ELASTICITY 1 Variable
ELASTICITY 1 Variable
1
Rn+1 (x) = f (n+1) (c)(x − a)n+1 (c is between x and a) (7)
(n + 1)!
It is easy to show that (7) follows from (1) and (2) by considering the function g defined by
g(t) = f (a + t) when t is close to 0.
(a) Find the Taylor polynomial of g(x) of order 2 about the origin.
Essential Math. for Econ. Analysis, 4th edn EME4_C07.TEX, 16 May 2012, 14:24 Page 228
SECTION 7.7 / WHY ECONOMISTS USE ELASTICITIES 229
this way will be independent of the units in which both quantities and prices are measured.
This number is called the price elasticity of demand, measured at a given price.
In 1960, the price elasticity of butter in a certain country was estimated to be −1. This
means that an increase of 1% in the price would lead to a decrease of 1% in the demand,
if all the other factors that influence the demand remained constant. The price elasticity
for potatoes was estimated to be −0.2. What is the interpretation? Why do you think the
absolute value of this elasticity is so much less than that for butter?
Assume now that the demand for a commodity can be described by the function
x = D(p)
of the price p. When the price changes from p to p + %p, the quantity demanded, x, also
changes. The absolute change in x is %x = D(p + %p) − D(p), and the relative (or
proportional) change is
%x D(p + %p) − D(p)
=
x D(p)
The ratio between the relative change in the quantity demanded and the relative change in
the price is
,
%x %p p %x p D(p + %p) − D(p)
= = (∗)
x p x %p D(p) %p
When %p = p/100 so that p increases by 1%, then (∗) becomes (%x/x) · 100, which is
the percentage change in the quantity demanded. We call the proportion in (∗) the average
elasticity of x in the interval [p, p + %p]. Observe that the number defined in (∗) depends
both on the price change %p and on the price p, but is unit-free. Thus, it makes no difference
whether the quantity is measured in tons, kilograms, or pounds, or whether the price is
measured in dollars, pounds, or euros.
We would like to define the elasticity of D at p so that it does not depend on the size of
the increase in p. We can do this if D is a differentiable function of p. For then it is natural
to define the elasticity of D w.r.t. p as the limit of the ratio in (∗) as %p tends to 0. Because
the Newton quotient [D(p + %p) − D(p)]/%p tends to D ′ (p) as %p tends to 0, we obtain:
p dD(p)
The elasticity of D(p) with respect to p is
D(p) dp
Usually, we get a good approximation to the elasticity by letting %p/p = 1/100 = 1% and
computing p %x/(x %p).
Essential Math. for Econ. Analysis, 4th edn EME4_C07.TEX, 16 May 2012, 14:24 Page 229
230 CHAPTER 7 / DERIVATIVES IN USE
x
Elx f (x) = f ′ (x) (elasticity of f w.r.t. x) (1)
f (x)
EXAMPLE 1 Find the elasticity of f (x) = Ax b (A and b are constants, with A ̸ = 0).
Solution: In this case, f ′ (x) = Abx b−1 . Hence, Elx Ax b = (x/Ax b )Abx b−1 = b, so
The elasticity of the power function Ax b w.r.t. x is simply the exponent b. So this function
has constant elasticity. In fact, it is the only type of function which has constant elasticity.
This is shown in Problem 9.9.6.
D(p) = 8000p−1.5
Compute the elasticity of D(p) and find the exact percentage change in quantity demanded
when the price increases by 1% from p = 4.
Solution: Using (2) we find that Elp D(p) = −1.5, so that an increase in the price of 1%
causes quantity demanded to decrease by about 1.5%.
In this case we can compute the decrease in demand exactly. When the price is 4, the
quantity demanded is D(4) = 8000 · 4−1.5 = 1000. If the price p = 4 is increased by 1%,
the new price will be 4 + 4/100 = 4.04, so that the change in demand is
EXAMPLE 3 Let D(P ) denote the demand function for a product. By selling D(P ) units at price P ,
the producer earns revenue R(P ) given by R(P ) = P D(P ). The elasticity of R(P ) w.r.t.
P is
P d 1
ElP R(P ) = [P D(P )] = [D(P ) + P D ′ (P )] = 1 + ElP D(P )
P D(P ) dP D(P )
Observe that if ElP D(P ) = −1, then ElP R(P ) = 0. Thus, when the price elasticity of the
demand at a point is equal to −1, a small price change will have (almost) no influence on
the revenue. More generally, the marginal revenue dR/dP generated by a price change is
positive if the price elasticity of demand is greater than −1, and negative if the elasticity is
less than −1.
Essential Math. for Econ. Analysis, 4th edn EME4_C07.TEX, 16 May 2012, 14:24 Page 230
SECTION 7.7 / WHY ECONOMISTS USE ELASTICITIES 231
NOTE 1
• If |Elx f (x)| > 1, then f is elastic at x.
• If |Elx f (x)| = 1, then f is unit elastic at x.
• If |Elx f (x)| < 1, then f is inelastic at x.
• If |Elx f (x)| = 0, then f is perfectly inelastic at x.
• If |Elx f (x)| = ∞, then f is perfectly elastic at x.
NOTE 2 If y = f (x) has an inverse function x = g(y), then Theorem 7.3.1 implies that
y ′ f (x) 1 1
Ely (g(y)) = g (y) = = (3)
g(y) x f ′ (x) Elx f (x)
1
Ely x = (4)
Elx y
There are some rules for elasticities of sums, products, quotients, and composite functions
that are occasionally useful. You might like to derive these rules by solving Problem 9.
as in Example 1. Taking the natural logarithm of each side of (5) while applying the rules
for logarithms, we find that (5) is equivalent to the equation
ln y = ln A + b ln x (6)
From (6), we see that ln y is a linear function of ln x, and so we say that (6) is a log-linear
relation between x and y. The transformation from (5) to (6) is often seen in economic
models, sometimes using logarithms to a base other than e.
For the function defined by (5), we know from Example 1 that Elx y = b. So from (6)
we see that Elx y is equal to the (double) logarithmic derivative d ln y/d ln x, which is the
constant slope of this log-linear relationship.
This example illustrates the general rule that elasticities are equal to such logarithmic
derivatives. In fact, whenever x and y are both positive variables, with y a differentiable
function of x, a proof based on repeatedly applying the chain rule shows that
x dy d ln y
Elx y = = (7)
y dx d ln x
Essential Math. for Econ. Analysis, 4th edn EME4_C07.TEX, 16 May 2012, 14:24 Page 231
232 CHAPTER 7 / DERIVATIVES IN USE
2. A study in transport economics uses the relation T = 0.4K 1.06 , where K is expenditure on
building roads, and T is a measure of traffic volume. Find the elasticity of T w.r.t. K. In this
model, if expenditure increases by 1%, by what percentage (approximately) does traffic volume
increase?
3. (a) A study of Norway’s State Railways revealed that, for rides up to 60 km, the price elasticity
of the volume of passenger demand was approximately −0.4. According to this study, what
is the consequence of a 10% increase in fares?
(b) The corresponding elasticity for journeys over 300 km was calculated to be approximately
−0.9. Can you think of a reason why this elasticity is larger in absolute value than the
previous one ?
4. Use definition (1) to find Elx y for the following (a and p are constants):
(a) y = eax (b) y = ln x (c) y = x p eax (d) y = x p ln x
6. The demand D for apples in the US as a function of income r for the period 1927 to 1941 was
estimated as D = Ar 1.23 , where A is a constant. Find and interpret the elasticity of D w.r.t. r.
(This elasticity is called the income elasticity of demand, or the Engel elasticity.)
7. Voorhees and colleagues studied the transportation systems in 37 American cities and estimated
the average travel time to work, m (in minutes), as a function of the number of inhabitants, N.
They found that m = e−0.02 N 0.19 . Write the relation in log-linear form. What is the value of m
when N = 480 000?
8. Show that
! "
Elx Af (x) = Elx f (x) (multiplicative constants vanish)
! " f (x) Elx f (x)
Elx A + f (x) = (additive constants remain)
A + f (x)
HARDER PROBLEMS
⊂⊃ 9.
SM Prove that if f and g are positive-valued differentiable functions of x and A is a constant, then
the following rules hold (where we write, for instance, Elx f instead of Elx f (x)).
(a) Elx A = 0 (b) Elx (f g) = Elx f + Elx g
% &
f f Elx f + g Elx g
(c) Elx = Elx f − Elx g (d) Elx (f + g) =
g f +g
f Elx f − g Elx g ! "
(e) Elx (f − g) = (f) Elx f g(x) = Elu f (u)Elx u (u = g(x))
f −g
Essential Math. for Econ. Analysis, 4th edn EME4_C07.TEX, 16 May 2012, 14:24 Page 232