Writing a coursework, especially in a complex field like psychology, can be a challenging and time-

consuming task. Crafting a well-researched and insightful paper requires a deep understanding of the
topic, critical thinking skills, and the ability to communicate ideas effectively. The Matching
Hypothesis in psychology is no exception; it involves analyzing and synthesizing various theories and
empirical evidence to support or refute the hypothesis.

The Matching Hypothesis posits that people tend to form romantic relationships with individuals
who are similar to them in terms of physical attractiveness. To successfully address this topic in a
coursework, one needs to conduct thorough research, review relevant literature, and present a
coherent argument supported by empirical studies and theoretical frameworks.

Considering the complexities involved, it's not uncommon for students to seek assistance. ⇒
HelpWriting.net ⇔ is one such platform that offers professional writing services. They can provide
valuable support by assigning experienced writers who specialize in psychology to work on your
coursework. These writers are well-versed in the nuances of the subject and can ensure that your
coursework meets academic standards.

However, it's crucial to approach such services with caution. While they can be a helpful resource,
it's essential to maintain academic integrity and use the provided materials as a reference for your
own work. Collaborating with a writing service can be beneficial for understanding complex topics,
improving writing skills, and managing time effectively.

In conclusion, tackling a psychology coursework on the Matching Hypothesis can be challenging,

and seeking assistance from reputable services like ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ can be a viable option.
Remember to use the provided materials responsibly and always prioritize your own learning and
academic integrity.
In this investigation, the research will explore attractiveness, specifically the match hypothesis. For
example the more body language they have towards each other it increases the rate of attraction
between them. Due to the findings of this study we must reject the working hypothesis that there is
a relation of physical similarity between individuals engaged in a long term relationship. I expect to
find similar findings to those found by Murstein in the real couples being similar in physical
attractiveness. Remember none of the data I have collected can be traceable back to you, thank you
for taking part’. This was found true, although the results are not significant, the results obtained did
account for the research found in the introduction. I would also use more photos, to make it a more
specific test and also to make my results more significant to this area of psychology. By Robert Gray.
Talent Acquisition. Interview a lot of people. We then split the image of the couples so we ended up
with 10 males and 10 females. CHAPTER TOPICS. Intimacy in Close Relationships Communication
in Families Communication in Friendships Communication in Romantic Relationships Improving
Close Relationships. They found that physical attractiveness was the single biggest predictor of how
much each date had been liked by both male and the female participants. The place has to
comfortable with decent lighting and distraction free. Following this using certain dating websites
we collated images of 10 single men and 10 single women. The research obtained in this
investigation also found that couples are rated as having similar attractiveness. By striking a value
match, individuals seek the partner they believe to be the most realistically rewarding they could
hope to find (Thibaut and Kelly 1959; Berscheid and Walster 1978.) In some instances the reward
may be physical appearance, explaining the slight correlation found in the results, however
personality and social outlook tend to be viewed as stronger and often greater rewards. The
participants used were all of the same age range of 16-19 and were the students of the 6 th form in
the UK. The students filling out the questionnaires were under the assumption that the results from
their questionnaires would determine their ideal partner for the dance. For example, on photograph
2, 2 female participants number 19 rated the male as 7 however only rates the female 5, unlike most
female participants who consistently ranked the female higher than the male. Many researchers have
tested this theory: Walster (1966) used a “computer dance” as the basis for his research. We done
this until all the pictures were finished and were left with 10 randomly created couples from the 20
single males and females. A Replication of the Study by Murstein Investigating the Matching
Hypothesi. Cause and analysis was the appropriate method for this investigation as it provides
information on the strength of a relationship between specific variables. Aligning human resources
with current and future needs is a significant challenge for organizations. First they were told to fill
in a questionnaire, after which they were told that they had been allocated an ideal partner for the
evening of the dance. Next forms produced with the photos on the back of the score sheet, with a
rank of 1-10 (10 being the highest- most attractive, see appendix). They will be told at the start they
are free to stop participating and also withdraw their data at any time. Sociologists estimate that only
10% of today’s marriages in the world are truly monogamous. This would make both the bride and
the groom, however specially the bride, look more attractive. Berry and Miller (2001) found that
males rated physical attractiveness as the best predictor for higher quality interactions with woman,
while woman rated sociability as the most important factor for men. The critical value of rho at a 5%
level for a one tailed hypothesis with 10 pieces of data was 0.564. The observed value of rho for the
correlation of the real couples in my study was 0.327. This number was lower than the critical value
and as a result deemed insignificant.
The subjects participated in the study on a voluntary basis and were an opportunity sample. This
research does not support the research that suggests people in long-term relationships are of similar
levels of physical attractiveness. Investigating the validity of the matching hypothesis. The matching
hypothesis is a popular psychological theory proposed by Walster et al. 1966, on what causes people
to be attracted to their partners. The sample used was an opportunity as participants that were
available at the time in the shopping centre were used. In this investigation, the research will explore
attractiveness, specifically the match hypothesis. It claims that people are more likely to form long-
lasting relationships with people who are roughly equally as physically attractive as themselves. The
place has to comfortable with decent lighting and distraction free. We actively select people that will
provide positive and ongoing interactions. B. Ostracism: exclusion, by general consent, from social.
Also couple 5 with 200 points (second highest score) received 10 marks for the matching hypothesis
(second lowest). These findings show evident support for the matching hypothesis. During the
dance, participants were asked to rate their date. If the ratings are similar between real couples then
this would provide support for the matching hypothesis. All the photos used throughout the
procedure are obtained from articles from a local newspaper. This investigation is going to replicate
this study. These studies generally show that people rated as being of high, low or average
attractiveness tend to choose partners of a corresponding level of attractiveness. For example the
more body language they have towards each other it increases the rate of attraction between them. I
would use approximately 10 photos, as it would give an easy average to work with. This is because a
female who has wide hips has a good physique to bear and comfortably give birth to a child without
putting it at risk and thus passing on the males genes. What gets us together and then keeps us that
way. Love. What exactly is it. In conclusion the hypothesis of this experiment was rejected as results
were statistically infrequent, this shows from the results that there is in fact no similarities in levels of
physical appearance amongst couples in long term relationships. Are shaped by communication
Influence how we communicate Are fluid A process. The participants will then be presented with
forms like the record sheet (appendix). Couple number 3 who received an overall ranking of 119
(lowest ranking) received 20 points (highest possible score) for the matching hypothesis. My
investigation was looking into the attractiveness of couples and the matching hypothesis. As the
observed value is higher than the critical value, the alternative hypothesis is accepted, and the null
hypothesis is rejected. This major finding provides supporting evidence for Goffman’s Matching
hypothesis. In this investigation, the research will explore attractiveness, specifically the match
hypothesis. Each photograph was printed on a separate sheet of paper and divided into two groups
according to sex (see appendix C.) Paper and pens were used for the subjects to record their ranking
order of physical attractiveness for the male and female groups. A similar problem could occur with
females as they have been shown to be very critical and so females will only be rating the male
pictures.
For example the point circled in red represents couple G where the male received an average rating
of 2.4 and the female received an average rating of 5.0. The point circled in purple represents couple
J where the male received an average rating of 2.4 and the female received an average rating of 4.7.
These pictures were then divided into groups according to their sex and were ranked separately in
order of physical attractiveness by 40 independent judges (20 male and 20 female) aged 18-24. I
repeated this for the males and females in the real and fake couples. They were asked to rate the
physical attractiveness of the individuals on a scale of 1-10. However the correlation is not strong
enough to be considered significant. This is, a confounding variable, as she is perceived to look more
attractive than she actually is. After the dance the students were asked whether they liked their date
and whether they would go out with them again. If the participant does not wish to withdraw their
data then the interviewer should keep the questionnaire at the top of the pile of completed
questionnaires. People may rate attractiveness in a totally different way. However, the regression line
is not steep, indicating the relationship is weak. If the participant replies “yes” or any other similar
word then inform the participant of what they will need to do by saying, “could you please take a
moment of your time to complete this questionnaire”. In this investigation, the research will explore
attractiveness, specifically the match hypothesis. Therefore people go for people on the same level as
themselves. Next forms produced with the photos on the back of the score sheet, with a rank of 1-10
(10 being the highest- most attractive, see appendix). Method Participants The sample was composed
of 40 students from the University of Warwick, 20 males and 20 females, between 18 and 24 years
of age. This is because a female who has wide hips has a good physique to bear and comfortably
give birth to a child without putting it at risk and thus passing on the males genes. I decided to use it
as firstly it is appropriate to use if a hypothesis predicts a correlation between 2 variables which mine
does. If the ratings are similar between real couples then this would provide support for the matching
hypothesis. The industry experienced rapid growth in the 80’s with the introduction of IBM’s first
PC series and the entrance of many small companies. A type two error is when a null hypothesis is
reserved when it is actually wrong. This was found true, although the results are not significant, the
results obtained did account for the research found in the introduction. For this experiment to be
statistically significant the Rho had to be equal to or greater than 0.564. The Rho of this experiment
is 0.2727273 and so is statistically infrequent. This investigation is going to replicate this study. I
would conquer this by video taping a couple on their wedding day and ask participants to judge their
attractiveness by more factors than just physical attractiveness. In order to test this hypothesis an
opportunity sample was used at a local shopping centre where willing participants were given a
questionnaire which had 20 pictures of the opposite sex. Include romantic relationships, but also
friendships, working relationships, relationships with family members, etc. It also shows that the
matching hypothesis may be applied to long term relationships as stable relationships or engagements
signal a successful relationship. The life cycle of a relationship. Buildup. Deterioration and decline.
Attraction. Ending. Important variables influencing attraction. Debriefing the participants after the
study will also minimise any issues that arise. My hypothesis would be that the more attracted the
couples are to each other the longer their marriage would last.