BD-I, Mr. Daniel IMRTI Assignment

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Mennonite Brethren Centenary Bible College

Shamshabad, Hyderabad
Topic: Psychological Approach.
Subject: Introduction to Major religious Tradition in India.
Submitted to: Dr. R.N.Peter Sir.
Submitted by: Mr. Daniel.
Class: BD-I Date of Submission: 29th January 2024

Introduction
Psychological approach to the study of religion is also an important understanding of religion
perspective, because this method is widely differ from other methods of study. For instance,
through the historical method, researchers try to find out facts of human history and of nature
science are quite different from the facts of religion. The facts of religion signify the human the
consciousness of knowing, feeling and willing which in turn are the elements of psychology. In
order to understand the facts of religion, one needs the help of psychology.
1. Understating of Psychological approach:
The realm of religious experience and practice is known one fundamental
psychological importance. As the psychologists who in order to understand human
beings, take into account the religious dimension, so also the religious scholars should
recognize the influence of the pysche’s structure and dynamics. Since the events of
religion are experienced by the human consciousness and building up such events is the
human mind or soul, psychology plays a significant role, giving the explanation of the
religious activities. It deals with the emotional experience of the primordial human kind.
It gives great weight to unconscious attitudes said to underlie the outward expressions of
religion.
Thus in the psychological approach of study, the area of investigation will be
primarily the mental states, motivation and attitudes found in religious context. From the
beginning, the psychology of religions has been said to employ two basic methods: “the
observation of religious individuals and the study of traditional content from the history
of religion.” The first concern is given greater emphasis, though the two points are
closely related.
Psychological approach presumes that the psychological method can be
universally applied to the phenomena of religiosity, as humans are human everywhere. It
is believed that psychological theories based on the evidence of Western case studies can
easily be applied in non- Western context. This presumption is questionable.
According to Eric J Lott, the psychologists generally have preference for the extreme
cases in their investigation of emotional experiences. They argue that the clearest clues to the
real life of human psyche is seen when the restraints of usual social convention are removed.
Although psychological method is frequently confined to one or other cultural context, yet,
general conclusion is drawn from such limited date, assuming human psyche is same
anywhere.
2. Scholars view of Psychology approach:
The greatest impact on the development of psychology has been studied by
Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) and Carl Jung (1875-1961) Sigmund Freud interpreted
religion primarily as “a neurotic solution feelings of infantile dependency”. Studying the
psychology of children, of youth and of the parents, he tried to find out how to
relationships could be maintained and kept to each other in terms of religion.
Religion, for him, is two things only: a set of dogmatic and unchangeable beliefs,
above all beliefs in a father, God who is loved out of rigidly prescribed ritual. And feared,
and the unreflective carrying out of ri In other words, religious beliefs and practices are
rooted in the fears and wishes of childhood, foremost being those that constitute the
Oedipus complex that influences the son in regard to his mother. There is a projection
into the external world of the father-son relationship of life, thereby creating a
supernatural world.
Carl Jung disagreed with Freud’s interpretation of religion and argued that a
human being tries to find “meaning” in his/her life, which often is expressed in a
religious form. He says that religion is an essential psychological function that one should
not neglect. There is a deeper lying region called the collective unconscious, beneath the
personal unconscious and out of its depths arise the myths and symbols that constitute the
various religious traditions. He says that over millennia of time, the repetition of
experiences has formed the structural elements of the collective unconscious,.
Conclusion
Can psychologists fully understand another person’s religious experience? Careful
observation, experimental manipulation, and cautious interpretation have nevertheless
made it possible to gain some understanding of the lives of these subjects. But these
techniques may not be equally suitable for the study of different religious experiences. It
may be that the psychologists comprehend certain forms of religious experience, but
there could be other forms of religious experience, which lie beyond the grasp of the
psychological approach.
Bibliography
Lalrinawma, V.S. Major Faith Tradition in India. Delhi: ISPCK, 2007.

You might also like