CS(E)119-45

Dial-Indicators (for linear measurements)

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
JESSE H. JONES, Secretary

NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS

LYMAN J. BRIGGS, Director

DIAL INDICATORS
(For Linear Measurements)

COMMERCIAL STANDARD (EMERGENCY) CS(E)119-45

Effective date for new production from January 1, 1945

A RECORDED VOLUNTARY STANDARD

OF THE TRADE

UNITED STATES
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON 1944 ;

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office

Washington 25, D. C. - Price 5 cents
U. S. Department of Commerce National Bureau of Standards

PROMULGATION
of

COMMERCIAL STANDARD (EMERGENCY) CS(E) 119-45

for

DIAL INDICATORS (For Linear Measurements)

On March 8, 1944, at the instance of the War Produxtion Board, a

proposed commercial standard for dial indicators (for linear measure-
ments) was circulated to leading user organizations, Government
agencies, distributors, and to manufacturers for commxnt. Following
adjustment in the light of that comment, the proposed commercial
standard was circulated May 18, 1944, to the entire trade for written
acceptance.
Those concerned have since accepted and approved the standard
asshown herein for promulgation by the United States Department of
Commerce, through the National Bureau of Standards.
The standard is effective for new production from January 1, 1945.

Promulgation recommended.
I. J. Fairchild,
Chief, Division of Trade Standards.
Promulgated.
Lyman J. Briggs,
Director, National Bureau of Standards.
Promulgation approved.
Jesse H. Jones,
Secretary of Commerce.
II
 DIAL INDICATORS
(For Linear Measurements)

COMMERCIAL STANDARD (EMERGENCY)

CS(E)1 19-45
PURPOSE
1 The purpose of this commercial standard is to provide minimum
.

essential requirements for precision dial indicators described herein,

as a basis for a better understanding between sellers and buyers, a
basis for fair competition and identification of precision dial indicators
conforming thereto.
SCOPE
2. This standard covers the major essential requirements of the
following precision dial indicators in four size groups of nominal bezel
diameters: Group 1, ranging from above 1% in. to and including 2 in.
group 2, above 2 in. to and including 2% in.; group 3, above 2% in. to
and including 3 in.; and group 4, above 3 in. to and including 3% in.;
with four classes of dial markings in English measure, .00005, .0001,
.0005, and .001 in.; and with four classes of dial markings in metric
measure, .001, .002, .005, and .01 mm. (See table 2 for combinations
regularly available.)

NOMENCLATURE
3. For the purposes of this standard the nomenclature shown in
figures 1 to 4 shall apply.

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
4. Type —
-This standard covers only the /Q (the symbol for Ameri-
.

can Gage Design) type shown in figure 1. The monogram, it will be

noted, consists of the initials ‘‘AD”, the right-hand side of the “A”
and the straight side of the “D” being common. The monogram, if
used, should be placed adjacent to the maker’s trade mark.
5. Material.
5a. Contact surface of contact points shall be of suitable material
to provide a smooth durable surface.
5b. Dial faces shall be clear and legible.
5c. Crystals shall be clear and preferably of the nonshattering type.
6. Construction.
6a. Dial-indicator cases shall be of such strength and rigidity that
free movement of mechanism is maintained under conditions of
normal use.
7. Dial .
—Unless otherwise specified a movable dial with suitable
clamp shall be furnished.
1
2 Commercial Standard (Emergency) CS(E)119-4B

= OFFICIAL MONOGRAM FOR DESIGNATING PRODUGTS MADE TO AMERICAN GAGE DESIGN STANDARDS

Figure 1.— >o Dial indicator standards.

Travel of spindle equals a minimum of 2J4 tmms of hand in all groups /o

Figure 2. — Balanced dial showing specimen numbering.

Balanced dials will be furnished in all sizes and classes unless continuous reading is specified by the purchaser
 Dial Indicators 3

Figure 3. — Continuous dial showing specimen numl)ering.

When specified by the purchaser, continuous reading dials 'will be furnished in all sizes
and classes.

DIAL MARKING, LOCATED

TO SUIT EACH MANU-
FACTURER’S PRACTICE

REVOLUTION COUNTER,
OPTIONAL EXTRA FOR ALL
SIZES AND CLASSES, LO-
CATED TO SUIT EACH MANU-
FACTURER’S PRACTICE
Figure 4. — Dial showing specimen dial marking and revolution counter.
4 Commercial Standard {Emergency) CS{E)119-Jf5

8. DETAIL REQUIREMENTS
Dial indicators .
—
Length of contact point, distance between
spindle axis and center of lug hole, diameter of lug hole, thickness of
lug and diameter of stem, which are identical for all sizes, shall be as
shown in figure 1. Spindle travel, or range, shall be a minimum of
2)^ revolutions of the indicating hand unless otherwise specified for ^

special applications requiring greater travel. The indicating hand

shall be set at the approximate 9-o’clock position (one-fourth revolu-
tion to the left of zero) when the spindle is fully extended. Size group
limits for nominal bezel diameters and corresponding minimum posi-
tion distances along spindle axis, between contact point and center of |

dial shall be as shown in table 1.

Table 1. — Nominal bezel diameters and minimum distance from contact point to
dial center with spindle fully retracted

9.
Nominal bezel diameters B
Size group Minimum
Above To and position
including (See fig. 1.)

in. in. in.

1
2
1%
2
2
23/^
m
2
3 2% 3 2H
4 3 m 2^16

Dial classes .
—
Dial markings indicating the value of the smallest
graduations shall be in four classes, see table 2, which shows the com-
binations of dial sizes and markings regularly available.

Table 2. — Dial sizes and classes of markings

American Gage English Metric

Bezel diameters
Design group measure measure

in. in. mm
{
.0001 0. 005
1 1% to 2 \ .0005 .01
1 .001
f .00005 .001
J .0001 .002
2 2 to 2?^
1 .0005 .005
1 .001 .01
f .0001 .001
0005 .002
3 2% to 3
1

1
.

.001 .005
.01
f .00005 .001
0001 .002
4 3 to 3H J .

.0005 .005
)

1 .001 .01

10. Dial markings . —

Dial markings, both English and metric
measure, shall indicate the smallest value of the graduation of the
dial, and shall be in decimals, e. g., .001", not 1/1,000"; or .01 mm,
not 1/100 mm.
11. Dial numbering.
lla. On English-measure dials the dial numbering shall always
indicate thousandths of an inch, irrespective of the class of dial
marking.
llb. On metric-measure dials the dial numbering shall always
indicate hundredths of a millimeter, irrespective of the class of dial
marking.
 Dial Indicators 5

12. Repetition and accuracy. —

The degree of repetition and accuracy
varies with the magnification factor of the dial indicator and the
magnitude of the difference measured; therefore, the values estab-
lished below are to be considered only as maximum tolerances.
12a. Repetition oj readings. —
Readings at any point shall be repro-
ducible through successive movements of the spindle to plus or mmus
one-fifth graduation.
12b. Accuracy. — ...»
The dial indicator shall be accurate to within one
graduation, plus or minus, at any point from the approximate ten
o’clock position to the final two o’clock position i2)i turns).

PACKING
13. Packing. —
Dial indicators shall be packed in cartons or boxes
that afford protection during shipment.

MARKING
14. Manufacturer’s na7ne or trade-mark. —
Unless otherwise specified,
each dial indicator shall have legibly marked upon it, in characters
not less than 0.025 in. high, the manufacturer’s name or trade-mark.
15. It is recommended that the individual manufacturers list in
their catalogs and data sheets appropriate references to dial indicators
of American Gage Design, as recorded in CS(E) 119-45.

EFFECTIVE DATE
16. The standard is effective for new production from January 1,
1945.
STANDING COMMITTEE
17. The following individuals comprise the membership of the
standing committee, which is to review, prior to circulation for accept-
ance, revisions proposed to keep the standard abreast of progress.
Comment concerning the standard and suggestions for revision may
be addressed to any member of the committee or to the Division
of Trade Standards, National Bureau of Standards, wliich acts as
secretary for the committee.
Warren Ames (chairman), B. C. Ames Co., Waltham 54, Mass.
F. C.Tanner, Federal Products Corporation, Providence 1, R. I.
Erik Aldeborgh, Standard Gage Co., Inc., Poughkeepsie, N. Y.
Arthur H. Starrett, The L. S. Starrett Co., Athol, Mass.
General Electric Co., Schenectady 5, N. Y. (Invited to name a representative.)
General Motors Corporation, Detroit 23, Mich. (Invited to name a representa-
tive.)
Sidney French, Pratt & Whitney Aircraft, E. Hartford 8, Conn.
W. C. Mueller, Western Electric Co., Hawthorn Station, Chicago, 111.
F. W. Fisher, Office of Procurement and Material, Navy Department, Wash-
ington 25, D. C.
J.R. Tucker, United States Testing Co., Inc., Hoboken, N. J.
Stanford University, Stanford University, Calif. (Invited to name a representa-
tive.)
D. R. Miller, Gage Section, National Bureau of Standards, Washington 25, D. C,
Oliver K. Holden, International Business Machines Corporation, Endicott,
N. Y.
Hoover Ball & Bearing Co., 200 Hoover Ave., Detroit, Mich. (Invited to name
a representative.)
6 Commercial Standard (Emergency) CS(E)119-45

HISTORY OF PROJECT
18. The War Production Board, on September 30, 1943, requested
the cooperation of the National Bureau of Standards in the establish-
ment of commercial standards for precision hand tools, of which dial
indicators represent an important category. A preliminary manu-
facturers’ conference in New York City, on December 14, 1943, voted
unanimously that the industry desired to establish a commercial
standard for dial indicators, and proceeded to the consideration of a
preliminary draft.
19. The work
of drafting the standard continued by correspondence,
and was concluded at the conference of January 4, 1944, inNew York
City. On March 8, 1944, the proposed standard was circulated to
leading user organizations. Government agencies, and distributors, for
constructive comment. On April 11, 1944, this comment was
reviewed and the proposed standard was changed accordingly.
20. The revised draft was circulated May 18, 1944, to the entire
trade for written acceptance, as it appeared that there was substantial
approval of the draft; and for this reason, coupled with wartime
emergency conditions, further conferences seemed unnecessary.
21. Upon receipt of acceptances in writing from a satisfactory
majority of the production volume of the industry, announcement
was issued -on June 30, 1944, that the standard would become effective
for new production from January 1, 1945.
 CS(E)1 19-45

ACCEPTANCE OF COMMERCIAL STANDARD

If acceptance has not previously been filed, this sheet properly filled in, signed,
I
and returned will provide for the recording of your organization as an acceptor
I of this commercial standard.

Date

Division of Trade Standards,

I!
National Bureau of Standards,
I
Washington, D. C.

Gentlemen

Having considered the statements on the reverse side of this sheet,

we accept the Commercial Standard (Emergency) CS(E) 119-45 as
our standard of practice in the
line)
Production ^
Distribution ^
Use ^
Testing ^

this

of dial indicators.x
on

(Cut
We will assist in securing its general recognition and use, and will
cooperate with the Standing Committee to effect revisions of the
standard when necessary.

Signature of individual officer

(In ink)

*
(Kindly typewrite or print the following lines)

Name and title of above officer

Organization
(Fill in exactly as it should be listed)

Street address

City and State

1

1 Please designate which group you represent by drawing

lines through the other three. Please file sepa-
rate acceptances for all subsidiary companies and affiliates which should be listed separately as acceptors.
In the case of related interests, trade papers, colleges, etc., desiring to record their general approval, the
words “in principle” should be added after the signature.

7
 TO THE ACCEPTOR
The following statements answer the usual questions arising in con-
nection with the acceptance and its significance:
1. Enforcement.— Commercial standards are commodity specifica-
tions voluntarily established by mutual consent of those concerned.
They present a common basis of understanding between the producer,
distributor, and consumer and should not be confused with any plan
of governmental regulation or control. The United States Depart-
ment of Commerce has no regulatory power in the enforcement of
their provisions, but since they represent the will of the interested
groups as a whole, their provisions through usage soon become estab-
lished as trade customs, and are made effective through incorporation
into sales contracts by means of labels, invoices and the like.
—
2. The acceptors responsibility. The purpose of commercial stand-
ards is to establish for specific commodities, nationally recognized
grades or consumer criteria and the benefits therefrom will be measur-
able in direct proportion to their general recognition and actual use.
Instances will occur when it may be necessary to deviate from the
standard and the signing of an acceptance does not preclude such
departures; however, such signature indicates an intention to follow'
the commercial standard where practicable, in the production, dis-
tribution, or consumption of the article in question.
3. The Department s responsibility— The major function performed
by the Department of Commerce in the voluntary establishment of
commercial standards on a Nation-wide basis is fourfold: first, to act
as an unbiased coordinator to bring all interested parties together for
the mutually satisfactory adjustment of trade standards; second, to
supply such assistance and advice as past experience with similar
programs may suggest; third, to canvass and record the extent of
acceptance and adherence to the standard on the part of producers,
distributors, and users; and fourth, after acceptance, to publish and
promulgate the standard for the information and guidance of buyers
and sellers of the commodity.
4. Announcement and promulgation. — ^Wlien the standard has been
endorsed by a satisfactory majority of production or consumption in
the absence of active, valid opposition, the success of the project is
announced. If, however, in the opinion of the standing committee
or the Department of Commerce, the support of any standard is inade-
quate, the right is reserved* to withhold promulgation and publication.
8
 CS(E)119-45

ACCEPTORS
22. The organizations and individuals listed below have accepted this com-
mercial standard as their standard of practice in the production, distribution,
and use of dial indicators. Such endorsement does not signify that they may
not find it necessary to deviate from the standard, nor that producers so listed
guarantee all of their products in this field to conform with the requirements of
this standard. Therefore, specific evidence of conformity should be obtained
where required.
ASSOCIATIONS Cessna Aircraft Co., Wichita, Kans.
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co., Bellwood, 111.

American Association of Engineers, Chicago, 111. Cincinnati Milling Machine Co., Cincinnati, Ohio.
American Society of Tool Engineers, Potomac Citadel, The, (The Military College of South Caro-
Chapter, No. 48, Arlington, Va. (In principle.) lina), Charleston, S. C.
City Engineering Co., The, Dayton, Ohio.
Clausing Manufacturing Co., Ottumwa, Iowa.
FIRMS Clearing Machine Corporation, Chicago, 111.
Colorado, University of. Department of Civil Engi-
Able Machine & Tool Works, New York, N. Y. neering, Boulder, Colo.
Accurate Tool Co., Detroit, Mich. Columbia Machine Works, Inc., Brooklyn, N. Y.
Ace Manufacturing Corporation, Philadelphia, Pa. Consolidated Vultee Aircraft, Stinson Division,
’

Acklin Stamping Co., The, Toledo, Ohio. Wayne, Mich.

Acme Foundry & Machine Co., Cofleyville, Kans. Consulting Co., The, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Acme Machine Tool Co., The, Cincinnati, Ohio. Cooper-Bessemer Corporation,’ The, Mt. Vernon,
Advance Manufacturing, Inc., Detroit, Mich. Ohio.
Aeronautical Manufacturing Corporation, Niagara Cornwell Quality Tools Co., The, Mogadofe, Ohio.
Falls, N. Y.
Covel Manufacturing Co., Benton Harbor. Mich.
Ahlberg Bearing Co., Chicago, 111. Craig Shipbuilding Co., Long Beach, Calif. (In
Ainsworth & Sons, Inc., Wm., Denver, Colo. principle.)
Akron, University of, Akron, Ohio. Cramp Shipbuilding Co., Philadelphia, Pa.
Allen Gauge & Tool Co., Pittsburgh, Pa. Dallas Laboratories, Dallas, Tex.
Allen Manufacturing Cc., The, Hartford, Conn. Davenport Besler Corporation, Davenport, Iowa.
Alliance Manufacturing Co., Alliance, Ohio. De Laval Steam Turbine Co., Trenton, N. J.
Alpha Industries, Logansport, Ind. Delaware Bay Shipbuilding Co., Leesburg, N. J.
Alten’s Foundry & Machine Works, Lancaster, Delaware, University of. Materials Testing Labora-
Ohio. tory, Newark, Del.
Aluminum Industries, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio. Detroit Testing Laboratory, The, Detroit, Mich.
American Brake Shoe Co., Kellogg Division, (In principle.)
Rochester, N. Y. Detroit Testing Machine Co., Detroit, Mich.
American Measuring Instruments Corporation, DeWalt Products Corporation, Lancastei, Pa.
New York. N. Y. Dravo Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pa.
American Tool & Manufacturing Co., Urbana, Eitzen-Co., Louis C., New York, N. Y.
Ohio. El Paso Testing Laboratories, El Paso, Tex.
American Tool Works Co.,. The, Cincinnati, Ohio. Electric Sprayit Co., Sheboygan, Wis.
,

American Viscose Corporation, Marcus Hook, Pa. Electrical Testing Laboratories, New York, N. Y.
American Well & Prospecting Co., Corsicana, Tex. Ex-Cell-0 Corporation, Detroit, Mich.
Ames Co., B. C., Waltham, Mass. Fairbanks Morse & Co., Beloit, Wis.
Andover Motors Corporation, Elmira, N. Y. Farrel-Birmingham Co., Inc., Buffalo, N. Y.
Andrews, A. B., Lewiston, Maine. Fay & Scott Machine Shop, Dexter, Maine.
Arter Grinding Machine Co., Worcester, Mass. Federal Products Corporation, Providente, R. I.
Autocar Co., The, Ardmore, Pa. Filer & Stowell Co., The, Milwaukee, Wis.
Automatic Products Co., Milwaukee, Wis. Fitzsimons Manufacturing Co., Detroit, Mich.
Axelson Manufacturing Co., Los Angeles, Calif. Flood & Co., Walter H., Chicago, 111.
Barrett Hardware Co., Joliet, 111. Fosdick Machine Tool Co., The, Cincinnati, Ohio,
Bauer Bros. Co., The, Springfield, Ohio. Fray Machine Tool Co., Inc., Glendale, Calif.
Bausch A Lomb Optical Co., Rochester, N. Y. Gallmeyer & Livingston Co., Grand Rapids, Mich.
Berger Engineering Works, Inc., Seattle, W^ash. General Electric Co., Schenectady, N. Y.
Bickford & Co., H., Lakeport, N. H. General Engineering & Manufacturing Co., St.
Birdsboro Steel Foundry & Machinery Co., Birds- Louis, Mo.
bopo. Pa. General Engineering Works, Chicago, 111.
Black & Decker Manufacturing Co., The, Towson, General Machinery Corporation, Hamilton, Ohio.
Md. General Motors Corporation, Cleveland Diesel
Blanchard Machine Co., The, Cambridge, Mass. Engine Div., Cleveland, Ohio.
Bolinders Co., Inc.,New York, N. Y. Geometric Tool Co., The, New Haven, Conn.
Boston Machine Works Co., Lynn, Mass. Georgia School of Technology, Atlanta, Ga.
Brady, Inc., F. A., New York, N. Y. Gisholt Machine Co., Madison, Wis.
Brewer Dry Dock Co., Staten Island, N. Y. Gould & Eberhardt, Inc., Irvmgton, N. J.
The J. G., Philadelphia, Pa.
Brill Co., Granite State Mach. Co., Inc., Manchester, N. H.
Brown-Camp Hardware Co., Des Moines, Iowa. Graphic Calculator Co., Chicago, 111.
Bruce Williams Laboratories, The, Joplin, Mo. Haarmann Steel Co., Holyoke, Mass.
Bryant Chucking Grinder Co., Springfield, Vt. Hallmark Laboratories, The, Jamestown, N. Y.
Buerk Tool Works, Buffalo, N. Y. Harris Laboratories, Lincoln, Nebr.
Buffalo Testing Laboratories, Inc., Buffalo, N. Y. Hart Brothers Machine Co., Clarksburg, W. Va.
Builders Iron Foundry, Providence, R. I. Hatch Textile Research, New York, N. Y.
Bulotti Machinery Co., C. F., San Francisco, Calif. Herron Co., The James H., Cleveland, Ohio.
Busch-Suker Bros. Diesel Engine Co., St. Louis, Hill Acme Co., The, Acme Machinery Division,
Mo. Cleveland, Ohio.
California Testing Laboratories, Inc., Los Angeles, Holm’s Manufacturing Co., Kenosha, Wis.
Calif. Hubbard Textile Consulting Bureau, C. C., Silver
Cedar Rapids Engineering Co. of Delaware, Cedar Spring, Md.
Rapids, Iowa. Hughes Aircraft Co., Culver City, Calif.

9
10 Commercial Standard {Emergency) CS{E)119-Jf.5

Hughes Tool Co., Houston, Tex. Rice Institute, The, Houston, Tex. (In principle.)
Hunt Co., Robert W., Chicago, 111. Rogers Machine Works, Inc., Alfred, N. Y.
Hunter Engineering Co., Riverside, Calif, Ryan Aeronautical Co., San Diego, Calif.
Illinois Tool Works, Chicago, 111. Sales Service Machine Tool Co., St. Paul, Minn.
Index Machine & Tool Co., Jackson, Mich. Sav-Way Industries, Detroit, Mich.
Indicating Calipers Corporation, New York, N. Y. Savage Tool Co., Savage, Minn.
Integrity Supply, Inc., New York, N. Y. Schauer Machine Co., Cincinnati, Ohio.
International 'Business Machines Corporation, Simmons Machine Tool Corporation, Albany, N. Y.
Endicott, N. Y. Skagit Steel & Iron Works. Sedro-Woolley, Wash,
Iowa State College, Ames, Iowa. Skinner Engine Co., Erie, Pa.
Isaacson Iron Works, Seattle, Wash. Smalley-General Co., Bay City, Mich. (In principle)
Jacobs Aircraft Engine Co., Pottstown, Pa. Smith-Emery Co., Los Angeles, Calif., and San
Jansson Gage Co., Detroit, Mich. Francisco, Calif.
Johnson Motors, Waukegan, 111. Snow Manufacturing Co., Chicago, 111.
Johnston & Jennings Co., The, Cleveland, Ohio. Souther Engineering Co., The Henry, Hartford,
Kaufman Manufacturing Co., Manitowoc, Wis. Conn.
Kennedy Van Saun Manufacturing & Engineering Southern Aircraft Corporation, Garland, Tex.
Corporation, Danville, Pa. Southern Testing Laboratories, Inc., Birmingham,
Knight Machinery Co., W. B., St. Louis, Mo. Ala.
Krueger & Co., H. R., Detroit, Mich. Spartan Aircraft Co., Tulsa, Okla.
Lamson & Se.ssions Co., The, Cleveland, Ohio. Standard Forgings Corporation, East Chicago, Ind.
Landis Machine Co., Waynesboro, Pa. Standard Gage Co., Inc., Poughkeepsie, N. Y.
Landis Tool Co., Waynesboro, Pa. Standard Machinery Co., The, Mystic, Conn.
Lapointe Machine Tool Co., Hudson, Mass. Starrett Co., The L. S., Athol, Mass.
Law & Co., Wilmington, N. C. Steel City Testing Laboratory, Detroit, Mich.
LejTnan Manufacturing Corporation, McGowan Sterling Motor Truck Co., Inc., Milwaukee, Wis.
Pump Division, Cincinnati, Ohio. Stokerunit Corporation, Milwaukee, Wis.
Lincoln Park Industries, Inc., Lincoln Park, Mich. Streeter-Amet Co., Chicago, 111.
Linderme Machine & Tool Co., Inc., Detroit, Mich. Streine Tool A Manufacturing Co., The, New Bre-
Link-Belt Co., Chicago, 111. men, Ohio.
Link-Belt Ordnance Co., Chicago, 111. Sturgeon Bay Shipbuilding A Dry Dock Co.,
Lombard Governor Corporation, New York, N. Y. Sturgeon Bay, Wis.
Los Angeles Testing Laboratory, Los Angeles, Calif. Sunnen Products Co., St. Louis, Mo.
Machined Products Co., Louisville, Ky. Taft-Peirce Manufacturing Co., The, Woonsocket,
Macnick Co., Tulsa, Okla. R. 1.
Mann Tool Works, R. S. Oak Park, 111. Taylor Instrument Co.’s, Rochester, N. Y.
Alaryland Drydock Co., The, Baltimore, Md. Tennessee, Universit>^ of, Knoxville, Tenn.
Merz Engineering Co., Indianapolis, Ind. Texas A. A M. College, College Station, Tex.
Messinger Bearings, Inc., Philadelphia, Pa. Thai, Nelson Edward, Toledo, Ohio.
Miami Shipbuilding Corporation, Miami, Fla. Thompson A Lichtner Co., Inc., The, Boston, Mass.
Midwestern Tool Co., Chicago, 111. Thompson Products, Inc., Cleveland, Ohio.
Miedendorp, Henry, Jr., Glen Rock, N. J. Treadwell Engineering Co., Easton, Pa.
Minnesota, University of, Minneapolis, Minn. Triplex Machine Tool Corporation, New York,
Missouri State Highway Department, JeSerson N. Y.
City, Mo. Troy Tool A Gage Co., Detroit, Mich.
Moore Engineering, Inc., South Bend, Ind. Tubular Micrometer Co., St. James, Minn.
Napoleon Products Co., The, Napoleon, Ohio. Twin City Testing A Engineering Laboratory, St.
National Automatic Tool Co., Inc., Richmond, Paul, Minn.
Ind. Twining Laboratories, The, Fresno, Calif.
Nebraska, University of, Lincoln, Nebr. United Aircraft Division, Stratford, Conn.
New Albany Machine Manufacturing Co.,' New U. S. Automatic Corporation, Amherst, Ohio.
Albany, Ind. United States Testing Co., Inc., Hoboken, N. J.
Niles-Bement-Pond Co., Pratt & Whitney Division, (In principle.)
West Hartford, Conn. Universal Engineering Co., Frankenmuth, Mich.
Nordberg Alanufacturing Co., The, Milwaukee, Van Camp Hardware A Iron Co., Indianapolis, Ind.
Wis. Vard, Inc., Pasadena, Calif.
North Carolina State College, Raleigh, N. C. Villanova College, Villanova, Pa.
Northrop Aircraft, Inc., Hawthorne, Calif. Vinco Corporation, Detroit, Mich.
Notre Dame, University of, Notre Dame, Ind. Vonnegut Moulder Corporation, Indianapolis, Ind.
Novo Engine Co., Lansing, Mich. Wabash College, Chemistry Department, Craw-
Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. fordsville, Ind. (In principle.)
Oklahoma A. & M. College, Stillwater, Okla. Waltham Machine Works, Waltham, Mass.
Oklahoma, University of. Department of Alechanics, Ward A Co., E. H., Chicago, 111.
Norman, Okla. Warner A Swasey Co., The, Cleveland, Ohio.
Oregon State College, Corvallis, Oreg. West Virginia Universitj^ Morgantown, W. Va.
Packard Motor Car Co. (Aircraft Engine Division), Western Electric Co., Inc., New York, N. Y.
Detroit, Mich. Western Gear Works, Pacific Gear Plant, Los
Palmer Bros. Engines, Inc., Cos Cob, Conn. Angeles, Calif.
Parrott & Hahn, Inc., Olympia, Wash. Whiting Corporation, Harvey, 111.
Patzig Testing Laboratories, Des Moines, Iowa. Wickman Corporation, The, Detroit, Mich.
Pease Laboratories, Inc., New York, N. Y. Williams Inspection Co., A. W., Mobile, Ala.
Peck Stow & Wilcox Co., Southington, Conn, Wisconsin Foundry A Machine Co., Madison, Wis.
Penniman & Browne, Baltimore, Md. Wisconsin Motor Corporation, Milwaukee, Wis.
Perth Amboy Hardware Co., Perth Amboy, N. J. Wisconsin Screw Co., Racine, Wis.
Peters Co., O. S., Washington, D. C. Wolverine Tool Engineering A Manufactm-ing Co.,
Pettibone Mulliken Corporation, Chicago, lU. Chicago, 111.
Physicists Research Co., Ann Arbor, Mich. Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Mass.
Pipe Machinery Co., The, Cleveland, Ohio. York Corporation, York, Pa. (In principle.)
Portman Machine Tool Co., New Rochelle, N. Y. Young Engine Corporation, Canton, Ohio.
Pratt Institute, Brooklyn, N. Y. Zehnder Engineering Service, Louisville, Ky.
Purdy Co., Inc., W. S., New York, N. Y. GOVERNMENT
Pusey A Jones Corporation, The, Wilmington, Del. U. S.
Rasmussen Machine Co., Inc., Racine, Wis. Agriculture, U. S. Department of, Washington 25,
Rayl Co., The, Detroit, Mich. D. C.
Redmond Co., A. G., Owosso, Mich. Federal Works Agency, Public Buildings Adminis-
Reid Brothers Co., Inc., Beverly, Mass. tration, Washington 25, D. C.
Reliable Tool & Machine Works, Milwaukee, Wis. War Production Board, Washington 25, D. C.