Lecture 4
Lecture 4
1 2
3 4
2023-12-06
Rapid development and delivery is now often the most Dissatisfaction with the overheads involved in software
important requirement for software systems design methods of the 1980s and 1990s led to the
Businesses operate in a fast –changing requirement and it is creation of agile methods. These methods:
practically impossible to produce a set of stable software Focus on the code rather than the design
requirements
Are based on an iterative approach to software development
Software has to evolve quickly to reflect changing business needs.
Are intended to deliver working software quickly and evolve this
Rapid software development quickly to meet changing requirements.
Specification, design and implementation are inter-leaved The aim of agile methods is to reduce overheads in the
System is developed as a series of versions with stakeholders software process (e.g. by limiting documentation) and to
involved in version evaluation be able to respond quickly to changing requirements
User interfaces are often developed using an IDE and graphical without excessive rework.
toolset.
5 6
7 8
2023-12-06
It can be difficult to keep the interest of customers who Most organizations spend more on maintaining existing
are involved in the process. software than they do on new software development. So,
Team members may be unsuited to the intense if agile methods are to be successful, they have to
involvement that characterises agile methods. support maintenance as well as original development.
Two key issues:
Prioritising changes can be difficult where there are
multiple stakeholders. Are systems that are developed using an agile approach
maintainable, given the emphasis in the development process of
Maintaining simplicity requires extra work. minimizing formal documentation?
Can agile methods be used effectively for evolving a system in
Contracts may be a problem as with other approaches to
response to customer change requests?
iterative development.
Problems may arise if original development team cannot
be maintained.
Chapter 3 Agile software development 9 Chapter 3 Agile software development 10
9 10
Perhaps the best-known and most widely used agile Incremental development is supported through small,
method. frequent system releases.
Extreme Programming (XP) takes an ‘extreme’ approach Customer involvement means full-time customer
to iterative development. engagement with the team.
New versions may be built several times per day;
Increments are delivered to customers every 2 weeks; People not process through pair programming, collective
All tests must be run for every build and the build is only ownership and a process that avoids long working hours.
accepted if tests run successfully.
Change supported through regular system releases.
Maintaining simplicity through constant refactoring of
code.
11 12
2023-12-06
Small releases The minimal useful set of functionality that provides business
value is developed first. Releases of the system are frequent
and incrementally add functionality to the first release.
Simple design Enough design is carried out to meet the current requirements
and no more.
Test-first development An automated unit test framework is used to write tests for a
new piece of functionality before that functionality itself is
implemented.
Refactoring All developers are expected to refactor the code continuously as
soon as possible code improvements are found. This keeps the
code simple and maintainable.
Chapter 3 Agile software development 13 Chapter 3 Agile software development 14
13 14
15 16
2023-12-06
17 18
Conventional wisdom in software engineering is to Programming team look for possible software
design for change. It is worth spending time and effort improvements and make these improvements even
anticipating changes as this reduces costs later in the life where there is no immediate need for them.
cycle.
This improves the understandability of the software and
XP, however, maintains that this is not worthwhile as
changes cannot be reliably anticipated. so reduces the need for documentation.
Rather, it proposes constant code improvement Changes are easier to make because the code is well-
(refactoring) to make changes easier when they have to structured and clear.
be implemented. However, some changes requires architecture
In principle, when refactoring is part of the development refactoring, and this is much more expensive.
process, the software should always be easy to
understand and change as new requirements are
proposed.
Chapter 3 Agile software development 19 Chapter 3 Agile software development 20
19 20
2023-12-06
Re-organization of a class hierarchy to remove duplicate Testing is central to XP and XP has developed an
code. approach where the program is tested after every
Tidying up and renaming attributes and methods to make change has been made.
them easier to understand. XP testing features:
The replacement of inline code with calls to methods that Test-first development.
have been included in a program library. Incremental test development from scenarios.
User involvement in test development and validation.
Automated test harnesses are used to run all component tests
each time that a new release is built.
21 22
Writing tests before code clarifies the requirements to be The role of the customer in the testing process is to help
implemented. develop acceptance tests for the stories that are to be
Tests are written as programs rather than data so that implemented in the next release of the system.
they can be executed automatically. The test includes a The customer who is part of the team writes tests as
check that it has executed correctly.
development proceeds. All new code is therefore
Usually relies on a testing framework such as Junit.
validated to ensure that it is what the customer needs.
All previous and new tests are run automatically when
new functionality is added, thus checking that the new However, people adopting the customer role have limited
functionality has not introduced errors. time available and so cannot work full-time with the
development team. They may feel that providing the
requirements was enough of a contribution and so may
be reluctant to get involved in the testing process.
23 24
2023-12-06
25 26
Programmers prefer programming to testing and In XP, programmers work in pairs, sitting together to
sometimes they take short cuts when writing tests. For develop code.
example, they may write incomplete tests that do not This helps develop common ownership of code and
check for all possible exceptions that may occur. spreads knowledge across the team.
Some tests can be very difficult to write incrementally. It serves as an informal review process as each line of
For example, in a complex user interface, it is often code is looked at by more than 1 person.
difficult to write unit tests for the code that implements It encourages refactoring as the whole team can benefit
the ‘display logic’ and workflow between screens. from this.
It difficult to judge the completeness of a set of tests. Measurements suggest that development productivity
Although you may have a lot of system tests, your test with pair programming is similar to that of two people
set may not provide complete coverage. working independently.
27 28
2023-12-06
In pair programming, programmers sit together at the It supports the idea of collective ownership and
same workstation to develop the software. responsibility for the system.
Pairs are created dynamically so that all team members Individuals are not held responsible for problems with the code.
Instead, the team has collective responsibility for resolving these
work with each other during the development process.
problems.
The sharing of knowledge that happens during pair It acts as an informal review process because each line
programming is very important as it reduces the overall of code is looked at by at least two people.
risks to a project when team members leave.
It helps support refactoring, which is a process of
Pair programming is not necessarily inefficient and there software improvement.
is evidence that a pair working together is more efficient
Where pair programming and collective ownership are used,
than 2 programmers working separately. others benefit immediately from the refactoring so they are likely
to support the process.
Chapter 3 Agile software development 29 Chapter 3 Agile software development 30
29 30
The principal responsibility of software project managers The Scrum approach is a general agile method but its
is to manage the project so that the software is delivered focus is on managing iterative development rather than
on time and within the planned budget for the project. specific agile practices.
The standard approach to project management is plan- There are three phases in Scrum.
driven. Managers draw up a plan for the project showing The initial phase is an outline planning phase where you
what should be delivered, when it should be delivered establish the general objectives for the project and design the
and who will work on the development of the project software architecture.
deliverables. This is followed by a series of sprint cycles, where each cycle
develops an increment of the system.
Agile project management requires a different approach, The project closure phase wraps up the project, completes
which is adapted to incremental development and the required documentation such as system help frames and user
particular strengths of agile methods. manuals and assesses the lessons learned from the project.
Chapter 3 Agile software development 31 Chapter 3 Agile software development 32
31 32
2023-12-06
33 34
35 36
2023-12-06
Sprints are fixed length, normally 2–4 weeks. They Once these are agreed, the team organize themselves to
correspond to the development of a release of the develop the software. During this stage the team is
system in XP. isolated from the customer and the organization, with all
The starting point for planning is the product backlog, communications channelled through the so-called
‘Scrum master’.
which is the list of work to be done on the project.
The role of the Scrum master is to protect the
The selection phase involves all of the project team who
development team from external distractions.
work with the customer to select the features and
functionality to be developed during the sprint. At the end of the sprint, the work done is reviewed and
presented to stakeholders. The next sprint cycle then
begins.
37 38
The ‘Scrum master’ is a facilitator who arranges daily Agile methods have proved to be successful for small
meetings, tracks the backlog of work to be done, records and medium sized projects that can be developed by a
decisions, measures progress against the backlog and small co-located team.
communicates with customers and management outside
It is sometimes argued that the success of these
of the team.
methods comes because of improved communications
The whole team attends short daily meetings where all which is possible when everyone is working together.
team members share information, describe their Scaling up agile methods involves changing these to
progress since the last meeting, problems that have
cope with larger, longer projects where there are multiple
arisen and what is planned for the following day.
development teams, perhaps working in different
This means that everyone on the team knows what is going on locations.
and, if problems arise, can re-plan short-term work to cope with
them.
39 40
2023-12-06
41 42
For large systems development, it is not possible to focus only Plan-driven development
on the code of the system. You need to do more up-front A plan-driven approach to software engineering is based around
design and system documentation separate development stages with the outputs to be produced at
Cross-team communication mechanisms have to be designed each of these stages planned in advance.
and used. This should involve regular phone and video Not necessarily waterfall model – plan-driven, incremental
conferences between team members and frequent, short development is possible
electronic meetings where teams update each other on Iteration occurs within activities.
progress. Agile development
Continuous integration, where the whole system is built every Specification, design, implementation and testing are inter-
time any developer checks in a change, is practically leaved and the outputs from the development process are
impossible. However, it is essential to maintain frequent decided through a process of negotiation during the software
system builds and regular releases of the system. development process.
43 44
2023-12-06
Most projects include elements of plan-driven and agile What type of system is being developed?
processes. Deciding on the balance depends on: • Plan-driven approaches may be required for systems that require a lot
of analysis before implementation (e.g. real-time system with complex
Is it important to have a very detailed specification and design timing requirements).
before moving to implementation? If so, you probably need to use What is the expected system lifetime?
a plan-driven approach.
• Long-lifetime systems may require more design documentation to
Is an incremental delivery strategy, where you deliver the software communicate the original intentions of the system developers to the
to customers and get rapid feedback from them, realistic? If so, support team.
consider using agile methods. What technologies are available to support system development?
How large is the system that is being developed? Agile methods • Agile methods rely on good tools to keep track of an evolving design
are most effective when the system can be developed with a small How is the development team organized?
co-located team who can communicate informally. This may not be
• If the development team is distributed or if part of the development is
possible for large systems that require larger development teams
being outsourced, then you may need to develop design documents to
so a plan-driven approach may have to be used. communicate across the development teams.
45 46
Are there cultural or organizational issues that may affect the Agile methods are incremental development methods that focus on
system development? rapid development, frequent releases of the software, reducing
• Traditional engineering organizations have a culture of plan-based process overheads and producing high-quality code. They involve
development, as this is the norm in engineering. the customer directly in the development process.
How good are the designers and programmers in the The decision on whether to use an agile or a plan-driven approach
development team? to development should depend on the type of software being
• It is sometimes argued that agile methods require higher skill levels developed, the capabilities of the development team and the culture
than plan-based approaches in which programmers simply translate of the company developing the system.
a detailed design into code
Is the system subject to external regulation? Extreme programming is a well-known agile method that integrates
a range of good programming practices such as frequent releases of
• If a system has to be approved by an external regulator (e.g. the
the software, continuous software improvement and customer
FAA approve software that is critical to the operation of an aircraft)
then you will probably be required to produce detailed
participation in the development team.
documentation as part of the system safety case.
47 48
2023-12-06
A particular strength of extreme programming is the I. K. Kirpitsas and T. P. Pachidis, “Evolution towards
development of automated tests before a program Hybrid Software Development Methods and Information
feature is created. All tests must successfully execute Systems Audit Challenges,” Software, vol. 1, no. 3, pp.
when an increment is integrated into a system. 316–363, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.3390/software1030015.
The Scrum method is an agile method that provides a https://www.mdpi.com/2674-113X/1/3/15
project management framework. It is centred round a set
of sprints, which are fixed time periods when a system
increment is developed.
Scaling agile methods for large systems is difficult. Large
systems need up-front design and some documentation.
49 50