Field Actions Science Reports

The journal of field actions

Special Issue 19 | 2019
Reinventing Plastics

Microplastics in our oceans and marine health

Subhankar Chatterjee and Shivika Sharma

Electronic version
URL: https://journals.openedition.org/factsreports/5257
ISSN: 1867-8521

Publisher
Institut Veolia

Printed version
Date of publication: 1 March 2019
Number of pages: 54-61
ISSN: 1867-139X

Electronic reference
Subhankar Chatterjee and Shivika Sharma, “Microplastics in our oceans and marine health”, Field
Actions Science Reports [Online], Special Issue 19 | 2019, Online since 01 March 2019, connection on
21 September 2021. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/factsreports/5257

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

THE VEOLIA INSTITUTE REVIEW - FACTS REPORTS

MICROPLASTICS IN If the 20th century was the revolution era of plastic industry
for manufacturing too many plastic based products

OUR OCEANS AND

starting from bucket to car, then the 21st century is the time
to face its consequences. Improper management, lack of
information about its negative effect and irresponsible use
MARINE HEALTH as well as dumping of plastic products turns this planet
into “plastic planet”. Besides emerging as solid waste,
these plastic materials also appeared as a great threat for
Subhankar Chatterjee Shivika Sharma
Assistant Professor, Central National Postdoctoral Fellow, Central human and animal health. It not only polluted the roads,
University of Himachal Pradesh University of Himachal Pradesh forests, mountains but also polluted our oceans. Ignorant
human populations always throw the plastic waste into
water bodies and most probably the “out of sight out
of mind” thought leads them to do so. This is why the
problem of microplastics in the marine ecosystem is an
issue of great concern nowadays.
Here we discuss the different sources of microplastics
in the oceans and their harmful impacts on the marine
organisms. The microscopic size of these plastic
fragments gets them easily available for ingestion by
an array of marine habitants, causing adverse effects
on their health. The potential of microplastics to absorb
various harmful hydrophobic pollutants from the
surrounding environment indirectly transfers these
contaminants in the food chain. Thus to tackle this
serious issue of microplastic pollution in the marine
ecosystem, various policies and rules must be formulated.
To avoid future threat, it is important to stop producing
it further and replace the plastic with alternative
eco-friendly materials.
Dr. Subhankar Chatterjee, Assistant Professor, and
Dr. Shivika Sharma, National Postdoctoral Fellow, work
at the Central University of Himachal Pradesh, Kangra,
Himachal Pradesh (India) in the Bioremediation and
Metabolomics Research group of the Department of
Environmental Sciences and in the Department of
Chemistry and Chemical Sciences.

INTRODUCTION
The fabrication and utilization of plastic over the last
few years have been drastically increased due to its cost
benefit nature and this has resulted in the increased
disposal of these non recycled (treated) synthetic plastic
polymers in the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystem1 . The
small plastic fragments disposed in the marine habitat
having dimensions ≤ 5 mm are defined as microplastics2 .
These tiny plastics can be consumed by different marine
biota including corals, planktons, marine invertebrates,
fish and whales and are ultimately transferred along the
food chain3. These plastic polymers directly pose a great
threat to marine organisms and also indirectly affect the
ecosystem by adsorbing other marine pollutants. Due
KEYWORDS to its large area to volume ratio, microplastics are readily
• MICROPLASTICS absorbing hydrophobic pollutants from the aquatic system.
• MICROBEADS Thus microplastic pollution is becoming an issue of concern
• MARINE BIOTA because of its detrimental effect mainly on the marine
• MARINE HEALTH
health and biota.

54
 Value and limitations of plastics

THE VEOLIA INSTITUTE REVIEW - FACTS REPORTS

MICROPLASTICS microplastics9 and are highly persistent in the ecosystem.

Based on shapes, sizes and chemical composition,
Plastics are synthetic polymers which are supple or microplastics can be differentiated as follows.
malleable (flexible) in nature and can be transformed
in different shapes. Plastic is composed of long chains of
polymers which are composed of carbon, oxygen, hydrogen,
silicon and chloride and are acquired from natural gas,
TYPES OF MICROPLASTICS
oil and coal 4 . The most prominent synthetic plastics On the basis of origin, microplastics are categorized in
are polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene two types: primary and secondary microplastics10. Primary
(PS), polyethylene terephtalate (PET), polyvinyl chloride microplastics are micro-sized synthetic polymers and
(PVC), low density polyethylene (LDPE) and high-density used as exfoliates of various processes such as chemical
polyethylene (HDPE) and constitute 90% of the worldwide formulations, sandblasting media, maintenance of
plastic production 5 . The properties of plastics such as various plastic products and also in the manufacturing
flexibility, durability, low cost, easy to handle (lightweight) of synthetic clothes. Microbeads are another type of
and resistant to corrosion makes it a widely acceptable primary plastics (size < 2 mm) composed of polyethylene
compound. Plastic can withstand high rate of electrical and (PE), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS) beads and are
thermal insulation and thus have tremendous industrial used in cosmetic and health care products. Secondary
and commercial usage 6 . There has been an exponential microplastics are the fragmented product of macro or
increase in plastic production from 1950 (1.5 million tons) meso plastics and mostly generated under the effect of
to 2015 (322 million tons)7. The disposal of plastic materials various environmental processes such as biodegradation,
is an issue of concern these days because of its durability photodegradation, thermo-oxidative degradation, thermal
and corrosion resistance. Plastic compounds take up to degradation and hydrolysis 3 (Figure 1). Further nanoplastics
years to get degraded in smaller fragments8. Larger plastic are plastic fragments with < 1 µm size, and all these
debris slowly degrades into small fragments with various microplastics and nanoplastics have potential implications
size ranges extending from meter to micrometer due to for the bioamplification and bioaccumulation of various
changing environmental conditions. This fragmented chemicals and pollutants due to their large surface to
plastic with size smaller than 5 mm are known as volume ratio11.

Diagrammatic representation of different types of plastics and their effect

on marine organisms

Types of marine
biota adversely
affected

Types of
plastic waste

Plastic types Megaplastics Macroplastics Mesoplastics Microplastics Nanoplastics

1 metre 2.5 centimetre 5 millimetre 1 micron

DEBRIS SIZE

Figure 1

55
THE VEOLIA INSTITUTE REVIEW - FACTS REPORTS

on different factors such as polymer type, biofouling

and surface chemistry of the particles15 . In most of the
studies, microplastics have been detected in benthic
environments and sediments. Benthic environment is one
of the significant feeding ecosystems for a range of marine
biota. Recent studies have shown that marine benthic biota
ingest microplastics which is present in the sea in the form
of microbeads and microfibers16.

EFFECT OF MICROPLASTICS ON
THE HEALTH OF MARINE BIOTA
These tiny plastic fragments are persistent in the marine
ecosystem and due to their micron sized particle nature,
these fragments are mistaken as food and ingested
by a range of marine biota which includes corals,
phytoplanktons, zooplanktons, sea urchins, lobsters, fish
etc. and ultimately get transferred to higher tropic level.
The impact of microplastic on marine biota is an issue of
concern as it leads to the entanglement and ingestion
which can be lethal to marine life. The microplastic
fragments mainly arrive from terrestrial source and thus
coastal ecosystems which comprise of coral reefs are in
SOURCES OF MICROPLASTICS great threat due to microplastic pollution. Corals survive
The presence of these hazardous plastic fragments in in a symbiotic association with single celled algae which is
the ecosystem (terrestrial and aquatic) is due to different present in the tissues of corals cavity. The algal association
anthrop ogenic ac tivities which include domestic , is a source of energy through the process of photosynthesis.
industrial and coastal activities. The introduction of Also corals obtain energy by feeding on planktons to
microplastics in the aquatic ecosystem is mainly because acquire important nutrients which are essential for their
of the domestic runoff which contain microbeads and growth, development and reproduction3. The ‘microplastic
microplastic fragments (used in cosmetic and other feeding’ mechanism of corals involves ingestion, retention
consumer products) and also from the of plastic fragments and digestion17. The
fragmentation of the large plastic trash12 . harmful effect of microplastics on corals
The plastic manufac turing industries Microplastics also involves retention of plastic fragments
release plastics in the form of pellets and in mesenterial tissue which leads to
adversely affect
resin powders produced from air-blasting13 reduc tion in fe eding c apabili t y and
planktons which lowering in energy reserves18.
which ultimately contaminate the aquatic
environment. Also the coastal activities are a most essential
The microbial biofilms associated with
which include fishing prac tices, aqua component of the microplastics may also negatively regulate
tourism activities and marine industries marine habitat coral reef by promoting pathogen
are the sources of microplastic pollution in t r a n s m i s s i o n19. T h e f i r s t r e p o r t o f
the marine ecosystem. presence of microplastics in scleractinian
Microplastics once entered in the marine habitat are corals was detec ted in the Australia’s Great Barrier
exposed to different physic-chemical processes such as Reef. The experiment of feeding trials of corals revealed
biofouling and leaching or incorporation of secondary that corals when exposed to microplastics consume
pollutants. Microplastics have different shapes, size and these tiny fragments at a rate of ~50 µg plastic cm −2 h −1 .
density, and according to these features, plastic fragments These ingested plastic fragments were detected in the
have distributed in different compartments of the marine mesenterial tissue within gut cavity of coral which have
ecosystem (finally settle down to benthos) and are available negative effect on coral’s health20.
for the marine biota3.
Microplastics also adversely af fect planktons which
The pelagic marine biota which consists of planktons and are most essential component of the marine habitat.
crustaceans are exposed to low density microplastics The penetration of microplastics along the cell wall of
whereas benthic organisms such as polychaete and phytoplanktons results in the reduction of chlorophyll
tubifex worms, amphipods and mollusks are known to absorption 21 . Also the heterotrophic plankton when
encounter with dense microplastics14. The settling rate of exposed to microplastics undergoes the process of
microplastics through the water column varies depending phagocytosis and retains these tiny plastic fragments

56
 Value and limitations of plastics

THE VEOLIA INSTITUTE REVIEW - FACTS REPORTS

in their tissues 2 2 . Zo oplank ton (a class o f marine fragments easily available for fish. Fish ingest microplastics
invertebrates) have essential role in marine ecosystem by mistaking these fragments as planktons or other natural
as these microorganisms are basic primary consumers prey. In a study, the microplastic ingestion was found in the
of aquatic food chain. Zooplanktons have a range of planktivorous fish Acanthochromis polyacanthus where
feeding mechanisms and utilize the mechanism of chemo- microplastics of the dimensions < 300µm was present in
mechano receptors for prey selection23. The omnipresent the gut cavity of individual fish29. In one of the experiments,
nature of microplastics in marine habitat results in the ingestion of microplastics by fish showed that exposure
interactions of microplastics with these zooplanktons as of these plastic fragments causes histopathological
both of these are of same dimensions (> 333 µm) resulting modifications in the intestine, resulting in the detachment
in highly possible interactions 24 . Experimental studies of mucosa epithelial lining from the lamino propia and
revealed that zooplankton were found to ingest latex causing its widening, reduction and puf fing of villi,
beads when exposed to microplastic 25. In another study, increase in number of globet cells and certain alterations
it was found that zooplankton has the tendency to ingest in the normal structure of serosa of fish30. The effect of
polystyrene beads of dimensions of 1.7−30.6 µ m. The polystyrene on a European fish ( Perca fluviatilis) was
Centropages typicus, a well known copepod was known studied in which eggs and larvae of Perca fluviatilis were
to ingest microplastics (of size 7.3 µm) and ultimately lost exposed to different concentration levels of microplastics
their feeding ability which consequently has negative found in the Swedish coast, namely 10,000 par ticles
effect on their health24 . The effect of microplastics on per m3 and 80,000 particles per m3. It was found that eggs
Gammarus fossarum leads to decrease in the growth of which were exposed to high concentration of microplastics
this organism when exposed to poly (methyl methacrylate) had a comparative slower hatching rate when compared
(PMMA) and polyhydrox ybutyrate (PHB) 26 . Also, the to control. Also the larvae exposed to microplastics were
ingestion of polyethylene (PE) microplastics in benthic smaller and slower in comparison to normal larvae. The
organism Hyalella azteca leads to decrease in the growth responsive ability of microplastics exposed Perca fluviatilis
and reproduction process27. The microplastics uptake in
larvae to the chemical alarm (existence of predator) was
the marine lugworm Arenicola marina caused reduction in
found to be very low and thus it has a deleterious effect
feeding capability and ultimately weight loss28.
on the survival rate of fish. Other study also showed that
Certain features of microplastics such as microscopic size, microplastic ingestion in fishes cause metabolic alterations
attractive colors and their high buoyancy makes these tiny which include up-regulation and down-regulation of fatty

57
THE VEOLIA INSTITUTE REVIEW - FACTS REPORTS

acids and amino acids respectively 31 . The ingestion of also vulnerable to microplastics ingestion in the oceans
micro and nano plastics causes alteration in the ratio of throughout the world; e.g. the presence of microplastics
triglycerides and cholesterol in the blood serum level of was detected in the stomach and intestine of harbor
fish and also causes variation in the delivery of cholesterol seal, Phoca vitulina 35 . This class of marine mammals is
between muscle and liver of fish32. filter feeders and thus ingests substantial amounts of
microplastics either directly swallowing from ocean water
The harmful effects of microplastic ingestion is an issue
or indirectly by consuming prey containing microplastics
of concern specially in case of sea birds as half of the
in their body cavity. The presence of the microplastics
species are endangered and the toxic effect of plastic
in the stomach of sharks of Sea of Cortez and whales
fragments has negative effects on their body which could
of Mediterranean Sea proved that most of the littered
cause alteration in the feeding behavior, reproduction
plastic waste worldwide ultimately ends up at sea36 and
and mor tality 33 . It was found that six species of sea
imposed a great threat to marine animals. In a study done
birds, Phalacrocorax bougainvillii, Pelecanoides garnotii, on Mediterranean fin whale ( Balaenoptera physalus),
Pelecanoides urinatrix , Pelecanus thagus , Spheniscus high concentration of phtalates were detected in these
humboldti and Larus dominicanus have the plastic baleen whales which indicates the severity of microplastic
fragments in their stomach region and maximum ingestion pollution in world ocean37.
capacity was detected in case of Larus dominicanus
which commonly feds upon fishing nets, waste disposal
products and plastic containers34. The ingestion of plastic
debris by these species mainly depends on certain factors
CONTROL MEASURE
such as size, weight and habitat of the sea birds; e.g. the The worldwide record of plastic litter entering in the ocean
species of sea birds Spheniscus penguins and Thalassarche gyres was estimated to be 4.8 to 12.7 million metric tons,
albatross have small body size and thus ingestion rates and with the increased use of plastic and its products, the
were lower in comparison to large total amount of plastic litter available
s e a b i r d s . T h e s p e c i e s su c h as to marine ecosystem is expected
Fulmarus fulmars , Cyclorhynchus The large creatures of marine to increase substantially by the end
auklets , Oceanodroma , Pachyptila biota which includes sharks, of 202538 . This major issue was also
prions and Pelagodroma have higher raised in the “16 th Global Meeting
whales, seals, sea turtles and
ingestion rate of plastic debris due of the Regional Seas Conventions
to their large body size and weight33. polar bears are also vulnerable and Action Plans” which was held to
The large creatures of marine biota to microplastics ingestion in the literate nations regarding worldwide
w hi ch inclu d e s shark s, whales, oceans throughout the world. threat of plastic pollution in the
seals, sea turtles and polar bears are marine habitat, and financial damage

58
 Value and limitations of plastics

THE VEOLIA INSTITUTE REVIEW - FACTS REPORTS

of approximately US$13 billion per year to the marine against the use of plastic and its product such as complete
ecosystem was estimated39. Considering this recent trend ban on plastic bags and plastic bottles and imposing fine on
of ocean pollution by plastic litter, there is a pressing need usage of plastic40. However, unfortunately FMCGs are still
to carry out some dedicated research which could help to using plastic packets for selling their products. There should
restrict plastic pollution and could clean different water be a complete ban on microbeads in cosmetic and other
bodies worldwide. Certain innovative measures should be personal care products such as toothpastes, face wash
taken by states to literate the society about the harmful and shampoos. The waste management schemes such as
effects of plastic debris in the marine ecosystem. It is very EPR (extended producer responsibility) which promote
essential to introduce certain strong legislative rules and the use of manufacturing packaging materials other than
policies which could monitor the excessive use of plastic plastic for food and other beverage packaging should be
items, otherwise the health of ecosystem will worsen in the encouraged. Various campaigns should be organized by
coming span of time3. There should be a well established various governmental and nongovernmental organizations
waste collection system which could check the collection for the public consciousness against the nocuous and
of waste containing plastic litter. Efficient management, chronic effects of microplastic pollution. Apart from that,
recycling and finally environment friendly disposal system more scientific innovation should be encouraged which
would help in making environment free from plastic. will facilitate to produce environment friendly derivatives
Substantial policies are formulated in developing countries instead of plastic materials (Figure 2).

Overall representation of sources and deleterious effects of microplastics

on marine biota and control measures for this problem

CLASSIFICATION OF MICROPLASTICS

a) Primary microplastics : produced by

the unintentional discharge of transitional MARINE BIOTA
SOURCES plastic feedstock. AFFECTED
a) Domestic a) Corals
• Cosmetics b) Secondary microplastics: fragments which
are produced by fragmentation of larger b) Phytoplanktons
• Washing of
clothes plastic trash. c) Zooplanktons
• Use in toothpastes d) Benthic organisms
• Household wastes e) Fish
f) Sea birds
b) Industrial
• Construction
MICROPLASTICS g) Large marine
(having dimensions ranging between animals which
• Recycling few micrometre to 500 µm)
includes whales,
c) Coastal dolphins, seals,
• Fishing activities and polar bears
including plastic CONTROL MEASURES
gears, nets
• Shipping litter • Adopting certain strong legislative rules and policies which
could monitor the excessive use of plastic litter.
• Establishing a waste collection system.
• Need of strong policies formulated in developing countries
against the use of plastic such as complete ban on plastic bags
and plastic bottles and imposing of fine on usage of plastic.
• Completing ban on microbeads in cosmetic and other
personal care products.
• Regulating certain rules on industries and companies dealing
with plastic to shun the use of persistent and toxic plastic.
• Carrying out a dedicated research which could reveal certain
innovative measures to literate the society about the harmful
effects of plastic debris.

Figure 2

59
THE VEOLIA INSTITUTE REVIEW - FACTS REPORTS

CONCLUSION
The problem of plastic pollution in the marine ecosystem factors which influence the presence of microplastics in
is an issue of concern nowadays because of its deleterious marine ecosystem and its biological impacts on marine
effects on marine biota. Due to the size of microplastics, biota. New research methodologies must be developed
their bioaccumulation potential is very high. They are for conservation management and supporting different
ingested by an array of marine habitants like corals, educational programmes for the protection of ecosystem
planktons, fish, seabirds and marine mammals and are against these harmful polymers. The very urgent call in
transferred along the food chain. Also plastic polymers this field is to spread awareness among the general public
have different chemical additives and stabilizers due to regarding the nocuous effects of microplastics. This would
which it absorbs various toxic contaminants and pollutants stimulate various innovations to reduce the utilization
from the surrounding environment. Thus these harmful and consumption of plastic and its products. To minimize
contaminants adhere to the microplastics which act as a the plastic input into the ecosystem the most important
vector. The problem of microplastics has been ignored approach is to collect and reuse of plastic fragments. To
for a long time and this threat has been recognized only avoid future threat, the best solution is to stop producing
recently. At present, drinking water, table salt and other it further and find out the alternative of plastic products.
daily used food items are contaminated with microplastics.
There are various social active platforms such as Plastic
Pollution Coalitions, Plastics for change, Plastic Oceans,
Surfers Against Sewage, Greenpeace, By the Ocean We
Unite, One More Generation, One Green Planet, Surf Rider
Foundation, Earth Guardians who are working on the issue
of microplastic pollution and contributing substantially.
The adverse effects of microplastics pollution in the marine
environment spans from molecular level of organism to its
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
physiological actions and include poor health of organisms
and poor economic services. Thus immediate actions are Financial support for this work was provided to SS
urgently required against the unnecessary use of plastics by SERB-DST, Govt. of India (PDF/2016/000818).
and its products. Strict measures must be enforced at
Compliance with Ethical Standards
national and international levels against the use of plastics.
New scientific studies are required to elucidate various Conflict of interest: Authors declare no conflict of interests

REFERENCES

1. Dokyung Kim, Yooeun Chae and Youn- 5. Anthony L Andrady and Mike A Neal, 9. Maria Sighicelli, Loris Pietrelli, Francesca
Joo An, Mixture toxicity of nickel and Applications and societal benefits of Lecce, Valentina Iannilli, Mauro Falconieri,
microplastics with different functional plastics, Philosophical Transactions Lucia Coscia, Stefania Di Vito, Simone
groups on Daphnia magna, Environment of the Royal Society: B, DOI:10.1098/ Nuglio and Giorgio Zampett, Microplastic
Science and Technology, DOI: 10.1021/acs. rstb.2008.0304, 2009 pollution in the surface waters of Italian
est.7b03732, 2017 Subalpine Lakes, Environmental Pollution
6. Richard C Thompson, Charles J 236: 645-651, 2018
2. Karen Duis and Anja Coors, Microplastics Moore, Frederick S vom Saal and Shanna
in the aquatic and terrestrial environment: H Swan, Plastics, the environment and 10. Carlo Giacomo Avio, Stefania Gorbi and
sources (with a specific focus on human health: current consensus and Francesco Regoli, Plastics and microplastics
personal care products), fate and effects, future trends, Philosophical Transactions in the oceans: From emerging
Environmental Sciences Europe, 28:2, 2016 of the Royal Society: B, DOI: 10.1098/ pollutants to emerged threat, Marine
rstb.2009.0053, 2009 Environmental Research, Doi.org/10.1016/j.
3. Shivika Sharma and Subhankar Chatterjee, marenvres.2016.05.012, 2016
Microplastic pollution, a threat to marine 7. Plastics Europe, Plastics—the Facts
ecosystem and human health: a short 2014/2015: an analysis of European 11. Joso Pinto da Costa, Patricia S M Santos,
review, Environment Science and Pollution plastics production, demand and Armando C Duarte and Teresa Rocha-
Research, DOI 10.1007/s11356-017-9910-8, waste data. (Retrieved from) http:// Santos, (Nano)plastics in the environment
2017 issuu.com/plasticseuropeebook/docs/ – Sources, fates and effects, Science of
final_plastics_the_facts_2014_19122/1 the Total Environment, DOI.org/10.1016/j.
4. Aamer Ali Shah, Fariha Hasan, Abdul ?e=5245759/13757977, 2014 scitotenv.2016.05.041 0048-9697, 2016
Hameed and Safia Ahmed, Biological
degradation of plastics: A comprehensive 8. David K A Barnes, Francois Galgani, 12. Anthony L Andrady, Microplastics in the
review, Biotechnology Advances, DOI. Richard C Thompson and Morton Barlaz, marine environment, Marine Pollution
org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.12.005, 2008 Accumulation and fragmentation of plastic Bulletin 62:1596–1605, 2011
debris in global environments, Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society: B,
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0205, 2009

60
 Value and limitations of plastics

THE VEOLIA INSTITUTE REVIEW - FACTS REPORTS

13. Michiel Claessens, Steven De Meester, 24. Matthew Cole, Pennie Lindeque, Elaine 34. Martin Thiel, Guillermo Luna-Jorquera,
Lieve Van Landuyt, Karen De Clerck Fileman, Claudia Halsband, Rhys Goodhead, Rocío Alvarez-Varas , Camila Gallardo,
and Colin R Janssen, Occurrence and Julian Moger and Tamara S. Galloway, Ivan A. Hinojosa, Nicolas Luna, Diego
distribution of microplastics in marine Microplastic Ingestion by zooplankton, Miranda-Urbina, Naiti Morales, Nicolas
sediments along the Belgian coast, Environmental Science and Technology, DOI. Ory , Aldo S. Pacheco, Matias Portflitt-Toro
Marine Pollution Bulletin, DOI:10.1016/j. org/10.1021/es400663f, 2013 and Carlos Zavalaga , Impacts of marine
marpolbul.2011.06.030, 2011 plastic pollution from continental coasts
25. Vivian S. Lin, Research highlights: to Subtropical Gyres—fish, seabirds,
14. Luis Carlosde Sa, Miguel Oliveira, Francisca impacts of microplastics on plankton, and other vertebrates in the SE Pacific,
Ribeiro, Thiago Lopes Rocha and Martyn Environmental Science Processes & Frontiers in Marine Science, DOI: 10.3389/
Norman Futter, Studies of the effects of Impacts, DOI: 10.1039/c6em90004f, 2016 fmars.2018.00238, 2018
microplastics on aquatic organisms: What
do we know and where should we focus 26. Sandrine Straub, Philipp E Hirsch and 35. Elisa L Bravo Rebolledo, Jan A Van Franeker,
our efforts in the future?, Science of the Patricia Burkhardt-Holm, Biodegradable Okka E Jansen and Sophie M J M Brasseur,
Total Environment, DOI.org/10.1016/j. and petroleum-based microplastics do not Plastic ingestion by harbour seals (Phoca
scitotenv.2018.07.207, 2018 differ in their ingestion and excretion but vitulina) in The Netherlands, Marine
in their biological effects in a freshwater Pollution Bulletin, DOI.org/10.1016/j.
15. Andrew Turner and Luke A Holmes, invertebrate Gammarus fossarum, marpolbul.2012.11.035, 2013
Adsorption of trace metals by microplastic International Journal of Environmental
pellets in fresh water, Environmental Research and Public Health, DOI:10.3390/ 36. Josh Gabbatiss, Microplastics ‘pose major
Chemistry, DOI.org/10.1071/EN14143, 2015 ijerph14070774, 2017 threat’ to whales and sharks, scientists
warn, INDEPENDENT, Monday 5 February
16. Winnie Courtene-Jones, Brian Quinn, 27. Sarah Y Au, Terri F Bruce, William C Bridges , 2018 06:15. [Accessed on 1/11/2018]
Stefan F Gary, Andrew O M Mogg and Stephen J Klaine, Responses of Hyalella
Bhavani E Narayanaswamy, Microplastic azteca to acute and chronic microplastic 37. Maria Cristina Fossi, Cristina Panti,
pollution identified in deep-sea water exposures, Environmental Toxicology, DOI. Cristiana Guerranti, Daniele Coppola,
and ingested by benthic invertebrates in org/10.1002/etc.3093, 2015 Matteo Giannetti , Letizia Marsili and
the Rockall Trough, North Atlantic Ocean, Roberta Minutoli, Are baleen whales
Environmental Pollution, DOI.org/10.1016/j. 28. Ellen Besseling, Anna Wegner, Edwin exposed to the threat of microplastics?
envpol.2017.08.026, 2017 M Foekema, Martine J van den Heuvel- A case study of the Mediterranean fin
Greve, and Albert A Koelmans, Effects whale (Balaenoptera physalus), Marine
17. Amy L Lusher, Gema Hernandez-Milian, of microplastic on fitness and PCB Pollution Bulletin, DOI.org/10.1016/j.
Joanne O Brien, Simon Berrow, Ian O bioaccumulation by the lugworm Arenicola marpolbul.2012.08.013, 2012
Connor and Rick Officer, Microplastic marina (L.), Environmental Science and
and macroplastic ingestion by a deep Technology, DOI: 10.1021/es302763x, 2013 38. Jenna R. Jambeck, Roland Geyer, Chris
diving, oceanic cetacean: The True’s Wilcox,Theodore R. Siegler, Miriam
beaked whale Mesoplodon mirus, 29. Kay Critchell and Mia O Hoogenboom, Perryman, Anthony Andrady, Ramani
Environmental Pollution, DOI.org/10.1016/j. Effects of microplastic exposure on Narayan, Kara Lavender Law, Plastic waste
envpol.2015.01.023, 2015 the body condition and behaviour of inputs from land into the ocean, Science ,
planktivorous reef fish (Acanthochromis DOI: 10.1126/science.1260352, 2015
18. Jessica Reichert, Johannes Schellenberg, polyacanthus), PLoS One , DOI.org/10.1371/
Patrick Schubert and Thomas Wilke, journal.pone.0193308, 2018 39. UN Environment, Ocean Experts Call for
Responses of reef building corals to Greater Local Government Role in Fight
microplastic exposure, Environmental 30. Cristina Peda, Letteria Caccamo, against marine waste 2014, https://europa.
Pollution, DOI.org/10.1016/j. Maria Cristina Fossi, Francesco Gai, eu/capacity4dev/unep/blog/ocean-
envpol.2017.11.006, 2017 Franco Andaloro, Lucrezia Genovese, experts-call-greater-local-government-
Anna Perdichizzi, Teresa Romeo and role-fight-against-marine-waste [Accessed
19. Jesse P Harrison, Melanie Sapp, Giulia Maricchiolo, Intestinal alterations on 13 September 2018].
Michaela Schratzberger and Mark in European sea bass Dicentrarchus
A Osborn, Interactions between labrax (Linnaeus, 1758) exposed to 40. Plastic Polution Coalition, California
microorganisms and marine microplastics: microplastics: Preliminary results, introduces National Trash Reduction act
A call for research, Marine Technology Environmental Pollution, DOI.org/10.1016/j. http://www.plasticpollutioncoalition.
Society Journal, Doi.org/10.4031/ envpol.2016.01.083, 2016 org/pft/2015/11/6/california-introduces-
MTSJ.45.2.2, 2011 national trash-reduction-act. 2016
31. Yifeng Lu, Yan Zhang, Yongfeng Deng, Wei [Accessed on 02 Sept 2018]
20. N M Hall, K L E Berry, L Rintoul and Jiang, Yanping Zhao, Jinju Geng, Lili
M. O. Hoogenboom, Microplastic ingestion Ding, and Hongqiang Ren, Uptake and
by scleractinian corals, Marine Biology, accumulation of polystyrene microplastics
DOI:10.1007/s00227-015-2619-7, 2015 in zebrafish (Danio rerio) and toxic effects
in liver, Environmental Science and
21. Inger Lise Nerland, Claudia Halsband, Ian Technology, DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b00183,
Allan and Kevin V Thomas, Microplastics 2016
in marine environments: occurrence,
distribution and effects project no. 14338 32. Tommy Cedervall, Lars-Anders Hansson,
report no. 6754-2014 Oslo, 2014 Mercy Lard, Birgitta Frohm and Sara Linse,
Food chain transport of nanoparticles
22. Dawid W Laist, Overview of the biological affects behaviour and fat metabolism in
effects of lost and discarded plastic debris fish, PLoS One, DOI.org/10.1371/journal.
in the marine environment, Marine pone.0032254, 2012
Pollution Bulletin, DOI.org/10.1016/S0025-
326X(87)80019-X, 1987 33. Chris Wilcox, Erik Van Sebille and
Britta Denise Hardesty, Threat of
23. William R DeMott, Discrimination between plastic pollution to seabirds is global,
algae and detritus by freshwater and pervasive, and increasing, Proceeding of
marine zooplankton, Bulletin of Marine National Academy of Sciences: USA, DOI.
Science, 14: 486-499, 1988 org/10.1073/pnas.1502108112, 2015,

61