Couplings of Microstrip Square Open-Loop Resonators For Cross-Coupled Planar Microwave Filters
Couplings of Microstrip Square Open-Loop Resonators For Cross-Coupled Planar Microwave Filters
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THBORY AND TECHNIQUES, VOL 44, NO 12, DECEMBER 1996 2099
I. INTRODUCTION
Authorized licensed use limited to: ULAKBIM UASL - ANKARA UNIVERSITESI. Downloaded on November 05,2023 at 11:35:11 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
2100 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, VOL. 44, NO. 12, DECEMBER 1996
a- + 11. COUPLING
STRUCTURES
Shown in Fig. 2 are the three basic coupling structures
encountered in the type of cross-coupled filters in Fig. 1. The
coupled structures result from different orientations of a pair
of identical square open-loop resonators which are separated
by a spacing s and may or may not be subject to an offset d. It
is obvious that any coupling in those coupling structures is that
of the proximity coupling, which is, basically, through fringe
fields. The nature and the extent of the fringe fields determine
the nature and the strength of the coupling. It can be shown
that at resonance, each of the open-loop resonators has the
maximum electric field density at the side with an open-gap,
and the maximum magnetic field density at the opposite side.
Because the fringe field exhibits an exponentially decaying
character outside the region, the electric fringe field is stronger
near the side having the maximum electric field distribution,
while the magnetic fringe field is stronger near the side having
the maximum magnetic field distribution. It follows that the
electric coupling can be obtained if the open sides of two
coupled resonators are proximately placed as Fig. 2(a) shows,
while the magnetic coupling can be obtained if the sides
with the maximum magnetic field of two coupled resonators
(c) are proximately placed as Fig. 2(b) shows. For the coupling
Fig. 2. Basic coupling structures of coupled microstrip square open-loop structure in Fig. 2(c), the electric and magnetic fringe fields at
resonators on substrate (not shown) having a relative dielectric constant E~ and the coupled sides may have comparative distributions so that
a thickness h. (a) Electric coupling structure. (b) Magnetic coupling structure. both the electric and the magnetic couplings occur. In this case
(c) Mixed coupling structure.
the coupling may be referred to as the mixed coupling.
Authorized licensed use limited to: ULAKBIM UASL - ANKARA UNIVERSITESI. Downloaded on November 05,2023 at 11:35:11 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
HONG AND LANCASTER: COUPLINGS OF MICROSTRIP SQUARE OPEN-LOOP RESONATORS 2101
A . Electric Coupling
For the fundamental mode near its resonance, an equivalent
lumped-element circuit model for the coupling structure in
Fig. 2(a) is given in Fig. 3(a), where L and C are the self-
inductance and self-capacitance so that (LC)-'/' equals the
angular resonant frequency of uncoupled resonators, and C,
represents the mutual capacitance. At this stage it should be
make clear that the coupled structure considered is inher-
ently distributed element so that the lumped-element circuit
equivalence is valid on a narrow-band basis, namely, near
its resonance as we have emphasized at the beginning. The
same comment is applicable for the other coupled structures
discussed later, Now, if we look into reference planes TI - Ti
and T2 - Ti, we can see a two-port network which may be
described by the following set of equations
I1 =jwcv,- jwc,v, (14
I2 =jwCV, - jwC,Vl (1b)
T'i
y,, : ___------
L t ' l1 T',
in which a sinusoidal waveform is assumed. It might be well
to mention that (la) and (lb) imply that the self-capacitance J=wC,
C is the capacitance seen in one resonant loop of Fig. 3(a) (b)
when the capacitance in the adjacent loop is shorted out. Thus, Fig 3 (a) Equivalent circuit of the coupled open-loop resonators exhibiting
the second terms on the right-hand side of (la) and (lb) are the electric coupling (b) An alternative form of the equivalent circuit with an
admittance inverter J = wC,,, to represent the coupling
the induced currents resulted from the increasing voltage in
resonant loop 2 and loop 1, respectively. From (la) and (Ib)
four Y-parameters Equations (3) and (4) can be used to find the electric
coupling coefficient ICE
y11 = y 2 2
=j w c (24
Yl2 =El
= -JWC, (2b) (5)
can easily be found by definitions. which is identical with the definition of ratio of the coupled
According to the network theory [ 181 an alternztive form of electric energy to the stored energy of uncoupled single
the equivalent circuit in Fig. 3(a) can be obtained and is shown resonator.
in Fig. 3(b). This form yields the same two-porl parameters
with those of the circuit of Fig. 3(a), but it is more convenient B. Magnetic Coupling
for our discussions. Actually, it can be shown that the electric Shown in Fig. 4(a) is an equivalent lumped-element circuit
coupling between the two resonant loops is repreliented by an model for the coupling structure in Fig. 2(b) near its resonance,
admittance inverter J = wC,. If the symmetry plane T - T' where L and C are the self-inductance and self-capacitance,
in Fig. 3(b) is replaced by an electric wall (or a silort-circuit), and L , represents the mutual inductance. In this case the
the resultant circuit has a resonant frequency coupling equations described the two-port network at reference
1 planes TI - Ti and Tz - Ti are
(3)
fe = 2 7 l 4 7 c T z J '
VI =jwLI1 + jwL,I2, (64
This resonant frequency is lower than that of uncoupled v, =jwLI, + jWLmII. (6b)
single resonator, which has also been confirmed by the full-
wave simulations. A physical explanation is that the coupling Equations (6a) and (6b) also imply that the self-inductance
effect enhances the capability of storing charge of the single L is the inductance seen in one resonant loop of Fig. 4(a)
resonator when the electric wall is inserted in the symmetrical when the adjacent loop is open-circuited. Thus, the second
plane of the coupled structure. Similarly, replacing the symme- terms on the right-hand side of (6a) and (6b) are the induced
try plane in Fig. 3(b) by a magnetic wall (or an open-circuit) voltage resulted from the increasing current in loops 2 and
results in a single resonant circuit having a resonant frequency 1, respectively. From (6a) and (6b) we can find four Z -
1 parameters
(4)
=2 n J m
In this case the coupling effect reduces the capabill ty of storing
charge so that the resonant frequency is increased.
Authorized licensed use limited to: ULAKBIM UASL - ANKARA UNIVERSITESI. Downloaded on November 05,2023 at 11:35:11 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
2102 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, VOL. 44, NO. 12, DECEMBER 1996
C. Mixed Coupling
For the coupling structure of Fig. 2(c), the electric and
magnetic field distributions on the coupled arms of two
resonators are comparative so that neither the electric coupling
nor the magnetic coupling can be ignored. Hence, in this case
the coupling may be referred to as the mixed coupling. For the
fundamental mode of this coupling structure near its resonance,
a network representation is shown in Fig. 5(a). Notice that
the Y-parameters are the parameters of a two-port network
looked into the left of reference plane TI - Ti and the right
of reference plane T2 - Ti,while the 2-parameters are the
parameters of the other two-port network looked into the right
of reference plane TI - T{ and the left of reference plane
T2 - Ti. The Y - and 2-parameters are defined by
y11 = y 2 2
Fig. 4. (a) Equivalent circuit of the coupled open-loop resonators exhibiting
the magnetic coupling. (b) An alternative form of the equivalent circuit with =j w c ,
an impedance inverter K = w L h to represent the coupling.
y12 =Y21
=j w c k
211 =222
Shown in Fig. 4(b) is an alternative form of equivalent =j w L ,
circuits having the same network parameters as those of
212 =Z21
Fig. 4(a). Similarly, it can be shown that the magnetic coupling
between the two resonant loops is represented by an impedance =jwLL.
inverter K = wL,. If the symmetry plane T - T' in Fig. 4(b) where C , L, C i , and L A are the self-capacitance, the self-
is replaced by an electric wall (or a short-circuit), the resultant inductance, the mutual capacitance, and the mutual inductance
single resonant circuit has a resonant frequency of an associated equivalent lumped-element circuit shown in
Fig. 5(b). It should be explained that the minus sign assigned
to the mutual capacitance is based on two facts. The first
fact is that the electric and magnetic couplings enhance each
It can be shown that the increase in resonant frequency, other (add in phase). The second fact is that when the
which has also been observed in the full-wave simulations, symmetry plane of the equivalent circuit is shorted-circuit,
is because the coupling effect reduces the stored flux in the which may correspond to the excitation for the currents on
single resonator circuit when the electric wall is inserted in the coupled arms of Fig. 2(c) having the same magnitude but
the symmetric plane. If the symmetry plane in Fig. 4(b) is
the opposite direction, the resonant frequency is higher than
replaced by a magnetic wall (or an open-circuit), the resultant that of uncoupled single resonator. In Fig. 5(b), one can also
single resonant circuit has a resonant frequency
identify an impedance inverter K = w L i and an admittance
1 inverter J = WCLwhich represent the magnetic coupling and
(9)
.fm = 27rJ(L +Lm)C. the electric coupling, respectively.
By inserting an electric wall and a magnetic wall into
In this case it turns out that the coupling effect increases the the symmetry plane of the equivalent circuit in Fig. 5(b),
stored flux so that the resonant frequency is shifted down. respectively, we obtain
Similarly, (8) and (9) can be used to find the magnetic
coupling coefficient k~ 1
fe =
27r2/(L - L L ) ( C - CL) '
1
f m = 27rJ(L + L L ) ( C+ CL) .
As can be seen that both the magnetic and electric couplings
It should be emphasized that the magnetic coupling coefficient have the same effect on the resonant frequency shifting. In
defined by (10) corresponds to the definition of ratio of the other words, they reduce or enhance the stored fluxlcharge of
Authorized licensed use limited to: ULAKBIM UASL - ANKARA UNIVERSITESI. Downloaded on November 05,2023 at 11:35:11 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
HONG AND LANCASTER: COUPLINGS OF MICROSTRIP SQUARE OPEN-LOOP RESONATORS 2103
Authorized licensed use limited to: ULAKBIM UASL - ANKARA UNIVERSITESI. Downloaded on November 05,2023 at 11:35:11 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
2104 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, VOL. 44, NO. 12, DECEMBER 1996
10 c I 0.05
Electric Couplinq I s=2.0 mm XU
E 0.04
.a,
6 0.03
8a 0.02
-20
C
m
s
3 0.01
8
-40 0.00
2.40 2.45 2.50 2.55 2.60 2.65 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
Frequency lGHz Spacing Imm
0.08
10 z
Maqnetic Couplinq . .. .
s=l .O mm
s=2.0 mm ,s
.c1
0.06
2
C
s=3.0 mm
g
8 0.04
a
s9 0.02
8
0.00
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
2.40 2.45 2.50 2.55 2.60 2.65 Spacing Imm
Frequency lGHz
.g-
d
10
s=l.O mm 0.06 ~ ~-
4. 4 0 . 8
-
Mixed Couplinq .. .-.. s=2.0"
m 0 F - - - A -~,=25.0
--
-
P ~ 3 . mm
0
0.04
-10 I/ :j
2
9 0.02
8
0.00
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
Spacing Imm
2.40 2.45 2.50 2.55 2.60 2.65
Fig. 7. Coupling coefficients for resonators with a = 7.0 mm, w = 1.0
Frequency lGHz mm, and d = 0.0 mm on a substrate with a thickness h = 1.27 mm and
different relative dielectric constants.
Fig. 6 . Typical resonant mode splitting phenomena of the three types of
coupled microstrip square open-loop resonators.
Be = 1.0678 + 0.266. In
[ .
+ 0.031 46 + 1.0051 ah
p e = 1.0886
(;I4
- Fm = - 0.5014 0.1557 (18)
Authorized licensed use limited to: ULAKBIM UASL - ANKARA UNIVERSITESI. Downloaded on November 05,2023 at 11:35:11 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
HONG AND LANCASTER COUPLINGS OF MICROSTRIP SQUARE OPEN-LOOP RESONATORS 2105
0.05
0.04 - mm
a=7.00
4.
- - - A - - - a-12.75 mm
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
Spacing Imm Spacing Imm
0.08 0 10
3
-
9
008 -I
-A--
- a=7 00 mm
a=12 75 mm
8- 002
8 8
0.00 0 00
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 10 15 20 25 30
Spacing Imm Spacing Imm
a=7.00
4.- mm
.. A- a=12.75 m m
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
Spacing Imm Spacing Imm
Fig. 8. Coupling coefficients for coupled resonators with (I = 7.0 mm, Fig. 9. Coupling coefficients for coupled resonators with w = 1.0 mm,
d = 0.0 mm and different w on a substrate of E ~ = 10.3 and thickness d = 0.0 mm and different size a on a substrate of E,-= 10.8 and thickness
h = 1.27 mm. h = 1.27 mm.
for the magnetic coupling coefficient, and the spacing is increased because the electric coupling decays
faster than the magnetic coupling against the spacing.
The full-wave EM simulator used has been proved to
be quite accurate in its prediction. Nevertheless, a set of
microstrip coupled open-loop resonators in Fig. 2 having a
spacing 2.0 mm on a RTDuroid substrate with E, = 10.8 and
a thickness h = 1.27 mm were fabricated and measured to
for the mixed coupling coefficient. Shown in Fig. 11 are the
verify the theory. The measured coupling coefficients together
coupling coefficients modeled by (17)-(19). Compared with
with those obtained from the full-wave simulations and the
the simulated ones obtained by the full-wave simulation, an
closed-formulas are listed in Table I for comparison. Good
accuracy better than 10% is achieved. The empirical formula
agreement are obtained.
of (19) is able to demonstrate quantitatively that the magnetic
coupling is predominant in the mixed couplirig case even
though both the electric and magnetic couplings occur. As an V. FILTERAPPLICATIONS
example Fig. 12 plots the ratio of the electric coupling to the A four-pole elliptic function bandpass filter is used to
magnetic coupling in a mixed coupling structure on a substrate demonstrate the filter applications of the coupled microstrip
with a relative dielectric constant E, = 10.8 and a thickness square open-loop resonators. The center frequency of the filter
h = 1.27 mm. As can be seen the electric coupling is less than is 2.46 GHz and the fractional bandwidth is 4%. The coupling
80% of the magnetic coupling, and the ratio is e\en smaller as matrix and input/output singly loaded Q = I / R to be realized
Authorized licensed use limited to: ULAKBIM UASL - ANKARA UNIVERSITESI. Downloaded on November 05,2023 at 11:35:11 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
2106 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, VOL. 44, NO. 12, DECEMBER 1996
0 06
?? 005
8
C
004
- - modelled (&,=IO 8)
-- modelled (~,=250)
0 full-wave
8 003 o full-wave
A full-wave
30, 002
001
8
0 00
10 15 20 25 30 0 75 1 00 125 1 5 0 1 75 2 00 2 25 2 50
Spacing lmm Normalized spacing slh
modelled (a/h=3.7402)
modelled (a/h=5.5118)
- - d=l Omm modelled (a/h=l0.0394)
full-wave
full-wave
full-wave
0 08
- modelled (w/h=0.3937)
- - d=l Omm s 006
- - modelled (w/h=0.7874)
modelled (w/h=1.1811)
-
0 full-wave
full-wave
2 004 A full-wave
s3
0,
002
s
0.00
10 15 20 25 30 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50
Spacing lmm Normalized spacing slh
Fig. 10. Coupling coefficients of the three types of coupled microstrip square Fig. 11. Comparison of the coupling coefficients modeled using the closed
open- loop resonators with a = 7.0 mm, w = 1.0 mm and different offset d formulas to those simulated uying the full-wave EM simulator.
on a substrate of E ? = 10.8 and thickness h = 1 . 2 i mm.
1.0 L
are
w/h=0.7874
M= [ 0
0.026 1
0
-0.0029
0.0261
0
0.022
0
0
0.022
0
0.0261
-0.0029
0.0261
0
a/h-5.5118
e,=10.8
Authorized licensed use limited to: ULAKBIM UASL - ANKARA UNIVERSITESI. Downloaded on November 05,2023 at 11:35:11 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
~
TABLE I APPENDIX
COEFFICIENTS
COUPLING OF COUPLED MICROSTRIPSQUARE OPEN-LOOP PROVE THAT f e AND f m ARE TWO
~ 10.8, h = 1.27 mm, w = 1.0 mm, 5 = 2.0 mm)
( E =
RESONATORS
NATURALRESONANTFREQUENCIES
ielled
It would seem that the best way to show that fe and
-
011
f,. are the two natural resonant frequencies of the coupling
-
034 structures in Fig. 2 is to prove that f e and fm are the two
eigen values of the eigen equation in association with the
individual coupling structure. For our purpose Fig. 14 shows
the modified equivalent circuits of the three coupling structures
0 0 of Fig. 2, where the resonators are all assumed tuned to the
-10
normalized center frequency w, = l/m = 1 and to have
-10 g normalized characteristic impedance z, = = 1. Thus
s-
h
-20
s... the mutual capacitance and inductance are normalized to C and
mm -20 m- L , respectively. By deriving the 2-matrix of each equivalent
*- Y-
-60 -50
For the electric coupling circuit we have
2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7
Frequency (GHz)
(a)
(b) 211 = z 2 2
Fig. 13. (a) Filter layout and performance of the ideal model for the four-pole --
A
filter. (b) Measured filter performance. B’
221 =212
-- 1
waveguide cavity filters to the proposed type of microstrip -
filters, a method for the rigorous calculation of the coupling
B’
1
coefficients of the three basic coupling structures encountered (1 - L,) - -
A=l+ W2
has been developed. We have presented the numerical results
L,
of the coupling coefficients obtained using fiill-wave EM 1
simulations. The characteristics of the three types of couplings, B=-. (23)
namely the electric, magnetic and mixed couplirlgs have been
jWL,
investigated. We have also derived three simple empirical Similarly, the eigen equation of (21) is satisfied with the
modes for estimation of the coupling coefficients of these types normalized frequencies w = 271. . f C = 1/Jm and
of couplings. We have performed the experiments to verify w = 2n . f m = l / d m of (8) and (9) given in Section
the numerical results. To demonstrate the filter application, we 111, indicating that f e and fm are the two eigen values or the
have designed and fabricated a four-pole elliptic function filter two natural resonant frequencies of the coupling structure of
of this type. Both theoretical and experimental performances Fig. 2(b) despite if the electric/magnetic wall is implemented
of the filter have been presented. or not.
Authorized licensed use limited to: ULAKBIM UASL - ANKARA UNIVERSITESI. Downloaded on November 05,2023 at 11:35:11 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
2 I08 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, VOL. 44, NO. 12, DECEMBER 1996
REFERENCES
S. Darlington, “Synthesis of reactance four poles which produce pre-
scribed insertion loss characteristics,” J . Math. Phys., vol. 18, pp.
257-353, Sept. 1939.
R. Levy and S. B. Cohn, “A history of microwave filter research, design,
and development,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theoty Tech., vol. MTT-32,
pp. 1055-1067, Sept. 1984.
Electric Coupling J. A. Curits and S. J. Fiedziuszko, “Miniature dual mode microstrip
filters,” in IEEE MTT-S, Dig., 1991, pp. 4 4 3 4 4 6 .
-, “Multi-layered planar filters based on aperture coupled dual
mode microstrip or stripline resonators,” in IEEE MTT-S Dig., 1992,
pp. 1203-1206.
G. L. Matthaei and G. L. Hey-Shipton, “Novel staggered resonator array
v,=o
--It--fv
~ IF
-to
IF I v,=o
superconducting 2.3 GHr bandpass filter,” in IEEE MTT-S Dig.,June
1993, pp. 1269-1272.
S. J. Hedges and R. G. Humphreys, “An extracted pole microstrip elliptic
function filter using high temperature superconductors,” in Proc. Eur.
Microwave C o n f , 1994, pp. 517-521.
M. Sagawa, K. Takahashi, and M. Makimoto, “Miniaturized hairpin
resonator filters and their application to receiver front-end MIC’s,” IEEE
i Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 37, pp. 1991-1997, Dec. 1989.
0 0 M. Makimoto, “Microstripline split-ring resonators and their application
to bandpass filters,” Electronics and Communication in Japan. New
Magnetic Coupling York: Wiley, 1989, vol. 12, no. 5, pt. 2, pp. 104-112.
J. S. Hong and M. J. Lancaster, “Realization of quasielliptic function
filter using dual-mode microstrip square loop resonators,” Elec. Lett.,
vol. 31, pp. 2085-2086, 1995.
S. J. Yao, R. R. Bonetti, and A. E. Williams, “Generalized dual-plane
multicoupled line filters,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol.
41, pp. 2182-2189, Dec. 1993.
R. R. Bonetti and A. E. Williams, “New design techniques for coupled
line filters with transmission zeros,” in Proc. Eur. Microwave Con5,
1993, pp. 240-243.
J. S. Hong and M. J. Lancaster, “Microstrip bandpass filter using
degenerate modes of a novel meander loop resonator,” IEEE Microwave
v,=o
1 Guided Wave L e x , vol. 5 , pp. 371-372, 1995.
-, “Canonical microstrip filter using square open-loop resonators,”
Elec. Lett., vol. 31, pp. 2020-2022, 1995.
C. Rauscher, “Microwave channelized active filters-A new modular
approach to achieving compactness and high selectivity,” IEEE Trans.
Mixed Coupling Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 44, pp. 122-132, Jan. 1996.
A. E. Atia and A. E. Williams, “Narrow-bandpass waveguide filters,”
Fig. 14. Normalizcd equivalent circuits of the electric, the magnetic, and IEEE Tranr. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. MTT-20, pp. 258-265, Apr.
the mixed coupling structures for deriving the eigen equation of the coupled 1972.
resonator circuit. A. E. Atia, A. E. Williams, and R. W. Newcomb, “Narrow-band
multiple-coupled cavity synthesis,” IEEE Trans. Circ. Syr., vol. CAS-21,
pp. 649-655, Sept. 1974.
B. I. Bleaney and B. Bleaney, Electriciw and Magnetism, 3rd ed.
For the mixed coupling circuit we have Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1976, vol. 1 , ch. 7.
C. G. Montgomery. R. H. Dicke, and E. M. Purcell, Principles of
Microwave Circuit.y. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1948, ch. 4.
EM User’s Manual. Sonnet Software, Inc., Version 2.4, 1993.
J. S. Wong, “Microstrip tapped-line filter design,” IEEE Trans. Mi-
crowave Theorj Tech., vol. MTT-27, pp. 44-50, Jan. 1979.
Authorized licensed use limited to: ULAKBIM UASL - ANKARA UNIVERSITESI. Downloaded on November 05,2023 at 11:35:11 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
HONG AND LANCASTER: COUPLINGS OF MICROSTRIP SQUARE OPEN-LOOP RESONATORS 2109
Authorized licensed use limited to: ULAKBIM UASL - ANKARA UNIVERSITESI. Downloaded on November 05,2023 at 11:35:11 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.