Picard's Existene Theorem (Statement Only)

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Picard-Lindelöf Theorem

Lecture 4
Math 634
9/8/99

Theorem The space C([a, b]) of continuous functions from [a, b] to R n equipped
with the norm

kf k∞ := sup |f (x)| x ∈ [a, b]
is a Banach space.

Definition Two different norms k · k1 and k · k2 on a vector space X are


equivalent if there exist constants m, M > 0 such that
mkxk1 ≤ kxk2 ≤ Mkxk1
for every x ∈ X .

Theorem If (X , k · k1 ) is a Banach space and k · k2 is equivalent to k · k1 on


X , then (X , k · k2 ) is a Banach space.

Theorem A closed subspace of a complete metric space is a complete metric


space.

We are now in a position to state and prove the Picard-Lindelöf Existence-


Uniqueness Theorem. Recall that we are dealing with the IVP
(
ẋ = f (t, x)
(1)
x(t0 ) = a.

Theorem (Picard-Lindelöf) Suppose f : [t0 − α, t0 + α] × B(a, β) → R n is


continuous and bounded by M. Suppose, furthermore, that f (t, ·) is Lipschitz
continuous with Lipschitz constant L for every t ∈ [t0 − α, t0 + α]. Then (1)
has a unique solution defined on [t0 − b, t0 + b], where b = min{α, β/M}.

Proof. Let X be the set of continuous functions from [t0 −b, t0 + b] to B(a, β).
The norm

kgkw := sup e−2L|t−t0 | |g(t)| t ∈ [t0 − b, t0 + b]

1
is equivalent to the standard supremum norm k · k∞ on C([t0 − b, t0 + b]), so
this vector space is complete under this weighted norm. The set X endowed
with this norm/metric is a closed subset of this complete Banach space, so X
equipped with the metric d(x1 , x2 ) := kx1 − x2 kw is a complete metric space.
Given x ∈ X , define T (x) to be the function on [t0 − b, t0 + b] given by
the formula
Z t
T (x)(t) = a + f (s, x(s)) dx.
t0

Step 1: If x ∈ X then T (x) makes sense.


This should be obvious.
Step 2: If x ∈ X then T (x) ∈ X .
If x ∈ X , then it is clear that T (x) is continuous (and, in fact, differentiable).
Furthermore, for t ∈ [t0 − b, t0 + b]
Z t Z t
|T (x)(t) − a| = f (s, x(s)) ds ≤ |f (s, x(s))| ds ≤ Mb ≤ β,
t0 t0

so T (x)(t) ∈ B(a, β). Hence, T (x) ∈ X .


Step 3: T is a contraction on X .
Let x, y ∈ X , and note that kT (x) − T (y)kw is
( Z t )
−2L|t−t0 |
sup e [f (s, x(s)) − f (s, y(s))] ds t ∈ [t0 − b, t0 + b] .
t0

For a fixed t ∈ [t0 − b, t0 + b],


Z t
−2L|t−t0 |
e [f (s, x(s)) − f (s, y(s))] ds
t0
Z t
−2L|t−t0 |
≤e |f (s, x(s)) − f (s, y(s))| ds
t0
Z t
−2L|t−t0 |
≤e L|x(s) − y(s)| ds
t0
Z t
−2L|t−t0 |
≤ Le kx − ykw e2L|s−t0 | ds
t0
kx − ykw 
= 1 − e−2L|t−t0 |
2
1
≤ kx − ykw .
2

2
Taking the supremum over all t ∈ [t0 −b, t0 +b], we find that T is a contraction
(with λ = 1/2).
By the contraction mapping principle, we therefore know that T has a
unique fixed point in X . This means that (1) has a unique solution in X
(which is the only place a solution could be).

You might also like