1999 Origins of Islam
1999 Origins of Islam
1999 Origins of Islam
net/publication/220828034
CITATIONS READS
22 4,122
3 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by A. Korotayev on 08 August 2020.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Akadémiai Kiadó is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Acta
Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hung. Volume 52 (3-4), 243-276 (1999)
The authors suggest to view the origins of Islam against the background of the 6th century AD
Arabian socio-ecological crisis whose model is specified in the paper through the study of clima-
tological, seismological, volcanological and epidemiological history of the period. Most socio-po-
litical systems of the Arabs reacted to the socio-ecological crisis by getting rid of the rigid supra-
tribal political structures (kingdoms and chiefdoms) which started posing a real threat to their very
survival. The decades of fighting which led to the destruction of most of the Arabian kingdoms and
chiefdoms (reflected in Ayyãm al- 'Arab tradition) led to the elaboration of some definite "anti-
royal" freedom-loving tribal ethos. At the beginning of the 7th century tribes which would recog-
nise themselves as subjects of some terrestrial super-tribal political authority, the "king", risked to
lose its honour. However, this seems not to be applicable to the authority of another type, the "ce-
lestial" one. At the meantime the early 7th century evidences the merging of the Arabian tradition
of prophecy and the Arabian Monotheist "Rahmanist" tradition which produced "the Arabian pro-
phetic movement". The Monotheist "Rahmanist" prophets appear to have represented a supratribal
authority just of the type many Arab tribes were looking for at this very time, which seems to ex-
plain to a certain extent those prophets' political success (including the extreme political success of
Muhammad).
For many years we were a bit puzzled by a strangely quick collapse of the South Ara-
bian Empire of the "Kings of Saba' and dhū-Raydān and Hadramawt and Yamanat
and Their Arabs in the Highland and the Coastal Plain" (' mlk SB' w-d-RYDn w-
HDRMWT w-YMNT w- ' 'rb-hmw TWDm w-THMT) in the second half of the 6th cen-
tury AD.
Of course, at the beginning of this century South Arabia experienced a series
of rather turbulent events: dhū-Nuwās' coup, violent persecutions of the Christians,
Ethiopian invasions and conquest, rebellion (successful) of the Ethiopian soldiers
deployed in Yemen, their leader (Abraha) getting the royal power etc. - see Sabaic
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
244 ANDREY KOROTAEV-VLADIMIR KLIMENKO-DMITRY PROUSSAKOV
inscriptions C621; Ry507; 508; 510; Ja 1028; as well as: Pirenne and T
(1982); Carpenter (1869); M0berg (1924); Berzina and Kubbel' (1990, p
249); Shahīd (1971); Lundin (1961); Kobishchanov (1980, pp. 10-88); Piot
(1985, pp. 17-23); Smith (1954); Robin et al. (1996) etc. Then, however,
Abrahams rule the Empire seemed to have stabilised and achieved rea
florescence by the end of the 540s: Abraha managed to organise the su
repairs of the famous Mārib Dam ('RAf [C 541]), campaigns to Central and N
Arabia etc. (Ry 506; Vasil'ev 1907; Kobishchanov 1980, pp. 64-89; Piot
1985, pp. 23-24)
And then in the second half of the century the Empire (together with the
year-old South Arabian civilisation) simply collapses without any apparent
reason. The study of this collapse is further complicated by the fact that the ca
phe appears to have been so profound that the written texts seem to have st
be produced in South Arabia - since the 7th decade of the 6th century (this
including) we have no authentic dated South Arabian texts up to the Islam
which stands in a sharp contrast with the comparatively well documented
5 decades of the century.1
The collapse seems to have been so profound that when in 570 AD (Sh
1995, p. 365) Khusraw [I] Parwěz reluctantly sent (as a sort of punishmen
hundred convicted criminals to put Yemen into the Persian sphere of influe
sidering this such an adventure that it would be wiser not to risk with the
troops), they (the convicted criminals) did manage to overthrow the dyna
Abraha, though, of course, not without the help of the Yemenites opposed to th
nasty - see e.g. al-Tabarī (1964, pp. 950-956).
Of course, it is evident that what happened in the 6th-century Yemen was not a
lated event. Already if we look at Arabia as a whole, we shall get a bit dif
perspective.
To begin with, in the Soviet Islamology up to the 1980s the dominant theory
of the origins of Islam connected it with the crisis and degeneration of the clan-tribal
system in the 6th-early 7th century Arabia, the process of the state and class forma-
tion (Tolstov 1932; Smirnov 1954, pp. 180 ff; Beljaev 1965; Petrushevskij 1966, pp.
5-11; Mavljutov 1974; Zhukov 1974, p. 29; Fil'shtinskij 1977, p. 22, p. 107; Negņa
1981 etc.; a preliminary critique of this point see e.g. Bol'shakov 1989, p. 40).
A somewhat strange theory, we must say, as the very well-known facts show quite
clearly that the actual processes were simply contrary to the ones described above.
The clan-tribal systems in pre-Islamic Arabia were strengthening and consolidating,
1 The last dated Sabaic text (C 325 - see Müller 1991) is (see line 5) of the year 669 of the
"Himy arite" Era ~ AD 554/555, or much more likely AD 559/560, depending on the solution of
the problem of the beginning of this era - for the current state of this question see de Blois (1990);
Shahīd (1994); Kitchen (1994, pp. 1-9); and especially Robin et al. (1996).
Acta Orient. Hung. 52, 1999
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
ORIGINS OF ISLAM 245
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
246 ANDREY KOROTAEV-VLADIMIR KLIMENKO-DMITRY PROUSSAKOV
could be significantly affected by the earthquakes. But this does not seem to be t
case with the kingdoms and chiefdoms of the Arabian North which could not be
parently affected by the earthquakes to a critical extent. Thus, the most signific
outcome of the seismic activity seems to be volcano eruptions rather than eart
quakes. Again, it is not self-evident how, say, the volcano eruptions on the New Brit-
ain Island near New Guinea could affect the evolution of the Arabian communities.
Again, what is significant here is not the direct effect though some of the South Ara-
bian sites were destroyed just in this way (though not necessarily in the 6th century -
see e.g. Müller and Wissmann [1976]). What is really important are volcanic gases
and tephra which are thrown to the atmosphere in great quantities during such erup-
tions. And this could affect significantly really huge areas. E.g. sulphuric aerosols
would halt partially solar radiation, causing the cooling of the Earth surface and,
hence, droughts, or otherwise floods, and various disbalances in the ecological sys-
tems, which could result in the outbursts of the numbers of the epidemic disease bear-
ing' animals, plague fleas etc., and the causal link between the tectonic and volcanic
activity and the epidemics was noticed long ago.
However, the most significant factor seems to be the droughts - and there are
documented cases when, say, changing solar activity or massive volcano eruption,
resulting in a global climatic shift, caused severe droughts in various parts of the
world (naturally, North Arabia could have been affected in such cases too [see Ap-
pendix C for detail]).
Hence, global climate deterioration and the peak of the tectonic activity pro-
duced such an array of primary, secondary, and tertiary factors (earthquakes and
volcano eruptions themselves, epidemics, droughts, barbarian invasions caused by
the socio-ecological crises on the barbarian peripheries) which could pose a deadly
threat for the survival of most of affected civilisations of the time. We ourselves
came to terms with the sudden death of the 1500-year-old pre-Islamic South Arabian
civilisation when we realised that this happened simultaneously with the severe crisis
in the Byzantine Empire which put it on the brink of an almost complete collapse
(the early 7th to early 6th century comparison would produce for Byzantine results
rather similar to the ones obtained above for the Arabian North and South in any
case). And what was an almost deadly blow for strong Byzantine appeared to have
been just a deadly blow for the weaker South Arabian civilisation as well as for most
Arabian kingdoms.3
This is not a mere speculation, especially for the Arabian North. Indeed, as
was mentioned above the second half of the 6th-century history of South Arabia is
documented very poorly (especially, in comparison with the earlier periods). But this
is not as true for the Arabian North. It is not simply that by the early 7th-early 6th-
century comparison we can deduce that most North and Central Arabian kingdoms
disintegrated, without knowing what happened in between. No, it is possible not only
3 The weakening of the state structures of the Byzantine, Sassanid and Yemeni empires
(caused to a considerable extent by the same socio-ecological factors), of course, led to the further
decline of the Arabian kingdoms and chiefdoms most of which were to a considerable degree
rather dependent on the support of those Near Eastern great powers.
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
ORIGINS OF ISLAM 247
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
248 ANDREY KOROTAEV- VLADIMIR KLIMENKO-DMITRY PROUSSAKOV
38-54] who himself took an active part in his tribe's struggle against the La
Kingdom which seems to have contributed significantly to the weakening an
dissolution of this political entity; on the struggle of Arab tribes against th
sanid kings see e.g. Negija [1981, pp. 36-37]; see also e.g. al-Bayātī [1407/198
232 ff]). In any case, at the end we normally find original chiefdoms or kin
disintegrated with free true tribes in their places.
Actually, what was described at the end of the previous section may well be cons
as an important component of this rather effective adaptation. This was simp
most socio-political systems of the Arabs (or, for the extreme methodologic
vidualists, the Arabs themselves, anyhow, it could be well described in both
reacted rather adequately to the socio-ecological crisis by getting rid of th
supratribal political structures (i.e. all those kings, chiefs and their retainers
started posing a real threat to their very survival. Indeed, it is rather difficult t
ine anything more nasty than the royal messengers coming to you in a "lea
(which may well have been preceded by one or two similar years) and dem
from you to pay royal taxes when you yourself have nothing to eat and to feed y
children.
However, the Arabs did not only destroy most of those rigid political
communal structures which were alienating the tribal sovereignty; they als
oped their alternatives - soft structures not posing any threat to the soverei
tribes. Most noticeable of them seems to be the development of the system o
enclaves, regular pilgrimages to them and the regular pilgrim fairs ( mawãsim ) w
accompanied those pilgrimages.
The result was the development of rather effective intersocietal networ
which the best known is the Western Arabian religious-political area (the functio
and evolution of which, incidentally, left a noticeable trace on the history of the
System as a whole). It seems to have been formed as a result of the expansion
zones of influence of the respective sanctuaries, their interweaving into one
less integrated religious-political area.
This of course was primarily a religious area, yet it had evident politic
mensions too. It was in the pilgrimage-fairs ( mawãsim ) at the above-mentioned
tuaries "that traditional tribal society established its manifold contacts, the e
of the religious and cultural ideas, as well as the barter of products with on
value. Furthermore, the various legal problems (armistice, debts, benefits, p
of blood-money, bailing out of prisoners, finding of clients, looking for disa
persons, questions of heritage, etc.) of the participants were also settled ther
exchange of ideas and goods, as well as the spreading of legal customs and cul
mon to several tribes, that is, regular social contact in general, played no ne
role in the extension of particular tribal consciousness" (Simon 1989, p. 90; a
especially Wellhausen [1897/1961, pp. 88-91]).
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
ORIGINS OF ISLAM 249
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
250 ANDREY KOROTAEV-VLADIMIR KLIMENKO-DMITRY PROUSSAKOV
cal structures (which seems to be valid even with respect to the Meccan
community [see e.g. Dostal 1991]) and, according, to such schemes
could be only classified as "autonomous communities", "tribes", at most
as "chiefdoms" (though most Arabian "chiefdoms" seem to have
disintegrated in the second half of the 6th century AD). However, they
were parts of a much wider cultural-political entity whose overall level
of social complexity may well be compared with the one of an average
"early state"; though lacking the political centralisation this entity fails
to find its place in the above-mentioned schemes (this appears to be
true with respect to any processes of socio-cultural growth which are
not accompanied by the growing political centralisation, or especially
going in hand with the political decentralisation).
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
ORIGINS OF ISLAM 25 1
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
252 ANDREY KOROTAEV-VLADIMIR KLIMENKO-DMITRY PROUSSAKOV
Though some pre-Islamic Arabian tribes managed to find a rather effective ada
tion to the crisis along the lines described in the previous section, this adaptation do
not appear to have been quite perfect everywhere. After the destruction of the polit
Crone and Simon (whose monograph, although, does not appear to be known to him), maint
that "the Arab caravan cities like Petra. . . still bear eloquent testimony to the prosperity of its m
chants in the form of capital investment in municipal buildings and monuments. Muhamm
Mecca, on the other hand, boasted one unroofed stone building, the Ka'bah, amidst its mud-b
dwellings" (p. 72). Surprisingly Peters fails to recollect at this point (though he manages to do
a considerable bit later [pp. 102, 138-141]) that there was at least one major "capital investm
of this kind in pre-Islamic Mecca. This "investment" is rather well known and that is the "re
struction" of the Ka'bah in c. 603-605 AD, a "reconstruction" which, incidentally, involved t
pulling down of all the sanctuary walls and the construction of the new ones, twice as high (c. 9
as the old ones, as well as the roofing of the building (apparently for the first time in its histo
additionally the walls were plastered and artistically painted from inside (al-Azraql 1858, pp.
118; Ibn Hischām: 1858-1860, 1, pp. 122-126). Actually, the old unroofed sanctuary building
pulled down and a new, twice as high, roofed one was built. After that "Muhammad's M
(< contra Peters) could boast at least one decent roofed "municipal" building. Note that this w
capital investment in the most strict sense of this word (of course, if one at least partly believe
traditional Muslim accounts of the fact that the Meccans derived a considerable part of their we
from the servicing of the pilgrims coming to the Ka'bah, and that their commercial links en
special protection due to their special association with this apparently rather venerated Ara
sanctuary [e.g. Kister 1965]). Of course this only major pre-Islamic "capital investment" doe
fit well in the traditional portrayal of the fabulously rich Meccan commercial empire flourishin
the way through the 6th century AD since the time of Hāshim, but it fits entirely well Sim
reconstruction, according to which the effective Transarabian Meccan trading network was a
tively recent phenomenon with the Meccan community achieving a reasonable (but by no m
fabulous) level of well-being just by the time of the "Reconstruction of the Ka'bah". Anyhow
general impression is that the Meccan Transarabian commercial network formed in its full-fledg
form just at the end of the 6th century and the beginning of the 7th century. Just during the first
ades of Muhammad's life the Meccans appear to have managed to finalise the formation of t
commercial network and to make it work rather effectively (Muhammad himself took his pa
this, e.g. participating in the 590s in the 'Ukaz Battle [e.g. Ibn Hischām 1858-1960, I, pp.
119; Ibn Saad 1905, pp. 181-182; Ibn Habīb 1942, p. 210, p. 211, p. 218] of the War of Fijār
which Mecca eliminated the last internal and external middlemen and obtained supremacy ove
transit trade [in] the Arabian peninsula" (Simon 1989, p. 159; see, however, a different interp
tion of these events in Crone 1987, pp. 145-148). Just by the beginning of Muhammad's Prop
the Meccans seem to have finally and completely succeeded in finding their rather effective
out of the 6th-century Arabian crisis, having sorted out all the major economic and political p
lems and achieved a rather reasonable (but by no means fabulous) level of well-being. Note t
the Qur'ân itself portrays a rather affluent society where it could be rather difficult to unders
why some other people have to kill their new-born babies when there are lots of food all aro
(VI, ayahs 140-141; ayah 151; XVII, ayah 31; CVIII). Hence, there is no surprise that the M
community (which had sorted out all the major problems and did not really need any radical str
tural changes, any new type of political authority) was not at all the best place where Muhamma
Prophecy could be completely accepted, though it seems to have provided a good environment
the initial development of the prophecy (with its lack of the political centralisation and a re
able level of well-being, when a considerable proportion of Meccans could afford to spend lot
time on thinking about the things other than their daily bread, without being too much afra
some state-sponsored persecutions).
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
ORIGINS OF ISLAM 253
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
254 ANDREY KOROTAEV-VLADIMIR KLIMENKO-DMITRY PROUSSAKOV
Hence, the impression is that whereas for many Arab tribes becoming sub
some terrestrial king was entirely unacceptable, was tantamount to an enorm
of honour, the recognition of some "celestial" authority (naturally through its te
trial representative) was more or less acceptable.
Another group of facts should be also taken into consideration here. Th
Islamic Arabia knew rather well the figure of "prophet" ( kãhin - see e.g. al-M
1965, pp. 151-176; Ibn Khaldūn 1415/1995, pp. 96-98; Fahd 1966, pp. 91
Anyhow, an average Arab seems to have known quite well how a "prophet"
like, what the prophetic trans was, etc. However, all the pre-7th-century Arab pr
ets ( kahanah ) were the ones of the pagan deities. Hence, their authority was
best possible one, as the recognition of their authority would mean the reco
of the authority of the respective pagan deity, whereas all the cults of such
would be normally connected with a specific tribe, whose protector this deit
hence, such a recognition would imply the recognition of the authority of the re
tive tribe as well (as is amply evidenced e.g. by the South Arabian epigraph
e.g. Beeston 1984a).
Hence, the best possible figure here would be rather some Monotheist proph
However, the prophets of the established Monotheist Faiths would not be en
suitable as well, as the recognition of their authority would imply the depend
some extra- Arabian powers, or in the case of Judaism would put the Arab
tribes in an advantageous position.
At the meantime there seems to have been a more or less independent M
theist Arabian ("Rahmanist"/al-Hanîfiyyah) tradition.10 However, its North A
adherents ( hunafã ') do not appear to have given any prophets before the 7th cen
(see e.g. Piotrovskij [1984, p. 20]). Yet, in the early 7th century both traditio
Arabian tradition of prophecy and the Arabian Monotheist "Rahmanist" trad
seem to have merged, producing what Piotrovskij calls "the Arabian prophetic
ment" (Piotrovskij 1984). It should be taken into consideration that in addi
Muhammad there were at least 5 other Monotheist prophets (pseudo-proph
course, from the Moslem point of view) in Arabia at the time of Muhammad
one Judaic prophet in Yathrib (Ibn Sayyäd - see e.g. Halperin [1976]) and a
Christian prophetess, Sajāh (e.g. al-Tabari 1964, pp. 1911-1916), 3 others (al-M
limah, al-Aswad and [rather hypothetically] Tulayhah b. Khuwaylid) seem t
belonged to the Arabian "Rahmanist" tradition (e.g. Bartol'd 1925; Piotr
1984). Note (e.g. al-Tabari 1964, p. 1933, p. 1937; Balādhūri 1866, pp. 10
that both al-Musaylimah and al-Aswad called the God al-Rahmān (just as wa
by Muhammad - see especially al-Qur'ãn XVII, p. 110: qui ud'ü {A}llãha a
'l-Rahmãn ayyan-mã tad'ü fa-la-hu ' l-asmä'u 'l-husnã "Say - invoke the Go
invoke Rahmān, however you would call, He has the best names" - it has bee
suggested that bi-smi '{AJllãhi ' l-rahmãni yl-rahīm may well be translated as "In
10 This hypothesis is still under attack (see e.g. Rippin 1991), however we do not th
has been either finally proved, or rejected, and can be still regarded as a working hypoth
especially Shahid 1989, pp. 154-156, pp. 162-172, pp. 332-338; and Beeston 1984a; 1984
Rubin 1990; Peters 1994, pp. 117-128; Korotayev 1996b etc.)
Acta Orient. Hung. 52, 1999
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
ORIGINS OF ISLAM 255
11 " Dans V invocation bi-{i}smi { AJllāh ar-rahmān ar-rahïm, il est clair que ar-Rahmãn
était à V origine un nom propre et que les sens premier était : 'au nom du dieu ar-Rahmãn le misé-
ricordieux (Robin 1991, p. 146).
12 In any case, apparently not earlier than 460-470 AD when RHMN" appeared as the main
name of the God in the South Arabian Monotheist inscriptions (e.g. Robin 1980; 1991, pp. 146-147).
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
256 ANDREY KOROTAEV-VLADIMIR KLIMENKO-DMITRY PROUSSAKOV
virtually all the texts mentioning the God's name (c. 2 dozen cases)
(Robin 1980, pp. 85-96), which stands in quite a sharp contrast with
e.g. the Jewish Palestinian Aramaic epigraphic texts of the Byzantine
period where the God is named Rhmnh only twice (Sokoloff 1990, p
522), though the total number of these texts exceeds the number of the
late 5th-early 6th-century South Arabian texts. Within such a contex
any Monotheists "deviating" from the established Monotheist faiths
were most likely to call the God just Rahmãnãn/al-Rahmãn. Inciden
tally, these developments could not be without repercussions in Centra
Arabia (including al-Yamāmah) where the Yemenites exerted consider-
able influence just at this time through their Kindite vassals (e.g. Gajd
1996; Robin 1996), hence, the presence in al-Yamāmah of the inde-
pendent Rahmanist tradition which at the age of Muhammad even pro
duced a Rahmanist prophet (or, naturally, pseudo-prophet from the Mus-
lim point of view) appears here of no surprise - for more detail see e.g
Korotayev (1996b). Irrespective of what have been mentioned above, i
this paper we denote as "Rahmanist" all the prophets belonging to th
Arabian autochthonous monotheist traditions for the present-day lack of
any other more adequate term.
From what has been mentioned in the previous section it must be rather clear that the
Arab adaptation to the 6th century AD crisis influenced the world system develop-
ment mainly through one of its more or less logical outcomes, the formation of Islam.
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
ORIGINS OF ISLAM 257
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
258 ANDREY KOROTAEV- VLADIMIR KLIMENKO-DMITRY PROUSSAKOV
As has been already mentioned above Arabs elaborated a rather effective ada
to the 6th-century crisis to a considerable extent through the massive tran
tion of their state and chiefdom structures into the tribal ones. This could h
regarded as a "degeneration" because the newly elaborated tribal structures
out to be able to serve the functional needs of rather complex stratified societies
With the Islamic conquests these tribal structures and tribal ethos (< al
byalah) appear to have proliferated through almost all of the territory of t
Islamic state.
Of course, it should be stressed that there is not so much of al-qabya
Islam itself. Yet it seems necessary to take into account the following points.
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
ORIGINS OF ISLAM 259
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
260 ANDREY KOROTAEV-VLADIMIR KLIMENKO-DMITRY PROUSSAKOV
Appendix A
1)
Lammã tasãfahat Bakr ibn Wä'il wa-ghalaba-hum sufahã'u-hã ... irta'ā ru 'sã ' li-
hům fa-qälü inna sufahã'a-nã qad ghalabü 'alã amri-na fa-akala 'l-qawiyyu 'l-da'īf,
wa-lã nastatV 14 taghylr dhãlik, fa-narã an numallik a 'alay-nã malik™ nu 'tī-hi ' l-shãf
wa-'l-ba'îr fa-yďkhudhu li- 'l-da'īf1 mina ' l-qawiyy , wa-yarudď 'alã 'l-mazlüm
mina ' l-zãlim , wa-lã yumkin an yakün min ba' d qabã 'ili-nã fa-ya 'bã-hu 'l-ãkharun
... wa-lãkin-nã na'tī Tubba'an fa-numalliku-hu ' alay-nã . Fa-ataw-hu fa-dhakarü la-
hu amra-hum, fa-mallaka 'alay-him al-Hãritha 'bn 'AmrÀkil al-Murãr al-Kindī
"When [the tribal confederation] Bakr b. Wä'il got corrupted and dominated by
shameless people among it..., the leaders of them [i.e. of the confederation tribes]
came to decision and said: 'We are unable to change this; our opinion is to make
king over us to whom we shall give (as a tax) sheep and camels, and he will protect
the weak from the strong, and the oppressed from the oppressor; it is impossible that
he will be from one of our tribes, as the other (tribes) will not accept him... Rather
we shall come to the tubba' [the Himyarite king of Yemen], and make him a king
over us'; so, they came to him and told him about their problem and he made al-
Hārith b. 'Amr Ākil al-Murār al-Kindī king over them" (Ibn 'Abd Rabbi-hi 1949-
1965, V, p. 222; see also e.g. al-Isfahānī [1955-1964, XII, p. 207]; Ibn al-Athīr
[1867, pp. 374-375]).
2)
Lammã tafãsadaí '1-qabã'it min Nizãr atã-hu ashrãfu-hum fa-qalü in-nã fi dīni-ka
wa-nahnu nakhãf an natafãnã fi-mã yahduth" bayna-nã, fa-wajjih ma ' a-nã banī-ka
yanzilüna fi-nã fa~yakufļuna ba'da-nä ' an ba'd fa-farraqa wulda-hu fi qabã* it 7-
' Arab fa-mallaka 'bna-hu Hujrm * alã Banī Asad wa-Ghatafãn, wa-fbna-hu Shurihbīl
... ' alã Bakr b. Wä'il ... wa-mallaka ' bna-hu Mďadkarib ... 'alã Banī Taghlib ...
wa-mallaka ť bna-hu 'Abď ' llãh ' alã ' Abct 'l-Qays; wa-mallaka ' bna-hu Salamah
' alã Qays
"When the tribes of the Nizār [confederation] got corrupted, their nobles came to him
[i.e. to al-Hārith b. 'Amr, reigning in al-Hīrah at that moment] and said: 'We are in
your power (judgement) we are afraid that we shall annihilate each other because of
what is happening between us; send with us your sons so that they will rule us - they
will secure the order among us (lit.: hold some of us back from the others). So he
distributed his offspring among the tribes of the Arabs: he made his son Hujr king
over Banū Asad and Ghatafān, his son Shurihbīl ... - over Bakr b. Wä'il ..., his son
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
ORIGINS OF ISLAM 26 1
Appendix B
1)
The end of the previous story ("the killing of the kings" taking place in the 530-40s,
i.e. after the beginning of the Arabian socio-ecological crisis):
Mallakat Banū 'Āmir Sharāhīl ibn ' l-Hãrith wa-mallakat Banū Tamīm ... Mu-
harriqan ibn ' l-Hãrith wa-mallakat Wã 'il Shurihbīl ibn ' l-Hãrith ..., kãna malika Ba-
ni Taghlib ... Salamať 'bri* 'l-Hãrith, wa-mallakat baqiyyať Qays ... Ma'adīkarib
ibn 'l-Hãrith ... [!!!] fa-qatalat Banū Asad Hujr"1 ... wa-nahadat Banū 'Āmir 'alã
Sharāhīl fa-qatalü-hu ... wa-qatalat Banū Tamīm Muharriq an ... wa-qatalat Wä'il
Shurihbīl .. [!!!]
"Banū 'Àmir made Sharāhīl the son of al-Hārith king [over them]; Banū Tamīm ...
made Muharriq the son of al-Hārith king [over them]; Wä'il made Shurihbīl the son
of al-Hārith king [over them] ...; Salamah the son of al-Hārith became king over
Banā Taghlib ... ; and the rest of Qays . . . made Ma'adīkarib the son of al-Hārith king
[over them]... Then Banü Asad killed Hujr ...; Banū 'Āmir rose up against Sharāhīl
and killed him ...; Banū Tamīm killed Muharriq ...; and Wä'il killed Shurihbīl.. "
(the end of the introduction to "the Day of Khazāz" in Yaqůťs edition [1410/1990,
II, pp. 418-419]).
2)
[Kãnat] Hawãzin lã tarã Zuhayr b . Jazīmah illã rabb™ wa-Hawãzin yawma idhin lã
khayr fi-hã... wa-inna-mã hum ri'ã'u 'l-shãyi fi ' l-jibãl ... wa-kãna Zuhayr ya'shuru-
hum... fa-ta'tī-hi Hawãzin bi-'l-itâwat* ' llatī kãnat la-hu fi a'nãqi-him fa-ya'tūna-hu
bi- 'l-samrí wa-yl-aqii wa- 'l-ghanam. . . atat-hu ' ajüzm min Hawãzin bi-samnin fi nahy,
wa-"tadharat ilay-hi wa-shakat1 ' l-sinīna 'llatī tatāba'na ' alã 'l-nãs fa-dhãqa-hu fa-
lam yarda ta' ma-hu fa-da" a-hã bi-qausin fi yadi-hi 'utuť fi sadri-hã fa- 'stalqat li-
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
262 ANDREY KOROTAEV-VLADIMIR KLIMENKO-DMITRY PROUSSAKOV
halãwai ' ' l-qafã ... fa-ghadabat min dhãlika Hawãzin wa-haqadat 'alay-hi i
kãnafl sadri-hã mina 'l-ghayz wa-'l-diman... wa-tadhãmarat 'Āmir b. Sa' sa' ah
ãlã Khãlid b. Ja' far fa-qãl wa-'llahl la-aj'alanna dhirä'ayya warä'a 'unuqi-hi hat
uqtať aw yuqtaf . . .
wa-qãla Khãlid b . Ja' far yamunn 'alā Hawãzin bi-qatli-hi Zuhayr n. . . :
"The Hawãzin [confederation] considered Zuhayr b. Jazīmah [their] lord. That time
they lived in poverty ,... they grazed [their] goats in the mountains... Zuhayr was
taxing them with 'ushr [a 10% tax]... The Hawãzin people brought to him the tribute
which he imposed on them, they brought to him melted butter, cheese, sheep... Once
an old Hawãzin women brought him a skinful of melted butter, apologised to him
[for the modesty of her tribute ]y and complaint of the ["lean"] years which struck
[her] people (The emphasis is ours - A. K., V. K., D. P.). He tried the butter, did not
like its taste and pushed her with a stringless bow which he held in his hand - she
fell flat on her back... The Hawãzin got angry because of that, bore rancour against
him; this added to spite and rancour which they nursed against him. And [the tribe]
'Ãmir b. Sa'sa'ah [one of the Hawãzin tribes] began to call for war, and Khãlid b.
Ja'far swore: I swear in the name of the God that my hands will reach his neck -
either I shall die, or he will..." [Finally {not without lots of trouble} Khãlid and his
fellow tribesmen manage to kill Zuhayr and destroy his chiefdom.] ". . .And Khãlid b.
Ja'far said, boasting in front of the Hawãzin of killing Zuhayr. . .
(al-Isfahānī 1955-1964, XI, pp. 77-83; see also Ibn al-Athīr 1867, pp. 411-414; Ibn
'Abd Rabbi-hi 1949-1965, V, pp. 135-137; al-Mawlā-bik et al. 1942, pp. 235-241
etc.).
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
ORIGINS OF ISLAM 263
Appendix C
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
264 ANDREY KOROT AE V- VLADIMIR KLIMENKO-DMITRY PROUSSAKOV
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
ORIGINS OF ISLAM 265
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
266 ANDREY KOROTAEV-VLADIMIR KLIMENKO-DMITRY PROUSSAKOV
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
ORIGINS OF ISLAM 267
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
268 ANDREY KOROTAEV-VLADIMIR KLIMENKO-DMITRY PROUSSAKOV
p. 21); for example, cooling in tropical latitudes creates favourable living conditi
for fleas - carriers of plague (Cavanaugh 1971).
The ancient historical sources do not definitely mention volcanic eruptions
Arabia proper, but according to modern natural studies the influence of volcanis
upon it is beyond doubt: it is conditioned both by geological structure and geographi-
cal location of the Arabian Peninsula. On the one hand, the Red Sea and the Oce
coasts of Arabia is a part of the seismic East-African Rift System (Belousov et
1974); thus, Western and Southern Arabia is situated in a volcanic zone (Belousov
al. 1974, I, p. 41; Koronovskij 1971; Macdonald 1975, p. 327, fig. 14-1). On t
other hand, Arabia could feel the force of tectonism and volcanism of the Mediterra-
nean region and the rest of the world, e.g. the consequence of earthquakes and in
tions of volcanic aerosols into the atmosphere. It is also important to note that th
is natural hotbed of plague in Arabia (Kozlov-Sultanov 1993, pp. 201-203) and th
earthquakes and plague epidemics often coincide (Biraben 1976, pp. 16-17).
In the 6th century AD the Mediterranean region has been going through o
of the heaviest tectonic disasters in its recent history. According to historical d
(Gezer 1867), it began in 512 AD with the Vesuvio eruption (see also Simkin et
[1981, p. 112]). In 526 AD there was a great earthquake in Syria, where 250 tho
sand people perished only in Antioch; it was followed by heavy earthquakes in A
Minor and Europe. In Egypt in summer 547 the highest Nile flooded the Delta an
prevented the sowing; as a result, the whole country suffered from famine. In 5
a new wave of earthquakes rolled from Constantinople to Alexandria. Earthqua
and volcanism were accompanied by inundations, droughts and widest spread o
plague - the so-called Justinianos pandemia, 531-580 AD, during which about se
eral million people perished (Ostrovskij 1978, p. 258). It is important that volca
activity at the same time was characteristic also for the Arabian Peninsula proper
the 6th-7th centuries AD there were eruptions of at least 5 volcanoes in Arabia
according to the recent volcanological research (Simkin et al. 1981, p. 1 12; Aprod
1982, pp. 269-270; Gushchenko 1979, pp. 12-13).
Taking the mechanism of interaction of processes in the atmosphere, hydro
sphere and lithosphère, as well as after-effects of seismic disasters (droughts, pla
pandemics etc.) into consideration, we have certain grounds to consider the 6th-
centuries AD as one of the ecologically most crucial periods in the history of t
Middle East including the Arabian Peninsula. The scale of the ecological catastrop
under consideration forces us to bear it in mind while studying the early history of I
lamic Arabia. We think that a socio-ecological rather than a purely social crisis in
6th century AD caused the disintegration of most Arabian kingdoms and chiefdo
and, consequently, the development of some alternative cultural-political structur
which provided the optimum environment for the development of the autochthonous
Arabian monotheist religion.
As volcanologists say, "empirical studies concerning volcanic effects on cl
mate tend to raise as many, if not more, questions than they answer" (Kelly-S
1984, p. 742). But we think the more questions we have, the more interesting
further work will be. In this paper we tried to raise an important problem of soc
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
ORIGINS OF ISLAM 269
Acknowledgements
References
Ahmadjonzoda, A. (1988), O probleme tak nazyvaemoj musul' manskoj kul' tury. Vzaimodejstvie i
vzaimovlijanie tsivilizatsij i kul* tur na Vostoke. Moskva, pp. 3-4.
Alley, R.-Meese, D.-Shuman, C.-Gow, A.-Taylor, K.-Grootes, P.-White, J.-Ram, M.-Wadding-
ton, E.-Mayewski, P.-Zielinski, G. (1993), Abrupt Increase in Greenland Snow Accumula-
tion at the End of the Younger Dryas Event. Nature 362, pp. 527-529.
Aprodov, V. A. (1982), Vulkány. Moskva.
Asaturov, M. L.-Budyko, M. I.-Vinnikov, K. Ja.-Grojsman, P. Ja.-Kabanov, A. S.-Karol', I. L.-
Kolomeev, M. P.-Pivovarova, Z. I.-Rozanov, E. V.-Hmelevtsov, S. S. (1986), Vulkány,
stratosfernyj aérozoV i klimat Žemli. Leningrad.
Audouin, R.-Breton, J.-F.-Robin, C. (1988), Towns and Temples - the Emergence of South Ara-
bian Civilization. In: Yemen: 3000 Years of Art and Civilization in Arabia Felix. Inns-
bruck-Frankfurt/Main, pp. 63-77.
al-Azraql, Muhammad b. 'Abdallah (1858), Kitāb akhbãr Makkah. Leipzig.
Balādhūri, Ahmad b. Yahyã (1866), Futūh al-buldãn. Lugduni Batavorum [Leiden].
Baldwin, B.-Pollack, J.-Summers, A.-Toon, O.-Sagan, C.-Van Camp, W. (1976), Stratospheric
Aerosols and Climate Change. Nature 263, pp. 551-555.
Bartol'd, V. V. (1925), Musejlima. Izvestija Rossijskoj Akademii nauk. Sērija VI 19, pp. 483-512.
Bauer, G. M.-Lundin, A. G. (1994), Juzhnaja Aravija v X veke do n.é.-VI veke n.é.: osnovnye
étapy istorii. Krasnomorskie zametki. Vol. 1. Moskva, pp. 86-117.
al-Bayātī, 'Sdii Jāsim (1407/1987), Al-malãhim al-'arabiyyah: Muqãranãt fi daw ' al-asātīr wa-'l-
malāhim al-kawniyyah al-sumiriyyah wa- ' l-Ãmiyyah . Bayrùt.
Beeston, A. F. L. (1984a), The Religions of pre-Islamic Yemen. In: L'Arabie du Sud: histoire et
civilisation. 1. Le peuple yéménite et ses racines (Islam d'hier et d'aujourd'hui, 21), Paris,
pp. 259-269.
Beeston, A. F. L. (1984b), Judaism and Christianity in pre-Islamic Yemen. In: L'Arabie du Sud:
histoire et civilization. 1. Le peuple yéménite et ses racines (Islam d'hier et d'aujourd'hui,
21), Paris, pp. 271-278.
Beeston, A. F. L. (1984c), Himyarite Monotheism. In: Studies in the History of Arabia. II. Pre-
Islamic Arabia. Riyad, pp. 149-154.
Beljaev, E. A. (1965), Araby , islam i arabskij halifat v rannee srednevekov'e. Moskva.
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
270 ANDREY KOROTAEV-VLADIMIR KLIMENKO-DMITRY PROUSSAKOV
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
ORIGINS OF ISLAM 27 1
Gajda, I. (1996), Hujr b. 'Amr roi de Kinda et rétablissement de la domination himyarite en Ara-
bie centrale. Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies 26, pp. 65-73, pl. I.
Galanopoulos, A. (1960), Tsunami Observed on the Coasts of Greece from Antiquity to Present
Time. Annali Geofisici 13.
Gellner, E. (1981), Muslim Society . Cambridge-New York, NY-Melbourne.
Gezer, G. (1867), Istorija povaVnyh boleznej. S-Peterburg.
Grjaznevich, P. A. (1994), Istoriko-arheologicheskie pamjatniki drevnego i srednevekovogo J eme-
na. Polevye issledovanija 1970-1971 gg. (Juzhnaja Aravija. Pamjatniki drevnej istorii
i kul' tury, 2/1), S-Peterburg.
Grove, J. M. (1988), The Little Ice Age. London-New York.
Gushchenko, 1. 1. (1979), Izverzhenija vulkanov mira (katalog). Moskva.
Hallpike, C. R. (1986), The Principles of Social Evolution. Oxford!
Halperin, D. J. (1976), The Ibn Sayyâd Tradition and the Legend of al-Dajjāl. Journal of the
American Oriental Society 96, pp. 129-141.
Hammer, C. (1977), Past Volcanism Revealed by Greenland Ice Sheet Impurities. Nature 270, pp.
482-486.
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
272 ANDREY KOROTAEV- VLADIMIR KLIMENKO-DMITRY PROUSSAKOV
Ibn al-Athîr, Abù-'l-Husayn 'Alî (1867), Kitāb al-kãmil fi 'l-ta'rīkh. Al-juť al-awwal. L
Batavorum [Leiden].
Ibn Habib, Muhammad (1942), Kitāb al-muhabbar. Hyderabad al-Dakkan.
Ibn Hischām, 'Abd al-Malik (1858-1860), Das Leben Muhammeds nach Muhammed Ibn
2 vols. Göttingen.
Ibn Khaldün, 'Ab d al-Rahmān ibn Muhammad (1415/1995), Muqaddimah. Saydâ-Bayrùt.
Ibn Khaldün (1958), The Muqaddimah. London.
Ibn Kulthūm, 4Amr (1983), Al-Mu'allaqah. In: Al-rawä'i' min al-adab al-'Arabiyy. 1. Al-
Jãhiliyy. Al-Qāhirah, pp. 162-165.
Ibn Saad (1905), Biographien Muhammedes. Bd. 1/1. Leiden.
Irvine, A. K. (1973), The Arabs and the Ethiopians. Peoples of the Old Testament Times. O
pp. 287-311.
al-Isfahānī, Abù-'l-Faraj (1955-1964), Kitāb al-Aghānī. Vols I-XXV. Bayrüt.
Al-Ja'qubi (al-Ya'qùbî), Ahmad b. Abi Ya'qùb (1883), Historia. 2 vols, Leiden.
Johnsen, S.-Dansgaard, W.-Clausen, H.-Langway C., Jr. (1970), Climatic Oscillations 1200-2000
AD. Nature 227, pp. 482^*83.
Johnsen, S.-Dansgaard, W.-Clausen, H.-Langway, C., Jr. (1972), Oxygen Isotope Profiles through
the Antarctic and Greenland Ice Sheets. Nature 235, pp. 429-434.
Juillet-Leclerc, A. -Schräder, H. (1987), Variations of Upwelling Intensity Recorded in Varved Sedi-
ment from the Gulf de California during the Past 3,000 Years. Nature 329, pp. 146-148.
Kelly, P.-Sear, G. (1984), Climatic Impact of Explosive Volcanic Eruptions. Nature 311, pp. 740-
743. V
Kennedy, J. (1898), The Early Commerce of Babylon with India. Journal of the Royal Asiatic So-
ciety ', pp. 241-273.
Kister, M. J. (1965), Mecca and Tamīm (Aspects of Their Relations). Journal of the Economic and
Social History of the Orient 8, pp. 1 17-163.
Kister, M. J. (1986), Mecca and the Tribes of Arabia. Studies in Islamic History and Civilization in
Honour of David Ayalon. Jerusalem-Leiden, pp. 33-57.
Kitchen K. A. (1994), Documentation for Ancient Arabia. Pt. 1. Chronological Framework and
Historical Sources. Liverpool.
Klimenko, V. V. (1997), O glavnyh klimaticheskih ritmah golotsena. Doklady Akademii nauk
357:3, pp. 399-402.
Klimenko, V. V. (1998), Klimat i istorija v épohu pervyh vysokih kul'tur (3500-500 do h.é.).
Vostok no. 4, pp. 5-24.
Klimenko, V. V.-Klimanov, V. A.-Fedorov, M. V. (1996), Istorija srednej temperatury Severnogo
polusharija za poslednie 1 1000 let. Doklady Akademii nauk 348: 1, pp. 1 1 1-1 14.
Klimenko, V. V.-Klimenko, A. V.-Andrejchenko, T. N.-Dovgaljuk, V. V.-Mikushina, O. V.-Te-
reshin, A. G.-Fedorov, M. V. (1997), Énergija, priroda i klimat. Moskva.
Kobishchanov, Ju. M. (1980), Severo-Vostochnaja Afrika v rannesrednevekovom mire (VI-seredi-
na VII vv.). Moskva.
Koronovskij, N. V. (1971), Molodoj vulkanizm Éfiopii i Jemena. Vestnik Moskovskogo universite-
ta, ser. IV (ģeoloģija) no. 3, pp. 52-53.
Korotayev, A. V. (1995), Ancient Yemen. Oxford.
Korotayev, A. V. (1996a), Pre-Islamic Yemen. Wiesbaden.
Korotayev, A. V. (1996b), "Aramaeans" in a Late Sabaic Inscription. ARAM 8, pp. 293-298.
Kozlov, M. P.-Sultanov, G. V. (1993), Épidemicheskie projavlenija chumy v proshlom i nastoja-
shchem. Mahachkala.
Kuť pin, É. S. (1990), Chelovek i priroda v Kitae. Moskva.
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
ORIGINS OF ISLAM 273
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
274 ANDREY KOROTAEV-VLADIMIR KLIMENKO-DMITRY PROUSSAKOV
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
ORIGINS OF ISLAM 275
Stookey, R. W. (1978), Yemen. The Politics of the Yemen Arab Republic. Boulder, CO.
Stothers, R. (1984), Mystery Cloud of AD 536. Nature 307, pp. 344-345.
Stothers, R. (1989), Volcanic Eruptions and Solar Activity. Journal of Geophysical Research
94:B12, pp. 17371-17381.
Stothers, R.-Rampino, M. (1983a), Historical Volcanism, European Dry Fogs, and Greenland Acid
Precipitation, 1500 BC to AD 1500. Science 222, pp. 41 1-413.
Stothers, R.-Rampino, M. (1983b), Volcanic Eruptions in the Mediterranean before AD 630 from
Written and Archaeological Sources. Journal of Geophysical Research 88:B8, pp. 6357-
6371.
al-Tabari (at-Tabari), Muhammad b. Jarir (1879-1901), Annales quos scripsit Abū Dja'far Mo-
hammed ibn D jarīr at-Tabarī. Series I- III. Lugduni Batavorum [Leiden].
al-Tabari (at-Tabari), Muhammad b. Jarir (1964), Annales quos scripsit Abū Dja'far Mohammed
ibn D jarir at-Tabari. Series I. Lugduni Batavorum [Leiden].
Tolstov, S. P. (1932), Ocherki pervonachalnogo islama. Sovetskaja étnografija no. 2, pp. 24-82.
Varushenko, S. I.-Varushenko, A. N.-Klige, R. K. (1987), Izmenenie rezhima Kaspijskogo morja
i besstochnyh vodoemov v paleovremeni. Moskva.
Vasil'ev, A. (ed.) (1907), Zhitie sv. Grigentija, episkopa Omiritskogo. Vizantijskij vremennik 14.
Watkins, N.-Sparks, R -Sigurdsson, H.-Huang, T.-Federman, A.-Carey, S.-Ninkovich, D. (1978),
Volume and Extent of the Minoan Tephra from Santorini Volcano: New Evidence from
Deep-Sea Cores. Nature 271, pp. 122-126.
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
276 ANDREY KOROTAEV-VLADIMIR KLIMENKO-DMITRY PROUSSAKOV
Andrey V. Korotaev
Institute of Cultural Anthropology
Russian State University for Humanities
6 Miusskaja Ploščaď
Moscow 125267, Russia
e-mail: [email protected]
Vladimir V. Klimenko
Moscow Institute of Energy
14 Krasnokazarmennaja ulica
Moscow 111250, Russia
e-mail: [email protected]
Dmitry B. Proussakov
Oriental Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
12 Roždestvenka
Moscow 103753, Russia
e-mai: [email protected]
This content downloaded from 109.72.76.80 on Fri, 22 May 2020 07:32:10 UTC
View publication stats
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms