Document - 895 - 539download EBook Ebook PDF Gendered Worlds 4Th Edition PDF Docx Kindle Full Chapter
Document - 895 - 539download EBook Ebook PDF Gendered Worlds 4Th Edition PDF Docx Kindle Full Chapter
Document - 895 - 539download EBook Ebook PDF Gendered Worlds 4Th Edition PDF Docx Kindle Full Chapter
Edition
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmass.com/product/ebook-pdf-gendered-worlds-4th-edition/
Sexual Violence in Men’s Prisons
Gendered Violence in Conflict Zones
Central and South America: A Case Study
Working to End Violence
New Social Movements
Finding Solutions
12 Sports
Sports and Masculinity
Women Navigating Masculine Athletics
Changing the Field
Bringing Women into Sports
What Continues to Hold Women Back?
Homophobia and Heterosexism in Sports
Assimilation or Reform?
13 Religion
Religion as an Institution
Abrahamic Religions
Catholicism
Islam
Buddhism
Fundamentalism on Gender Relations
Muslim Fundamentalism
Christian Fundamentalism
Fundamentalist Views of Masculinity
Evangelical Feminists
Hindu Fundamentalism
Women in the Pulpit
Religion as a Base of Resistance
Women Activists in Sri Lanka
Religion in the American Civil Rights Movement
Challenging Religions
What Difference Would More Gender-Equal Religions Make?
Feminist Theoretical Models
What If There Were No Religions?
Glossary
Credits
Index
Talking About
BOX 1.1: Hegemonic Masculinity and Supermen
BOX 2.1: The Heterosexual Matrix
BOX 2.2: “Where Do You Fit?”
BOX 2.3: Intersex Activism
BOX 2.4: Commonality
BOX 2.5: Bathroom Politics
BOX 2.6: The International Bill of Gender Rights, Adopted June 17,
1995, Houston, Texas, USA
BOX 2.7: Ancient Beliefs about Human Anatomy
BOX 2.8: Latino, Latina, Latinx, and Rejecting the Binary
BOX 3.1: Asexuality
BOX 3.2: Women’s Liberation
BOX 3.3: The Stonewall Monument
BOX 3.4: Sally Hemings and Thomas Jefferson
BOX 3.5: Men Who Have Sex with Men
BOX 3.6: Heterosexism and Heterosexual Privilege
BOX 3.7: “Is My Son Gay?”
BOX 4.1: Presenting Gender
BOX 4.2: Hansel and Gretel
BOX 4.3: Tokenism: The Smurfette Syndrome
BOX 4.4: A World Without Gender
BOX 5.1: Addressing Bias in the K–12 Classroom
BOX 5.2: Coed versus Single-Sex Schools and Classrooms
BOX 5.3: What’s Your Major?
BOX 5.4: Student Evaluations
BOX 6.1: Emotional Labor
BOX 6.2: Makeup
BOX 6.3: LGBTQ Rights in the Workplace
BOX 6.4: Sexual Harassment in the Workplace
BOX 6.5: World Poverty
BOX 6.6: Agricultural Workers, Hunger, and Gender
BOX 7.1: Promoting Marriage in Japan and Korea
BOX 7.2: Lesbian Mothers
BOX 7.3: Free Riders
BOX 7.4: Fathers
BOX 7.5: Child Care, Finnish Style
BOX 8.1: Acid Attacks
BOX 8.2: Campus Rape
BOX 8.3: Criminalizing Battered Women
BOX 8.4: Fraternities
BOX 8.5: The Thomas Theorem and Trayvon Martin
BOX 8.6: Tactics in #MeToo
BOX 8.7: Black Lives Matter
BOX 9.1: Danger on the Highways
BOX 9.2: Palm Oil Plantations in Malaysia
BOX 9.3: Cervical Cancer
BOX 9.4: Privatizing Water
BOX 9.5: Pain
BOX 9.6: Bollywood Bodies and Steroids
BOX 9.7: LGBTQ Health and Illness
BOX 9.8: Care Workers Take Action
BOX 9.9: How to Be a Change-Maker
BOX 10.1: Chinese Villages
BOX 10.2: Bystanders
BOX 10.3: Immigrant Women Take the Lead
BOX 10.4: Gender Quotas
BOX 10.5: Pregnant Women, Drugs, and Child Endangerment
BOX 10.6: Women Prisoners
BOX 10.7: Military Training
BOX 10.8: Transgender in the Military
BOX 11.1: YouTube and Children
BOX 11.2: Thin Girls and Fat Boys
BOX 11.3: Diversity Versus Normalizing
BOX 11.4: “Who Tells Us the News?”
BOX 11.5: Regulating Advertising
BOX 11.6: Top Ten Films Worldwide (in millions of dollars)
BOX 11.7: North, South, Hegemony, and Resistance
BOX 12.1: Kids at the Pool
BOX 12.2: Taking a Knee
BOX 12.3: Throwing Like a Girl
BOX 12.4: Team USA
BOX 12.5: Professional Cheerleading
BOX 12.6: Olympic Women
BOX 12.7: Black LGBTQ Athletes
BOX 13.1: Sunday School Curricula
BOX 13.2: Hijab and the Government
BOX 13.3: Stay-at-Home Daughters
BOX 13.4: Women Priests
BOX 13.5: Christianity In The White Nationalist Movement
BOX 13.6: Women’s Leadership in the Civil Rights Movement
BOX 13.7: Goddess Worship
Preface
The first edition of this book was a work of faith—faith that we could
grasp the massive wealth of gender scholarship in one brief volume. This
fourth edition is our continued effort to tap into the global discussions on
gender and to introduce our readers to an even broader array of empirical
research and theory-building that increasingly makes feminist scholarship
so crucial today.
This book is our attempt to bring together the multiple strands of
gender studies and related research on everything from the local and
everyday manifestations of masculinities and femininities to the gendered
institutions that undergird today’s global politics and social crises. To
accomplish this objective, each chapter builds on five principles.
First, we weave together theory and empirical data. The book gathers
scholarship—mainly sociological, but also interdisciplinary—that has
accumulated in many substantive areas. For example, readers will learn
about research on the gender of violence and how it affects families, as
well as how gender, together with race/ethnicity, social class, and
sexuality, shapes media, sports, politics, sexual rights, religion, education,
health, and bodies. Theories that have grown out of and alongside this
research provide frameworks for interpreting the issues presented in each
chapter, allowing students to see how theory emerges from and helps to
explain empirical studies.
Second, we connect personal experiences with sociological concepts
by offering both social constructionist and social structural approaches to
gender that explain the production of inequalities in face-to-face
interactions within organizations as well as the gendered character of the
institutions themselves. We ask how the gendered features of our everyday
lives are given life, shape, and meaning by these larger organizations and
institutions; and how we, in turn, act back on these structures to reimagine
social relationships and social structures that could move us toward a
more just world.
Third, this is a book about gender as an inclusive concept. Often,
people conflate gender studies with women’s studies, but men’s lives, too,
are shaped by gender; and the experiences of transgender, gender
nonconforming, and intersex people show how gender enters everyone’s
life. In fact, a discussion of gender that focuses only on cisgender women
and cisgender men reinforces the myth of sex and gender binaries that
research shows are actually socially constructed and exclusionary
patriarchal tools. We invite the reader to join us in our attempt to uncover
and understand how the binary of woman/man is re-created on multiple
levels and how it might be eliminated by thinking and interacting with
each other differently, as well as by reorganizing our social institutions.
Fourth, this book reminds readers that there are differences within
groups. Inter-sectionality is an approach that recognizes that we are never
just gendered and sexed, but that we are all located in what black feminist
theorist Patricia Hill Collins called a “matrix of domination.” There is no
way to understand gender as a phenomenon separate from social class,
race/ethnicity, sexuality, and nation. Women are not a monolithic group;
they experience gender differently based on their race/ethnicity, for
example. This intersectional perspective is a feature of each chapter and is
intended to help readers better understand the complicated character of
power and inequality. Gendered identities are accomplishments, not fixed
states of being, and gender intersects with other social structures to
provide opportunities to some people while creating barriers for others.
Privilege and subordination are dynamic and variable, so that while some
men experience a massive amount of—taken-for-granted—privilege,
others are subordinated along racial/ethnic, national, sexual, and class
lines. In each chapter, we explore these advantages and disadvantages, as
well as how people are sometimes complicit in perpetuating but also often
resisting social inequalities.
Fifth, this book shoulders the enormous task of taking a global view.
Our goal is to help readers gain a sense of how culture, national identities,
and immigration and migration similarly or differently shape gender in
different places. We hope to encourage students to begin asking questions
about the many ways gender structures people’s lives all around the world.
SUMMARY OF CHAPTERS
Chapter 1 provides a brief overview of the assumptions we make and the
tools we use throughout this book to introduce the reader to gender. The
chapter explains three basic ground rules for studying gender: life is
socially based and politically structured; gender is part of a larger web of
social inequalities; and scholarship is political. We also introduce the
overarching framework of the text: intersectionality.
Chapter 2 begins with the question of biology. Most people believe that
male and female, masculinity and femininity, and heterosexuality are
natural and normal. We discuss how biological, historical, and
anthropological research on intersex and transgender individuals
challenges this “standard story.” We show how not everyone is male or
female and explain that we overlook sex and gender diversity when we
assume that all “normal” males become heterosexually masculine and all
“normal” females become heterosexually feminine.
Chapter 3 focuses on sexuality as a key component of understanding
the relationships among sex, gender, and social power. We open with a
discussion of how the intersecting dimensions of gender, race/ethnicity,
class, and nation have historically shaped sexuality. While, currently, men
and women are often expected to be heterosexual, actual sex practices
offer much more complicated and interesting examples of the ways gender
identities enter into and produce sexual desires, sexual acts, and sexual
identities. Feminist, queer, and antiracist studies of sexuality have exposed
the political character of sexuality. The chapter moves from discussing the
construction of conventional sexualities by means of sexual scripts and
gendered double standards to describing the global politics of sex tourism
and sex trafficking, and exploring organized efforts by LGBTQ
communities to challenge normative sexualities and demand sexual human
rights.
If biology is not the basis of gender, then what is? Chapter 4 reviews
the sociological and social psychological theories scholars have developed
to explain the sources of gender. These theories look at three levels of
social life: socialization, social interaction, and social structure. We both
explain and critique these three theoretical approaches. We also show that,
when taken together, feminist theories on gender spotlight the
constructedness of our gendered worlds and thus open up possibilities for
change toward greater equality.
Chapter 5 makes clear that gender in education is not a simple story. In
some ways and in some places, girls and women are not allowed the same
opportunities in education as boys and men are, but gender in schools
creates problems for boys, too, especially for boys of color. Boys are more
likely to be diagnosed and treated for hyperactivity, for example. They
also have lower graduation rates, and black and Latino boys in the U.S. are
often stereotyped as potentially criminal and tracked out of the classroom
and into disciplinary spaces. Racism and poverty contribute to the
diminished education that many children receive, and when we look at the
intersection of these factors with gender in the global South, unexpected
problems become evident, such as how the lack of access to water and
toilets results in educational inequality.
Chapter 6 turns the lenses of gender, race/ethnicity, class, and nation
on local and global economies and on the gendered and raced character of
work. This chapter is divided into three broad issues: gender inequality in
the paid workforce; gender inequality in unpaid work; and gender
inequality in the global workforce. The chapter covers topics such as how
race/ethnicity intersects with gender to determine who encounters the
glass ceiling or who rides the glass elevator at work.
The family has been a contentious political issue in the United States
for many years, as conservatives hold its so-called decline responsible for
the ills of contemporary life. In Chapter 7, readers will have a chance to
draw their own conclusions about family life today. Does marriage really
prevent poverty? Will allowing same-sex marriage undermine marriage as
an institution, or will it give it new life? What is the purpose of marriage,
and whom does it serve? In addition to marriage, the chapter covers the
family issues of divorce, caregiving, and balancing work and family.
Chapter 8 shows that gender is a central feature of the continuum of
violence that stretches from our most intimate lives to the ongoing global
tragedies of militarism and war. Street harassment, rape, domestic
violence, gendered violence in prisons, militarist masculinity, wartime
rape, the enslavement of women by militias, sex trafficking, and growing
civilian casualties—what can explain such relentless and pervasive
gendered violence? This chapter reviews the complex intersections of
gender, nation, and race/ethnicity as a way of answering this question.
Inequalities of race/ethnicity, class, gender, and sexuality shape our
relationship to violence, both as victims and as perpetrators. Feminist
movements to end violence are sweeping the globe, and so we discuss the
emergence of the #MeToo movement in the United States and Ni Una
Menos in South and Central America, as well as the work on the
International Criminal Court.
Chapter 9 recounts the many ways that health and illness are raced and
gendered around the globe. Everything we have explored up to this point
impacts the distribution of health and illness, including the sexual division
of paid and unpaid labor, the political economies and ruling orders of the
nations in which people live, and membership in particular sexual
communities. For example, how are men and women who work on Nestle-
and Kellogg-owned palm oil plantations in the global South facing risks
particular to local labor laws? This chapter also describes feminist and
antiracist social movements involving reproductive rights, including the
right to abortion. It also reviews the debate over how best to address the
HIV/AIDS pandemic. In addition, we discuss how local actions can grow
into transnational movements linking reproductive and general health to a
wide range of rights to housing, education, employment, and freedom
from violence.
Is changing the gender of officeholders sufficient to make positive
political change? According to studies we discuss in Chapter 10, the
evidence is mixed. This is because men dominate all channels of
contemporary politics around the world: electoral politics, the news
media, and the metaphors of political discourse—war and sports. These
issues are examined across nations, challenging the common belief among
Americans that the United States is a model of democracy by exploring
data on the participation of U.S. women in legislative and executive
positions compared to other nations. Policies that have made other nations
more gender equal in political representation are discussed, and readers
are asked to consider their efficacy and the barriers they might confront if
we were to attempt to implement them in the United States. Politics is not
just about elections and offices, however. Other political issues that are
also shaped by gender as well as race/ethnicity and class are reviewed in
this chapter, as are the prison system and the military. The chapter
concludes with a discussion of the conceptualization of power.
Our daily lives are saturated with media. The thousands of images and
messages we receive in these ways exhort us overtly or subtly to view,
experience, and act on the world in prescribed ways. Chapter 11 explores
how these messages are simultaneously gendered and raced, and often
sexualized. Some progress has been made, but gender stereotypes continue
to abound in all media forms. Women are still missing as subjects of
media stories and behind the scenes as reporters, writers, and producers.
While representations vary across borders and by race/ethnicity and age,
some factors are consistent, especially the underrepresentation of
transgender, queer individuals, and people of color. The chapter describes
these problems and discusses the notion of normalizing the diversity that
is our real social experience by emphasizing inclusion and rejecting
marginalization in media representations.
Chapter 12 covers the topic of sports. Historically, women have largely
been excluded from athletics, based on the widespread idea that femininity
does not include athletic ability or athletic experience. In contrast, being a
successful athlete and being a “real man” are closely related. Critics of
organized sports cite normalized violence, the weaponization of male
bodies, and excessive competitiveness as both physically and
psychologically damaging for men. For women, however, athletics can be
a space to challenge gender divisions and sexual barriers that have forced
queer athletes to hide their sexual identities and women athletes to
suppress their athletic performance and potential. Studying gender and
sports forces comparisons between the highly organized and competitive
fan-supported sports that have become big business and participation
sports that are more loosely and democratically organized activities.
In Chapter 13, we focus on gender and religion, one of the most loaded
topics of debate today, as we have seen the rise of religious
fundamentalism and the rise in hate crimes against religious minorities.
Ironically, although fundamentalist religions subordinate women in many
ways, more women than men are fundamentalists. But religious
communities, regardless of doctrine, can also be places where women find
support and space for some freedom of expression in otherwise restrictive
societies. Religion has played an important positive role in the civil rights,
peace, and antiwar movements, for example. Not all forms of spirituality
and religious organization constrain women; Ecofeminism has even
centered around the worship of goddesses. Ancient and indigenous
societies provide examples of forms of worship that were egalitarian and
that revered women’s bodies for their lifegiving abilities. Activists also
often resist constraints imposed on women within religions. Some
Catholics, for example, are calling for an end to the ban on women priests.
Our world is filled with injustice, inequality, and pain. It is also filled
with hope and promise that grow from the many people who resist
injustices and promote potential and pleasure. We dedicate this book to
furthering those ends.
Acknowledgments
Writing this book required the authors to learn new areas of research about
which they may initially have known little. Judy Aulette thanks Anna
Aulette-Root, Elizabeth Aulette-Root, and Albert Aulette for their help
with this work through their careful reading and essential feedback on
many drafts of chapters. In addition, she thanks them for living with this
project for so many years. She also thanks her most recent coauthor,
Kristen Barber, for bringing to the text greater awareness of sexuality as a
critical component of gender and the value of queer theory in
understanding the links among sex, gender, and sexuality. In addition,
Barber’s insights into how to transform the book into a teaching tool were
invaluable. Most importantly, Judy Aulette thanks her coauthor, Judith
Wittner, for her knowledge, creativity, tenacity, and especially her
friendship.
Judith Wittner thanks the members of her writing group, Susan Stall
and Martha Thompson, for their encouragement and support. Her thanks
also go to Judy Aulette for her handholding and great patience and to
Kristin Blakely for the intelligence and energy she brought to our project.
Special thanks to Jenny Wittner, Jorge, Nathaniel, and Alex Pinheiro, Liz
Wittner, and John, Mollie, Mario, and Lily Pepper.
Kristen Barber thanks Judy Aulette, Judith Wittner, and Sherith
Pankratz for bringing her on board as a coauthor. She is honored to be part
of such a comprehensive feminist project. She is also grateful to Annie
Johnson, who helped dig up new statistics and images to update the text,
and to Damien Ricklis, who is a pillar of support and provided input on
many of the chapters. While working on this book, Oliver Beau Barber-
Ricklis was born, joining his sibling, Beatrice Rose Barber-Ricklis.
Together, this voyager and peacemaker have made Kristen even more
dedicated to the feminist mission of inclusion, equity, and justice—a
mission guiding this book.
We all thank Sherith Pankratz from Oxford University Press for
choosing to continue the project and inviting us to write a fourth edition.
And we thank Grace Li and William Murray for their careful attention to
all of the details in the final stages. Special thanks to the terrific
copyeditor, Betty Pessagno. Also special thanks to Soma Chaudhuri for
reviewing the chapter on violence and to Michael Messner for providing
exceptionally thoughtful suggestions on the sports chapter. We also are
grateful to additional reviewers who provided vital and supportive
suggestions that helped make this text something we are very proud of:
Nancy Provolt, Eastern Michigan University
Lisa DiDonato, David & Elkins College
Annamaria Formichella Elsden, Buena Vista University
Melissa M. Gosdin, Albany State University
Nancy Porter, Chestnut Hill College
Amy Sorenson, Radford University
Nivedita Vaidya, California State University, Los Angeles
2 anonymous reviewers
GENDERED WORLDS
1 CHAPTER
What is This Book About?
FIGURE 1.1: In 2017, the bronze statue, “Fearless Girl,” by artist Kristen Visbal, was placed in
front of Wall Street’s “Charging Bull” by Arturo Di Modica, which had been there since 1989 and
represented U.S. resiliency after the 1987 stock market crash. Following the Women’s March, the
Fearless Girl was installed by the investment management group, State Street Global Advisors, to
mark International Women’s Day. While some people called her an advertising ploy, other people
rallied behind the sentiment of courage and independence, and so the statue remained in place
well beyond the few weeks for which she was scheduled. In 2018, Fearless Girl was permanently
installed across from the New York Stock Exchange. Why do you think the presence of the
Fearless Girl resonated with so many people? How does the Charging Bull represent masculinity,
and what does it say about the United States to have the bull serve as a symbol of national
character? Would the Fearless Girl have been received differently by the public if she had not been
installed just after the 2017 Women’s March?
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
> Identify and explain three basic ground rules for studying gender: Life is
socially based and politically structured; gender is part of a larger web of
social inequalities; and scholarship is political.
> Understand the importance of variation in gender equity across the globe
by reviewing some empirical evidence ranking different nations.
> Know how intersectional analysis is key to understanding gender in a
global context.
> Be able to define the concepts: sex, gender, hegemonic masculinities,
emphasized femininities, and transnational feminism.
Introduction
Climate change and the environmental disasters that accompany it would
seem to be issues that touch all human beings in the same way. But when a
tsunami hit Indonesia in 2004 killing more than a quarter of a million
people, 75% of them were women (Oxfam 2005). This scenario is not
unusual. Women typically far outnumber men in mortalities resulting from
environmental disasters. This effect is strongest in countries where women
have few social and economic rights (Neumayer and Pluemper 2007; Juran
2012).
Physical differences between men and women do not explain the higher
mortality rate for women in disasters. In the case of the tsunami, for
example, some men may have survived because of greater physical strength
that allowed them to hang on to trees or to stay afloat. But not all men are
stronger than women, and there tend to be more in-group than between-
group differences in terms of size and abilities. For example, supermodel
Petra Nemcova was strong enough to survive the tsunami by clinging to a
palm tree for eight hours with a broken pelvis. Social factors were far more
significant, especially the social factor of gender (Oxfam 2005; Doocy et
al. 2007). Reports on the tsunami identify a number of gendered issues that
contributed to women being more likely to have died:
Swimming and tree climbing were taught mainly to boys. These skills
were essential to survival when the waves of the tsunami hit land.
Women were indoors, whereas men were more likely to be outside
working, shopping, and socializing; therefore, information warning
residents to leave the area reached women later than men who were out in
public.
Responsibilities for others, especially children and adult dependents,
prevented women from moving fast enough to escape the floods. In Aceh,
for example, many women were found dead with babies still clutched in
their arms. Some personal accounts from survivors tell of mothers pushing
their children to safety on buildings or trees that withstood the tsunami,
but being swept away themselves.
The same division of labor that placed women indoors and in charge of
dependents placed men in fishing boats at sea (a tsunami wave is not as
dangerous at sea as when it crashes to shore), farming in agricultural areas
away from the beach, or serving as soldiers in conflict areas away from
the shore, making them less likely to be affected.
Long dresses women wore inhibited their ability to run or swim to save
themselves from the floods. In addition, some women who were in their
homes but casually dressed when the first wave struck ran to put on
culturally “acceptable” outdoor clothes before seeking safety and as a
result drowned or barely escaped (Juran 2012).
Are you surprised that gender played such an important role in determining
whether people lived or died in this environmental disaster? Do the
differences in gender seem relatively insignificant if they are taken out of
context? For example, would you have thought that gender differences in
clothing or play activities like swimming and tree climbing could be so
important?
The tsunami scenario emphasizes gender differences. You are probably
familiar with the images of devastation following Hurricane Katrina that
revealed the importance of race/ethnicity and social class in that disaster. If
you look at images of the people desperately weathering the flood at the
Superdome—a shelter of last resort—many were women. Why is this? How
did gender add to or interact with the racial/ethnic and class inequalities
that made it more difficult for poor black women to survive the storm and
its aftermath (Deitz and Barber 2015)?
The researchers who studied the tsunami argue that biology had little to
do with differences in survival. What do you think of this argument in
general? Is gender mostly a function of biology? Or are social factors most
important? And what exactly is gender? Is gender a problem only for
women? Or does gender cause problems for men, too? And what can we
learn about gender by looking at the lives of gender-nonconforming
individuals?
The tsunami describes a situation in Asia, but how does gender affect
people’s lives around the globe? Why is it important to consider other
social factors, including race/ethnicity, social class, sexuality, and
immigration status, for example, to really understand the effects of gender
on groups of people? How are gender expectations being challenged locally
and globally? And how might these changes reshape our relationships,
behavioral expectations, structural opportunities, and institutional
protections?
These are the kinds of questions we will be asking in this text. Our goal
is to explore how gender appears in every corner of our lives and every
section of the globe. Before the tsunami, very few scholars had ever
considered the connections between gender, environmental disasters, and
mortality (Enarson and Morrow 1998). Every day, researchers are
discovering new situations in which gender critically impacts people’s
lives. We will be trying to keep up with them as we travel around the world
looking for gender and seeking ways to understand how it works, what its
effects are, and the ways we might address the problems it causes.
TABLE 1-1
The Global Gender Gap Index 2017 Rankings (highs and lows)
Country Highest Ten Ranks Score
Iceland 1 .88
Norway 2 .83
Finland 3 .82
Rwanda 4 .82
Sweden 5 .82
Nicaragua 6 .81
Slovenia 7 .80
Ireland 8 .80
New Zealand 9 .79
Philippines 10 .79
Country Lowest Ten Ranks Score
Jordon 135 .60
Morocco 136 .60
Lebanon 137 .60
Saudi Arabia 138 .59
Mali 139 .58
Iran 140 .58
Chad 141 .58
Syria 142 .57
Pakistan 143 .55
Yemen 144 .52
Source: World Economic Forum (2017).
GENDER GAP AROUND THE GLOBE. One of the most important goals we have
in this book is to present a global view of gender. The gender gap affects
everyone’s lives, but the way in which gender is constituted and
experienced varies across many social and political borders. The World
Economic Forum (WEF) ranks the inequity between men and women in
144 of the world’s approximately 195 nations. Table 1-1 lists the ten
countries with the least inequality and the ten countries with the most
inequality. We can see here that, according to these rankings, no country
has achieved gender equity. If you would like to see all of the nations’
rankings, as well as much more information on individual countries, check
out the full report: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2017.pdf.
WEF ranks countries by evaluating four factors: economic participation
and opportunity; educational attainment; political empowerment; and
health and survival. The highest possible score a nation can receive is 1.00,
which would mean that women and men were 100% equal on all four
factors.
In the nations represented in the full table, equity ranges from .52 in
Yemen to .88 in Iceland. Some of the highest-ranked nations are what most
people would expect. They are located in Europe and Scandinavia, nations
that are known to value gender equality between women and men and to
have implemented strong policies to encourage it. Other high-ranking
nations, such as Rwanda, the Philippines, and Nicaragua, may be more
surprising, since we don’t hear about them in discussions of gender as
often.
These numbers have been compiled annually following changes that
have occurred over the past few decades. The rankings and the scores of the
top rated countries have nearly completely closed the gap between women
and men in health outcomes (96%) and educational attainment (95%). The
gap between women and men remains wide in economic outcomes (59%)
and political outcomes (23%) (WEF 2017).
The numbers in Table 1-1 give us one way to make comparisons around
the globe, but we also don’t want to forget the gaps that exist within
nations. The numbers for each nation, for example, hide the diversity of
experience among racial/ethnic groups and social classes within each
nation. In addition, statistics for trans or gender nonconforming individuals
would surely reveal a gap in all of the measures between them and
cisgender individuals. The term cisgender might be a new one for you. In
Chapter 2 we will discuss the term more extensively, but for now just
remember that cisgender refers to people whose gender identity
corresponds with the sex to which they were assigned when they were born
(Gingerich 2017).
Scholarship is Political
Sociologists have long debated whether the study of human beings can be
based on a model that demands distanced “objectivity” and that promotes
the idea that only experts can tell us all we need to know about social life.
Writing in the third person and avoiding the use of “I” in formal scientific
papers, for example, evokes what Donna Haraway (1988) refers to as the
“god trick” that gives the impression research findings are being made and
reported by disembodied unbiased authorities (Haraway 1988, 581). More
than six decades of feminist activism and research have developed the
alternative idea—standpoint epistemology—which asserts that
researchers cannot and should not claim to be neutral. The questions
researchers ask, how they go about designing studies to investigate these
questions, and how they make sense of their findings are all shaped by their
social locations, their political beliefs, and their personal biographies.
Feminists argue that, rather than claiming objectivity, researchers
should acknowledge that their political opinions and interests shape their
studies and identify exactly what those opinions and interests are.
Feminists also support and conduct research that amplifies the voices of
people at the bottom of power systems of gender, race/ethnicity, sexuality,
and class. As a challenge to the history of the scientific community—the
experts—speaking for disenfranchised people, building knowledge from
the perceptions and lives of the marginalized and least powerful members
of society produces knowledge for—not just about—people (Smith 1999).
Promoting research that gives voice to those who are most marginalized is
not only more just, it is also more valid because it allows us to obtain the
fullest view of social life.
This book is written in the tradition of the scholars who take this
alternative, political view of scholarship. We seek to replace the “view
from above” with the “view from below” by exploring the lives of people
who have often been invisible, ignored, censored, or oppressed (Mies
1986). The topics we examine and the perspective we take emphasize the
point of view of those who are marginalized by gender as well as by
race/ethnicity, sexuality, social class, nation, and religion. This does not
mean we ignore privilege. We consider inequality a double-sided coin that
privileges a few at the expense of many. By writing from the perspective of
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
DANCE ON STILTS AT THE GIRLS’ UNYAGO, NIUCHI
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.