International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering

ISSN: 2229-8649 (Print); ISSN: 2180-1606 (Online);

Volume 14, Issue 1 pp. 4030-4049 March 2017
©Universiti Malaysia Pahang Publishing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15282/ijame.14.1.2017.16.0326

Performance and emission characteristics of micro gas turbine engine fuelled with
bioethanol-diesel-biodiesel blends

N. Saifuddin1*, H. Refal1 and P. Kumaran2

1
Institute of Sustainable Energy,
Universiti Tenaga Nasional (The National Energy University),
Jalan IKRAM-UNITEN, 43000 Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia
2
Uniten Research and Development Centre
Universiti Tenaga Nasional (The National Energy University),
Jalan IKRAM-UNITEN, 43000 Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia
*
Email: [email protected]

ABSTRACT

Biodiesel is receiving increasing attention as an alternative fuel due to the ever-growing

demand for energy. However, the inferior physiochemical properties of biodiesel render
it incompatible for gas turbine application, which needs to meet the standard requirement
of gas turbine fuel accordance to ASTM D2880. In this quest, the biodiesel-diesel–
bioethanol blends might be a good option. In this paper, the research work was carried
out to study experimentally the performance and exhaust emission characteristics of a
25kW micro gas turbine engine (Capstone Model C30) fuelled with biodiesel-diesel-
bioethanol blends. The assessment on the improved fuel properties of biodiesel by
blending with bio-ethanol had shown more superior atomisation characteristics
performance compared to unmodified biodiesel. Moreover, the performance test in the
micro gas turbine was limited up to 20% blend of biofuel, which showed improved
thermal efficiency during the test. Subsequently, the emission test carried out in this work
also showed significant enhancement in emissions, except nitrogen oxides (NOx) which
contributed to the higher formation in comparison with the distillate diesel. Finally,
B80E20 (80:20 of biodiesel-bioethanol) was proposed to be selected as an ideal blended
fuel ratio to be applied in micro gas turbine engine due to its adaptability to replace diesel
fuel, while showed better performance and emission properties as compared to the pure
petroleum diesel.

Keywords: Gas turbine; biodiesel; bioethanol;, atomisation; Sauter mean diameter; engine
performance; emissions

INTRODUCTION

Today, energy-intensive activities are the highest contributors to the increase in carbon
dioxide (CO2) emissions and fossil fuel combustion efficiency accounts for 90% of the
total CO2 emissions [1-3]. Power generation remains the most important sector related to
fossil fuel consumption. Therefore, the power sector choice of fossil fuel is of the utmost
importance in reducing CO2 emissions [4]. The global average annual growth rate of 2.4
ppm in atmospheric CO2 concentrations in 2012 was rather high [5]. Renewable energy
(RE) resources have become an increasingly significant part of power generation in the
efforts to reduce fossil fuel consumption and pollutant emissions [6]. Among these, the

4030
 Saifuddin et al. / International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering 14(1) 2017 4030-4049

two main types of liquid biofuels are bioethanol and biodiesel; both drawing considerable
attention in the recent years [7]. Biodiesel is methyl ester of triglyceride prepared from
edible or non-edible vegetable oils (virgin or used) or animal fats by the conversion of the
triglycerides to esters via transesterification. The reproducibility, nontoxicity, and
sulphur-free property of biodiesel have generated a lot of research interest. The primary
focus has been on the use of biodiesel in diesel engines [1-3, 8-11]. The compatible
physiochemical properties of biodiesel to diesel fuel have allowed up to 20% blending of
biodiesel with petroleum diesel for the application in diesel engines without any
modification [12-17].
Recently, there has been a lot of interest to consider biodiesel fuel for gas turbine
application. Micro gas turbines (MGTs) are becoming more popular and experiencing
greater demand due to their advantages of being small, modular, reliable. It is more
flexible in terms of fuel, have compact size and light weight, are low in maintenance costs
and emissions levels and high in efficiency, and lower electricity costs [18, 19]. Micro
gas turbines are poised to take over from petrol and diesel reciprocating engines in a
number of key applications due to their superior performance. Micro gas turbines are
originally designed for the use of crude oil derivatives. However, it has been shown that
biodiesel has shortcomings that need to be improved before it can be considered for gas
turbine application. A study by Ivaniš, Radović [20] reported that biodiesel has higher
density and viscosity than conventional diesel which results in poor atomisation of the
fuels and may clog fuel nozzles. The properties of a liquid fuel that affect atomisation are
viscosity, density, and surface tension. Atomisation refers to the process of breaking up
bulk liquids into droplets. Atomisation plays a major role in the combustion efficiency
and emission in gas turbines engines. Adequate atomisation enhances mixing and
completes the combustion efficiency in a direct injection gas turbine. Higher density
causes the fluid to resist acceleration and tends to result in a larger average droplet size.
An increase in fuel density will also increase the surface tension of the fuel. Surface
tension tends to stabilise the fluid and prevents its breakup into smaller droplets; hence,
adversely affects the atomisation of the liquid. Viscosity causes the fluid to resist
agitation, prevents its breakup and leads to a larger average droplet size. The use of a fuel
with higher viscosity delays atomisation by suppressing the factors required to make the
fuel spray to break up. Extensive research by Gao, Deng [21] on the spray characteristics
of biodiesel found that the Sauter mean diameter (SMD) of biodiesel-blended fuels is
larger than that of fossil diesel because of the higher viscosity and surface tension of
biodiesel. Evaporation and atomisation of the biodiesel are relatively more difficult
because of the higher surface tension and viscosity of the biodiesel.
Several techniques are available in order to modify the physical properties of the
biofuel [22]. The properties of the fuels require modification according to the demands of
the equipment. Several studies tried to use preheating in order to reduce the viscosity of
the biodiesel [9, 23-29]. Some researchers showed that distillation process can be applied
to improve the physical properties that affect atomisation characteristics of biodiesel for
gas turbine application such as viscosity, density, and surface tension [30]. However,
these processes are energy intensive and time consuming; hence, finding a non-laborious
process (such as blending with bioethanol) is highly recommended. The outcome of the
work by Yilmaz and Sanchez [31] implied that biodiesel–bioethanol blends are more
effective than biodiesel–methanol blends in improving engine performance and emission.
The addition of less viscous fuels with smaller surface tension into biodiesel is potentially
capable of recovering the deteriorated spray characteristics compared to diesel. Similarly,
Yoon, Park [32] showed that adding up to 20% (by volume) of bioethanol into biodiesel

4031
Performance and emission characteristics of micro gas turbine engine fuelled with bioethanol-diesel-biodiesel blends

(BE20) enhances the spray characteristics of fuel blends. Studies showed that blending
lower alcohols such as methanol and bioethanol with biodiesel only in lower proportions
improves the engine performance. This is because of their lower heating value and higher
latent heat of vaporisation [33, 34].
Accordingly, limited numbers of studies have focused on the application of
bioethanol–biodiesel blends for the gas turbine engine. Similarly, there is a scarcity of
published works on data examining combustion efficiency and emission of biodiesel
blended with bioethanol, in particular, bioethanol produced from waste glycerol (a by-
product of biodiesel transesterification process). The notion that there is an enhancement
of the combustion efficiency of biodiesel fuel when added with oxygenated fuels such as
bioethanol needs a further study. Such investigation is important to understand which
kind of blends is more effective in reducing both NOx and particulate emissions of a gas
turbine engine. Hence, in evaluating the potential of bioethanol blended with biodiesel as
an alternative fuel for gas turbines, it is a priority to ensure that the properties of the fuels
are compatible with the gas turbine fuel properties so as not to violate the warranty of the
equipment. Thus, the aim of the study is to investigate the performance and emissions of
a gas turbine engine operating on bioethanol-Diesel-biodiesel blends, using biodiesel
produced from palm oil and bioethanol produced from waste glycerol.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Blend Fuel Preparation and Property Test Evaluation

The biodiesel obtained in this study was produced by utilising palm oil as the feedstock
(via the alkali catalyst mediated trans-esterification process), which was obtained from
the Sime Darby Biodiesel plant (Klang, Malaysia). Hence, the bioethanol used was
produced from waste glycerol, as described elsewhere by Saifuddin and Refal [35]. Prior
to its use in the experiments, the bioethanol used was dehydrated, which had undergone
the prior water removal step as performed by following the method of Tomanee [36]
without any modification. Distillate diesel as the baseline fuel was obtained locally
(Petronas Gas Station, Malaysia). There were seven types of fuel used in the study for
preliminary atomisation which included pure bioethanol (E100), pure biodiesel (B100),
B20E80 ( biodiesel 20% blend with 80% bioethanol), B40E60 (biodiesel 40% blend with
60% bioethanol), B60E40 ( biodiesel 60% blend with 40% bioethanol), B80E20
(biodiesel 80% blend with 20% bioethanol), and distillate diesel (DD). However, there
were also three types of fuel used for the performance and emission tests for micro gas
turbine, namely, (i) 90% Diesel: 9.0% Biodiesel: 1.0% Bioethanol (DBE10%), (ii) 85%
Diesel: 12.75% Biodiesel: 2.25 % Bioethanol (DBE15%) and (iii) 80% Diesel: 16%
Biodiesel: 4% Bioethanol (DBE20%). In this paper, all performance and emissions tests
were performed at five engine loads, namely 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25KW. All the fuel
preparations were subjected to the property test evaluation in accordance with ASTM
D2880 Standard Specification fuel oil requirements for gas turbine application, which
were performed by third-party laboratories, namely, the TNB Research Laboratory and
ITS Testing Services (M) SDN BHD.

Numerical Evaluation of Preliminary Atomisation Characteristics

The atomisation characteristics of blended biodiesel with various ratios of bioethanol
were measured by determining the SMD parameter. SMD is designated as D32 and a very
common parameter in fluid dynamics used for expressing the fineness of a spray in terms
of the surface area, viscosity, and density of the spray droplets. The atomisation

4032
 Saifuddin et al. / International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering 14(1) 2017 4030-4049

characteristic analysis was done numerically using Equation (1) reported by Lefebvre and
McDonell [37].

0.4 0.5
D32 σ 1 0.4 μ2𝐿 1
= 0.48 ( ) (1 + ) + 0.15 ( ) (1 + ) (1)
d0 ρA UR2 d0 ALR σρ𝐿 d0 𝐴𝐿𝑅

where 𝐷32 = Sauter Mean Diameter; 𝑑0 = Liquid discharge opening diameter (m); 𝜎 =
Liquid surface tension (N⁄m); 𝜌𝐴 = Density of air (Kg⁄m3 ); 𝑈𝑅 = Relative co −
flowing velocity of the two streams (m⁄s); 𝜌𝐿 = Density of liquid (kg/m3); 𝜇𝐿 =
Liquid viscosity (kg/ms); and ALR = Air to liquid mass flow ratio.
Droplet evaporation time is another crucial element in atomisation and depends on
the droplet size of the fuel. The fuel droplet size after atomisation depends on fuel delivery
geometry and the properties of the fuel such as density, viscosity, and surface tension,
while the evaporation rate depends on the specific heat, temperature at the evaporation
zone and chemical structure of the fuel molecules. Bolszo [38] analysed the evaporation
time of diesel fuel in micro gas turbines using effective evaporation constant and droplet
evaporation lifetime. Thus, a similar approach was used to evaluate the evaporation time
of bioethanol and biodiesel. The details of Equations (2) to (4) are given for effective
evaporation constant (𝜆𝑒𝑓𝑓 ) calculated based on Bolszo [38].
D232
te = (2)
λeff

where 𝑡𝑒 = Effective evaporation time (s); 𝐷32 = Sauter mean diameter (m)
; 𝜆𝑒𝑓𝑓 = Effective evaporation constant (m2/s).

Since
1 𝑌0∞
𝐵 = ( ) ⌈𝐶𝑝(Τ∞ − Τ𝚤 + (𝒬 ⌉ (3)
𝐿 𝑖

where L = Latent heat of vaporisation per unit mass of fuel (kJ/kg); Τ∞ = Temperature of
compressed air after recuperating (oC); Τι = Surface temperature of fuel droplet (oC); Y0∞
= Mass fraction of oxidant in surrounding; Q = Heat of reaction (°C); i = Stoichiometric
mixture ratio; Cp = Specific heat of liquid fuel droplet (kJ/kg.K),

and
8
λeff = ρ Cp ln(1 + B) (4)
ι

Where  = Thermal conductivity of gas around the droplet (W/m.K); 𝜌𝜄 =

3
Fuel density (Kg/m ); 𝐶𝑝 = Specific heat of gas around the deplete (kJ/kg.K); 𝐵 =
Heat transfer number.

Performance and Emission Tests for Micro Gas Turbine

The performance test of biofuel blend with distillate diesel was conducted in a liquid
fuelled micro turbine (Capstone Model C30) at UNITEN Gas Turbine laboratory. A
schematic plant-layout of the micro gas turbine engine and accessories are shown in
Figure 1. The micro turbine generator performance test for this study was measured by
thermal efficiency and specific fuel consumption. The performance test was conducted at

4033
Performance and emission characteristics of micro gas turbine engine fuelled with bioethanol-diesel-biodiesel blends

ambient temperatures of 23.9 °C to 24.2 °C, achieved by using the cooling equipment.
This is because the power output is affected by ambient temperature; hence, conducting
the test at the lowest ambient temperatures is recommended to achieve the highest power
output. The micro turbine was calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer correction
curves during commissioning prior to the testing. The micro turbine was started and run
for 30 min using diesel to warm up the equipment before switching to the designated test
fuel when the micro turbine has reached the steady-state condition. This steady-state
condition was achieved when the temperatures of the exhaust gases, mass flow rate, and
electric power output reached a stable reading. Then, the power output was varied from
idle to 25kW with intervals of 5kW, whilst ensuring that steady state conditions were
reached before measurements were recorded.

Figure 1. A schematic plant-layout of the micro gas turbine engine.

Meanwhile, the test fuels were also evaluated accordingly with a continuous
emission monitoring system (CEMS) to evaluate the emissions of the micro turbine.
CEMS was used at a sample port on the exhaust stack of the micro turbine for emission
monitoring. The data for emission exhaust gases such as carbon CO, CO2, O2, and NOX
were recorded at 5 s intervals. Prior to use, the instrument analyser was calibrated
periodically with an available sample with known quantities of gas. The entire
performance test was conducted in accordance with calculations of Standard [39]. The
following equations were used for the calculation of thermal efficiency and brake-specific
fuel consumption respectively. Thermal efficiency was derived from the formula shown
in Equations (5) to (8).

Wnet
𝜂= (5)
HI

where 𝑊𝑛𝑒𝑡 = Generator power obtained from the data acquisition system (KW); 𝐻𝐼 =
Heat input (KW). Meanwhile, heat input was derived from Equation (6).

4034
 Saifuddin et al. / International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering 14(1) 2017 4030-4049

HI = 𝒬ι ρι (LHV𝔭 ) + SH𝔭 (6)

where 𝒬ι = Volumetric flow (Litre/sec); 𝜌𝜄 = Density of the liquid fuel at operating

temperature (kg/m3); 𝐿𝐻𝑉𝔭 =Lower heating value at constant pressure (kJ/kg);
𝑆𝐻𝔭 =Sensible heat at constant pressure (kJ/sec).
From Equation (7), the lower heating value can be obtained. The higher heating
value can be calculated from equation (8):

LHV𝔭 = HHV𝒱 − 91.20(H) (7)

where 𝐻𝐻𝑉𝒱 = Higher heating value at constant volume in accordance with ASTM
D4809 (kJ/kg); 𝐻 = Percentage of hydrogen by weight contained in the liquid fuel and
determined in accordance with ASTM D1018.

SH𝔭 = 𝒬ι ρι − (hı − hı,77 ) (8)

where ℎ𝚤 = Specific enthalpy of the liquid fuel at operating temperature of 27.38 °C

(kJ/kg); ℎ𝚤,77 = Specific enthalpy of the liquid fuel at a standard operating temperature of
25 °C (kJ/kg).
The brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC) from the micro turbine system was
derived from Equation (9).

𝐴verage Mass Flow Rate of Fuel

BSFC = (9)
Average Load

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Sauter Mean Diameter Analysis of Bioethanol Blends with Biodiesel

The major goal of atomisation is to increase the surface to volume ratio to enhance liquid
evaporation and combustion efficiency. The biggest requisite for atomisation is that a
relative velocity between the liquid to be atomised and surrounding air is high. One way
to obtain this is by inserting moving liquid on a high-velocity airstream. Among the many
methods of atomisation, the micro turbine deploys air blast atomising for its fuel
combustion system as the air used to atomise the liquid promotes a good blend and better
atomisation. SMD is the most widely used parameter to define the droplet size in a spray.
Due to cost constraints, an SMD formula generated from Lefebvre correlation was
adopted to numerically evaluate the SMD of bioethanol and its blends with biodiesel fuel,
as a similar correlation was previously used to evaluate SMD of diesel fuel in Capstone
C30 micro gas turbine with air blast atomiser, which has been experimentally validated
using the phase doppler anemometer (PDA), air to liquid ratio (ALR), and relative co-
flowing velocity exiting (UR) value adopted from a report by Bolszo [38].
Based on Figure 2, using Lefebvre equation, the patterns of all fuels were identical
where SMD decreased gradually as the atomisation air to liquid mass flow ratio ALR
spanned from 0.2 to 0.65. In a prompt atomisation process, air velocity, ALR, and fuel
properties such as surface tension and density play primary roles, while viscosity takes a
reduced role [40]. In general, test fuels have smaller droplet size at a high air velocity
injection. At the low values of ALR, the kinetic energy of the atomising air was
insufficient to overcome the viscous and surface tension forces which opposed the
disintegration of the liquid. As ALR increased, it was evident that not only the droplets

4035
Performance and emission characteristics of micro gas turbine engine fuelled with bioethanol-diesel-biodiesel blends

were quite smaller but also the difference between the largest and smallest droplets
decreased significantly. In fact, for the highest values of ALR shown in Figure 2, there
was a difference between the droplet sizes of the entire fuels. However, as can be
anticipated, the highest atomising air velocities result in the finest atomisation. The
biodiesel had a higher SMD value for all cases, though at the highest velocities produced
an average SMD larger than the other fuels. Yoon, Park [32] in their investigation
revealed that the measured results of biodiesel-bioethanol blended fuel showed SMD
decreased with the increase of the relative velocity between the injected fuel and ambient
gas. In conclusion to their work, the atomisation performance of test fuels was remarkably
affected by the difference of relative velocity. Therefore, BE10 and BE20 have a smaller
SMD distribution compared with ultra-low sulphur diesel (ULSD). The SMDs calculated
using Lefebvre equation for all sample fuels prepared is illustrated in Figure 2. The results
exhibited in Table 1 show that bioethanol has the lowest surface tension, density, and
viscosity compared to biodiesel and distillate diesel, while the most significant reduction
was found for viscosity.

90
Sauter Mean Diameter (µm)

80
70 E100
60 B20E80
50 B40E60
40 B60E40
30 B80E20
20 B100
10 DD
0
0.65 0.45 0.34 0.28 0.22
Air to liquid ratio
E100 Pure Bioethanol B80E2 80% Biodiesel/20% Bioethanol
0
B20E8 20% Biodiesel/80% Bioethanol B100 Pure Biodiesel
0
B40E6 40% Biodiesel/60%Bioethanol DD Pure Distillate Diesel.
0
B60E4 60% Biodiesel/40%Bioethanol
0

Figure 2. Effect of air to liquid ratio on SMD using different blends of fuel (bioethanol
and distillate diesel)

Pure biodiesel fuel (B100) has the largest SMD, followed by B80E20, B60E40, DD,
B40E60, B20E80, and pure bioethanol. SMD of biodiesel blends was much larger when
compared to diesel because of the higher value of viscosity and surface tension of
biodiesel [41]. When bioethanol was added, the blended fuels gave smaller droplets and
when the blending ratio of bioethanol increased, the diameter became even smaller. This
is because the addition of bioethanol led to a more active breakup process. This indicates
that the addition of bioethanol reduces the droplet size and enhances the mixture
formation. The higher viscosity and larger surface tension of biodiesel inhibited its
atomisation process, and as bioethanol increased, the viscosity and surface tension of the

4036
 Saifuddin et al. / International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering 14(1) 2017 4030-4049

blended fuel decreased (Table 1). Referring to Table 1, the higher ratio of bioethanol in a
fuel will correspond to the lower density, viscosity, and surface tension. This will favour
the break of droplets due to the reduced resistance to shear stress and thus, better
atomisation performance was achieved.

Table 1 Physical property of test fuel used for atomisation assessment

Density Viscosity Surface Tension

Fuel Samples
(kg/m3) (mm2/s) (mN/m)
E100 811.0 1.19 22.30
B80E20 860.0 4.26 31.32
B60E40 854.0 3.37 28.88
B40E60 845.0 2.18 25.93
B20E80 837.0 1.36 24.11
DD 845.0 3.95 23.00
B100 874.0 4.60 34.00

It is interesting to note that distillate diesel (DD) and blended 60BE40 fuel had a
similar tendency of droplet size over the entire range of measurement. This was consistent
with the study by Guan, Tang [42] who characterised the diameter size of biodiesel
(B100) and diesel by the particle/droplet image analysis (PDIA) technique. They
examined that the diameters for the fuels were 25 µm and 20 µm. However, when di-n-
butyl ether (DBE) was blended into biodiesel with a volume fraction of 15% and 30%,
the diameters decreased to 21 µm and 16 µm, respectively. Likewise, Yoon et al. [18]
concluded that by adding up to 20% (by volume) of bioethanol into biodiesel (BE20), the
droplet size of BE10 and BE20 was smaller than of diesel. The smaller the size of fuel
drops in the air-fuel mixture, the faster the air-fuel mixture evaporates in the cylinder and
the higher the combustion velocity of the air-fuel mixture [43]. This affirms that the
improvement in physical properties by blending with different biofuels which are less
viscous can reduce SMD of different percentage ratios of biodiesel compared with pure
biodiesel and lead to better combustion efficiencies.

Droplet Evaporation Time (DET) of Bioethanol and Biodiesel

DET is another crucial element that influences the combustion efficiency and its
dependence on the droplet size of the fuel. Decreasing the size of the fuel drops decreases
evaporation time of the air-fuel mixture and therefore, will increase the combustion
velocity of the air-fuel mixture [44]. The evaporation time of droplets was analysed using
effective evaporation time constant and the droplet lifetime was determined using the D2
law. According to the experimental data by Bolszo [38], when using ideal premixing and
pre-vaporization at 30kW load, the Capstone C30 required 11 milliseconds (ms) for the
droplets with SMD 50μm of diesel to be fully vaporized corresponding to the value (0.28)
of ALR. Hence, in order to determine the evaporation time of neat bioethanol and
biodiesel, experimental data from Bolszo’s work were adapted for this analysis to
estimate the required evaporation time for the droplets (to be fully vaporized) in the micro
turbine. Table 2 shows DET of bioethanol, biodiesel, and distillate diesel, respectively. It
was observed that at lower ALR, (same operation condition as Bolszo’s work), the
biodiesel and diesel required 21 and 18 ms, respectively to be fully vaporized, whereas
bioethanol required 23 ms for a 54 µm droplets, which require a much longer time to
evaporate.

4037
Performance and emission characteristics of micro gas turbine engine fuelled with bioethanol-diesel-biodiesel blends

Chong and Hochgreb [45] reported that fuel droplets with higher SMD contain high
momentum and thus have extended evaporation time. However, the results of this
research showed that decreasing the size of the bioethanol drops increased the evaporation
time of the air-fuel mixture. This is in contrast for the liquid fuel like biodiesel and diesel;
although their droplet size was bigger, the evaporation time was lower compared with
bioethanol. This phenomenon is due to the very high evaporation enthalpy of bioethanol,
causing the droplets evaporation rate to be limited. Thus, bioethanol behaved much more
like a high boiling point fuel compared to biodiesel and diesel. As can be seen from Table
3, the latent heat of vaporization of bioethanol (840 kJ/kg) was the highest, which was
three times higher than that of biodiesel and diesel (230 and 250 kJ/kg, respectively).
Consequently, more heat energy is required to evaporate a sufficient amount of fuel to
make a combustible fuel to air mixture. This issue is more severe for bioethanol as
compared to biodiesel and diesel due to its higher vaporization energy.

Table 2. DET of bioethanol, biodiesel and distillate diesel.

Distillate Diesel
Bioethanol (E100) (D100) Biodiesel (B100)
ALR
SMD (µm) DET (ms) SMD DET (ms) SMD DET (ms)
(µm) (µm)
0.65 21 4 26 3 29 4
0.45 28 6 34 5 38 6
0.34 38 11 46 9 51 11
0.28 54 23 63 18 72 21
0.22 64 33 75 25 85 29

Table 3. Physical properties of fuels that affect the rate of evaporation time.

Latent Heat of Evaporation Specific Heat of Fuel Droplet

Fuels
(kJ/kg) (kJ/kg.K)
E100 840 2.55
DD 250 1.85
B100 230 1.90

The experiment results obtained in this study were supported by the work of
Benjumea, Agudelo [46], who stated that the lower heat of vaporisation of palm methyl
ester of approximately 200~220 kJ/kg had faster evaporation compared to diesel which
had 375 kJ/kg latent heat of vaporisation at the same operating condition. Similarly,
Zhang, Xu [47] reported that the evaporation of methanol and bioethanol fuels was much
slower than that of gasoline because of their lower vapour pressures and higher latent
heats of vaporization. Bagul AD [48] stated that the vaporization of bioethanol blends
requires more heat input than needed to vaporize the same mass of gasoline. The lower
vapour pressures and higher latent heats of vaporization are still the challenges for the
evaporation of alcohol fuels because inadequate vaporization of the fuel can lead to an
increase in hydrocarbon emissions. Iranmanesh [49] reported that the higher heat of
evaporation of the bioethanol or diethyl ether in the fuel blends tends to produce slow
vaporization and poorer fuel-air mixing which subsequently produces incomplete
combustion efficiency of the mixture.

4038
 Saifuddin et al. / International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering 14(1) 2017 4030-4049

Specific heat capacity is another critical factor that influences the evaporation rate.
Bioethanol has a higher specific heat than biodiesel and diesel, which means that it
requires higher energy to raise the temperature of the liquid fuel. The results from this
work is in a good agreement with [50, 51] where they reported that the specific heat of
the bioethanol fuel is higher than that of pure gasoline and this leads to the decrease in
the drop of the charge temperature. Hence, more addition of bioethanol decreases
combustion temperature (caused by its increased specific heat) in contrast with biodiesel
and diesel. It can be concluded by using direct proportional assumption (as shown in
Table 3) that the increase in bioethanol percentage ratio in blended fuel could lead to
prolonged ignition delay period and reduced combustion flame temperature. This is
explained as mentioned earlier by the higher latent heat of vaporization and specific heat
value of bioethanol, which are considered as the most influential factors [52]. Based on
the results, it is recommended that the micro gas turbine operation is limited to up to 20%
blend of bioethanol so as to achieve a balance of good droplet size and combustion
efficiency characteristics.

Micro Gas Turbine Engine Performance Characteristics Evaluation

The analyses of performance and emissions characteristic of micro gas turbine fuelled
with biofuel (Biodiesel-Bioethanol) blended with distillate diesel and using load ranging
from 5kW to 25kW were carried out. The comparative parameter to determine the
efficiency of conversion of fuel into work to power the micro gas turbine was measured
by brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC). Fuel consumption is a measure of the
volumetric fuel consumption for any particular fuel and depends on a number of
parameters, namely the calorific value. In general, the brake thermal efficiency is simply
the inverse of the product of fuel consumption and the lower calorific value of the fuel.
Figure 3 indicates the variations of the BSFC for different diesel-biodiesel-bioethanol
blended fuels ratio under various engine loads. The brake specific fuel consumption
trends for diesel and the blends are similar in nature. The results showed that increasing
bioethanol proportion in the fuel blend increased the BSFC. This behaviour is attributed
to the heating value per unit mass of the bioethanol (31825 kJ/kg), which was noticeably
lower than that of the diesel and biodiesel fuels (45088, 40023 kJ/kg, respectively).
Yilmaz [53] studied the performance and emission of biodiesel-diesel-ethanol blends
(B45E10D45, B40E20D40) in a diesel engine at different load conditions. They found
that the use of ethanol in the biodiesel-diesel blend showed higher fuel consumption than
that of diesel fuel. From Figure 3, it can be seen that BSFC for the blend fuel DBE10 was
the most comparable ratio to neat diesel (DD) for all loads tested. This is because of the
high heating value of the blend in comparison to the BSFC of DBE15 and DBE20. These
results agree with those found by other authors [54, 55].
The brake specific fuel consumption is greater at smaller loads, but it decreases at
medium and higher loads. For the same loads, the bioethanol blends exhibited higher
consumption due to lower heating values (meaning less energy content than pure diesel
fuels). Different properties of the test fuels significantly affected the brake thermal
efficiency of the engine. The higher thermal efficiency in turn helped to achieve better
combustion efficiency and lower emissions correspondingly. The variation of brake
thermal efficiency for pure diesel and its blends of up to 20% of biodiesel-bioethanol for
the low and high loads are shown in Figure 4. The brake thermal efficiency for the 20%
ratio (80:16:4 of diesel-biodiesel-bioethanol) fuel was found to be 21.92% (at test load of
20kW); which was very close to the value of pure diesel (22.87%) at a similar load. It
should be noted that an increase in the thermal efficiency was observed in spite of the fact

4039
Performance and emission characteristics of micro gas turbine engine fuelled with bioethanol-diesel-biodiesel blends

that the calorific values of the blends were lesser than the values for pure diesel. The
increase in the thermal efficiency can be attributed to the addition of the oxygenated
additive, which decreased the viscosity of the mixture, improved the atomisation and fuel
vaporization and thereby enhanced the combustion efficiency of the fuel to a greater
extent. Besides that, the thermal efficiency of blends was also improved due to faster
burning of bioethanol in the blend (An increase in the rate of heat release due to rapid
combustion of bioethanol by flame propagation). These results agreed with those found
by other authors [56, 57].

0.700
0.600
Brake Specific Fuel
Consumption

0.500
(kg/kW.hr)

SFC DD
0.400 SFC DBE10
0.300 SFC DBE15
0.200 SFC DBE20

0.100
0.000
5 10 15 20 25
Load Test (kW)

Fuel %Vol of Biofuel in blends

Diesel Biodiesel Bioethanol
blending [(B) + (E) / (Total Vol)]
(D) (B) (E)
description
DBE20 80 16 4 20%
DBE15 85 12.75 2.25 15%
DBE10 90 9 1 10%
DD 100 0 0 -

Figure 3. Brake specific fuel consumption at various load using different fuels blends

30
Brake Thermal Efficiency (%)

25

20

15
DD
10 DBE10
DBE15
5 DBE20

0
5 10 15 20 25
Test Load (kW)

Figure 4. Variation of brake thermal efficiency of the micro gas turbine at different
loads using various fuel blends.

4040
 Saifuddin et al. / International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering 14(1) 2017 4030-4049

At the maximum test load of 25kW, it was observed that the thermal efficiency of
the blend was marginally lower than diesel. Thermal efficiency was 22.99%, 23.16%, and
22.64% for DBE10 (90:9:1 of diesel-biodiesel-bioethanol), DBE15 (85:12.75: 2.25 of
diesel-biodiesel-bioethanol), and DBE20 (80:16:4 of diesel-biodiesel-bioethanol),
respectively. The slight variations in the thermal efficiency of the DBE blends were
mainly due to the lower calorific value of bioethanol when compared to diesel and
biodiesel. The results of this work concurred with Krishna, Bandewar [58] who found the
brake thermal efficiency of the blend was 26.73% as compared to 23.21% of Karanja oil
and 27.01% of pure diesel. Similar results were also reported by Anand R [59], who
showed that at 100% load condition, the maximum brake thermal efficiency of biodiesel-
bioethanol blends (B90E10) was higher than that of B80E20 and lower than that of diesel
fuel. Thus, it can be concluded that most works have reported that the thermal efficiency
of the fuel blends is marginally lower than diesel at the maximum engine power output.

Exhaust Emission Comparison of Micro Gas Turbine Operating on Biofuel Blends

with Distillate Diesel
Renewable bio-fuels also emit pollutants that are equally detrimental to the environment
and specifically dependant to the combustion dynamic of a particular engine. CO2 is one
of the main combustion products which are very important in determining the
completeness of a combustion reaction of the fuel. The variation of CO2 with various
loads for diesel fuel and diesel-biodiesel-bioethanol blends is illustrated in Figure 5.

2
1.8
1.6
CO2 Concentration (%)

1.4 DD
1.2
1 DBE1
0.8 0
DBE1
0.6
5
0.4
0.2
0
5 10 15 20 25
Test Load (KW)

Figure 5. Variation of CO2 emissions from micro gas turbine at different test loads for
different fuel blends

It was found that as the load increased, CO2 emissions increased as more and more
fuel was burned at high load while complete combustion efficiency was achieved at the
high loads due to high temperature. This trend was similar for all fuel blends. The CO2
emissions of DBE10, DBE15, and DBE20 (at the highest test load of 25 kW) were higher
(1.84%, 1.88%, and 1.89%, respectively) than those of diesel fuel and increased with the
increase of bioethanol percentage. This was due to the complete combustion efficiency
caused by the presence of highly oxygenated bioethanol supply, thus the emission of CO2
increased with the increase in bioethanol percentage of blends. These results were in
agreement with Cheenkachorn and Fungtammasan [60] and Subbaiah, Gopal [61] who
showed that at the high engine speed and load, the CO2 emissions increased as more and
more fuel burned more excess air. They also observed that the CO2 concentrations

4041
Performance and emission characteristics of micro gas turbine engine fuelled with bioethanol-diesel-biodiesel blends

emissions from all biodiesel-bioethanol-diesel blend fuels were higher than that of diesel
fuel. Deshpande SS [62] stated in their research that for the blended fuel of DBE10, the
CO2 emissions were higher at all loads and maximum increase was 66.37% as compared
to the pure diesel. However, they reported that for the blend DBE20, the CO2 emissions
were lower at all loads in comparison with the fuel DBE10. Their result was in contrast
with this study, which showed that DBE20 emitted more CO2 emissions for all test loads
compared to DBE10, and DBE15.
Another important emission gas is carbon monoxide (CO). During the complete
combustion efficiency, the conversion of CO into CO2 takes place whereas if the
combustion efficiency is incomplete due to shortage of air or the low gas temperature,
more CO will be formed. Formation of CO indicates loss of power, resulting in oxygen
deficiency in the combustion chamber [63]. The variation of CO with loads for different
fuels is shown in Figure 6.

100
CO Concentration (ppm)

90
80
70
60 DD
50 DBE10
40 DBE15
30 DBE20
20
10
0
5 10 15 20 25
Test Load (KW)

Figure 6 Variation of CO emissions from micro gas turbine at different test loads for
different blended fuels.

Emissions of CO from engine mainly depend on the physical and chemical

properties of the fuel. The CO emissions of the diesel-biodiesel-bioethanol blend fuels
were much different from that of conventional diesel at the low loads as shown in
Figure 6. However, the CO emissions slightly increased at the low loads and decreased
significantly at the higher loads with all the fuel modes. The report by Hulwan and Joshi
[54] indicated that CO emissions were drastically increased at the low loads using the
high percentage of bioethanol in diesel–bioethanol blends. They reported that the drastic
increase in the CO percentage at the low load for the blend was due to the decrease in the
cylinder gas temperature and delayed combustion efficiency process, even though enough
oxygen was available for the combustion efficiency process. The reduction in CO
emissions was noticed for blends at the high load due to the high temperature and
enrichment of oxygen owing to the bioethanol addition, in which an increase in the
proportion of oxygen will promote further oxidation of CO during the engine exhaust
process [59-64].
The experimental results of Barabas, Todoruţ [65] showed that at the high engine
loads, the lowest CO emission (0.234 % vol.) was for the biodiesel 10%-diesel 85%-
ethanol 5% (B10D85E5) mixture. This compared to the one seen in the diesel fuel case
(0.575% vol.) represented a 59% reduction. In the previous works by several researchers,
it was suggested that the higher oxygen content of the blended fuels could improve the
combustion efficiency process while the lower viscosity and density of the blended fuels

4042
 Saifuddin et al. / International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering 14(1) 2017 4030-4049

could lead to better air-fuel mixing, which can sufficiently burn all fuel, resulting in the
lower CO emissions [52, 66, 67].

120
100
80
NOx Concentration

60
(ppm)

DD DBE10 DBE15 DBE20

40
20
0
5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25
Test Load (KW)

Figure 7. Variation of oxides nitrogen emissions from the micro gas turbine at different
test loads for different blended fuels.

The most troublesome emissions from engines are NOx. It is produced during the
combustion efficiency process when nitrogen and oxygen are present at elevated
temperatures. The oxides of nitrogen in the exhaust emissions contain nitric oxide (NO)
and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). The formation of NOx is highly dependent on the combustion
temperatures, oxygen concentration, and residence time for the reaction to take place [68].
The variation of nitrogen oxides with loads for diesel fuel and diesel-biodiesel-bioethanol
blends is presented in Figure 7. It can be observed that NOx emitted by all fuels blends
are higher than the ones for the corresponding pure diesel fuel case. The NOx emissions
of diesel-biodiesel-bioethanol blends were lower at the low loads and higher at medium
and high loads than those of diesel fuel. This was due to the higher combustion
temperature as well as the oxygen content of the bioethanol at medium and high loads
versus the diesel fuel. The NOx emissions of DBE10, DBE15, and DBE20 were 94%,
83%, and 105% higher compared to those of the diesel at full load (25 kW) of the engine.
Generally the higher oxygen content results in the higher combustion temperature which
leads to the higher NOx emission. This result was comparable with Mofijur, Rasul [69]
who also found less influence of oxygenated components of the fuel blends in the NOx
formation at smaller loads. Nevertheless, at the medium and high engine load conditions,
the NOx emission increased by 10–26% compared to diesel fuel. Most of the studies on
this fuel concluded that the higher oxygen content and low viscosity in bioethanol fuel
can lead to better mixing, improve combustion efficiency and rise the combustion
chamber temperature, which contributes to the higher formation of NOx emissions [54,
70]. Thus, with the increase of bioethanol in the blended fuel, NO2 emission increased
correspondingly at the high load engine. Opposite results were also observed by several
considerable studies that developed new methods for the reduction of NOx emission from
the diesel engine by using selective catalytic reduction technology. An experiment
research by Xiaoyan, Yunbo [70] used three types of catalyst for NOX emission reduction.
They observed approximately a 5.5% increase in NOx emission from the diesel–
biodiesel–ethanol blend without any catalyst assembly. However, when they used the
Ag/Al2O3 catalyst, NOx was reduced by 73%. Again, when the exhaust was passed
through the Ag/Al2O3+Cu/TiO2 catalyst and Ag/Al2O3+Cu/ TiO2+Pt-supported catalysts,
the reduction was 71% and 61% respectively at the high load engine. The same trend was
obtained in the research published by Baskar and Kumar [71], who studied the effect of

4043
Performance and emission characteristics of micro gas turbine engine fuelled with bioethanol-diesel-biodiesel blends

oxygen concentration in the intake air and diesel-water emulsion as fuel for combustion,
performance and emission characteristics for a direct injection diesel engine. A reduction
in NOx emission was observed in their work due to the reduction in combustion chamber
temperature as the water concentration increased.
Another gas found in the emissions obtained in the combustion exhaust during the
experiment was oxygen. Oxygen (O2) was not perceived as a pollutant in this aspect. The
necessity to examine the concentration of O2 in the exhaust was important to establish the
benefits of bioethanol as being a carbon neutral and oxygenated fuel. The graph in
Figure 8 presents the O2 emission in the exhaust gas, which shows that the concentration
was the lowest in distillate diesel (DD) and high with respect to the increasing bioethanol
volumetric ratio in the blending. The O2 concentration in the exhaust stream was pretty
much stable and ranged from 17.95 to 19.25% from the high to low load input. Generally,
the O2 emissions increased with the higher amount of bioethanol in diesel-biodiesel-
bioethanol blended fuel as compared with the pure diesel. The results indicated that the
O2 levels did not have any drastic change. In the lean and stoichiometric conditions where
the amount of air is enough to sustain complete combustion efficiency, the levels of O2
are abundant, and the presence of additional O2 atoms in the bioethanol is directly noticed
[59]. From Figure 8, it can be noticed that the oxygen concentration emissions were
reduced with load for all the fuels modes. This was due to the fact that as the load
increased, more O2 was used for complete combustion efficiency. The O2 emissions were
reduced by 18.49%, 18.35%, and 18.36%, respectively with the blends DBE10, DBE15,
and DBE20 compared with the diesel fuel at the full load of engine (25kW).

20
19.5
O2 Concentration (%)

19
18.5
18
DD
17.5
DBE10
17
DBE15
16.5
DBE20
16
5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25
Load Test (KW)

Figure 8. Variation of oxygen emissions from the micro gas turbine at different test
loads for different blended fuels.

CONCLUSIONS

Renewable energy utilisation for power generation is still not wide spread and more data
is needed on the performance of biofuel for gas turbine engines. The current study
provided new information regarding the use of biofuels in micro turbines. The
physicochemical characteristics of all the biofuels used must lie within the specifications
for their use in micro gas turbines. Recent reports on the use of biodiesel in micro gas
turbines have described problems associated with viscosity and density. In addition, the
current study on the use of bioethanol in micro gas turbines has also demonstrated the
drawbacks related to the increase in evaporation droplet time, which was explained in the
part of the high latent heat of evaporation of ethanol. Hence, the blend ratio B80E20 (80%

4044
 Saifuddin et al. / International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering 14(1) 2017 4030-4049

biodiesel-20% bioethanol) indicated by this research work was the most ideal blended
fuel ratio to be applied in the micro gas turbine engine. This blend can replace diesel fuel,
and therefore a 100% biofuel can be used in the existing gas turbine engines without the
need of engine modifications. The results of this study are important to establish the limits
of biofuel properties essential for the utilization in gas turbine application. Subsequently,
the emissions test reported in this work also showed significant enhancement in
emissions. This study has therefore shown that better returns that can be gained with the
integration of the production of biodiesel and bioethanol by turning the waste glycerol, a
by-product of biodiesel production, into fuel like bioethanol. Finally, it is worth
mentioning that this study is among the few that has provided valuable data on the usage
of biofuel for power generation using gas turbine. The usage of biodiesel and bioethanol
(produced from waste glycerol) for power generation in micro gas turbine engine will
also help to defray the cost of biodiesel production. Further work is necessary to evaluate
the preliminary atomization in terms of the spray length and angle using thermal imaging
for various blend fuels to mimic the actual condition that occurs in gas turbine prior to
gas turbine application.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank the Malaysian Ministry of Education for valuable
financial support through the Exploratory Research Grant Scheme No. 12012013. We
also acknowledge the Sime Darby Malaysia, for supplying the (crude glycerol, biodiesel)
and Universiti Tenaga Nasional for the research facilities.

REFERENCES

[1] Jaichandar S, Annamalai K. Jatropha oil methyl ester as diesel engine fuel - an
experimental investigation. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical
Engineering. 2016;13:3248-61.
[2] Dubey P, Gupta R. Study of the performance and emission characteristics for a
dual fuel powered single cylinder diesel engine. International Journal of
Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2016;13:3373-88.
[3] Shukri MR, Rahman MM, Ramasamy D, Kadirgama K. Artificial neural network
optimization modeling on engine performance of diesel engine using biodiesel
fuel. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering.
2015;11:2332-47.
[4] Blok K, Höhne N, Van Der Leun K, Harrison N. Bridging the greenhouse-gas
emissions gap. Nature Climate Change. 2012;2:471.
[5] Wu Z, Xia X, Wang B. Improving building energy efficiency by multiobjective
neighborhood field optimization. Energy and Buildings. 2015;87:45-56.
[6] Esen M, Yuksel T. Experimental evaluation of using various renewable energy
sources for heating a greenhouse. Energy and Buildings. 2013;65:340-51.
[7] Dharma S, Ong HC, Masjuki H, Sebayang A, Silitonga A. An overview of engine
durability and compatibility using biodiesel–bioethanol–diesel blends in
compression-ignition engines. Energy Conversion and Management.
2016;128:66-81.
[8] Aziz Hairuddin A, Yusaf T, Wandel AP. Single-zone zero-dimensional model
study for diesel-fuelled homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI)

4045
Performance and emission characteristics of micro gas turbine engine fuelled with bioethanol-diesel-biodiesel blends

engines using Cantera. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical

Engineering. 2016;13:3309-28.
[9] Khalid A, Jaat N, Sapit A, Razali A, Manshoor B, Zaman I, et al. Performance
and Emissions Characteristics of Crude Jatropha Oil Biodiesel Blends in a Diesel
Engine. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering.
2015;11:2447-57.
[10] Ghafoori M, Ghobadian B, Najafi G, Layeghi M, Rashidi A, Mamat R. Effect of
nano-particles on the performance and emission of a diesel engine using biodiesel-
diesel blend. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering.
2015;12:3097-108.
[11] Azad AK, Rasul MG, Giannangelo B, Islam R. Comparative study of diesel
engine performance and emission with soybean and waste oil biodiesel fuels.
International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2015;12:2866-
81.
[12] Loganathan M, Anbarasu A, Velmurugan A. Emission characteristics of jatropha-
dimethyl ether fuel blends on a DI diesel engine. International journal of scientific
& technology research. 2012;1:28-32.
[13] Mahgoub BK, Sulaiman S, Karim ZA. Performance study of imitated syngas in a
dual-fuel compression ignition diesel engine. International Journal of Automotive
and Mechanical Engineering. 2015;11:2282.
[14] Khalid A, Jaat N, Sapit A, Razali A, Manshoor B, Zaman I, et al. Performance
and emissions characteristics of crude jatropha oil biodiesel blends in a diesel
engine. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering.
2015;11:2447.
[15] Hamada KI, Rahman MM, Ramasamy D, Noor MM, Kadirgama K. Numerical
investigation of in-cylinder flow characteristics of hydrogen-fuelled internal
combustion engine. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences.
2016;10:1782-802.
[16] Mohd Noor CW, Mamat R, Najafi G, Mat Yasin MH, Ihsan CK, Noor MM.
Prediction of marine diesel engine performance by using artificial neural network
model. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2016;10:1917-30.
[17] Kettner M, Dechent S, Hofmann M, Huber E, Arruga H, Mamat R, et al.
Investigating the influence of water injection on the emissions of a diesel engine.
Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2016;10:1863-81.
[18] Cavarzere A, Morini M, Pinelli M, Spina PR, Vaccari A, Venturini M.
Experimental analysis of a micro gas turbine fuelled with vegetable oils from
energy crops. Energy Procedia. 2014;45:91-100.
[19] De Paepe W, Contino F, Delattin F, Bram S, De Ruyck J. Optimal waste heat
recovery in micro gas turbine cycles through liquid water injection. Applied
Thermal Engineering. 2014;70:846-56.
[20] Ivaniš GR, Radović IR, Veljković VB, Kijevčanin ML. Thermodynamic
properties of biodiesel and petro-diesel blends at high pressures and temperatures.
Experimental and modeling. Fuel. 2016;184:277-88.
[21] Gao Y, Deng J, Li C, Dang F, Liao Z, Wu Z, et al. Experimental study of the spray
characteristics of biodiesel based on inedible oil. Biotechnology Advances.
2009;27:616-24.
[22] Park SH, Suh HK, Lee CS. Nozzle flow and atomization characteristics of ethanol
blended biodiesel fuel. Renewable energy. 2010;35:144-50.

4046
 Saifuddin et al. / International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering 14(1) 2017 4030-4049

[23] Mohod TR, Bhansali S, Moghe S, Kathoke T. Preheating of biodiesel for the
improvement of the performance characteristics of di engine: A Review.
International Journal of Engineering Research and General Science. 2014;2:747-
53.
[24] Kun-Balog A, Sztankó K. Reduction of pollutant emissions from a rapeseed oil
fired micro gas turbine burner. Fuel Processing Technology. 2015;134:352-9.
[25] Dubey P, Gupta R. Study of the performance and emission characteristics for a
dual fuel powered single cylinder diesel engine. International Journal of
Automotive & Mechanical Engineering. 2016;13.
[26] Yasin MHM, Mamat R, Aziz A, Yusop AF, Ali MH. Investigation on combustion
parameters of palm biodiesel operating with a diesel engine. Journal of
Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2015;9:1714-26.
[27] Said NH, Ani FN, Said MFM. Review of the production of biodiesel from waste
cooking oil using solid catalysts. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and
Sciences. 2015;8:1302-11.
[28] Hoque N, Mourshed M, Das BK. Performance and emission comparison of
Karanja (pongamia pinnata), Pithraj (aphanamixis polystachya), Neem (azadira
chtaindica) and Mahua (madhuca longofolia) seed oil as a potential feedstock for
biodiesel production in Bangladesh. International Journal of Automotive and
Mechanical Engineering. 2015;12:2967-82.
[29] Hasan MM, Rahman MM, Kadirgama K. A review on homogeneous charge
compression ignition engine performance using biodiesel–diesel blend as a fuel.
International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2015;11:2199-
211.
[30] Selim MY. Reducing the viscosity of Jojoba Methyl Ester diesel fuel and effects
on diesel engine performance and roughness. Energy Conversion and
Management. 2009;50:1781-8.
[31] Yilmaz N, Sanchez TM. Analysis of operating a diesel engine on biodiesel-
ethanol and biodiesel-methanol blends. Energy. 2012;46:126-9.
[32] Yoon SH, Park SH, Suh HK, Lee CS. Effect of biodiesel-ethanol blended fuel
spray characteristics on the reduction of exhaust emissions in a common-rail
diesel engine. Journal of Energy Resources Technology. 2010;132:042201.
[33] Campos-Fernández J, Arnal JM, Gómez J, Dorado MP. A comparison of
performance of higher alcohols/diesel fuel blends in a diesel engine. Applied
energy. 2012;95:267-75.
[34] Mwangi JK, Lee W-J, Chang Y-C, Chen C-Y, Wang L-C. An overview: Energy
saving and pollution reduction by using green fuel blends in diesel engines.
Applied Energy. 2015;159:214-36.
[35] Saifuddin N, Refal H. Optimization of fermentation parameters for bioethanol
production from waste glycerol by microwave induced mutant Escherichia coli.
Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences.
2015;6:1449-61.
[36] Tomanee P. Cassava-based adsorbent for removing water from ethanol vapor.
AIChE 2008 Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, USA2008.
[37] Lefebvre AH, McDonell VG. Atomization and sprays: CRC press; 2017.
[38] Bolszo CD. Investigation of atomization, mixing and pollutant emissions for a
microturbine engine. The UCI Undergraduate Research Journal. 2005;8:13-22.
[39] Standard A. Power test code for fired steam generators. ASME Standard PTC-4-
1. USA: ASME; 1998.

4047
Performance and emission characteristics of micro gas turbine engine fuelled with bioethanol-diesel-biodiesel blends

[40] Lefebvre AH. Airblast atomization. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science.
1980;6:233-61.
[41] Anwar ZM TE. Investigation of various biodiesel blend spray characteristics in
micro turbine. Journal of Advanced Science and Engineering Research.
2014;4:184-95.
[42] Guan L, Tang C, Yang K, Mo J, Huang Z. Effect of di-n-butyl ether blending with
soybean-biodiesel on spray and atomization characteristics in a common-rail fuel
injection system. Fuel. 2015;140:116-25.
[43] Farouk T DF. Studies of the combustion of drops in a fuel spray—the burning of
single drops of fuel. Symposium (International) on Combustion: Elsevier; 1953.
p. 818-30.
[44] Gupta K, Rehman A, Sarviya R. Bio-fuels for the gas turbine: A review.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2010;14:2946-55.
[45] Chong CT, Hochgreb S. Spray combustion characteristics of palm biodiesel.
Combustion Science and Technology. 2012;184:1093-107.
[46] Benjumea P, Agudelo J, Agudelo A. Basic properties of palm oil biodiesel–diesel
blends. Fuel. 2008;87:2069-75.
[47] Zhang M, Xu M, Zeng W, Zhang G, Zhang Y, Cleary DJ. Characterization of
methanol and ethanol sprays using Mie-scattering and laser induced fluorescence
under engine cold-start conditions. 13th Annual Conf on Liquid Atomization and
Spray Systems-Asia; 2009.
[48] Bagul AD RH, Chaudhari SA, Waghodekar SV. Performance Testing of engine
under alcohol blending with data acquisition system. International Journal of
Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering. 2016;6:238-43.
[49] Iranmanesh M. Experimental investigations about the effect of new combination
of biofuels on simultaneous reduction of NOx and smoke emissions in DI-diesel
engine. International Journal of Automotive Engineering. 2013;3(2):379-92.
[50] Attallaa M, Solimana A, Torkyb MA. Engine Performance and Exhaust
Emissions of an SI Engine Using Acetic Acid, Ethanol, and Gasoline Blended
Fuel. 2013.
[51] Sileghem L, Casier B, Coppens A, Vancoillie J, Verhelst S. Influence of water
content in ethanol-water blends on the performance and emissions of an SI engine.
Fisita World Automotive Congress2014.
[52] Zhu L, Cheung C, Zhang W, Huang Z. Combustion, performance and emission
characteristics of a DI diesel engine fueled with ethanol–biodiesel blends. Fuel.
2011;90:1743-50.
[53] Yilmaz N. Comparative analysis of biodiesel–ethanol–diesel and biodiesel–
methanol–diesel blends in a diesel engine. Energy. 2012;40:210-3.
[54] Hulwan DB, Joshi SV. Performance, emission and combustion characteristic of a
multicylinder DI diesel engine running on diesel–ethanol–biodiesel blends of high
ethanol content. Applied Energy. 2011;88:5042-55.
[55] Prabakaran B, Udhoji A. Experimental investigation into effects of addition of
zinc oxide on performance, combustion and emission characteristics of diesel-
biodiesel-ethanol blends in CI engine. Alexandria Engineering Journal.
2016;55:3355-62.
[56] Tse H, Leung C, Cheung C. Performances, emissions and soot properties from a
diesel-biodiesel-ethanol blend fuelled engine. Advances of Automobile
Engineering S1: 005:1-11.

4048
 Saifuddin et al. / International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering 14(1) 2017 4030-4049

[57] Banapurmath N, Khandal S, Swamy RL, Chandrashekar T. Alcohol (ethanol and

diethyl ethyl ether)-diesel blended fuels for diesel engine applications-a feasible
solution. Advances in Automobile Engineering. 2015;4(1) 1000117.
[58] Krishna R, Bandewar AG, Dongare VK. Experimental Investigations of blending
diethyl ether in karanja vegetable oil using a multi-cylinder diesel engine.
International Journal of Research and Innovative Technology. 2015;1:70-3.
[59] Anand R KG, Karthikeyan PA. Study of the performance emission and
combustion characteristics of a di diesel engine using waste cooking oil methyl
ester-ethanol blends. Proceedings of the ASME 2012 International Mechanical
Engineering Congress & Exposition. 2012;1:1-7.
[60] Cheenkachorn K, Fungtammasan B. Biodiesel as an additive for diesohol.
International Journal of Green Energy. 2009;6:57-72.
[61] Subbaiah GV, Gopal KR, Hussain SA. The effect of biodiesel and bioethanol
blended diesel fuel on the performance and emission characteristics of a direct
injection diesel engine. Iranica Journal of Energy and Environment. 2010;1:211-
21.
[62] Deshpande SS CS, Pawar AA. . Experimental evaluation of diesel engine
performance and emissions using diesel/biodiesel/ ethanol blend fuel.
International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering.
2015;5:263-71.
[63] Farkade H, Pathre A. Experimental investigation of methanol, ethanol and butanol
blends with gasoline on SI engine. International Journal of Emerging Technology
and Advanced Engineering. 2012;2:205-15.
[64] Kumar BM, Prabakaran B. experimental investigation on performance and
emission characteristics of diesel-ethanol-biodiesel blend in diesel engine.
Parameters. International Journal Of Engineering Sciences & Research
Technology. 2015;20:347-52.
[65] Barabas I, Todoruţ A, Băldean D. Performance and emission characteristics of an
CI engine fueled with diesel–biodiesel–bioethanol blends. Fuel. 2010;89:3827-
32.
[66] Bhale PV, Deshpande NV, Thombre SB. Improving the low temperature
properties of biodiesel fuel. Renewable Energy. 2009;34:794-800.
[67] Palash S, Kalam M, Masjuki H, Arbab M, Masum B, Sanjid A. Impacts of NOx
reducing antioxidant additive on performance and emissions of a multi-cylinder
diesel engine fueled with Jatropha biodiesel blends. Energy Conversion and
Management. 2014;77:577-85.
[68] Shahir S, Masjuki H, Kalam M, Imran A, Ashraful A. Performance and emission
assessment of diesel–biodiesel–ethanol/bioethanol blend as a fuel in diesel
engines: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015;48:62-78.
[69] Mofijur M, Rasul M, Hyde J. Recent developments on internal combustion engine
performance and emissions fuelled with biodiesel-diesel-ethanol blends. Procedia
Engineering. 2015;105:658-64.
[70] Xiaoyan S, Yunbo Y, Hong H, Shuai S, Hongyi D, Rulong L. Combination of
biodiesel-ethanol-diesel fuel blend and SCR catalyst assembly to reduce
emissions from a heavy-duty diesel engine. Journal of Environmental Sciences.
2008;20:177-82.
[71] Baskar P, Kumar AS. Experimental investigation on performance characteristics
of a diesel engine using diesel-water emulsion with oxygen enriched air.
Alexandria Engineering Journal. 2017;56:137-46.

4049