st

ICFAI VIRTUAL NATIONAL

9th - 10th February , 2024

Education Partner

Knowledge Partner Media Partner

 Invitation Letter

ICFAI Law School, The ICFAI University, Dehradun is pleased to

announce its 1st Virtual National Mediation Competition to be held from
9th February-10th February 2024. This competition is organized in
synchronization with the vision and objective of The ICFAI University i.e.
acquiring domain knowledge, developing professional skills, and its
application in the practical world. With participants from across the
country, this event aims to foster a culture of peaceful resolution and
enhance students' understanding of Alternative Dispute Resolution
methods. The competition will not only test participants' mediation
techniques but also provide a valuable learning experience, promoting the
significance of mediation in today's legal landscape. With immense
pleasure, we take this opportunity to invite your esteemed organization to
participate in the Mediation Competition actively. We solicit your presence
in our competition by sending a team and enhancing the process. A copy
of detailed rules and regulations is attached herewith for your kind
reference.
It would be an honor to have participation from your esteemed institute.
We are thanking you in anticipation.
We are looking forward to your engagement in the event.

Thanking you,
With warm regards
ICFAI Law School, The ICFAI University, Dehradun
 About The University
The ICFAI University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand (hereinafter referred to as
the University) was established under The ICFAI University Act 2003 (Act
No.16 of 2003) passed by the Uttaranchal Legislative Assembly and assented
to by the Governor on July 08, 2003.

The ICFAI University secured 44th rank in the World Universities with Real
Impact (WURI) Rankings 2020 released by United Nations Institute for
Training and Research. ICFAI is the only non-governmental institution
among two Indian Universities in this list. The University has also been
awarded the certificate for E-Learning Excellence of Academic Digitization
(e-LEAD).

About ICFAI Law School, Dehradun

The ICFAI Law School (formerly known as Faculty of Law), a constituent of
the ICFAI University, Dehradun, is established to develop a new generation
of legal professionals through the comprehensive and contemporary body of
knowledge integrating law with Management/Humanities. The Bar Council
of India has accorded its approval for imparting three-year and five-year Law
Courses at ICFAI University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, and awards degrees
in law. The ICFAI Law School, Dehradun offers B.B.A. LL.B. (Hons.),
LL.B. and B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) integrated five-year courses, One Year LL.M
in Corporate, Constitution law, Cyber law and PhD full-time and part-time
programs.

The ICFAI Law School, Dehradun held the 1st Rank in the Category of
“Top Law School in the State of Uttarakhand” by CSR-GHRDC Law
Schools Survey 2022. It also secured 1st position in Uttarakhand & 13th
among Top Law Colleges (Pvt.) in India -IIRF. The ICFAI Law School,
Dehradun ranked 11th, by India Today under the category Best College in
North India- Law MDRA Best Colleges Survey- 2021.
 About CEADRL

The Centre for Excellence in Alternative Dispute Resolution Law (CEADRL)

has been instituted within the framework of ICFAI Law School, The ICFAI
University, Dehradun, in the year 2021. Under the guidance of Associate
Professor Dr. Susanta Shadangi, Assistant professor Ms. Monika Kothiyal,
serving as Faculty Convenors and Placement Cordinatore Mr. Diwakar Das
as Faculty Co-Convenor, the centre adheres to the university's guidelines and
regulations. Dedicated to fostering education on Alternative Dispute
Resolution Laws (ADR) , the center emphasizes a comprehensive, research-
driven exploration of this field.

The logo of the Centre bears the Sanskrit phrase वक्छ्यामी ते हितम, taken from
bhagwat Gita translates to "I speak for your benefit." This encapsulates the
core ethos of the Centre, emphasizing its commitment to resolving disputes
with a focus on the well-being and interests of all parties involved.
Committed to the convergence of academia and expert perspectives, the
centre is poised to embark on innovative projects that showcase the
intersection of theory and practice in ADR. Through advocacy, research
initiatives, and policy-oriented discussions, the centre seeks to facilitate a
nuanced understanding of ADR law, providing a platform for individuals to
enhance their knowledge in this dynamic legal domain. The centre envisions
becoming a hub for fostering excellence in ADR, promoting informed
discourse and contributing to the broader legal landscape.
The Centre For Excellence Alternative Dispute Resolution Law (CEADRL)
is a dynamic and proactive student body comprising enthusiastic and
committed students from B.B.A./B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) programme , dedicated
to promoting peaceful conflict resolution within the academic environment.
 Organizing Committee

Patron-in-Chief: Prof. (Dr.) Ram Karan Singh, Patron: Dr. Ramesh Chand Ramola ,
Vice Chancellor, The ICFAI University, Dehradun Registrar, The ICFAI University, Dehradun

Prof. (Dr.) Tapan Chandola Dr. Monica Kharola

Dean, ICFAI Law School, Dehradun Associate Dean, ICFAI Law School, Dehradun

Dr. Susanta Shadangi Ms. Monika Kothiyal Mr. Diwakar Das

Associate Professor Assistant Professor Placement Cordinatore
Convenor Convenor Co-Convenor
 Our Collaborations

Knowledge Partner

MediateGuru is a social initiative led by members across the globe. The aim
of the organization is to build a bridge using which more law students can be
encouraged to opt for ADR methods. MediateGuru is creating a social
awareness campaign for showcasing mediation as a future of alternative
dispute resolution to provide ease to the judiciary by encouraging and
empowering Law Professionals to take up the mantle of Mediation.

Education Partner

Weवाद is an Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Institution which helps

parties with time bound, cost effective and confidential dispute resolution
through institutional arbitration, institutional mediation and institutional
conciliation. Expert facilitation, secure communication & user-friendly
interface for fair resolutions.

Knowledge Partner
Aditya Aryan is a hardcore Mediation enthusiast, he is also associated with
various leading and eminent organizations promoting and working in the field
of Mediation in different capacities. We appreciate his support and insights
provided by him for this competition.
 Objective Of The Competition
ICFAI Law School, The ICFAI University Dehradun is going to conduct its
1st Virtual National Mediation Competition to encourage the budding
lawyers to understand the rising need for Alternative Dispute Resolution
mechanisms like mediation.

Mediation is where a neutral third party, known as a mediator, assists the

parties in resolving their conflicts. A mediator is a bridge for conflicting
parties to meet in the middle by facilitating communication, identifying
issues, and guiding parties toward a mutually acceptable solution. The
objectives of a mediation competition are multifaceted, encompassing skills
development, education, promotion of ADR, networking, cultural
advancement, standardization, recognition, and public awareness. These
goals collectively contribute to the growth and acceptance of alternative
dispute resolution mechanisms in the legal landscape.

Through this competition, The Centre of Excellence in Alternative Dispute

Resolution Law (CEADRL) aims at promoting a much achievable choice to
resolve the issues of families and preparing future lawyers with the skills
required for them to be active cog to smooth functioning of justice in our
society.
 Definitions
1. “Breakout Rooms” refers to the virtual sub-meeting rooms on the
designated virtual platforms (as agreed by the organizing committee) that
are used for the main rounds, confidential information distribution, and
caucus breakout sessions.

2. “Caucus” refers to a confidential, private meeting held by the mediator

with the individual parties to discuss options with the intent to find a
resolution.

3. “Competition” refers to the 1st Virtual national mediation competition.

4. “Competition Problems” pertains to the problem framed by the organising

committee to be used throughout the competition, in the competition
sessions/rounds.

5. “Confidential Information” pertains to the essential key points provided to

the participating teams concerning the party they represent and is
confidential.

6. “Main Round” refers to the phase of the Competition Session instantly

pursuing the Confidential Information Session, where the Teams are
commissioned to reconcile the Competition Problem.

7. “Mediation” refers to the process where a neutral person assists the parties
who help them mitigate their dispute and reach a mutually agreed outcome
through negotiations.

8.“Mediation Session” refers to the scheduled period during which the

mediation process takes place, including any caucus.

9. “Negotiating Team” pertains to a team comprising two participants - one

Counsel and one Client - from the same institution.
 Definitions
10. “Oral Rounds” refers to the team's pleadings in the mediation session.

11. “Organizing Committee” refers to the CEADRL members and the

faculty in charge of the centre.

12. “Penalty” refers to actions taken by the Organizing Committee

(CEADRL) in response to violations of competition rules, which may
include point deductions, participant disqualification, or any other
disciplinary measures.

13. “Preliminary Rounds” refer to the initial oral rounds which will
determine the scores and ranks of the participants for further rounds.

14. “Room Coordinator” refers to an individual or individuals appointed by

the Organizing Committee to oversee the smooth operation of a specific
Competition Room, ensuring adherence to the rules and addressing any
issues that arise.

15. “Rule” pertains to a special individual regulation in this Rulebook, along

with the sub-rules/ suggests thereunder. The Participants are considered to
understand and submit these regulations on the report of their enrollment in
the Competition.

16. “Scouting” refers to the participating teams observing the sessions of

other teams.

17. ''Speaker'' refers to the participant who presents oral arguments in

rounds of the competition.
 Eligibility
Only bonafide students pursuing Law three/five-year degree programs in the
Law Colleges/Universities recognized by the Bar Council of India are eligible
to participate.

Registration Process

There shall be no registration fee for the competition.

Participants are required to fill out the google form. To finalize the
registration NOC (No Objection Certificate) issued by the relevant authority
of the respective college of the participant shall be submitted within 72 hours
of provisional registration through mail to [email protected].
The NOC shall include the names of the members of the participating team. .

The last date for registration is 28/ 01/ 2024.

Registration form : Link
 Team Composition
Each participating team shall consist of 3 members and all the team members
shall be from the same institute. No Cross Institutional Team is allowed to
take part in the competition. Only ONE Team from a college can represent
the college and participate in the competition.
A Team shall comprise a Mediator and a Mediating Pair; the Mediating Pair
shall consist of a Counsel and a Client.
After Final registration is over, no team shall be allowed to change their
composition and roles in any of the rounds. If any issue occurs regarding the
same, the Organizing Team shall have the discretion to adjudicate upon the
same.

Note: The members' roles shall not be changed throughout the competition. No
team shall be accompanied by a coach or an instructor.

Language
The official language of the competition is English and shall be strictly
followed.

Dress Code
All the participants are required to adhere to the formal style of dressing i.e.
The participants must adhere to standards of conduct and dress as high as
those required of a lawyer engaged in the practice of law in India.
For Gentlemen - Business Formals (White formal shirt with black formal
pants + black blazer + Tie)
For Ladies - Formals (White formal shirt with black formal pants/black
formal skirt and a black blazer).
 Structure Of The Competition

All participating Teams shall compete in the preliminary round.

Based on the score, the top 8 teams and the top 8 mediators will qualify
for the quarter-final round.
This round will not be a knockout round.
The total time for the preliminary round will be 40 minutes, including 10
minutes of the caucus session and 30 minutes of the mediation session.
To avoid conflict of interest, the organizing committee will shuffle the
mediators and ensure that the mediating team and mediator are not
from the same institution.
Participating teams will be informed of the team they would be
competing against, venue room link and details, confidential
information (CI), and the side they will be representing via mail 1 hour
prior to the round.
In the venue room, participants are expected to follow the code of
conduct throughout the competition.
In times of dispute, the decision of the organizing committee will be
considered final.
 Structure Of The Competition

The top 8 teams qualifying in the preliminary round will be competing in

this round
This round will be a knockout round.
A total of 4 teams will qualify for the semi-final round.
The total time for the quarter-final round will be 45 minutes which is
inclusive of 10 minutes of caucus session and 35 minutes of mediation
session.
To avoid conflict of interest, the organizing committee will shuffle the
mediators and ensure that the mediating team and mediator are not from
the same institution.
Participating teams will be informed of the team they would be competing
against, venue room link and details, confidential information (CI), and
the side they will be representing via mail 1 hour prior to the round.
In the venue room, participants are expected to follow the code of conduct
throughout the competition.
In times of dispute, the decision of the organizing committee will be
considered final.
 Structure Of The Competition

The top 4 Teams qualifying from the Quarter-Finals Round will be

competing in thisround will be a knockout round.
A total of 2 teams will qualify for the final round.
The total time for the semi-final round will be 55 minutes which is
inclusive of 15 minutes of caucus session and 40 minutes of mediation
session.
To avoid conflict of interest, the organizing committee will shuffle the
mediators and ensure that the mediating team and mediator are not
from the same institution.
Participating teams will be informed of the team they would be
competing against, venue room link and details, confidential
information (CI), and the side they will be representing via mail 1 hour
prior to the round.
In the venue room, participants are expected to follow the code of
conduct throughout the competition.
In times of dispute, the decision of the organizing committee will be
considered final.
 Structure Of The Competition

Top 2 Teams qualifying from the Semi-Final Round will be competing

in this round.
This round will be a knockout round.
The total time for the final round will be 60 minutes which is inclusive of
15 minutes of caucus session and 45 minutes of mediation session.
Participating teams will be informed of the team they would be
competing against, venue room link and details, confidential
information (CI), and the side they will be representing via mail 1 hour
prior to the round.
In the venue room, participants are expected to follow the code of
conduct throughout the competition
In times of dispute, the decision of the organizing committee will be
considered the final
 Code Of Conduct
The Participating Teams should mention only their allotted Team Codes for
communication with Judges/Organizers. The identity of the Participating
Team or Members or the name of their College/University shall not be
disclosed to any other person during the Competition in any form, whether
directly or indirectly. Disclosure of identity shall lead to immediate
disqualification.
In addition to the above rule, sporting any visible or distinguishable
badges/card/ uniform by any participant that provides an opportunity to
infer/disclose their identity or the identity of the Law College/University
being represented, is strictly forbidden. Any violation shall lead to immediate
disqualification.
The Organizing Committee reserves the right to disqualify any team for
misconduct during the competition. In case of conflict, the decision of the
Organizing Committee shall be final.

General Rules & Regulations

Mediation Problem: The problem for the Preliminary Round, Quarter Final round,
Semi-Final, and Final Round shall be different. The problem for Quarter Final,
Semi-Final and Final Round shall be released 1 week prior of the competition and
the participating teams will be informed of the problem via mail.
The problem for the Preliminary Round has been provided below. (pg.24 & pg.25)
Problem Interpretation: Teams are required to base their strategies solely on
the information provided in the Competition Problem. Negotiating Teams
and Mediators are prohibited from introducing new facts or modifying
existing ones within the Competition Problem. However, they are permitted
to draw reasonable conclusions from the given facts. Deviating from a
sensible interpretation of the case may lead to penalties. Should there be any
uncertainties or questions about the interpretation of any aspect of the
competition, the decision of the organizing committee shall be considered
final and binding. The Organizing Committee retains exclusive authority
over all matters related to the competition’s problems.
 Confidential Information
Confidential information specific to each team will be provided 1 hour
before each competition round through email. Along with the confidential
information teams will be intimated of the sides they will be representing.

Confidentiality Obligation: Participants must not reveal confidential

information to any other participating team during the competition. Any
disclosure made to other participants before or after their round will result in
immediate disqualification without the possibility of appeal.

Mediation Plan

All participating teams, on completing the registration process, shall

submit their mediation plan for Preliminary Round.

Every team shall mandatorily submit the mediation plan, the failure of
which will result in the deemed withdrawal of the respective team’s
registration.

The mediation plan shall be prepared as per Annexure A. (pg.28, pg.29,

pg.30, pg.31)

Formatting of the mediation plan shall be done in font type Times New
Roman with a font size of 14 for headings and 12 for the main text. The
body of text shall be justified and Line Spacing shall be 1.5.

The mediation plan shall be submitted before 05/02/2024 before 11:59 pm

via mail to [email protected]
 Private Caucus
During the mediation session, the decision to initiate a private caucus rests
with the Mediator(s). A private caucus involves a confidential meeting
between the mediator(s) and one of the disputing parties, without the
presence of the other party. This setting allows for an open and frank
discussion of issues, concerns, and potential solutions.

The mediator(s) have the autonomy to call for a private caucus based on
their judgment of what would best serve the interests of the parties involved.
The Mediator(s) must conduct at least one private caucus during the session
to ensure the progression of the mediation process.

Parties may also express their preference for a private caucus, and such
requests should be considered by the mediator(s) in the spirit of facilitating
constructive dialogue.

The use of private caucuses is a strategic tool in the mediation process,

allowing the mediator(s) to effectively guide the parties toward a mutually
acceptable resolution. The mediator(s) should ensure that these sessions are
conducted in a manner that respects the confidentiality and integrity of the
mediation process.

The caucus will be conducted in a separate breakout room in the same

virtual meeting room in which the round will be conducted.
 Ranking & Tie-Breakers
The ranking and selection of Negotiating Teams and Mediators will
primarily be based on overall scores.

In case of a tie in the score of two or more Negotiating Teams during the
Preliminary or Knock Out Rounds, the advancing team shall be determined
by (i) the total number of score sheets designating 'wins,' and (ii) the highest
number of points scored during the joint session.

In case of a tie in the score of two or more Mediators during the Preliminary
or Knock Out Rounds, the advancing Mediator shall be determined by (i) the
highest number of scores secured during Caucus, and (ii) the highest number
of points scored in the Opening and Closing Statement.

If the tie is not resolved by the aforementioned methods, then the team
advancing to the next round shall be decided by a coin toss.

Penalties
In the event of a rule violation, the Organizing Committee reserves the right
to impose penalties. These may include a deduction of points or, in more
severe cases, disqualification of the entire team from the competition.
If a team member fails to adhere to the directives of the Organizing
Committee, the team may face penalties as determined by the Expert
Assessors overseeing the respective Round.
Teams that are subject to potential penalties will be granted a fair
opportunity to present their case and explain why the penalty should not be
applied.
Decisions made by the Organizing Committee regarding penalties are
conclusive and binding. All participants must familiarize themselves with the
rules and follow them diligently to maintain the integrity of the competition.
 Marking Criteria : Mediator

Serial No. Criteria Allotted Marks

Initial Presentation (Covers the

introduction to the concept of
mediation, clarification of mediator
1. roles, the establishment of basic rules,
/20
and a clear outline of the mediation
process)

Collaboration with Fellow Mediator

(Working in harmony with the fellow
2. mediator throughout the session,
/20
providing support as needed)

Application of Mediation Techniques

(Demonstrates active listening, fosters
trust in both joint and private meetings,
3. ask pertinent questions, grasps the
/20
underlying interests of the parties, and
remains impartial at all times)

Management of Private and Collective

Sessions (Focus on the confidentiality
aspect, effective information collection,
4. distinguishing between the parties’ /20
interests and their stated positions, and
managing the collective session
efficiently)

Advancements made in the Resolution

5. Process
/20
 Marking Criteria : Mediating Pair

Serial No. Criteria Allotted Marks

Introductory Remark (This encompasses

the clear presentation of facts, outlining
1. of interests, objectives, and the agenda
/20
for mediation)

Negotiation Abilities (This includes the

capacity for problem resolution,
leveraging mediation services to
2. overcome deadlocks, gathering relevant
/20
information, and the strategic use of
questioning)

Strategic Approach in Negotiation (This

covers the strategic revelation and
3. application of confidential data, /20
prioritizing the client’s interests, and the
tactical use of private caucus sessions)

Innovative Problem Solving (This

involves the generation of creative
options and solutions, testing the
4. viability of proposed solutions, and the
/20
degree of cooperation with the opposing
party)

Synchronization within the Team (This

pertains to the collaboration between
5. the client and counsel, ensuring clear /20
communication within the mediating
duo, and distinct separation of roles)
 Awards

Winning Team
The Winning Team (client & counsel) shall receive a cash
prize worth Rs.7,000 along with the opportunity to secure an
internship at MediateGuru.

Runners-up Team
The Runner-up Team (client & counsel) shall receive a cash
prize worth Rs.5,000 along with a scholarship in the CIRC-
Weवाद ODR Learning Course.

Best Mediator
The Best Mediator shall receive a cash prize worth Rs.5,000
along with the opportunity to secure an internship at
MediateGuru.

Runner-up Mediator
The Runner-up Mediator shall receive a cash prize worth
Rs.4,000 along with the opportunity to secure an internship
at Weवाद.
 Important Dates

1 8th
Jan 2024
Registration Open

2 28th
Jan 2024
Last date of Registration

3 29th
Jan 2024
Last date of Clarification

4
31st
Jan 2024 Release of Clarification

5 Inauguration,
9th
Feb 2024
Prelims & Quarter

6
10th Semi final, Final &
Feb 2024
Valedictory
 Mediation Problem - Prelims

Reviving Lakeside Legacy: The Azure Oasis Hotel Dilemma

The Harrison siblings, four individuals from the outskirts of Manchester, inherited
£1,300,000 from their parents 40 years ago. At that time, Samuel Harrison, the eldest
sibling, was 11 years old, and Oliver Harrison, the youngest sibling, was six. Their
parents' friend, Richard Blake, set up a business for the four siblings with the
inheritance by purchasing 'The Azure Oasis Hotel,' a spacious lakeside hotel in
Windermere. For 40 years, this hotel served as a livelihood for the four siblings.

Unfortunately, over the last four decades, Windermere experienced a general decline,
and the once state-of-the-art and luxurious hotel lost its '5-star' rating 20 years ago.
After a prolonged period of stagnation and only minor modernization, it lost its '4-
star' rating three years ago. The hotel's Wi-Fi was limited to communal areas, with half
of the rooms unable to receive a mobile signal, let alone mobile internet. While the
amenities met the standards of the 1980s, for modern-day vacationers, the once
luxurious-looking hotel had become less appealing.

This resulted in the hotel being used mainly by bikers and older vacationers. Young
couples attracted by the hotel's beautiful exterior and lakeside balconies never returned
due to the perceived 'run-down' condition of the hotel.

With the hotel running at a loss for a year following the downgrade from 4- to 3-stars,
the Harrison siblings had to take action. Each of them was leading separate lives,
managing their businesses. None of them needed the hotel anymore but couldn't bring
themselves to sever ties with the hotel that had supported them, a hotel that had been
their parents' final gift before their tragic deaths in their youth.

The primary issue they faced was Windermere itself. The Lake District town possessed
breathtaking beauty but lacked sufficient investment and tourism. Renovating a hotel
with as many rooms and function spaces as 'The Azure Oasis Hotel' would cost
millions. After approaching investors for funding, the siblings discovered that
Windermere couldn't attract an investment of that scale, even for a hotel as iconic as
theirs. After facing rejection from multiple investors, the siblings decided, as a last-
ditch effort, to approach banks.
 Mediation Problem - Prelims

Emma Thompson is the relationship manager at First North Bank, where the hotel's
accounts are held. She had spent her childhood summers at 'The Azure Oasis Hotel'
and believed in its potential. Following due diligence checks and studying the siblings'
projections and business plans, she championed their cause. After a grueling six
months of meetings and negotiations, she successfully convinced the bank to support
the siblings with a loan of £2,500,000.

Work on the renovation commenced two years ago. The funds were released in stages
directly to the contractors, and after 14 months of nearly seamless work, the hotel
reopened its doors exactly on schedule, three months ago. It was a modern marvel
with superfast fiber broadband, contemporary designer furniture and bathroom
fixtures, and a sleek new design in every room. The state-of-the-art kitchen and
revamped function rooms successfully retained the old charm of the building while
ushering it into the 21st century. Following the renovations, the hotel regained its '4-
star' rating.

However, the business figures did not respond as expected. The hotel's regular guests
and vacationers, with an average age of 62, were delighted with the renovations but
would have come to the hotel anyway. A substantial new social media campaign is
underway, and some exciting professional conferences are upcoming, but the numbers
so far have been disappointing. Last month, Emma's worst fears were realized: the
siblings missed the third of their 100 instalments of £30,000. Emma convinced her
superiors, who are closely monitoring the account, that this was merely an
administrative error. The siblings promptly paid the instalment, along with an
apology, but privately indicated to Emma that they might be late again next month.

If the siblings continue to miss payments, First North Bank will have to initiate
proceedings to take the hotel from them. Before anything serious happens, Emma,
with full authority to represent the bank, and Samuel Harrison, representing all four
siblings, have decided to sit down and have a mediation along with their legal
counsels.
Author -

Aditya Aryan
Dispute Prevention and Resolution Professional

Note: Kindly do not contact the author in any case. Any contact will lead to immediate disqualification.
 Student Organizing Body

Mayank Saraf
Student Convenor

Shitanshu Abhishek Raghav Khandelwal

Student Co-Convenor Student Co-Convenor

Abhay Pandey
General Secretary

Suyash Singh Trisha Soni Arnav Tripathi Pallavi Kashyap

Secretary Secretary Secretary Secretary
 Clarification
All queries regarding the competition must be submitted in writing to the
designated email address [email protected] with the subject line
“Clarification to the competition problem”. Responses to queries will be
circulated to all participating teams to ensure transparency. The last date to
seek clarification is 29/ 01/ 2024 before 11:59 PM. The clarifications shall be
released on 31/ 01/ 2024.

Clarifications can be sought only by the teams short-listed for the

Competition. Clarifications can be requested only for ambiguity or possible
errors, but not to inquire about further information, as the Problems are
self-contained.

Grievance Redressal

We understand the importance of addressing your concerns promptly and

efficiently. We are committed to resolving your concerns and providing a
satisfactory resolution. For any further information or if you have any
grievances, kindly contact the numbers provided :-

Mayank Saraf - +91 74870 69179

Shitanshu Abhishek - +91 8923242727

Raghav Khandelwal - +91 82670 31708

Abhay Pandey - +91 70075 70215

** In the event of any ambiguity arising during the mediation

competition, the decision of the organizing committee shall
be final and binding.
 Annexure A

1st ICFAI VIRTUAL NATIONAL MEDIATION COMPETITION 2024

9th-10th February 2024

Mediation Plan Outline

Team Code:
Preliminary/Quarter/Semi-final/Final:
Party:
Core Issues:-What are your main interests? What brings you to the mediation?

Know your ZOPA (Zone Of Possible Agreement)

Your goals (financial and other) Their goals (financial and other)

My high expectation is: They will be hoping for:

The minimum we expect is (and why): The minimum they will expect is (and why):
 Annexure A

Know your Alternatives – BATNA / WATNA If mediation fails, is litigation an

alternative? How does it weigh? Any other alternatives?

Your perspective: Their perspective:

Your costs to date: Their costs to date:

Your costs in court: Their costs in court:

Your chances of winning/losing at Their chances of winning/losing at

trial: trial:

Your hidden costs - eg. Management Their hidden costs – eg. management
of time, finances - of going to trial: of time, finances - of going to trial:

Strings attached?
Are there any consequences to reputation or existing relationships that depend on
the conclusion of the mediation?

With the other party / third parties What is at stake for them to lose?
 Annexure A

Timelines and deadlines Are there any timing issues that may force or retard
agreement?

For You For them

 Annexure A

Mutual problem-solving
What offers can you make to the other side that cost you little and they might value
highly and vice versa?

What could you offer? What might the opposite party offer?