Writing a coursework, especially in a complex subject like C3 Maths from the MEI syllabus, can

indeed be quite challenging. It demands a deep understanding of mathematical concepts, proficiency

For those finding themselves overwhelmed or struggling to meet these demands, seeking assistance
can be a prudent choice. ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ is a reliable platform that offers professional writing
services, including coursework assistance. Their team comprises experts well-versed in various
subjects, including mathematics, ensuring that your C3 Maths coursework is handled with
competence and precision.

By entrusting your coursework to ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔, you can alleviate the stress associated
with academic assignments and gain access to quality work that meets academic standards. Plus,
their service can save you time and effort, allowing you to focus on other important tasks or subjects.

However, it's important to remember that while seeking help is beneficial, it's essential to use such
services responsibly and ethically. Collaboration with professionals can supplement your learning
process, but it's crucial to engage with the material and understand the concepts being covered.
Ultimately, ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ can be a valuable resource for students seeking support with
their C3 Maths coursework or any other academic endeavors.
As a result of this no change of sign will be found using the method above and so the root will not be
found. Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office:
Imperial House, 2nd Floor, 40-42 Queens Road, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 3XB. Second was the
Decimal Search, which took five iterations and last was the Rearrangement Method, which took the
most number of iterations, 6. Anyone else? Being expelled lnat results thread 2024 I need to make a
business portfolio but I've never done business before Law Offer 2024 Paramedic Science
Applicants 2024 Bsc accounting and finance Do I still have a chance for dentistry. With the use of
AutoGraph Software, It is even easier as you don’t even have to work out the gradient function. To
do this, we need to find the gradient at that point. But whichever bit of software you use, it is hands
down the easier way of finding the roots of an equation. It must still be rearranged manually though,
and a large proportion of rearrangements fail. It was not hard to use but tricky, due to the different
options available. With the use of excel, it can be really easy to work out the values of y when you
sub in the x values. This makes it much easier than excel but it is again less accurate as it only gives
the root to 3 decimal places where as excel can be configured to as many decimal places as needed.
So using the Re- arrangement method to solve f(x), I find that the root is - 1.961703555. Because of
this it is the most difficult method to use, especially if you do not have software to automate the
iterations. Some methods give you the exact and precise answer but usually are harder and more
complex. But with ever growing technology, there might already be software that solves the roots of
an equation after entering the formula in. Full description Save Save C3 MEI A-level Maths
Coursework For Later 100% 100% found this document useful, Mark this document as useful 0%
0% found this document not useful, Mark this document as not useful Embed Share Print Download
now Jump to Page You are on page 1 of 18 Search inside document. So when I substitute the
incremented values of x between -10 and 0 into the equation, I get the following results. The
iterations are also wrong as they diverge away from the point as well. This is because the tangent
crosses the asymptote, as shown below. So this means that there will be no sign changes resulting in
the failure of the graph. Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn. Out of the three,
some are faster at converging to the root that others and some are easier to use than others, especially
with the recent technology made available to everyone. Also, the formula is iterative, therefore, it is
not very time consuming. If that g’(x) 1, then we know that the function will not converge to the root
but will diverge away. Both make good use of Autograph software visually interpret equations
before using an Excel spreadsheet to carry out the calculations to find each root. Looking at the
graph you can see that the root is between -2 and -1. However, this method is best done on a
spreadsheet, where you would be able to spot the sign change easily. In some cases you may not be
able to differentiate f(x). Taking x 0 as the first guess at the root, the tangent to the curve at (x 0,f(x
0 )) crosses the x axis at x 1, the second guess.
Regarding the speed the convergence, this is by far the fastest to converge to the root and it is also
the method which fails the least out of the three different methods. For example sing the same
rearrangement of the equation to find the root between 5 and 6 using 5 as the starting point, the
iterations converge on the root between 1 and 2. Each boundary is tested for sign change which
indicates that a root exists between them. The fact that the solution lies between -3 and -4 can also
be seen in the graph. Writing the formula in a cell and dragging it down so it is easier to calculate the
y values for various points of x. Some computer programs, such as Autograph, can carry out the
iterations for you, which, if they are available to you, can make it easier to use than a decimal search.
The x where the sign change occurs in now the new boundaries and tested for sign change again.
Some methods give you the exact and precise answer but usually are harder and more complex.
Taking x 0 as the first guess at the root, the tangent to the curve at (x 0,f(x 0 )) crosses the x axis at x
1, the second guess. However, this method is best done on a spreadsheet, where you would be able
to spot the sign change easily. This makes it much easier than excel but it is again less accurate as it
only gives the root to 3 decimal places where as excel can be configured to as many decimal places
as needed. But whichever bit of software you use, it is hands down the easier way of finding the
roots of an equation. This is the only hard part of the method as the iterative part of the method is
very simple with the use of the formula. To start the process, we have to select two points on the
graph visual basis. So the only human interaction needed is to look at the results and manually
looking at between which two points (limits) there is a sign change and then setting the new limits as
such. The downside of the method is that it is the most likely method of all three to fail as there is
always a chance that when you rearrange an equation and start the iterative process, it will not
converge to the root but it will diverge away. Report this Document Download now Save Save C3
MEI A-level Maths Coursework For Later 100% (1) 100% found this document useful (1 vote) 2K
views 18 pages C3 MEI A-Level Maths Coursework Uploaded by Maurice Yap AI-enhanced title
Coursework on the use of numerical methods. Then we look at where the tangent crosses the X axis
and that value will be the new x value on the graph for a tangent. However the need for much
manual computation can make the process quite laborious and time consuming. Also, the formula is
iterative, therefore, it is not very time consuming. Using Autograph is much, much simpler as you
have the ability to zoom in on the point where the signs change, i.e. the point on the X-axis, and can
do so to many places. Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn. With the use of
excel, it is every easy to write down the formula of the method in one cell and dragging it down as
many cells as you wish to (the number of iterations) and it is very easy to use. The Newton-Raphson
method was the quickest, finding the root within a certain degree of accuracy in only three iterations.
As the function f(x) is continuous, a change of sign will always indicate a root. This process is then
repeated on the new x values until they converge on the root to the required level of accuracy. If that
g’(x) 1, then we know that the function will not converge to the root but will diverge away. This
method is slightly complex even on easy formulas, but when we get really complicated when harder
formulas are introduced. But with ever growing technology, there might already be software that
solves the roots of an equation after entering the formula in. But after the 4 th iteration, we have
reached a point where the x value started repeating due to the fact that this was to 4 decimal places.
For example sing the same rearrangement of the equation to find the root between 5 and 6 using 5 as
the starting point, the iterations converge on the root between 1 and 2. This is not accurate enough as
I want it to be to 5 decimal places. With the use of excel, it can be really easy to work out the values
of y when you sub in the x values. This makes it even easier than excel but it is less accurate as it
only gives the root to 3 decimal places where as excel can be configured to as many decimal places
as needed. The fact that the solution lies between -3 and -4 can also be seen in the graph. It was not
hard to use but tricky, due to the different options available. Most of the mistakes are made in this
stage by humans. Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn. This makes it very easy to
work out the repetitive part of the method and makes the speed of convergence much faster. With
the use of excel, it is every easy to write down the formula of the method in one cell and dragging it
down as many cells as you wish to (the number of iterations) and it is very easy to use. It must still
be rearranged manually though, and a large proportion of rearrangements fail. After 19 iterations, I
found the root of the equation as from then on, it repeats. I can only obtain an approximation of the
solution as it is impossible or hard to find the exact value of the function. Out of the three, some are
faster at converging to the root that others and some are easier to use than others, especially with the
recent technology made available to everyone. This makes it much easier than excel but it is again
less accurate as it only gives the root to 3 decimal places where as excel can be configured to as
many decimal places as needed. This process is then repeated on the new x values until they
converge on the root to the required level of accuracy. As the function f(x) is continuous, a change of
sign will always indicate a root. But whichever bit of software you use, it is hands down the easier
way of finding the roots of an equation. Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No.
806 8067 22 Registered Office: Imperial House, 2nd Floor, 40-42 Queens Road, Brighton, East
Sussex, BN1 3XB. So when I substitute the incremented values of x between -10 and 0 into the
equation, I get the following results. This is because the tangent crosses the asymptote, as shown
below. Each boundary is tested for sign change which indicates that a root exists between them.
Regarding the speed the convergence, this is by far the fastest to converge to the root and it is also
the method which fails the least out of the three different methods. If that g’(x) 1, then we know that
the function will not converge to the root but will diverge away. So the only human interaction
needed is to look at the results and manually looking at between which two points (limits) there is a
sign change and then setting the new limits as such. The value of g(x) at this point is then taken as
the next guess and this process is repeated to converge on the root. The x where the sign change
occurs in now the new boundaries and tested for sign change again. Full description Save Save C3
MEI A-level Maths Coursework For Later 100% 100% found this document useful, Mark this
document as useful 0% 0% found this document not useful, Mark this document as not useful
Embed Share Print Download now Jump to Page You are on page 1 of 18 Search inside document. It
is shown that the root lies between -1.53407035 and -1.53407025. So this means that there will be no
sign changes resulting in the failure of the graph.
This is the only hard part of the method as the iterative part of the method is very simple with the use
of the formula. With the use of AutoGraph Software, It is even easier as you don’t even have to work
out the gradient function. But whichever bit of software you use, it is hands down the easier way of
finding the roots of an equation. With the use of excel, it can be really easy to work out the values of
y when you sub in the x values. Full description Save Save C3 MEI A-level Maths Coursework For
Later 100% 100% found this document useful, Mark this document as useful 0% 0% found this
document not useful, Mark this document as not useful Embed Share Print Download now Jump to
Page You are on page 1 of 18 Search inside document. Regarding the speed the convergence, this is
by far the fastest to converge to the root and it is also the method which fails the least out of the
three different methods. Anyone else? Being expelled lnat results thread 2024 I need to make a
business portfolio but I've never done business before Law Offer 2024 Paramedic Science
Applicants 2024 Bsc accounting and finance Do I still have a chance for dentistry. A decimal search,
in contrast, just requires calculations, which can easily be done using a computer. However the need
for much manual computation can make the process quite laborious and time consuming. As a result
of this no change of sign will be found using the method above and so the root will not be found.
Second was the Decimal Search, which took five iterations and last was the Rearrangement Method,
which took the most number of iterations, 6. In some cases you may not be able to differentiate f(x).
The diagram above shows that the gradient of g(x) is within this range at the root which is found.
Some methods give you the exact and precise answer but usually are harder and more complex. The
downside of the method is that it is the most likely method of all three to fail as there is always a
chance that when you rearrange an equation and start the iterative process, it will not converge to the
root but it will diverge away. Some computer programs, such as Autograph, can carry out the
iterations for you, which, if they are available to you, can make it easier to use than a decimal search.
So this means that there will be no sign changes resulting in the failure of the graph. To work out X 1
I will use the formula above to work out X 1 in steps and will repeat it to find a root to 5d.p and
summarise in a table. But regarding the speed of convergence, this is relatively low as it is not
completely automated and requires human interaction after each set of results and is very repetitive.
However, this method is very tiresome to calculate by hand and the tiniest mistake can result in a
wrong answer. This makes it much easier than excel but it is again less accurate as it only gives the
root to 3 decimal places where as excel can be configured to as many decimal places as needed.
However, this method is best done on a spreadsheet, where you would be able to spot the sign
change easily. Looking at the graph you can see that the root is between -2 and -1. But with ever
growing technology, there might already be software that solves the roots of an equation after
entering the formula in. As the function f(x) is continuous, a change of sign will always indicate a
root. Upload Read for free FAQ and support Language (EN) Sign in Skip carousel Carousel
Previous Carousel Next What is Scribd. But with Computers being able to do even that, it makes it
even easier to use it. Each boundary is tested for sign change which indicates that a root exists
between them. Then we look at where the tangent crosses the X axis and that value will be the new x
value on the graph for a tangent. The x where the sign change occurs in now the new boundaries and
tested for sign change again.
Then we look at where the tangent crosses the X axis and that value will be the new x value on the
graph for a tangent. Both make good use of Autograph software visually interpret equations before
using an Excel spreadsheet to carry out the calculations to find each root. A decimal search, in
contrast, just requires calculations, which can easily be done using a computer. The downside of the
method is that it is the most likely method of all three to fail as there is always a chance that when
you rearrange an equation and start the iterative process, it will not converge to the root but it will
diverge away. With the use of AutoGraph Software, It is even easier as you don’t even have to work
out the gradient function. The diagram above shows that the gradient of g(x) is within this range at
the root which is found. Show 10 more Latest imperial clearing Experian Graduate Scheme 2024
Wanting to study neuroscience at postgrad Cambridge postgraduate application: Decision pending -
application is under review Girls Vs. This will mean that the gradient function will equal to zero.
Taking x 0 as the first guess at the root, the tangent to the curve at (x 0,f(x 0 )) crosses the x axis at x
1, the second guess. However, this method is best done on a spreadsheet, where you would be able
to spot the sign change easily. The x where the sign change occurs in now the new boundaries and
tested for sign change again. This makes it even easier than excel but it is less accurate as it only
gives the root to 3 decimal places where as excel can be configured to as many decimal places as
needed. This makes it much easier than excel but it is again less accurate as it only gives the root to 3
decimal places where as excel can be configured to as many decimal places as needed. But
whichever bit of software you use, it is hands down the easier way of finding the roots of an
equation. Also, the formula is iterative, therefore, it is not very time consuming. This is because the
tangent crosses the asymptote, as shown below. I am going to use the inbuilt function in AutoGraph
to work it out initially and then I will use Excel to work the root out to more decimal places. Full
description Save Save C3 MEI A-level Maths Coursework For Later 100% 100% found this
document useful, Mark this document as useful 0% 0% found this document not useful, Mark this
document as not useful Embed Share Print Download now Jump to Page You are on page 1 of 18
Search inside document. This shows that generally the Newton-Raphson method has a much quicker
speed of convergence than the other two methods. As a result of this no change of sign will be
found using the method above and so the root will not be found. As for the speed of convergence, it
would be slower that Newton Raphson because of the extra time needed to re-arrange the equation
but it is faster than Decimal search. The value of g(x) at this point is then taken as the next guess and
this process is repeated to converge on the root. Out of the three, some are faster at converging to the
root that others and some are easier to use than others, especially with the recent technology made
available to everyone. This process is then repeated on the new x values until they converge on the
root to the required level of accuracy. Some methods give you the exact and precise answer but
usually are harder and more complex. Similarly to before, I used excel to work out the value of f(x).
It was not hard to use but tricky, due to the different options available. If that g’(x) 1, then we know
that the function will not converge to the root but will diverge away. However the need for much
manual computation can make the process quite laborious and time consuming. Compared to the
change of sign method both are generally more easy to use as once the initial formula has been
entered it is very quick and simple to do the iterations many times.
With the use of excel, it can be really easy to work out the values of y when you sub in the x values.
This is the only hard part of the method as the iterative part of the method is very simple with the use
of the formula. Using Autograph is much, much simpler as you have the ability to zoom in on the
point where the signs change, i.e. the point on the X-axis, and can do so to many places. Out of the
three, some are faster at converging to the root that others and some are easier to use than others,
especially with the recent technology made available to everyone. If the gradient function is zero,
that will mean that the denominator is 0 and that is an impossible fraction. It was not hard to use but
tricky, due to the different options available. This is because the tangent crosses the asymptote, as
shown below. The Decimal search method enables you to get a very close approximate to the real
solution but more easily. I can only obtain an approximation of the solution as it is impossible or hard
to find the exact value of the function. But whichever bit of software you use, it is hands down the
easier way of finding the roots of an equation. Second was the Decimal Search, which took five
iterations and last was the Rearrangement Method, which took the most number of iterations, 6. It is
shown that the root lies between -1.53407035 and -1.53407025. However the need for much manual
computation can make the process quite laborious and time consuming. Register Number: 04666380
(England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: Imperial House, 2nd Floor, 40-42
Queens Road, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 3XB. This was often very time-consuming and
frustrating as simple mistakes could let to the wrong route. But with ever growing technology, there
might already be software that solves the roots of an equation after entering the formula in. So the
only human interaction needed is to look at the results and manually looking at between which two
points (limits) there is a sign change and then setting the new limits as such. With the use of excel, it
is every easy to write down the formula of the method in one cell and dragging it down as many cells
as you wish to (the number of iterations) and it is very easy to use. The value of g'(x) at this point is
far greater than 1, so the iterations do not converge. For example sing the same rearrangement of the
equation to find the root between 5 and 6 using 5 as the starting point, the iterations converge on the
root between 1 and 2. This repeats until we find the root of the equation, (when x value starts
repeating or reached enough significant levels). Taking x 0 as the first guess at the root, the tangent
to the curve at (x 0,f(x 0 )) crosses the x axis at x 1, the second guess. As a result of this no change
of sign will be found using the method above and so the root will not be found. A decimal search, in
contrast, just requires calculations, which can easily be done using a computer. However, this method
is best done on a spreadsheet, where you would be able to spot the sign change easily. Then we look
at where the tangent crosses the X axis and that value will be the new x value on the graph for a
tangent. To work out X 1 I will use the formula above to work out X 1 in steps and will repeat it to
find a root to 5d.p and summarise in a table. Similarly to before, I used excel to work out the value
of f(x). So this means that there will be no sign changes resulting in the failure of the graph. If we
take a look at the Newton Raphson formula, it’s denominator is the gradient function of f(x).
But with ever growing technology, there might already be software that solves the roots of an
equation after entering the formula in. If that g’(x) 1, then we know that the function will not
converge to the root but will diverge away. Report this Document Download now Save Save C3
MEI A-level Maths Coursework For Later 100% (1) 100% found this document useful (1 vote) 2K
views 18 pages C3 MEI A-Level Maths Coursework Uploaded by Maurice Yap AI-enhanced title
Coursework on the use of numerical methods. But whichever bit of software you use, it is hands
down the easier way of finding the roots of an equation. This makes it particularly useful if computer
software is not available. To do this, we need to find the gradient at that point. Each boundary is
tested for sign change which indicates that a root exists between them. But with Computers being
able to do even that, it makes it even easier to use it. Writing the formula in a cell and dragging it
down so it is easier to calculate the y values for various points of x. Anyone else? Being expelled lnat
results thread 2024 I need to make a business portfolio but I've never done business before Law
Offer 2024 Paramedic Science Applicants 2024 Bsc accounting and finance Do I still have a chance
for dentistry. The fact that the solution lies between -3 and -4 can also be seen in the graph. If we
take a look at the Newton Raphson formula, it’s denominator is the gradient function of f(x). The
Newton-Raphson method was the quickest, finding the root within a certain degree of accuracy in
only three iterations. With the use of excel, it can be really easy to work out the values of y when you
sub in the x values. Then we look at where the tangent crosses the X axis and that value will be the
new x value on the graph for a tangent. With the use of excel, it is every easy to write down the
formula of the method in one cell and dragging it down as many cells as you wish to (the number of
iterations) and it is very easy to use. This makes it even easier than excel but it is less accurate as it
only gives the root to 3 decimal places where as excel can be configured to as many decimal places
as needed. So using the Re- arrangement method to solve f(x), I find that the root is - 1.961703555.
However, this method is best done on a spreadsheet, where you would be able to spot the sign
change easily. If the gradient function is zero, that will mean that the denominator is 0 and that is an
impossible fraction. In some cases you may not be able to differentiate f(x). But regarding the speed
of convergence, this is relatively low as it is not completely automated and requires human
interaction after each set of results and is very repetitive. The Decimal search method enables you to
get a very close approximate to the real solution but more easily. I am going to use the inbuilt
function in AutoGraph to work it out initially and then I will use Excel to work the root out to more
decimal places. As a result of this no change of sign will be found using the method above and so the
root will not be found. Both make good use of Autograph software visually interpret equations
before using an Excel spreadsheet to carry out the calculations to find each root. Here the root had
been found to 5 significant figures. Regarding the speed the convergence, this is by far the fastest to
converge to the root and it is also the method which fails the least out of the three different methods.
This process is then repeated on the new x values until they converge on the root to the required level
of accuracy.