0% found this document useful (0 votes)
51 views24 pages

MP364 Ch5

This document describes stationary perturbation theory, which provides analytical approximations for small perturbations to quantum mechanical systems. It outlines: 1) The general perturbation approach, expanding the perturbed Hamiltonian, energy, and wavefunction as power series in a small parameter λ. 2) Applying this to a non-degenerate energy level of the unperturbed Hamiltonian, deriving first-order corrections to the energy and wavefunction, and second-order energy corrections. 3) The perturbation mixes the unperturbed wavefunction with others, and the accuracy of first-order perturbation theory depends on the energy gap to nearest levels.

Uploaded by

Freddy Fernandez
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
51 views24 pages

MP364 Ch5

This document describes stationary perturbation theory, which provides analytical approximations for small perturbations to quantum mechanical systems. It outlines: 1) The general perturbation approach, expanding the perturbed Hamiltonian, energy, and wavefunction as power series in a small parameter λ. 2) Applying this to a non-degenerate energy level of the unperturbed Hamiltonian, deriving first-order corrections to the energy and wavefunction, and second-order energy corrections. 3) The perturbation mixes the unperturbed wavefunction with others, and the accuracy of first-order perturbation theory depends on the energy gap to nearest levels.

Uploaded by

Freddy Fernandez
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24

CHAPTER 5: STATIONARY PERTURBATION THEORY

(From Cohen-Tannoudji, Chapter XI)


A. DESCRIPTION OF THE METHOD

Approximation methods to obtain analytical solution of eigenvalue problems.

1. Statement of the problem

We consider a time-independent perturbation

Ĥ = Ĥ0 + W (5.1)
of the time-independent Hamiltonian Ĥ0, whose eigenvalues and eigenvectors are
known and which captures the essential physics, by an additional term

W = λŴ (5.2)
λ  1 (5.3)
We assume that the eigenvalues and eigenstates of Ĥ0 are known and that the un-
perturbed energies form a discrete spectrum E 0p with eigenvectors |ϕipi (where the
index i refers to degeneracy):

Ĥ0|ϕipi = E 0p|ϕipi (5.4)

where
0
hϕip|ϕip0 i = δ pp0 δii0 (5.5)
XX
|ϕipihϕip| = 1̂ (5.6)
p i

i.e. the states |ϕipi form a basis.


We seek an approximative solution of the full Hamiltonian Ĥ(λ) = Ĥ0 + λŴ

Ĥ(λ)|ψ(λ)i = E(λ)|ψ(λ)i (5.7)

where the eigenvalue and eigenvector can be expanded in terms of λ

E(λ) = ε0 + λε1 + . . . + λqεq + . . . (5.8)


|ψ(λ)i = |0i + λ|1i + . . . + λq|qi + . . . (5.9)

Inserting these into the eigenvalue equation yields


    
 X∞  ∞
 X  X∞ 
 0
Ĥ0 + λŴ  λq|qi =  λq εq0   λq|qi (5.10)
    
q =0
   0  
q=0 q=0
As this equation must hold for any (small) value of λ, it must hold for each power of
λ separately, giving the equations for various orders of the perturbation:
0th-order: is just the eigenvalue equation of the unperturbed Hamiltonian, ε0 = En0

Ĥ0|0i = ε0|0i (5.11)

1st order:
   
Ĥ0 − ε0 |1i + Ŵ − ε1 |0i = 0 (5.12)

2nd order
   
Ĥ0 − ε0 |2i + Ŵ − ε1 |1i − ε2|0i = 0 (5.13)

q-th order
   
Ĥ0 − ε0 |qi + Ŵ − ε1 |q − 1i − ε2|q − 2i . . . − εq|0i = 0 (5.14)
We shall write |ψ(λ)i to be normalized and its phase will be chosen s.t. h0|ψ(λ)i ∈ R.
For 0th order we have

h0|0i = 1 (5.15)

and to the 1st order we get


 
hψ(λ)|ψ(λ)i = [h0| + λh1|] [|0i + λ|1i] + O λ2 (5.16)
 
= h0|0i + λ [h1|0i + h0|1i] + O λ2 (5.17)

Since both h0|0i = 1 and hψ(λ)|ψ(λ)i = 1 we get to the 1st order

λ [h1|0i + h0|1i] = 0
⇒ h0|1i = h1|0i = 0 (5.18)
For the 2nd order we get

hψ(λ)|ψ(λ)i = h0|0i + λ [h1|0i + h0|1i]


 
+λ2 [h2|0i + h0|2i + h1|1i] + O λ3 (5.19)

1
⇒ h0|2i = h2|0i = − h1|1i (5.20)
2

and eventually for q-th order we have


1
h0|qi = hq|0i = − hq − 1|1i + hq − 2|2i + . . . + h2|q − 2i + h1|q − 1i (5.21)

2
B. PERTURBATION OF A NON-DEGENERATE LEVEL

We will try to answer how a nondegenerate eigenvalue and eigenvector of the unper-
turbed Hamiltonian Ĥ0

ε0 = En0
|0i = |φni
are modified by introducing the perturbation W .

We will be seeking the eigenvalue En(λ) of the full Hamiltonian Ĥ(λ) which when
λ → 0 approaches En0 of Ĥ0.

We will assume that λ is small enough for this eigenvalue to remain non-degenerate.
1. First-order corrections

a. ENERGY CORRECTION
Taking the 1st order equation we found above, and projecting onto |ϕni gives
   
hϕn| Ĥ0 − ε0 |1i + hϕn| Ŵ − ε1 |0i = 0 (5.22)
and since |ϕni = |0i is the eigenvector of Ĥ0 with the eigenvalue ε0 = En0, we obtain
the first order correction to the energy
ε1 = hϕn|Ŵ|0i = hϕn|Ŵ|ϕni (5.23)
and the 1st order perturbative expression for the energy eigenvalue of the perturbed
system in the form (recall, W = λŴ )

En(λ) = En0 + hϕn|W|ϕni + O(λ2)


b. EIGENVECTOR CORRECTION

To find the first-order correction to the eigenvector, we must project the first-order
n o
i
equation above onto all the vectors of the |ϕ pi basis other than |ϕni
   
hϕip| Ĥ0 − En0 |1i + hϕip| Ŵ − ε1 |ϕni = 0 (p , n) (5.24)

Since the eigenvectors of Ĥ0 associated with different eigenvalues are orthogonal
ε1hϕip|ϕni = 0 and hϕip|Ĥ0 = hϕip|E 0p, we get
 
E 0p − En0 hϕip|1i + hϕip|Ŵ|ϕni = 0 (5.25)

and
1
hϕip|1i = hϕ
0 p
i |Ŵ|ϕ i
n (p , n) (5.26)
En0 − E p
and, since hϕn|1i = h0|1i = 0, the first order correction to the eigenvector can be
written as
X X hϕip|Ŵ|ϕni
|1i = |ϕ ii (5.27)
p
p,n i En0 − E 0p

The expression for the eigenvector of the perturbed Hamiltonian to the first-order is
thus
X X hϕip|W|ϕni  
|ψn(λ)i = |ϕni + |ϕ i i + O λ2 (5.28)
p
p,n i En0 − E 0p

The perturbation W mixes the state |φni with the other eigenstates of Ĥ0.
2. Second-order corrections

a. ENERGY CORRECTION

We proceed in a way similar to the previous case. We project the 2nd order equation
obtained above onto |ϕni
   
hϕn| Ĥ0 − En0 |2i + hϕn| Ŵ − ε1 |1i − ε2hϕn|ϕni = 0 (5.29)

Since |ϕni = |0i is the eigenvector of Ĥ0 with the eigenvalue ε0 = En0, the first term is
zero and the second order correction becomes

ε2 = hϕn|Ŵ|1i (5.30)
With the expression for |1i obtained above we can write the second order correction
to the energy eigenvalue as

X X hϕip|Ŵ|ϕni 2
ε2 = 0 − E0
(5.31)
p,n i E n p
The 2nd order expression for the energy eigenvalue of the perturbed system be-
comes
X X hϕip|W|ϕni 2
En(λ) = En0 + hϕn|W|ϕni + + O(λ3) (5.32)
p,n i En0 − E 0p
b. EIGENVECTOR CORRECTION

The eigenvector corrections |2i can be obtained by projecting the equation


   
Ĥ0 − ε0 |2i + Ŵ − ε1 |1i − ε2|0i = 0 (5.33)

onto the set of basis vectors |φipi different from |φni and by using the condition

1
h0|2i = h2|0i = − h1|1i (5.34)
2
c. UPPER LIMIT OF ε2

What is the error involved in the 1st order perturbation theory?


Consider
X X hϕip|Ŵ|ϕni 2
ε2 = (5.35)
p,n i En0 − E 0p
and let the absolute value of difference of En0 being studied and that of the nearest
level E 0p be

En0 − E 0p ≥ ∆E (5.36)
then an upper limit for the absolute value of 2 is
1 XX i 2
|ε2| ≤ hϕ p |Ŵ|ϕ n i (5.37)
∆E p,n
i
1 XX i 2
|ε2| ≤ hϕ p|Ŵ|ϕni (5.38)
∆E p,n
i
1 X X
= hϕn|Ŵ|ϕipihϕip|Ŵ|ϕni (5.39)
∆E p,n
i
 
1  X X
i i

= hϕn|Ŵ   |ϕ pihϕ p| Ŵ|ϕni (5.40)
∆E p,n i

Taking into account the completeness relation


XX
|ϕnihϕn| + |ϕipihϕip| = 1̂ (5.41)
p,n i
allows us to rewrite the inequality as
1 h i
|ε2| ≤ hϕn|Ŵ 1̂ − |ϕnihϕn| Ŵ|ϕni (5.42)
∆E 
1 2
 2  1  2
≤ hϕn|Ŵ |ϕni − hϕn|Ŵ|ϕni = ∆Ŵ (5.43)
∆E ∆E

An upper limit for the 2nd order term in En(λ) = 0 + λ1 + λ22 + . . . is then
1
λ2ε2 ≤ (∆W)2 (5.44)
∆E

This indicates the order of magnitude of the error committed by taking only the 1st
order correction into account.
C. PERTURBATION OF A DEGENERATE STATE

Assume that the level En0 to be gn-fold degenerate, and E0n be the corresponding
gn-fold dimensional eigenspace of Ĥ0.

Now the choice

ε0 = En0 (5.45)

is not sufficient to determine |0i since the equation Ĥ0|0i = 0|0ican be satisfied by
any linear combination of vectors in E0n.
To determine |0i and 1 we project the 1st order equation
   
Ĥ0 − ε0 |1i + Ŵ − ε1 |0i = 0 (5.46)

onto the gn basis vectors |φini:

since Ĥ0|φini = 0|φini for all |φini we obtain the gn relations:

hϕin|Ŵ|0i = ε1hϕin|0i (5.47)

Now using the completeness relation


XX 0 0
hϕn|Ŵ|ϕ p ihϕ p |0i = ε1hϕin|0i
i i i (5.48)
p i0
0
where hϕ p |0i = 0 for all p , n.
i
Taking into account only the terms where p = n we get
gn
X 0 0
hϕin|Ŵ|ϕin ihϕin |0i = ε1hϕin|0i (5.49)
i0 =1
where the gn × gn matrix
0
Ŵ (n) = hϕin|Ŵ|ϕin i (5.50)

is the restriction of Ŵ to the eigenspace E0n.


We can rewrite the equation
gn
X 0 0
hϕin|Ŵ|ϕin ihϕin |0i = ε1hϕin|0i (5.51)
i0 =1
into a vector equation

Ŵ (n)|0i = ε1|0i (5.52)

To calculate the eigenvalues (to the 1st order) and the eigenstates (to the 0th or-
der) of the Hamiltonian corresponding to a degenerate unperturbed state En0, we
have to diagonalize the matrix W (n), which represents the perturbation Ŵ inside the
eigenspace E0n associated with the eigenvalue En0.
The first order effect of the perturbation is given by the various roots of the charac-
j (1)
teristic equation of W (n), 1( j = 1, 2, . . . , fn ).

Since W (n) is self-adjoint, its eigenvalues are real numbers and their degrees of
degeneracy sum to gn.

Each eigenvalue introduces a different energy correction, i.e. under W = λŴ , the
(1)
degenerate levels split to the 1st order into fn distinct sublevels
j (1)
En, j(λ) = En0 + λε1 j = 1, 2, . . . , fn ≤ gn (5.53)
j
We shall now choose an eigenvalue 1 of W (n):

- if it is non-degenerate, the corresponding vector |0i is completely determined, i.e.


there exists a single eigenvalue E(λ) of Ĥ(λ) which is
j
En0 + λε1 (5.54)

and is non-degenerate;

- if it is q-fold degenerate, the equation

W (n)|0i = 1|0i (5.55)


(1)
indicates only that |0i belongs to the corresponding q-dimensional subspace F j .

You might also like