Nicrofer 3033 Alloy 33 English
Nicrofer 3033 Alloy 33 English
Nicrofer 3033 Alloy 33 English
A new corrosion-resistant
austenitic material for
No. 24
June 1998 many applications
Cover: Distribution
system of a sulfuric
acid plant in Nicrofer
3033 - alloy 33.
Operator:
Norddeutsche
Affinerie, Hamburg
(copper refinery).
Process equipment
manufacturer:
Franken GmbH,
Oberhausen
Nicrofer 3033 - alloy 33: Abstract
A new corrosion-resistant
austenitic material for
many applications
1
Introduction
It is well known that increasing the chromium content Theoretical considerations led to an alloy in the
of stainless steels increases their resistance to corrosion Cr-Fe-Ni system but with substantial additions of nitrogen
by oxidizing media. This is true both for pure nitric acid to stabilize the austenitic microstructure. A feasibility
and for nitric/hydrofluoric acid mixtures, as has been study based on laboratory heats and carried out in early
shown recently by E.-M. Horn and co-workers (1). Nickel- 1993 proved the concept. The first large-scale heat was
base alloys like alloy 690 with about 29 wt.% chromium melted immediately and successfully processed into plate
have also shown advantages both for handling of nitric and sheet, billets, welding wire and seamless tubes.
acid where halogen compounds are present and for the
use of nitric/hydrofluoric acid mixtures, e.g., in repro- Since the alloy´s processing behavior proved excel-
cessing of nuclear fuel elements (2, 3). Another oxidizing lent at all stages of production, preparations began in
medium of widespread industrial interest is highly con- 1994 for its approval as a pressure-vessel material in
centrated sulfuric acid. Nevertheless, until some years accordance with German (VdTÜV) and ASME standards.
ago the maximum chromium content of commercially
available stainless steels and nickel-base alloys was lim- 1995 saw the first manufacture of strip and longi-
ited to about 29 wt.%. Therefore the goal was to develop tudinally welded pipe in the new material. All the process
a new corrosion-resistant material with a chromium con- steps were accompanied by extensive corrosion tests on
tent distinctly higher than that of the materials hitherto in semi-finished products, both in the laboratory and under
use. This new material should also have an austenitic operating conditions at the Bayer plant. Processing tests,
microstructure to provide processing characteristics as which involved forming semi-finished products into dished
similar as possible to those of existing austenitic stainless heads, flanges and plate-type heat exchangers, were
steels and nickel-base alloys. monitored by a team of development specialists.
These were the objectives defined in 1992, from the Final material inspection by TÜV, based on three
beginning of Krupp VDM’s cooperation with Bayer AG 30-tonne heats, was documented in 1996 for a variety of
on the development of a metallic material which was to semi-finished product forms in VdTÜV sheet 516 and
possess the highest possible corrosion resistance when ASME Code Case 2227.
exposed to strongly oxidizing media such as highly con-
centrated sulfuric acid. Alloy 33 has been assigned the materials numbers
W.-Nr. 1.4591 (Europe) and UNS R20033 (USA).
2
Composition, microstructure,
mechanical properties and
thermal stability
of alloy 33
Table 1 shows the chemical composition of the new Table 2 shows the mechanical properties of alloy 33
corrosion-resistant alloy 33. The main feature is the high and other austenitic materials. The minimum characteris-
chromium content of about 33 wt.%. To achieve a fully tics of alloy 33, which have been approved by VdTÜV
austenitic structure the nickel content had to be adjusted and ASME, are well above those established both for
to 31 wt.% and about 0.4 wt.% nitrogen had to be stainless steels including the 6 %-Mo steels and for the
added. In order to create a multipurpose versatility nom- nickel-base alloys and come close to the requirements of
inally 1.6 wt.% molybdenum and some copper are al- alloy 625 in the soft-annealed condition. Ductility, as
loyed at the same time. As follows from Table 1, chromi- expressed by elongation, is very high and a ratio of yield
um, molybdenum and nitrogen result in a nominal pitting point to tensile strength of 0.53 gives additional safety, if
resistance equivalent (PRE) of 50, which compares fa- plastic strain is considered (9).
vourably with the PRE of 47 of the 6 % molybdenum aus-
tenitic stainless steel alloy 926 and is close to the PRE of With respect to phase stability, a chromium content
51 of alloy 625. Consequently, an excellent resistance to of 33 % and a nitrogen content of 0.4 % are not incom-
pitting and crevice corrosion can be expected. It should patible. Figure 2 indicates that there is a small loss of
be pointed out that the nitrogen content of the new alloy impact strength in the temperature range 700°C
is kept below the solubility limit of nitrogen in the solid to 900°C due to precipitation of some σ-phase.
phase to avoid any problems during welding with match- Nevertheless, even when sensitized for 8 hours the
ing filler. The high nitrogen solubility has been achieved impact strength at ambient temperature was well above
by the alloy´s high chromium content (4) and not by an 100 J in all tests. Furthermore, it should be noted that no
increase of manganese in the alloy (5). Together with the sensitization was observed after annealing in the temper-
low sulfur content of max. 0.005 wt.%, this will avoid the ature range 600°C to 1000°C for up to 10 hours, as
formation of any MnS, which tends to impair the local shown by testing for 15 cycles of 48 hours in boiling
corrosion resistance of stainless steels, especially resist- nitric acid (Huey Test), using the distillation method (10).
ance to crevice corrosion (6). Figure 3 shows that neither a significant increase in the
overall corrosion rate nor any sign of intergranular pen-
Figure 1 shows that the austenitic microstructure of a etration could be detected, and it is worth noting that this
40 mm solution-annealed plate of alloy 33 is completely remains true for annealing times of up to 1000 hours (11).
homogeneous (7, 8). A solution annealing temperature of
1120°C was selected. The fine-grained microstructure
(ASTM No. 5) is typical of nitrogen-alloyed materials.
3
Weldability of alloy 33
4
Resistance of alloy 33
to local corrosion
The main problem with standard austenitic steels is account the 30 % advantage in yield strength of alloy 33
their poor resistance to pitting and crevice corrosion in over the 6 %-Mo steels (see Table 2), the benefits for the
chloride-bearing media. It has been shown by Garner design of lightweight structures for marine applications
(12) that the ferric chloride test provides a conservative can be appreciated.
prediction of the occurrence of pitting and crevice corro-
sion in ambient seawater for a range of austenitic steels. Nevertheless, each alloy is only as good as the
In order to obtain an initial ranking of alloy 33 with re- corrosion resistance which is obtained in the welded
spect to resistance to localized corrosion, the ASTM G-48 condition. Therefore, at a very early stage of the alloy’s
test procedure was applied (13, 14). Table 3 gives the development the local corrosion resistance of welded
test results for alloy 33 in comparison to stainless steels samples with and without matching filler was determined
and nickel-base alloys. In addition to the critical pitting in 10 % FeCl3 • 6 H2O solutions. Table 4 gives the results
and the critical crevice temperatures of the different alloy of the critical pitting temperature evaluation of a 5 mm
types the pitting resistance equivalent and the cost ratio PAW weldment without filler in comparison to the base
with respect to alloy 316 L have been calculated. It is well material. Though welded without filler, and with no addi-
established that with increasing PRE values there is an tional heat treatment of the welded sample, the critical pit-
almost linear increase of resistance to localized corro- ting temperature was only reduced by 10°C in compari-
sion. As Table 3 shows, alloy 33 fits into this empirical son to the base material. Production of tubes longi-
rule. A critical pitting temperature of 85°C and a critical tudinally welded by GTAW without filler has already con-
crevice temperature of 40°C were determined. This pit- firmed this test result of an exceptionally small decrease
ting temperature is superior, and the crevice temperature in local pitting resistance in the welded condition.
equivalent, to those of the 6 %-Mo steels. Taking into
5
In addition, electrochemical tests have been per-
formed in chloride-bearing media and in artificial seawater.
Table 5 gives the critical pitting temperature determined
by potentiodynamic polarization curves as a function of
the repassivation potential in 1.0 n NaCl solution (7). The
evaluation was performed according to B.E. Wilde (15)
using a sweep rate of 180 mV/h. Among the stainless
steels tested, alloy 33 exhibits the highest pitting temper-
ature and outperforms even alloy 926 under these test
conditions. In order to explore the full potential of the
local pitting resistance of alloy 33, potentiostatic tests
applying a potential of 0.75 and 0.3 V (SCE) in arti-
ficial seawater according to DIN 50905-4 (16) were per-
formed. The test results are given in Table 6. The testing
time was 7 hours. Neither at 60°C and a potential of
0.75 V (SCE), nor at 0.3 V (SCE) and 85°C could pitting
be observed under those conditions. Alloy 926, which
was tested under those conditions for comparison, re-
vealed the same localized corrosion resistance. Finally
the chloride concentration of the artificial seawater was
increased by a factor of 2 by additions of NaCl at 0.3 V
(SCE) to increase the corrosiveness of the solution. Alloy
33 again showed no degradation with respect to pitting
resistance. A critical pitting temperature of 85°C was
determined, which is again equivalent to alloy 926.
6
Resistance of alloy 33
to stress corrosion
7
Corrosion resistance of
alloy 33 in nitric acid
and nitric acid/hydrofluoric
acid mixtures
Nitric acid
Evaluation of the corrosion behavior of alloy 33 in
nitric acid had been done (8) first by testing in boiling
azeotropic (67 %) HNO3 (Huey Test) using the distillation
method (10). Table 11 shows the test results after 15
cycles of 48 hours in comparison with two stainless steels
and the chromium rich nickel-base alloy G-30. Alloy 33
exhibits the lowest corrosion rate. According to these
results, in this kind of test alloy 33 is about 6 and 2 times
more corrosion-resistant respectively than AISI 304 L and
AISI 310 L and about 3.3 times more resistant than the
nickel-base alloy G-30.
Highly concentrated
sulfuric acid
Laboratory tests have been performed in 98 % sul-
furic acid at various temperatures between 100 and
200°C. Table 16 indicates the excellent corrosion resist-
ance of alloy 33 over the whole temperature range in
contrast to alloy 310 L and the 5 wt.% austenitic silicon
grade alloy 611. It also compares well with the 28 Cr -
4 Ni - 2 Mo superferritic stainless steel without the duc-
tility problems encountered with this material.
Moderately
concentrated sulfuric acid
The first results obtained so far from corrosion tests
in 15 to 80 % sulfuric acid at temperatures from 50 to
90°C indicate that alloy 33 in the passive state possesses
clear advantages over the reference materials for use in
sulfuric acid: alloy 825 and alloy 20. Polarization meas-
urements in agitated oxygen-containing and deaerated
sulfuric acid solutions show a higher tendency to pas-
sivation and a more stable passive state in comparison
with the reference materials (23). The presence of small
amounts of oxidants such as ferric sulfate, nitric acid or
potassium dichromate results in a widening of the range
of corrosion resistance of alloy 33 in the temperature-con-
centration field studied.
11
Corrosion resistance of
alloy 33 to alkaline solutions
12
Discussion
The data provided in this paper demonstrate the multi- Typical applications include heat exchangers, vessels,
purpose character of alloy 33. The unique combination piping and other equipment for sulfuric acid production,
of high strength, ductility and phase stability combined sulfuric acid heat recovery and distribution systems, nitric-
with resistance to localized attack in halide media, hydrofluoric acid pickling plants, seawater systems,
in mineral acids and in alkaline solutions opens a evaporation plants for salts and alkalis, bleaching plants
wide window for applications such as heat exchangers, for chemical pulp, plate or tubular heat exchangers using
which were not possible in the past. Furthermore, with brackish water or seawater as a coolant, as well as light-
respect to sulfuric acid applications the new alloy will weight structures in the offshore industry. Especially the
help overcome the inherent manufacturing problems multipurpose character of alloy 33 with respect to its
which are encountered with the chromium-rich super- corrosion resistance to acidic and alkaline media as well
ferritic alloys and also provide a cost advantage in com- as to chloride-containing cooling water opens up a wide
parison to chromium-rich nickel-base alloys. The balanced variety of applications.
chemical composition and ease of manufacturing of alloy
33 makes it possible to offer all product forms to the che- On the whole, the development of alloy 33 (W.-Nr.
mical process industry. This includes successful fabrica- 1.4591) is a textbook example of a customer-oriented
tion of plate-type heat exchangers; however, other com- project, completed to an extremely tight schedule through
ponents such as dished ends and tube to tubesheet weld- effective time management. It is a prime example of the
ments have also been successfully fabricated (20), technical and market potentials still to be explored with
including a complete 6.5 m3 agitator pressure vessel. nickel-containing austenitic stainless materials.
13
Figures and tables
100 µm
e
Tim
➤
Temperature, °C ➤
14
1000 •0.05 •0.05 •0.05 •0.05
900 •0.04 •0.04 •0.04 •0.05
Temperature, °C
older data
1
Corrosion rate, mm/a
Colombier + Hochmann
Fontana 1964
1952
0.3
+
304 L
newer data 28,31
0.1 310 L
Heubner + Kirchheiner 690
1987, with addition of alloy 31
+ this study 1997 33
100 µm 0.03
12 18 25 33
Chromium content, wt. %
Figure 4: Weld seam of a 15 mm plate of alloy 33 welded by GTAW using Figure 5: Corrosion rate of iron-chromium-nickel alloys in boiling azeotropic
matching filler (67 %) nitric acid plotted against the alloys’ chromium content according to
older (21, 22) and newer (2) sources and to this study
15
Lorem epsum (evl. Headline)
Cr Fe Ni Mo Cu N C PRE
Table 1: Nominal chemical composition and pitting resistance equivalent (PRE) of alloy 33
Alloy RP0,2 Rm A5
N/mm2 N/mm2 %
28 215 500 40
33 380 720 40
31 280 650 40
59 340 690 40
Table 2: Mechanical properties of alloy 33 and other austenitic materials (min. requirements at room temperature)
904 L 37 45 25 2.3
28 38 60 35 4.1
G-3 46 70 40 9.0
926 47 70 40 3.7
33 50 85 40 5.4
31 54 > 85 65 4.5
Table 3: Comparison of pitting resistance equivalent (PRE) with critical pitting/crevice temperature (CPT/CCT)
when tested according to ASTM - G 48 A/B (10% FeCl3 solution) and cost ratios of various alloys
Condition CPT in °C
5 mm plate
solution annealed 85
PAW weldment
of 5 mm plate without filler as welded 75
Table 4: Critical pitting temperature (CPT) of alloy 33 when tested according to ASTM - G 48 A for 24 hours
16
Alloy CPT, °C
316 Ti 45
310 L 60
904 L 75
926 90
33 > 95
Table 5: Critical pitting temperature determined by potentiodynamic polarization curves as a function of the repassivation potential Epp in 1.0 n NaCl solution.
Sweep rate 180 mV/h, pitting criterion: determination of the temperature at which Epp < Ecorr for alloy 33 and some other materials
U = 0.75 V (SCE)
Artificial seawater (16) > 60 > 60
0.55 mol/l Cl-
U = 0.3 V (SCE)
Artificial seawater (16) > 85 > 85
0.55 mol/l Cl-
U = 0.3 V (SCE)
Artificial seawater (16) 85
+ NaCl additions 85
1.05 mol/l Cl-
Table 6: Potentiostatically determined pitting resistance of alloy 33 in chloride-containing solutions in comparison with alloy 926
50 °C 75 °C 95 °C 100 °C
Table 7: Results of crevice corrosion tests in artificial seawater (17) tested according to MTI procedure (18)
U = 0.3 V (SCE)
0.55 mol/l Cl- 55 45
Table 8: Potentiostatically determined crevice corrosion resistance of alloy 33 in artificial seawater (16) in comparison with alloy 926
304 73.1
316 491.3
33 > 5000
Table 9: Results of stress corrosion cracking test in saturated CaCl2 at 135°C, test equipment after J.A. Jones (19), average time to failure of at least 3 specimens
17
Lorem epsum (evl. Headline)
Table 10: Results of stress corrosion cracking test in saturated CaCl2 at 125 °C and different stress levels related to 125 °C yield strength under constant load
conditions. Average time to failure of at least 3 specimens, in hours
G-30 0.13
33 0.04
Table 11: Corrosion tests in boiling azeotropic HNO3 (67 %) according to Huey using the distillation method (10) 15 x 48 h
AISI 304 L < 0.01 0.01 0.11 < 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.03 0.03 0.35
AISI 310 L < 0.01 < 0.01 0.08 < 0.01 0.02 0.06 0.03 0.02 0.14
33 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.03 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.07
Table 12: Corrosion tests in nitric acid under various conditions. Immersion tests over 21 days, g/m2h
AISI 304 L 25 < 0.01 0.028 0.36* < 0.01 0.07 0.76* 0.019 0.15* 1.18*
+ 25 < 0.01 0.029 n.t. < 0.01 0.05* n.t. 0.018 0.20* n.t.
+ 25 < 0.01 0.028 n.t. < 0.01 0.05* n.t. 0.033 0.27* n.t.
+ 25 < 0.01 0.028 n.t. < 0.01 0.05* n.t. 0.014 0.43* n.t.
AISI 310 L 25 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.16 < 0.01 0.02 0.32* < 0.01 0.10* 0.92*
+ 25 < 0.01 0.012 0.37* < 0.01 0.02* n.t. 0.011 0.13* n.t.
+ 25 < 0.01 < 0.01 n.t. < 0.01 0.03* n.t. 0.029 0.25* n.t.
+ 25 < 0.01 < 0.01 n.t. < 0.01 0.03* n.t. < 0.01 0.56* n.t.
33 25 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.06 < 0.01 0.01 0.12 < 0.01 0.05 0.19*
+ 25 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.06 < 0.01 0.01 0.17* < 0.01 0.03 0.31*
+ 25 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.07 < 0.01 0.01 n.t. 0.012 0.04 n.t.
+ 25 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.07* < 0.01 < 0.01 nt. < 0.01 0.06* n.t.
* = intergranular corrosion
Table 13: Corrosion tests in nitric acid under various conditions over very long times. Immersion tests up to 100 days, g/m2h.
18
12 % HNO3 0.4 % HF
+ 32 % + 44.5 % + 56 % + 67.5 %
Alloy + 0 % HF + 0.9 % HF + 3.5 % HF HNO3 HNO3 HNO3 HNO3
Table 14: Corrosion tests in solutions of nitric acid and hydrofluoric acid; immersion tests over 21 days at 90 °C, g/m h
2
25 °C 50 °C
Alloy + 3 % HF + 5 % HF + 7 % HF + 3 % HF + 5 % HF + 7% H
Table 15: Corrosion tests in 20 % nitric acid with additions of hydrofluoric acid, immersion tests over 3 x 7 days, g/m2h
28-4-2
0.03 0.06 0.53 0.04 0.07
superferrite
grade
0.02 0.36 0.81 0.70 0.61
A 611
Table 16: Corrosion resistance of alloy 33 and three other materials in 98 % sulfuric acid, test duration 7 days, mm/year
825 1.46
316 Ti 0.81
690 0.09
33 < 0.01
Table 17: Corrosion resistance of alloy 33 and various other materials tested in a sulfuric acid plant.
99.1 % H2SO4 ,velocity of flow ≥ 1.2 m/sec., 150 °C, test duration: 134 days
316 Ti 0.24
304 0.18
G-30 0.08
A 611 0.03
33 < 0.01
Table 18: Corrosion resistance of alloy 33 and various other materials tested in a sulfuric acid plant.
96 - 98.5 % H2SO4 , velocity of flow ≥ 1 m/sec., 135 - 140 °C, test duration: 14 days
19
Lorem epsum (evl. Headline)
28 0.10
C-276 0.05
33 0.06
Table 19: 96 % H2SO4 saturated with SO2 , velocity of flow ≥ 1 m/sec., 80 °C, test duration: 65 days
Alloy 33 Alloy 33
Medium Base material PAW welded
Table 20: Corrosion rate of alloy 33 in 96 % sulfuric acid at 240 °C with additions of nitrosylsulfuric acid, test duration: 3 x 7 days, mm/year
H2SO4
Alloy 101 % 102 % 102.5 % 103 % 107.5 %
Table 21: Corrosion rate of alloy 33 and various other materials in concentrated
H2SO4 and oleum at 150 °C, test duration: 21 days, mm/year
20
25 % NaOH 50 % NaOH
Alloy 75 °C 100 °C BT* 104 °C 75 °C 100 °C 125 °C BT* 146 °C
EN 1.4465 < 0.01 0.03 0.02 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.26 1.35
33 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
* Boiling temperature
Table 22: Corrosion behavior of stainless steels in sodium hydroxide under various conditions, test duration 28 days, mm/year
654 SMO ≤ 0.01 mm/yr ≤ 0.01 mm/yr —- ≤ 0.01 mm/yr ≤ 0.01 mm/yr
some uniform
corrosion
33 ≤ 0.01 mm/yr ≤ 0.01 mm/yr ≤ 0.01 mm/yr ≤ 0.01 mm/yr ≤ 0.01 mm/yr
some crevice some crevice some crevice
corrosion corrosion corrosion
Table 23: Corrosion resistance of alloy 33 and various other materials exposed to NaOH and NaOCl in the liquid and vapor phase
21
References
18) R. S. Treseder:
Guideline information on newer wrought iron
and nickel base corrosion-resistant alloys, MTI
Manual No. 3, Appendix B, Materials Technology
Institute of the Chemical Process
Industry, Columbus (Ohio), USA, 1980
19) J. A. Jones:
Engineering 101 (1921), 469 - 470
23
Krupp VDM high-performance materials and products
Corrosion-resistant alloys
Nickel, nickel-copper
VDM Nickel 99.2 – alloy 200 2.4066 Ni 99.2 N 02200 NA 11 ● ● ● ● ● 1101
VDM LC-Nickel 99.2 – alloy 201 2.4068 LC-Ni 99 N 02201 NA 12 ● ● ● ● ● 1101
VDM LC-Nickel 99.6 – alloy 205 2.4061 LC-Ni 99.6 N 02205 – ● ● ● ● ● –
Heat-resistant alloys
Nickel-chromium-iron, iron-nickel-chromium
Nicrofer 7520 – alloy 75 2.4951 NiCr20Ti N 06075 HR 203 ● ● ● ● 4035
Nicrofer 7216 – alloy 600 2.4816 NiCr15Fe N 06600 NA 14 ● ● ● ● ● 4107
Nicrofer 6030 – alloy 690 2.4642 NiCr29Fe N 06690 – ● ● ● ● ● 4038
Nicrofer 5120 CoTi – alloy C-263 2.4650 NiCo20Cr20MoTi N 07263 HR 206 ● ● ● ● 4120
Nicrofer 4722 Co – alloy X 2.4665 NiCr22Fe18Mo N 06002 HR 204 ● ● ● ● 4116
Nicrofer 4626 MoW – alloy 333 2.4608 NiCr26MoW N 06333 – ● ● ● ● 4134
Nickel-chromium-iron – standard alloys
Nicrofer 7216 H – alloy 600 H 2.4816 NiCr15Fe N 06600 NA14(H) ● ● ● ● ● 4107
Nicrofer 6023 H – alloy 601 H 2.4851 NiCr23Fe N 06601 – ● ● ● ● ● 4103
Nicrofer 45 TM – alloy 45 TM 2.4889 NiCr28FeSiCe N 06045 – ● ● ● 4139
24
Krupp VDM W.-Nr. Designation UNS BS Available product form Krupp
alloy designation designation desig- Sheet, Tube/pipe Strip Wire Rod, VDM
nation plate seamless- bar data
sheet
Krupp VDM W.-Nr. Designation UNS AWS Classification BS Available product form
alloy designation designation design-
Filler metal
ation Weld
Rod Wire Electrode strip
25
Krupp VDM sales offices, subsidiaries and representations
27
Krupp VDM stockholders and distributors
28
Imprint
A company of the
Krupp Hoesch Industries group.