20.9 Vinod Thomas 20 Sep - Financial and Market-Based Interventions Post-Glasgow
20.9 Vinod Thomas 20 Sep - Financial and Market-Based Interventions Post-Glasgow
20.9 Vinod Thomas 20 Sep - Financial and Market-Based Interventions Post-Glasgow
Interventions Post-Glasgow
Vinod Thomas
Former senior vice president, World Bank
September 20, 2023
Topics
1.Risk Finance
2.Carbon Pricing
3.Climate Finance
Risk Finance
Global Risk
Inter-
Connections
Disaster Phases and Resource Needs
Energy efficiency investment leading to lower energy bills and savings from less pollution.
Investment in flood resistant rice varieties, leading to stable rice production during floods.
Zoning and land use planning leading to lower death toll and damages during an earthquake.
6
Risk Transfer
https://www.casact.org/sites/default/files/presentation/reinsure_2015_presentations_c-12.pd
Singapore’s Coastal
Risk
• Most of Singapore being within 15 m above sea-level
and around 30% less than 5 m above.
• The minimum land reclamation level was raised from
3-4 metres above sea-level.
• 70% of Singapore's coastline is protected from erosion
by concrete seawalls and stone revetments.
• The rest of the coast consists beaches and mangroves.
• Frontload the proposed $100 billion investment over
50-100 years to guard coastlines.
• Expand renewable energy, and phase out fossil fuels,
95% of energy needs.
Carbon Pricing
Emission
Pricing
• A carbon tax sets a price on carbon by defining a tax rate on GHG emissions, or
on the carbon content of fossil fuels.
• More than 40 countries, including Singapore, have adopted carbon taxes, but at
different stages and varying rates, from Japan’s S$3.50/ton to Sweden’s
S$184/ton.
• A carbon tax policy can raise sizable revenues, which can be used for green
investments.
• Since 2008 BC has applied a carbon tax on 70% of GHGs, which is estimated to
have “significantly reduced” the emissions.
Singapore’s Priority for a Carbon Tax
The world needs to simultaneously tackle the COVID-19 and climate crises. The pandemic has highlighted that the old
normal was deeply fragile and dangerous.
The language of the climate accords starting with COP16 makes it clear that the $100 billion may include finance from
public and private sources.
Climate finance counting towards the $100 billion had been on an upward trajectory, but still falling short of the $100
billion per year ..the only realistic scenarios are those in which the $100 billion target is not reached in 2020.
Starting with the $100 billion per year by 2020, the whole climate finance system must scale up, urgently. A step change is
needed.
By one estimate, averted global indemnities could be $150 trillion to $792 trillion by 2100, or upwards
of four times the investment. Health benefits alone could exceed investment costs 1.5-2.5 times.
The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimated, a decade ago, that the capital required to meet
energy demand through 2030 in a non-carbon constrained world would amount to $1.1 trillion a
year. A more recent figure for needed capital investment for a low carbon economy would be $2.4
trillion a year through 2035.
Southeast Asia has seen how the needed resilience to pathogens varies widely in
resources, capacities, and strategies. Compare a SEA country with another country
faced with a new outbreak in 2025 on these questions.
• What is the best approach once a pandemic has started in coordination,
awareness, public health messaging, quarantine, reduction of transmission, and
care for the ill?
• What is the role of contingency planning and response, and surge capacity?
• Would you invite external financing and technology?
• Are there risk transfer mechanisms not considered thus far?