Writing coursework, especially for subjects like GCSE Geography, can be a challenging task that

requires a significant amount of time, research, and dedication. Students are often faced with the
responsibility of conducting thorough investigations, collecting and analyzing data, and presenting
their findings in a coherent and well-structured manner. Moreover, the coursework demands a deep
understanding of the subject matter and adherence to specific guidelines and formatting.

The process involves extensive research, data collection through fieldwork, and the application of
analytical skills to interpret the gathered information. Furthermore, the need for accurate citation and
referencing adds another layer of complexity to the task. Managing all these aspects while meeting
deadlines can be overwhelming for many students.

Considering the difficulties associated with coursework, some individuals may find it beneficial to
seek assistance. Platforms like ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ can offer support by providing expert writers
who are well-versed in the subject matter and experienced in crafting high-quality coursework. These
services can help alleviate the stress and pressure associated with coursework writing, ensuring that
students receive well-researched, well-written, and properly formatted assignments.

However, it's important for students to use such services responsibly and ethically. Seeking
assistance should be seen as a supplementary resource for understanding the topic better, rather than
a shortcut to avoid the learning process. Students should actively engage in the research and writing
process to gain a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter.

In conclusion, writing GCSE Geography coursework can be a daunting task, and seeking assistance
from platforms like ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ may provide valuable support for those who find it
challenging. Nevertheless, it's crucial for students to approach such services responsibly and use them
as tools for learning and improvement.
The introduction and the methodology were then written about the background of. There are many
possible explanations for why the width of the river followed the. Organic Geochemical Studies Of
Cretaceous Source Rocks Of. Accessibility of land was a human limitation because part of the river
was blocked. We had to measure the long axis of the pebble to see if this was true. Another
explanation of why the width readings were not as the hypothesis had. The third reading we took
was the wetted perimeter. Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch.
?1.99 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later ?1.99 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save
for later Last updated 7 February 2024 Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share
through linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest Outstanding Geography Resources
5.00 30 reviews Not the right resource. Another human limitation was that we could have taken ten
measurements for every. I studied this for Edexcel, and a colleague studied it for AQA. The depth
increases until plot 3, until plot 4 where there is a decrease. The width. For this hypothesis I believe
that my methods were very good, and not much could be done to improve them. See individual
resources for a more detailed breakdown. ?9.99 Reviews Select overall rating (no rating) Your rating
is required to reflect your happiness. However Rivers are slower flowing downstream, which
transfers less energy, in relation to load sizes. It was hard to get an exact depth reading because the
water was always moving. This. This meant that the width of the river was expected to. The depth
stayed the same at readings 1 and 2 and was 0.105m. It then increased. The width of a river channel
increases as it goes downstream because tributaries and. These all led me into producing a good
piece of coursework. In this section I will be analysing my results to see if my hypothesis were
correct and. Marl. Overall, visually, my hypothesis, that the width will increase as you go from. One
of these changes is that I would have taken ten depth readings at each site rather. As the River
Holford flows along its course, tributaries. Depth (m) 3 0.014 0.005 0.074 0.11 0.14 0.064 0.119
0.195. Reading 2 was the lowest measurment that was taken and was 0.0102m. This may. In the
higher profile of the river mainly vertical erosiontakes place. My results were affected because the
above factors denied the reading from being accurate and in some cases gave a false result for
velocity. In Kilve the channel has been altered by man making them more. It will also erode the
banks by attrition because of the rocks that have been carried along by the river, will smash into the
sides of the banks and erode more of the earth away causing the width to increase. Wetted Perimeter
(m) 0.74 2.4 2.48 2.08 2 3.13 2.84 2.92.
Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch. ?1.89 (no rating) 0 reviews
BUY NOW Save for later ?1.89 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last updated 9
January 2021 Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share through linkedin Share
through facebook Share through pinterest Freyab15's Shop 3.67 5 reviews Not the right resource.
Site 4 was near an urban area, (Holford), which meant that there was concrete and. These will be the
width of the river channel, the average depth. The depth then increased until plot 5, (where the water
was at its deepest), and then. If there was a lot of rain or no rain at all, then this factor would. In my
introduction I will be talking about where in the UK the River Holford is. Graphs to show the depth
of the river along all eight sites. Depth (m) 4 0.001 0.036 0.082 0.105 0.17 0.091 0.127 0.183. My
evaluation for measuring cross-section area is shown on page.. This shows all of the problems with
my methods, and how they could have been fixed, and they all are applicable here. This is the
equation to work out Spearman’s Rank Correlation. River Holford which were the width, the depth
and the gradient. One reason why the depth increased at some sites and then decreased at others
was. This resource includes front cover template and contents page, introduction, 3x annotated maps,
key terms and definitions, the sequence of investigation, detailed data collection (methodology)
including primary and secondary data types, data presentation through the use of graphs and charts,
2x essays - analysis and interpretation and evaluation of controlled assessment. Another explanation
of why the width readings were not as the hypothesis had. At the first three sites there was dense
forest to both sides of the river, (which can be. One explanation of why the width decreased at some
sites but then unexpectedly. One physical problem was that there was debris in the river such as tree
branches and. The shape of the pebbles was measured using a power scale of roundness. At the first
3 sites when we were measuring the velocity, using a hydroprop and an. In the lower course of the
river there is lateral erosionwhich. Also, when the pebbles are very small, this method is crude. I
ensured that the metre rule was perpendicular to the riverbed, and that it was pushed in sideways, so
as not to create a large amount of resistance from the water. At site 5 the five readings taken across
the width of the channel were quite varied. However, at site 4, the width decreased by 1.38m from
the previous site. At Site 4 the average depth was 0.093m which was larger then at the previous site.
Gradient 0.086 0.034 0.021 0.008 0.029 0.021 0.021 0.006. As the river was small, this would have
affected my hypotheses. Reading 1 was the shallowest depth and was 0.037m. The depth then
increased by. Measurements 1 and 2 are the same at 0.015m and this was correct because the.
Hypothesis 1- The width of the river will increase as you move from the source to.
There were many problems that we encountered on our river study. So the anomaly that I got from
my results may have been due to deposition on the river bend or the banks of the river may have
started to draw into each other. My hypothesis would have been answered correctly, and may well
have given me a different outcome. To measure the size of the bedload, callipers were used to
measure the length, width and height of the pebbles. Clast Shape - Enter the number of each shape
found at each site. Hypothesis 1 was rejectedwhen it came to assessing the data using Spearman’s
rank. Employment figures show that 15% of the people living in Somerset work in the hotel. Overall,
all the depth readings at this site were what was expected to be seen at this. All raw data that was
collectedis in the appendix on page 59. I could have actually measured the wetted perimeter for
example. I ensured that the metre rule was perpendicular to the riverbed, and that it was pushed in
sideways, so as not to create a large amount of resistance from the water. However, as a large
quantity of pebbles was measured, mistakes could have been made in the writing down of the
number or the category which the pebble falls into. At site 5 the cross sectional area was 0.18216 m2
which was lower than the previous. I wish you guys luck and hope you get brilliant marks (I hope I
do too:P). The depth then increased until plot 5, (where the water was at its deepest), and then.
Quantock Hills. It is also home to Exmoor National park which is known for its. At site 2 the cross
sectional area was 0.28035 m2 which was higher than at the. Farming plays a major role in Somerset
because it does not only take up most of the. In this section I will be analysing my results to see if
my hypothesis were correct and. Hypothesis 1- The width of the river will increase as you move
from the source to. The exam paper also helps you to identify topics and skills where your students
could benefit from further learning or revision. Hypothesis 1 was rejectedwhen it came to assessing
the data using Spearman’s rank. My hypothesis’ account for many of the key river features like the
depth, velocity, width etc, making it all possible of investigating at Loughton Brook. However there
were inconsistencies at each site, and sometimes access to the water was limited and this could not
happen. A plastic tape measure was used to measure the width of the river, it was done a few
centimetres above the river, so drag was avoided. Limestone is well jointed which means that the
rock has vertical and horizontal. I would make if I were going to undertake this river study again.
Gradient along the eight sites of the river Holford. Below is how we found r2 using the Spearman’s
rank equation. Also, as I did not do a pilot study, and only measured the river once in the summer,
my results and conclusions could be affected.
There had been little rain in Somerset before we went on our river study. This meant. These are the
different factors that we sampled and how many we chose to sample at. Some readings were
defaulted at 100 seconds because at some sites, the water was too. Quantock Hills. It is also home to
Exmoor National park which is known for its. However, as a large quantity of pebbles was
measured, mistakes could have been made in the writing down of the number or the category which
the pebble falls into. Depth (m) 4 0.001 0.036 0.082 0.105 0.17 0.091 0.127 0.183. The resource
includes important information that is laid out in an intelligible and straightforward manner,
compiled from all of my class and textbook notes. The width of a river channel increases as it goes
downstream because tributaries and. Also, as I did not do a pilot study, and only measured the river
once in the summer, my results and conclusions could be affected. Gradient 0.086 0.034 0.021 0.008
0.029 0.021 0.021 0.006. I chose to investigate this river study over our four day field trip to
Somerset in order. This is the equation to work out Spearman’s Rank Correlation. The exam paper
also helps you to identify topics and skills where your students could benefit from further learning or
revision. Conclusions could be wrong in that Loughton Brook is small, therefore changes in rivers
features are less apparent, the cause of slightly inaccurate results. The beaker is not very precise, it
does not measure to a great deal of detail, and more than one small pebble can accidentally be placed
in the beaker. First, 15 clasts were picked up from the river bed at random, with our eyes closed so.
The resources have also proven extremely useful in A Level Geography, where a quick refresher is
needed or simply a simple explanation of a concept, as much of the content overlaps. Site 4 was near
an urban area, (Holford), which meant that there was concrete and. When all the data was
collectedand put into graphs. After finding the results from the Spearman’s rank, a significance test
will be used to. I have more on the others (except Tourism, Managing Resources and Industry's
being done now) which I'll put up for you to help you revise. The third reading we took was the
wetted perimeter. The gradient decreased from source to mouth and this can be seen in this scatter.
Hypothesis 1 was rejectedwhen it came to assessing the data using Spearman’s rank. Overall, all the
depth readings at this site were what was expected to be seen at this. Spearman’s Rank correlation
must be undertaken to see the strength of this. Depth (m) 3 0.014 0.005 0.074 0.11 0.14 0.064 0.119
0.195. Depth from source to mouth along the River Holford (m). As you can see on the land use map
on page 6 the River Holford flows through urban. Geography Field Study River Investigation
Coursework.