal population was wiped off, was but only one indication of the
prevailing chaos.
● The company directors were unable to pay their shareholders the
expected amounts of dividend, and began to look for reasons for
falling revenues and the devastation of famine.
● The main reason to introduce these settlements was to control the
economy of India through their exploitative policies and get rid of
Indians altogether from the administration of revenue and make the
British sole controller of the resources of the provinces.
● In 1772, Warren Hastings introduced a new system known as the
farming system where european district collectors were to be in
charge of revenue collection, while revenue collecting right was
farmed out to the highest bidder.
● This system ultimately failed to improve the situation as the farmers
tried to extract as much as possible without any concern for the
production process.
● The burden of revenue demand increased on the peasants.
● The net outcome of this whole period of rash experimentation was the
ruination of the agricultural population.
PERMANENT SETTLEMENT.
● With this act in place, the Zamindars were now recognised as the
owners of the land and were given hereditary rights of succession of
the lands.
● The Zamindars could sell or transfer the land as they wished.
● Their proprietorship would stay as long as he paid the fixed revenue
at the said date to the government.
● If they failed to pay, their rights would cease to exist and the land
would be auctioned off.
● The amount to be paid by the landlords was fixed.
● It was agreed that this would not increase in future (therefore the
name is permanent).
● The fixed amount was 10/11th portion of the entire revenue reserved
for the government and only 1/10th for the Zamindar.
● This rate of taxation was noted to be way higher than the prevailing
rates in England.
● The Zamindar also had to give the tenant a patta which described the
area of the land given to him and the rent he had to pay the landlord.
RYOTWARI SYSTEM
Ryot word comes from the word raiyat meaning the peasant or the
cultivator.
● The ryotwari system was a land revenue system in British India which
was introduced by Thomas Munro which allowed the government to
deal directly with the cultivator ('ryot') for revenue collection.
● It started from the Madras presidency and spread to Bombay, Assam
and coorg.
● After the implementation of Permanent settlement in Bengal, Lord
Cornwallis expected that it could be extended to other parts of India.
● In 1798 Lord Wellesley tried to extend the permanent settlement
system to Madras Presidency by recognizing local poligars as
zamindars however it did not work out due to disillusionment with the
system because it did not provide the means to raise the income of
the government.
● This was also the time of Scottish enlightenment and Utilitarian Ideas
which influenced to revise the existing system of India.
● Instead of collecting from the zamindars, they began to collect directly
from the villages, fixing the amount that each village had to pay.
● After this they proceeded to assess each cultivator separately - and
thus evolved what came to be known as the 'Ryotwari' system.
● This early ryotwari was a field assessment system.
● This means that the tax payable on each field was fixed by a
government officer, and then the cultivator had the choice of
cultivating that field and paying that amount, or not cultivating it.
● If no other cultivator could be found; then the field would not be
cultivated: it would lie fallow.
● The quality of soil, the area of the field and the average produce of
every piece of land had to be assessed and on the basis of that the
amount of revenue was to be fixed.
● But this was the theory; in practice the estimates were often
guesswork and the revenue demanded was often so high that they
could only be collected with great difficulty or could not be collected at
all.
● And the peasants were to be coerced to agree to such unjust
settlements.
● So the Ryorwari system was almost abandoned soon after Munro's
departure for London in 1807.
Madras:
● After some experiments with other ways of managing the land
revenue, the Madras authorities were by 1820 converted to the
ryotiwari system, and its triumph led to the appointment of Munro as
Governor of Madras.
● Munro advanced many arguments in favour of this system.
● He argued that it was the original - Indian land tenure, and the one
best suited to Indian conditions.
● Its adoption was due, however, to one main reason - it resulted in a
larger revenue than any other system could have produced.
● This was because there were no zamindars or other intermediaries
who received any part of the agricultural surplus - whatever could be
squeezed from the cultivator went directly to the State.
● The Madras government was chronically short of funds, and such a
system would naturally appeal to it.
● So, taking advantage of the rejection of the Permanent Settlement, it
introduced the temporary ryotwari settlement.
● After 1820 however, ryotwari was extended to most of the Madras
Presidency in forms quite different from those visualized by Munro. ,
● the working of such a system depended upon the government
carrying out a detailed measurement and assessment of each field.
● But after 1820 the system was extended to many districts where no
surveys had ever been carried out.
● No one knew how much land a peasant cultivated, or what its product
might be.
● His tax came to be fixed on an arbitrary basis, usually by looking at
what he had paid in earlier years.
● This was known as a 'putcut' assessment.
● There is hardly any doubt that the effects of this system upon the
rural economy were distinctly harmful.
● The peasants were impoverished and lacked the resources to
cultivate new lands.
● The Government of Madras itself noted in 1855 that only 14% million
acres of ryotwari land were cultivated, while 18 million acres were
waste.
● It confessed: 'There is no room for doubt that an increase of
cultivation would follow reductions of the Government tax.'
● Apart from this depressing effect upon the rural economy, the heavy
burden of taxation distorted the land market.
● Land in most districts of Madras had no value The New Land
Revenue Settlement in the first half of the 19th century.
Bombay
MAHALWARI SETTLEMENT
● The term 'Mahalwari' is derived from the term 'Mahal' which means a
group of villages considered as a single economic unit.
● It was implemented in nearly twenty nine percent of British India.
● In 1819, Holt Mackenzie suggested its implementation and therefore,
it was introduced in western part of Uttar Pradesh.
● Later in 1833, R.M. Bird extended and implemented in Gangetic
valley, north-west provinces, parts of central India and Punjab.
● In the agrarian structure of this area, there was on the one hand, a
small group of magnates, known as the taluqdars.
● Nurul Hasan has described them as the "intermediary zamindars",
who contracted with the state to realize the revenue of a given
territory.
● There were, on the other hand, a large group of "primary zamindars",
who were the holders of proprietary rights over agricultural as well as
habitational lands.
● Included in this group were both the small owner-cultivators and also
the large proprietors of several villages.
Holt Mackenzie
R.M. Bird
Overall Impact
● Since Punjab and northern India had fertile land, the British wanted to
extract maximum revenue out of this region.
● Land revenue was usually fifty percent to seventy five percent of the
produce.
● The survey and maintenance of land record which was at core of the
settlement failed miserably due to unavailability of required officials.
● As such, the outcome of faulty records was based on idiosyncratic
estimates.
● This settlement led to widespread discontent among peasants.
● Moreover , in extreme situations to pay revenue on time, they started
to sell their land.
● In other words, it led to commodification of land.
● The grievances of the rural society of north India were soon to be
expressed rather loudly and violently in the revolt of 1857.
● Our most important takeaway from this assignment is that with these
settlements the land became a private commodity.
● Earlier there was no private ownership of land.
● Even kings and cultivators did not consider land as his 'private
property'.
● Due to the very high taxes, farmers then resorted to growing cash
crops instead of food crops.
● This led to food insecurity and even famines.
● Changes in land ownership were followed by the commercialization of
agriculture, which started to emerge around the 1860s.
● This brought a shift from cultivation for home consumption to
cultivation for the market.
● Cash transaction became the basis of exchange and largely replaced
the barter system .This put rural Indian communities at greater risk of
damage due to famine because agriculture, which had previously
been used to meet local needs, was now controlled from afar with the
goal of profit rather than subsistence Taxes on agricultural produce
were moderate during pre-British times.
● The British made it very high.
● The insistence on cash payment of revenue led to more indebtedness
among farmers.
● Moneylenders therefore became landowners in due course.
● Bonded labour arose because loans were given to farmers/labourers
who could not pay it back.
● When India achieved freedom from colonial rule, 7% of the villagers
(Zamindars/landowners) owned 75% of the agricultural land.
● Overall we can say that all these settlements introduced by Britishers
had a singular aim, that is to extract maximum revenue from the land.