Writing coursework, especially on a specific topic like Edexcel GCSE Statistics, can be a challenging

task. It requires a deep understanding of the subject matter, the ability to analyze data, and effective
communication skills. Students often face difficulties in collecting and interpreting data, conducting
statistical analysis, and presenting their findings in a coherent and structured manner.

Edexcel GCSE Statistics coursework exemplar requires attention to detail, adherence to guidelines,
and the application of statistical concepts. It involves a combination of mathematical skills, data
interpretation, and critical thinking. Additionally, meeting deadlines and managing time effectively
can add to the stress of coursework completion.

While the challenges are significant, seeking help from external sources like ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔
can be a viable option for students looking to alleviate some of the burdens associated with
coursework. Professional writing services can provide assistance with research, data analysis, and the
overall structure of the coursework, ensuring that the final piece meets the necessary standards and
requirements.

If you find yourself struggling with the complexity of the Edexcel GCSE Statistics coursework
exemplar or facing time constraints, ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ might be a helpful resource to consider.
However, it's essential to approach such services with caution, ensuring that the assistance received
aligns with ethical guidelines and the academic integrity of your institution. Always prioritize
learning and understanding the subject matter while seeking external support to enhance your
academic experience.
The tallest male is 1.83M and the tallest female is 1.72M, demonstrating the fact that males do
eventually grow taller than females. It was decided not to keep these as it would give 4 anomalies so
I removed them from the list. Adobe Express Go from Adobe Express creation to Issuu publication.
Articles Get discovered by sharing your best content as bite-sized articles. Males will, however,
eventually grow taller and so in years 10-11 it can be assumed the number of males taller than
females will be greater; this can be proven by looking at the tallest of each sex. I will ignore these
rows, as they may be genuine errors, to increase the precision and accuracy of my investigation. The
only problems I can oversee are those which are included in the secondary data. Specifically, the box
plots should hopefully show me any miss calculations, outliers or anonymous results within the data
provided. This may be attributable to not involving external factors which may have influenced the
results, and overall the correlation, of these two scatter graphs, for example the dietary habits or
quantity of exercise that the students do. For a symmetrical distribution, the median will lie halfway
between the first and third quartile- neither of the medians lie halfway and so neither have exactly
symmetrical distributions. The smaller the inter-quartile range, the more consistent the data is. The
height and weight of a person is affected by their age and gender. I will use continuous qualitative
data for height and weight because they can both be measured and can be any value within a given
range. I see no enemy to a fortunate issue but in the brow; and that brow. Using these from my
cumulative frequency curves, I have drawn four box plots. The tallest male is 1.83M and the tallest
female is 1.72M, demonstrating the fact that males do eventually grow taller than females. Earlier I
mentioned that in years 7-9 females will generally be taller than males- this is because females tend
to grow faster than males during the early stages of development. I will ignore these rows, as they
may be genuine errors, to increase the precision and accuracy of my investigation. The more
calculations used will, in my opinion, enhance the reliability and understanding of the investigation
and results, I will calculate the distribution, standard deviation and variance. I will then calculate the
cumulative frequency of the data, and from this produce two cumulative frequency graphs which
will allow me to make a direct comparison between the heights and weights of males and females.
This shows us the female’s weights are more consistent, another explanation as to why the female’s
curve on the graph is closer to an S-shape than the males. As both boxes are of equal size both
distributions are equally U-shaped. This may be attributable to not involving external factors which
may have influenced the results, and overall the correlation, of these two scatter graphs, for example
the dietary habits or quantity of exercise that the students do. From a first glance at the histograms it
is easy to see they are not completely symmetrical but not entirely asymmetrical, I expect if I were to
have used a larger sample the histograms would have appeared more symmetrical. As I did not collect
the statistics myself, I am left unaware as to whether or not they are reliable. As well as this, it is
more specific than using a census- I collected my data by using systematic sampling. A thin box
relative to the whiskers indicates that a very high number of cases are contained within a very small
segment of the sample indicating a distribution with a thinner peak whereas a wider box is indicative
of a wider peak and so, the wider the box, the more U-shaped the distribution becomes. That year
seven girls will weigh less year eight girls 7. Next I will draw my normal distribution curve and I will
also calculate the standard deviation of the data to find the measure of spread and dispersal of the
data set. Perhaps this is because my sample size was simply not large enough or there is in fact no
correlation between height and weight.
The unreliability of the data can be proven by looking at these; many values are missing and in some
cases there appears to be two people with the same name. The unreliability of the data can be proven
by looking at these; many values are missing and in some cases there appears to be two people with
the same name. The advantage of the inter-quartile range over the standard deviation, however, is
that the inter-quartile range includes half of the points regardless of the shape of the distribution. For
example, if I had chosen to look at eye colour and hair colour my analysis would be limited and
therefore my investigation may be imprecise. Video Say more by seamlessly including video within
your publication. The tallest male is 1.83M and the tallest female is 1.72M, demonstrating the fact
that males do eventually grow taller than females. As both boxes are of equal size both distributions
are equally U-shaped. The only problems I can oversee are those which are included in the secondary
data. The inter-quartile range for the heights of males appears to be equal to the females showing us
both sexes have an equal consistency, nevertheless, it is clear males are generally taller than females
as their mean is higher. It will also allow me to calculate the median, upper quartile, lower quartile
and inter-quartile range which will lead me to drawing box plots which will assist me in spotting any
outliers or miscalculations and help me to assess the spread of data. I assumed that in years 7-9 girls
will generally be taller than boys- due to the fact girls tend to grow faster than boys during the early
stages of development. Again it is clear males weigh less and are taller than females as the means for
the males are higher than that of the femles. I will also calculate Spearman’s rank correlation
coefficient, which will allow me to discover easily the strength of correlation within the data, and
whether the correlation is positive or negative, or if there is any correlation whatsoever. As I did not
collect the statistics myself, I am left unaware as to whether or not they are reliable. Males Graph 1
Graph 2 This graph shows slight positive correlation. The medians lie at the same point- 1.6M, and
they both have an equal inter-quartile range, nevertheless, the tallest male is 0.5M taller than the
tallest female. As for the weight, boys are generally heavier than girls; this is due to their body
structure. The height and weight of a person is affected by their age and gender. The highest value
for females is 70KG (ignoring the outlier) and for males: 75KG, the median for the males’ weight is
5KG higher than that of the females. If the box is shifted significantly to the low end, it is positively
skewed; if the box is shifted significantly to the high end, it is negatively skewed, however, none of
the four box plots are shifted significantly to either the high end or the low end. Sampling,
Cumulative Frequency, Box Plots, Histograms. Each PowerPoint is a full lesson including starter,
examples, questions and plenary. I will use stratified sampling to choose the amount of data for each
strata because it is representative of the whole population. Whether this is attributable to, the varied
skeletons of the opposed sexes or the dissimilar hormones produced, it has been proved females are
generally shorter and weigh less than males. Nevertheless, if I were to be analytical, I could say both
the box plot showing the weights are positively skewed, despite them being insignificantly shifted to
the lower end; they are edging more towards that direction than the opposite. The lowest value which
appears on the box plot for males is 30KG and the highest is 75KG, giving us a range of 45KG.
More Features Connections Canva Create professional content with Canva, including presentations,
catalogs, and more. This resource hasn't been reviewed yet To ensure quality for our reviews, only
customers who have downloaded this resource can review it Report this resource to let us know if it
violates our terms and conditions. That year eight girls will weigh less year nine girls 9. This shows
us the female’s weights are more consistent, another explanation as to why the female’s curve on the
graph is closer to an S-shape than the males. As well as this, it is more specific than using a census- I
collected my data by using systematic sampling.
These will allow me to assess the consistency and dependability of my results and spot any
anomalous results. It will also achieve greater precision than, for example, random sampling;
therefore because it provides greater precision, a stratified sample often requires a smaller sample,
which will avert wasting unnecessary time. I will ignore these rows, as they may be genuine errors,
to increase the precision and accuracy of my investigation. I will then calculate the cumulative
frequency of the data, and from this produce two cumulative frequency graphs which will allow me
to make a direct comparison between the heights and weights of males and females. Males will,
however, eventually grow taller and so in years 10-11 it can be assumed the number of males taller
than females will be greater; this can be proven by looking at the tallest of each sex. Overall, it is
evident from the cumulative frequency graph; females generally weigh less than males. I will also
calculate Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, which will allow me to discover easily the strength
of correlation within the data, and whether the correlation is positive or negative, or if there is any
correlation whatsoever. I will take a stratified sample of males and females in this age range. In
addition the sampler has created a person in each set of data twice. I hope they will show me the
overall trend of the relationship between weight and height. Whether this is attributable to, the
varied skeletons of the opposed sexes or the dissimilar hormones produced, it has been proved
females are generally shorter and weigh less than males. The medians lie at the same point- 1.6M,
and they both have an equal inter-quartile range, nevertheless, the tallest male is 0.5M taller than the
tallest female. Social Posts Create on-brand social posts and Articles in minutes. Help Center Here
you'll find an answer to your question. Fullscreen Sharing Deliver a distraction-free reading
experience with a simple link. Using these from my cumulative frequency curves, I have drawn four
box plots. The only problems I can oversee are those which are included in the secondary data. See
other similar resources ?0.00 (no rating) 0 reviews Download Save for later Not quite what you were
looking for. I will also calculate Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, which will allow me to
discover easily the strength of correlation within the data, and whether the correlation is positive or
negative, or if there is any correlation whatsoever. Embed Host your publication on your website or
blog with just a few clicks. The unreliability of the data can be proven by looking at these; many
values are missing and in some cases there appears to be two people with the same name. The only
problems I can oversee are those which are included in the secondary data. The tallest male is 1.83M
and the tallest female is 1.72M, demonstrating the fact that males do eventually grow taller than
females. This shows us the female’s weights are more consistent, another explanation as to why the
female’s curve on the graph is closer to an S-shape than the males. It was decided not to keep these as
it would give 4 anomalies so I removed them from the list. So in order for parents to prepare their
children to meet term paper writer discount code international standards. I am hoping that they will
show me for the females the height and weight are more negatively skewed than that of the males’,
showing that most of the data are smaller values, proving females generally weigh less and are
shorter than males. I will investigate the data in my sample and the graphs, stating whether it
supported my hypotheses or not. Perhaps this is because my sample size was simply not large enough
or there is in fact no correlation between height and weight. Three revision exercises, featuring past
exam questions, consolidate learning on groups of topics.