Fundamentals - of - Geographic - Information System CH 1
Fundamentals - of - Geographic - Information System CH 1
Introduction to Digital
Geography
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
When you are finished with this chapter you should be able to:
19
20 Chapter 1 • Introduction to Digital Geography
and software, space and organizations within which these reside, personnel
who use the system in a number of levels and capacities, data and information
upon which the system operates, clients who obtain and use the products,
vendors who supply the hardware and software, and other systems (financial,
institutional, and legal) within which the GIS functions (Figure 1.1). While the
software component of GIS is most often what we think of when we hear the
term, its scope is far bigger and more comprehensive than that. Initially we will
focus our discussion on the computer programs themselves—the technology
component—and revisit the other components later in this book as appropriate.
The primary task of a GIS is to analyze spatially referenced data and infor-
mation. To perform meaningful analysis requires that the software be able to
perform many other tasks, such as input, editing, retrieval, and output. Still,
analysis is the strength of GIS. There are many ways of classifying the analytical
and modeling capabilities of GIS because many of these capabilities interact.
Ultimately, the software most certainly contains algorithms and computer code
specifically designed to (1) organize geographic data within appropriate refer-
encing systems, (2) selectively query those data and aggregate them for easy
understanding, (3) count and measure both individual objects and collections
of objects, (4) classify and reclassify objects based on user specified properties,
(5) overlay related thematic map data, and ultimately (6) be able to combine
these individual techniques into ordered sequences of operations designed to
simulate some natural or anthropogenic activities for decision making. All of
these tasks tend to involve, either directly or indirectly, some form of mapped
data.
To understand how this works, imagine how you currently read, analyze, and
interpret the analog equivalent of GIS—maps. Many first-time GIS students, even
those who do not regularly refer to maps, are surprised when they discover
that they are already GIS practitioners when using road maps to find routes
from one place to another. This activity requires us to select portions of the
road map for analysis (query), to find the shortest route from place to place
(measurement), and to mark that route with a highlighter pen (classification).
We use a special-purpose digital GIS when we use online map services such
as MapQuest to perform this same task for us (Figure 1.2). Some of us have
onboard global positioning system (GPS)/GIS components in our automobiles
such as OnStar (Figure 1.3) that not only tell us where we are and give
us routing information, but also connect us to emergency services through
wireless telecommunication. Both of these examples deal with the movement
along networks and demonstrate relatively simple applications of the existing
technology.
We become more sophisticated in our GIS skill set when we begin looking
for places to buy or build a home. Whether we directly employ maps or
not we most certainly employ what geographers call mental maps (mental
perceptions of our spatial environment) when we do this. To perform this
task we frequently develop spatial queries by defining the criteria we employ
in selecting our candidate locations. For example, we may tell a real estate
agent that we wish to buy a home that is in a new development (a query of
our geographic data), costs less than $150,000 (another query), ‘‘near’’ our
workplace (a measurement combined with a query), and within a particular
school district (a form of overlay that we will later call point-in-polygon). These
operations can readily be implemented by a digital GIS and are commonplace
within commercial GIS software. Some real estate firms already employ GIS
on a regular basis. So from these simple illustrations you can see that you
already possess some of the skills necessary to perform GIS analysis. You
only need to expand your concept of how space can be examined, measured,
and compared, and then envision how the geographic objects you wish to
examine might be encoded (input), stored, retrieved, and manipulated inside
the computer.
The last example illustrates the analytical power of the GIS. Some people
believe, for example, that there is no difference between computer-assisted
cartography (CAC), computer aided drafting (CAD), and GIS. Because the
graphic display from these three systems can look identical to both casual and
trained observers, it is easy to assume that they are, with minor differences,
the same thing. Anyone attempting to analyze maps will discover, however,
that CAC systems, computer systems designed to create maps from graphical
objects combined with descriptive attributes, are excellent for display but
22 Chapter 1 • Introduction to Digital Geography
1
A GPS receiver in the vehicle
picks up signals from Global
Positioning System (GPS)
satellites and calculates the
location of the vehicle. That
location information is stored
in the vehicle’s OnStar
hardware.
2
When the driver pushes the
blue OnStar button, red
Emergency button, or an air
bag deploys, OnStar places an
embedded cellular call to the
OnStar Center. Vehicle and
GPS location data is sent at
the beginning of the call.
3
The cellular call is received by
a cellular tower and routed to
the land line phone system.
4
The OnStar switch sends the
call to the first available
advisor, who has the location
of the vehicle and the
customer’s information on
her computer screen.
@2006 HowStuffWorks
Figure 1.3 OnStar system at work.
generally lack the analytical capabilities of a GIS. Likewise, for pure mapping
purposes it is highly desirable to use a CAC system developed specifically for
the input, design, and output of mappable data rather than working through
the myriad analytics of the GIS to produce a simple map. CAD—a computer
system developed to produce graphic images but not normally tied to external
descriptive data files—is excellent software for architects, speeding the process
of producing architectural drawings and simplifying the editing process. It
would not be as easy to use for producing maps as would CAC, nor would
it be capable of analyzing maps—generally the primary task assigned to the
GIS (Cowen, 1988). As each of these three technologies matures, however, we
are finding a large crossover of techniques and capabilities, thus blurring the
definitional lines among them.
A Brief History of Geographic Information Systems 23
assigned to produce what was to become the first fully operational geographic
information system ever built—the Canada Geographic Information System
(CGIS). Its initial task was to classify and map the land resources of Canada,
but more advanced uses were envisioned as these maps became available for
analysis.
Before any of this could be accomplished there were substantial hurdles that
needed to be negotiated. Because Canada encompasses such a large area of
land, the first problem the CGIS developers encountered was how to input such
vast amounts of data into the computer without using clear plastic grids and
cell-by-cell input. This required the refinement of the rather crude digitizers of
the day to a large (48′′ × 48′′ ) pencil-following cartographic digitizing table to
input point data. At the same time a large format (48′′ × 48′′ ) cartographic-quality
drum scanner was also invented to replace manual line tracing. In tandem
with the development of the digitizer, and because graphic displays were not
available, Tomlinson’s team was forced to developed computational versions
of topology—a branch of mathematics dealing with spatial properties and
their conditions upon deformation—to detect input errors (e.g., closure of
polygons).
Related to the large data volume problem was the limitation of the computers
available in the early 1960s. In 1962 neither laptop nor desktop computers
existed. Moreover, even the largest mainframe computers had very little core
memory (kilobytes, not megabytes nor gigabytes). The IBM 1401, for example,
had 16K of memory and the 1964 IBM 360/65 had 512K of core memory. There
was no such thing as random access memory (RAM), so all the data had to
be kept on tape. Imagine trying to build a geographic information system with
a computer that has less core memory than one of today’s simplest hand
calculators. A simple text file with the three characters Hi. would take up nearly
1/3 of the core memory of most computers of the time (Figure 1.4). One major
solution to the memory limitation was the development of the Morton Matrix,
the first of today’s facet or tile data structures. It provided a method of splitting
up the database into small portions called tiles (Guy Morton’s idea). This ‘‘tiling’’
approach to dividing large spatial databases into manageable portions is still
used today.
A third major problem needing a solution was that of finding a way to
store and to link the locational data (points, lines, and polygons) with their
nonspatial descriptions—a storage and editing problem. On analog maps this
is done through the legend, a graphical device interpreted by the map reader,
but the computer required that these be explicitly defined and linked. The
spatial database management system that was developed was called a retrieval
monitor and consisted of two separate databases—one for the locational
data and one for the descriptions—linked by software pointers. The retrieval
monitor also contained a language structure that allowed users to reclassify
attribute data, dissolve lines, merge polygons, measure cartographic objects,
change scale, generate circles, generate new polygons, search attributes, create
lists and reports, and carry out polygon overlay operations. This was the
essence of the analytical portion of a GIS and is still the core of modern GIS
software.
One additional problem to overcome was the need to build a complex
spatial software package using (pre-PL1) computer languages that were not
designed for graphics or for the complex nature of geographic data. More-
over, nearly all the programmers at that time either worked for computer
companies or for very centralized governmental service bureaus. None of
these programmers were trained in digital spatial data handling. This required
rethinking the training of computer scientists to understand the nature of
spatial (geographic) data and the training of geographers in computer
science.
Whether we think of GIS as software or not, its primary purpose is the organiza-
tion and analysis of spatially referenced (usually geographical) data. The utility
of GIS to solve real-world geographical problems and to provide long-term return
on investment has contributed to its continued growth and increasing popu-
larity. Some general areas of endeavor for which GIS is useful include natural
resources management; city, regional, and environmental planning; transporta-
tion planning; crime analysis; emergency services; and site selection to name
just a few.
You have already seen some examples of the specific types of problems for
which the technology is currently applied. While at first it might seem unnec-
essary to identify specific examples of problems, I have found that the more
examples I encounter, the more possibilities I can imagine. These possibilities
Sample Application Areas of GIS 27
often result in pushing the technology even further so that the tool improves to
meet these new demands.
Take, for example, the burgeoning use of GIS and remote sensing technologies
in the defense industry. During ‘‘Operation Iraqi Freedom’’ in 2003–4, many of
us saw three-dimensional images of urban areas in Baghdad and other Iraqi
cities, both as static pictures (Figure 1.5) and as dynamic ‘‘flythroughs.’’ Not
only was the general public able to view these images in extreme detail on
their television sets as the news media tried to explain tactical details of
operations, but the U.S. Congress saw them as well. Within months of these
images appearing on the evening news, the U.S. federal agency then known
as the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) was ordered to change
its name to the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) to more closely
reflect its increasing use of GIS and remote-sensing technologies in the defense
and intelligence missions.
Prior to that, the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 on the World
Trade Center, the Pentagon, and the thwarted attack on Washington D.C.
brought about new applications of the technology. Within hours after the World
Trade Center buildings collapsed, some entrepreneurial students at the City
University of New York began creating a database that could, and ultimately
would, be used to reroute traffic around the site. In fact, the GIS database was
also used to plan for debris removal, to allocate and route service vehicles,
and to perform a wide variety of planning strategies in and around the area.
Figure 1.6 shows a 3-D image of the World Trade Center towers (www1.cuny.edu/
events/cunymatters/2001 december/groundzero.html; last visited 7/27/2007).
With the resulting development in the United States of a cabinet-level Office of
Homeland Security (OHS), the utility of GIS was quickly recognized. It is now an
integral part of OHS operations both at the state and the national levels. It may
one day become an integrative tool to empower the various agencies to share
vital security-related geospatial data and information.
The recognition of the utility of geospatial data and software has also been
responsible for some radical changes in how police and federal crime agencies
perform their missions. In September of 2000 a series of related sniper attacks
on innocent civilians in the Virginia and Washington, D.C. area prompted the FBI
to request the assistance of D. Kim Rossmo of the Vancouver Police Department
to employ the newly developing geospatial toolkit now know as ‘‘geographic
profiling’’ to identify suspects. By comparing geographic space used by these
28 Chapter 1 • Introduction to Digital Geography
perpetrators with that of their victims (sometimes called activity space), together
with psychological profiles of similar types of criminals, the agencies hoped
to narrow down the potential search area for their investigations. Although
the results were not clearly responsible for the eventual apprehension of the
suspects, it shows once again the high level of sophistication and increasing
application areas of GIS and related technologies. In fact, the U.S. Department of
Justice (DOJ) created the Crime Mapping Research Center (CMRC) to encourage
and enhance the utility of GIS and related technologies within the DOJ.
In recent years there has been a major concern about the potential pandemic
effects of the avian flu. This has prompted a variety of international health orga-
nizations to begin tracking the occurrences of the disease worldwide (Fig-
ure 1.7) (www.passporthealthtampa.com/fluinfo.html; accessed 10/19/2007).
While these maps may be relatively crude by cartographic standards, they
represent an increasing use of GIS for such things as epidemiology and other
forms of medical research. There is even an effort by the National Geographic
Society to map the deep ancestry of people from all over the world.
work with maps, and especially those who work with the interactions of many
maps, must constantly remind themselves of the limitations of the cartographic
product. Here are just a few simple exercises you can do to become familiar
with the cartographic model and some of its limitations.
Take a look at a number of world maps from different atlases you might find
in your library. Pick out a country familiar to you. Notice how maps of it differ
with respect to sizes, shapes, boundary configurations, numbers of cities, and
the like. You might be surprised at the wide variation from one map to another.
Consider, then, what you would have to do if you were to digitize a map of this
country into a GIS. Which one would you select? Why? How does focusing on
the purpose of your GIS project help you decide which map you want?
Obtain two or three adjacent topographic maps for your areas. What are the
dates for each map? Are they the same? Different? Now the fun begins. With
clear plastic tape (preferably removable), tape the maps together so that all the
lines match. Be sure to turn on some relaxing music while you do this. What
do you discover? The lines don’t match exactly. Imagine how you are going to
input 20 or 30 of these documents into a GIS if the lines don’t line up.
Soil data might be nice to include in your GIS. Try the last experiment with
your local soil map sheets. The match between sheets is even worse. If you
are using soil maps from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation
Service, you might be quite taken with the use of the aerial photography in the
background. Admittedly, this feature is nice to have. But the addition comes at
a cost. If you are going to input this map with other maps inside a geographic
information system, you will have to co-register it with all the others so that the
features match. This requires that the locational coordinates be specified on all
maps. Try to find these on the soil survey maps. How do you solve this little
dilemma?
If the foregoing examples haven’t convinced you of the importance of under-
standing the vocabulary of maps before you begin speaking GIS, perhaps this
one will. You need to create a map of presettlement vegetation for your state or
region. It turns out that three very well-known vegetation mappers have com-
piled such maps for portions of your area of interest. Taking a trip to the library
to obtain these maps, you discover that the first shows vegetation classified
by its structural components (herbaceous, grasses, trees, shrubs, etc.), and the
second map, which intersects with the first map, shows vegetation classed by
floristics (based on species). You also note, to your annoyance, that the two
systems seem to have only limited map areas that correspond. Hoping for help
from the third map, you discover that although it is classed on the basis of a
combination of floristics and structure, its area does not overlap either of the
other two maps; in fact, it is well separated from them.
Classification problems of the type just described are common and require
the student of GIS to become more than a student of the terminology. Before
you can master the technology, you should first master its concepts. We will
begin this first step in the journey in the next chapter, where we will look
closely at the nature of geographic data and the methods by which they
can be represented on map documents. This first step will give you a better
appreciation of the fundamental building blocks of GIS and will ensure a more
cautious approach when you begin implementing geographic analysis and
cartographic modeling.
References 31
Terms .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
1. What was the initial impetus for the development of the first GIS?
2. Provide a description of the change in geographic thought from pure
exploration through to prediction and planning. Describe the place of GIS
in this context.
3. What is a GIS? Why is the software-only definition of GIS incomplete? What
other components make up a GIS?
4. What are the six basic types of analytical techniques generally found in a
geographic information system? Can you think of some examples of each?
5. What is the difference between GIS and CAC? Between GIS and CAD?
6. What are some of the technical difficulties encountered by Roger Tomlin-
son’s team in the early development of GIS?
7. What is the Morton Matrix? Topology? Retrieval monitor? What role did
each of these play in the early development of GIS?
8. Who would normally use a GIS? What accounts for its popularity?
References ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Cowen, D.J., 1988. ‘‘GIS Versus CAD Versus DBMS: What Are the Differneces?’’ Photogram-
metric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 54(11):1551–1554.
DeMers, M.N., 2005. ‘‘Geographic Information Systems.’’ Encyclopaedia Britannica.
Tomlinson, R.F., 1984. ‘‘Geographic Information Systems: The New Frontier.’’ The Opera-
tional Geographer, 5:31–35.
University Consortium for Geographic Information Science, 2007. Geographic Information
Science and Technology: Body of Knowledge 2006. Washington, D.C.: Association of
American Geographers.
U.S. News & World Report, 1995. ‘‘20 Hot Job Tracks: 1996 Career Guide,’’ October 30,
pp. 98–108.
This page intentionally left blank