Writing a coursework, especially on a complex subject like Maths C3 Coursework Comparison, can

be a challenging and time-consuming task. It requires a deep understanding of the topic, analytical
skills, and the ability to present information coherently. Here are some reasons why writing such
coursework can be difficult:

1. Complexity of the Subject: Mathematical coursework often involves intricate concepts and
theories that may be challenging to grasp. Understanding and applying these concepts
correctly is crucial for a successful coursework.
2. Research and Analysis: Conducting thorough research and analysis is a fundamental part of
any coursework. For Maths C3 Coursework Comparison, it may involve exploring different
mathematical models, theories, and their applications, which can be time-consuming.
3. Data Interpretation: Maths coursework often requires working with data, graphs, and
mathematical models. Interpreting data accurately and drawing meaningful conclusions can
be a daunting task, especially for those who are not well-versed in mathematical analysis.
4. Time Management: Balancing coursework with other academic and personal commitments
can be challenging. Maths coursework, in particular, demands time and concentration to
ensure accuracy and quality.
5. Writing Skills: Expressing complex mathematical ideas in a clear and coherent manner is a
skill that not everyone possesses. Translating mathematical concepts into well-structured and
articulate writing can be a struggle for some students.

For those finding the task too overwhelming, seeking assistance from reputable services like ⇒
HelpWriting.net ⇔ can be a viable option. Such services often provide expert writers with a strong
background in mathematics who can help with coursework. However, it's important to approach these
services cautiously and ensure that they adhere to academic integrity guidelines.

Remember, while seeking assistance is understandable, it's crucial to maintain academic honesty and
integrity throughout the coursework process. Use external help as a supplement to your own efforts
and learning, rather than a substitute for them.
But among the three methods, I think change of signs method should be chosen as the easiest and
quickest one. The reason is that it only involves a few calculations and it is easy to calculate them.
This shows that generally the Newton-Raphson method has a much quicker speed of convergence
than the other two methods. The value of g'(x) at this point is far greater than 1, so the iterations do
not converge. This is because the tangent crosses the asymptote, as shown below. Also, using change
of signs method with graphic can guarantee that the method should be worked; it seems it takes a bit
longer than other methods, though. What is more? There is a function of zooming in the graph in the
graphic calculator, which makes it easier to find out the values that correct to 5 decimal places. Fg is
denoted by h. Find h-1(x), where h-1 is the inverse of h. Get this resource as part of a bundle and
save up to 20% A bundle is a package of resources grouped together to teach a particular topic, or a
series of lessons, in one place. Some computer programs, such as Autograph, can carry out the
iterations for you, which, if they are available to you, can make it easier to use than a decimal search.
Looking at the graph you can see that the root is between -2 and -1. This will help you understand
the questions given and with practice will enable you to achieve a very high grade in you maths A
Level or any other exam with this content. Full description Save Save C3 MEI A-level Maths
Coursework For Later 100% 100% found this document useful, Mark this document as useful 0%
0% found this document not useful, Mark this document as not useful Embed Share Print Download
now Jump to Page You are on page 1 of 18 Search inside document. The value of g(x) at this point is
then taken as the next guess and this process is repeated to converge on the root. Also, if the too
roots are too close together, we might miss the other two a fter finding the first one. The iterations
are also wrong as they diverge away from the point as well. Despite this, it is a very effective method
as failure chances are relatively very low and the root can be found to many decimal places if the
right software is used. But with Computers being able to do even that, it makes it even easier to use
it. Therefore, we might miss the other two after finding the first one. Then we look at where the
tangent crosses the X axis and that value will be the new x value on the graph for a tangent. If so, I
think that the decimal search will be the simplest way to find the roots. So using the Re- arrangement
method to solve f(x), I find that the root is - 1.961703555. It is shown that the root lies between -
1.53407035 and -1.53407025. If we take a look at the Newton Raphson formula, it’s denominator is
the gradient function of f(x). In some cases you may not be able to differentiate f(x). Write a review
Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback. Therefore, we might
miss the other two after finding the first one. Our customer service team will review your report and
will be in touch. ?0.00 4.50 24 reviews Download Save for later ?0.00 4.50 24 reviews Download
Save for later Last updated 16 January 2018 Share this Share through email Share through twitter
Share through linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest phildb 4.02 936 reviews Not
the right resource. With the use of excel, it is every easy to write down the formula of the method in
one cell and dragging it down as many cells as you wish to (the number of iterations) and it is very
easy to use. The downside of the method is that it is the most likely method of all three to fail as
there is always a chance that when you rearrange an equation and start the iterative process, it will
not converge to the root but it will diverge away.
Similarly to before, I used excel to work out the value of f(x). Report this Document Download now
Save Save C3 MEI A-level Maths Coursework For Later 100% (1) 100% found this document
useful (1 vote) 2K views 18 pages C3 MEI A-Level Maths Coursework Uploaded by Maurice Yap
AI-enhanced title Coursework on the use of numerical methods. This is the only hard part of the
method as the iterative part of the method is very simple with the use of the formula. The downside
of the method is that it is the most likely method of all three to fail as there is always a chance that
when you rearrange an equation and start the iterative process, it will not converge to the root but it
will diverge away. Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave
some feedback. Out of the three, some are faster at converging to the root that others and some are
easier to use than others, especially with the recent technology made available to everyone. Both
make good use of Autograph software visually interpret equations before using an Excel spreadsheet
to carry out the calculations to find each root. After 19 iterations, I found the root of the equation as
from then on, it repeats. Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn. So this means that
there will be no sign changes resulting in the failure of the graph. The questions on proof are well
organized but the solution sheet is not very clear. Compared to the change of sign method both are
generally more easy to use as once the initial formula has been entered it is very quick and simple to
do the iterations many times. Fg is denoted by h. Find h-1(x), where h-1 is the inverse of h. When
the line met the curve, a tangent is drawn and extended until it meets the x-axis and it is a new point
on the x-axis, called X 4, which is equal to -3.5273. Upload Read for free FAQ and support
Language (EN) Sign in Skip carousel Carousel Previous Carousel Next What is Scribd. Therefore, we
might miss the other two after finding the first one. It’s very easy for us to use autograph and it just
involves one step. What is more? There is a function of zooming in the graph in the graphic
calculator, which makes it easier to find out the values that correct to 5 decimal places. But regarding
the speed of convergence, this is relatively low as it is not completely automated and requires human
interaction after each set of results and is very repetitive. C3 Coursework - different methods of
solving equations. With the use of AutoGraph Software, It is even easier as you don’t even have to
work out the gradient function. The value of g(x) at this point is then taken as the next guess and
this process is repeated to converge on the root. After finding the roots, we can leave Autograph and
use Excel to proof the rest of the change of signs method. This makes it even easier than excel but it
is less accurate as it only gives the root to 3 decimal places where as excel can be configured to as
many decimal places as needed. Full description Save Save C3 MEI A-level Maths Coursework For
Later 100% 100% found this document useful, Mark this document as useful 0% 0% found this
document not useful, Mark this document as not useful Embed Share Print Download now Jump to
Page You are on page 1 of 18 Search inside document. It must still be rearranged manually though,
and a large proportion of rearrangements fail. Empty reply does not make any sense for the end user
Submit reply Cancel neokleousstavri 4 years ago report 5 Thank you Empty reply does not make any
sense for the end user Submit reply Cancel See more Report this resource to let us know if it violates
our terms and conditions. What is more? There is a function of zooming in the graph in the graphic
calculator, which makes it easier to find out the values that correct to 5 decimal places. The iterations
are also wrong as they diverge away from the point as well. Write a review Update existing review
Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback.
Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch. ?3.25 (no rating) 0 reviews
BUY NOW Save for later ?3.25 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last updated 23
November 2023 Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share through linkedin Share
through facebook Share through pinterest Matthew O'Neil's Shop 4.19 16 reviews Not the right
resource. What is more? There is a function of zooming in the graph in the graphic calculator, which
makes it easier to find out the values that correct to 5 decimal places. Empty reply does not make any
sense for the end user Submit reply Cancel neokleousstavri 4 years ago report 5 Thank you Empty
reply does not make any sense for the end user Submit reply Cancel See more Report this resource to
let us know if it violates our terms and conditions. This process is then repeated on the new x values
until they converge on the root to the required level of accuracy. Care must be taken when choosing
a starting value and asymptotes can cause the method to fail. But among the three methods, I think
change of signs method should be chosen as the easiest and quickest one. See other similar resources
?3.25 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Not quite what you were looking for. This will
mean that the gradient function will equal to zero. After finding the roots, we can leave Autograph
and use Excel to proof the rest of the change of signs method. It is shown that the root lies between -
1.53407035 and -1.53407025. Also, if the too roots are too close together, we might miss the other
two a fter finding the first one. The reason is that it only involves a few calculations and it is easy to
calculate them. There isn’t any iteration and rearrangement involved in the formulae and it is very
easy to enter all the information into Excel. Therefore, we might miss the other two after finding the
first one. Also, using change of signs method with graphic can guarantee that the method should be
worked; it seems it takes a bit longer than other methods, though. Write a review Update existing
review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback. If I only had a scientific calculator,
Newton Raphson will be the fastest way to find the roots. This repeats until we find the root of the
equation, (when x value starts repeating or reached enough significant levels). For example sing the
same rearrangement of the equation to find the root between 5 and 6 using 5 as the starting point, the
iterations converge on the root between 1 and 2. However, if we do the integer search, we can only
get 1 change of sign. Otherwise, it is possible for us to miss the other roots. As a result of this no
change of sign will be found using the method above and so the root will not be found. Full
description Save Save C3 MEI A-level Maths Coursework For Later 100% 100% found this
document useful, Mark this document as useful 0% 0% found this document not useful, Mark this
document as not useful Embed Share Print Download now Jump to Page You are on page 1 of 18
Search inside document. However the need for much manual computation can make the process
quite laborious and time consuming. So I used the formula to work out the values in excel. Empty
reply does not make any sense for the end user Submit reply Cancel nishilamin1234 4 years ago
report 5 Found it well organised Empty reply does not make any sense for the end user Submit reply
Cancel pkempner 4 years ago report 5 Great resource on a topic that many students ignore. After 19
iterations, I found the root of the equation as from then on, it repeats. Join our team of reviewers
and help other students learn. Our customer service team will review your report and will be in
touch. ?7.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later ?7.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW
Save for later Last updated 17 January 2017 Share this Share through email Share through twitter
Share through linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest Tamaholic's Shop 4.75 4
reviews Not the right resource. Similarly to before, I used excel to work out the value of f(x).
Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch. ?7.00 (no rating) 0 reviews
BUY NOW Save for later ?7.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last updated 17
January 2017 Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share through linkedin Share
through facebook Share through pinterest Tamaholic's Shop 4.75 4 reviews Not the right resource. So
using the Re- arrangement method to solve f(x), I find that the root is - 1.961703555. This repeats
until we find the root of the equation, (when x value starts repeating or reached enough significant
levels). Some computer programs, such as Autograph, can carry out the iterations for you, which, if
they are available to you, can make it easier to use than a decimal search. But after the 4 th iteration,
we have reached a point where the x value started repeating due to the fact that this was to 4 decimal
places. So this means that there will be no sign changes resulting in the failure of the graph. Despite
this, it is a very effective method as failure chances are relatively very low and the root can be found
to many decimal places if the right software is used. Fg is denoted by h. Find h-1(x), where h-1 is the
inverse of h. Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch. ?3.25 (no
rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later ?3.25 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later
Last updated 23 November 2023 Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share through
linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest Matthew O'Neil's Shop 4.19 16 reviews
Not the right resource. Also, if the too roots are too close together, we might miss the other two a
fter finding the first one. This is the only hard part of the method as the iterative part of the method
is very simple with the use of the formula. When the line met the curve, a tangent is drawn and
extended until it meets the x-axis and it is a new point on the x-axis, called X 3, which is equal to -
3.5566. Full description Save Save C3 MEI A-level Maths Coursework For Later 100% 100% found
this document useful, Mark this document as useful 0% 0% found this document not useful, Mark
this document as not useful Embed Share Print Download now Jump to Page You are on page 1 of
18 Search inside document. In some cases you may not be able to differentiate f(x). What is more?
There is a function of zooming in the graph in the graphic calculator, which makes it easier to find
out the values that correct to 5 decimal places. Otherwise, it is possible for us to miss the other roots.
If so, I think that the decimal search will be the simplest way to find the roots. The reason is that it
only involves a few calculations and it is easy to calculate them. C3 Coursework - different methods
of solving equations. Looking at the graph you can see that the root is between -2 and -1. See other
similar resources ?0.00 4.50 24 reviews Download Save for later Not quite what you were looking
for. This process is then repeated on the new x values until they converge on the root to the required
level of accuracy. But with ever growing technology, there might already be software that solves the
roots of an equation after entering the formula in. The diagram above shows that the gradient of g(x)
is within this range at the root which is found. A decimal search, in contrast, just requires
calculations, which can easily be done using a computer. Both make good use of Autograph software
visually interpret equations before using an Excel spreadsheet to carry out the calculations to find
each root. Because of this it is the most difficult method to use, especially if you do not have
software to automate the iterations. To start the process, we have to select two points on the graph
visual basis. Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch. ?0.00 4.50 24
reviews Download Save for later ?0.00 4.50 24 reviews Download Save for later Last updated 16
January 2018 Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share through linkedin Share
through facebook Share through pinterest phildb 4.02 936 reviews Not the right resource. Also, using
change of signs method with graphic can guarantee that the method should be worked; it seems it
takes a bit longer than other methods, though.
I repeat this until I get down to increments the size of 0.00001. When the line met the curve, a
tangent is drawn and extended until it meets the x-axis and it is a new point on the x-axis, called X
4, which is equal to -3.5273. It’s very easy for us to use autograph and it just involves one step. If
that g’(x) 1, then we know that the function will not converge to the root but will diverge away. With
the use of AutoGraph Software, It is even easier as you don’t even have to work out the gradient
function. A decimal search, in contrast, just requires calculations, which can easily be done using a
computer. As a result of this no change of sign will be found using the method above and so the root
will not be found. Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave
some feedback. This resource hasn't been reviewed yet To ensure quality for our reviews, only
customers who have purchased this resource can review it Report this resource to let us know if it
violates our terms and conditions. All resources include detailed definitions, diagrams and activities.
?24.00 Reviews Select overall rating (no rating) Your rating is required to reflect your happiness. The
diagram above shows that the gradient of g(x) is within this range at the root which is found. But
among the three methods, I think change of signs method should be chosen as the easiest and
quickest one. Also, using change of signs method with graphic can guarantee that the method should
be worked; it seems it takes a bit longer than other methods, though. Otherwise, it is possible for us
to miss the other roots. Some methods give you the exact and precise answer but usually are harder
and more complex. If so, I think that the decimal search will be the simplest way to find the roots. If
we take a look at the Newton Raphson formula, it’s denominator is the gradient function of f(x).
Also, if the too roots are too close together, we might miss the other two a fter finding the first one.
The questions on proof are well organized but the solution sheet is not very clear. Writing the formula
in a cell and dragging it down so it is easier to calculate the y values for various points of x. Write a
review Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback. Care must be
taken when choosing a starting value and asymptotes can cause the method to fail. Because of this it
is the most difficult method to use, especially if you do not have software to automate the iterations.
This will mean that the gradient function will equal to zero. This makes it much easier than excel but
it is again less accurate as it only gives the root to 3 decimal places where as excel can be configured
to as many decimal places as needed. To start the process, we have to select two points on the graph
visual basis. Also, using change of signs method with graphic can guarantee that the method should
be worked; it seems it takes a bit longer than other methods, though. It must still be rearranged
manually though, and a large proportion of rearrangements fail. Our customer service team will
review your report and will be in touch. ?3.25 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later ?3.25
(no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last updated 23 November 2023 Share this Share
through email Share through twitter Share through linkedin Share through facebook Share through
pinterest Matthew O'Neil's Shop 4.19 16 reviews Not the right resource. But after the 4 th iteration,
we have reached a point where the x value started repeating due to the fact that this was to 4 decimal
places.