Report Compiled HCI
Report Compiled HCI
• Text Presentation:
• Non-Speech Audio Output for Data
Attention to font size, type, and screen area
Visualization:
used for text is vital. Tailoring language
"Visualization" extends beyond visual displays difficulty to the target learner, using short
to include non-speech audio output. sentence lengths for readability, and
Representing data perceptibly to users may maintaining appropriate text layout contribute
involve audio cues, adding an auditory to effective communication.
dimension to the information. Utilizing sounds
• Image Selection:
can offer a more nuanced and meaningful
experience. Choosing suitable photographs, graphics, and
animations aligned with the learning task and
• Speech:
audience age enhances the overall learning
Achieving natural, continuous speech output is material. Visual elements significantly influence
challenging, but conveying simple, isolated the program's appeal and character.
utterances is reasonable. Similar considerations
• Balance in Screen Design:
from speech input apply, emphasizing the
importance of research on effective speech A visually pleasing screen requires symmetry in
integration into multimode interfaces. layout and a suitable balance between text and
graphics. For clarity and simplicity, text should
• Ergonomic Considerations:
occupy a reasonable portion of the page.
Less tiring output media becomes crucial as Grouping or chunking material enhances
users spend more time receiving computer learning effectiveness.
SURVEY DESIGN:
TABLE 1. PERSONAL INFORMATION
PERSONAL INFORMATION
MALE
GENDER
FEMALE
1st YEAR
2nd YEAR
STUDENT LEVELS
3rd YEAR
4th YEAR
COMPUTER
SCIENCE
SCIENTIFIC MAJOR
SOFTWARE
ENGINEERING
YES
1. HCI has a positive impact on teaching quality
NO
YES
2. HCI has a positive impact on learning management system quality
NO
YES
3. HCI has a positive impact on learning content quality
NO
MEASUREMENT FACTORS
DOMAIN OF AGREE DISAGREE DISAGREE
SURVEY ITEMS AGREE NEUTRAL
THE ITEM STRONGLY STRONGLY
The presence of
Impact of HCI classroom discussions
on teacher such as chatting
quality characterizes the e-
learning process.
Learning process has
reliability and has good
interactivity.
Available documents,
related training courses
and other information
can be shared and
downloaded.
Feedback can easily be
provided.
Ease of completing the
tasks required of me.
Attention and solutions
can be obtained in the
event that problems
arise in thee-learning
process.
I feel confident using the
e-learning system
The quality of
Impact of HCI information positively
on Learning affects the e-learning
management process
system The learning process at
the e-learning platform
(LMS)quality
gives us flexibility to
navigate in learning
resources
The content and
information available in
the e-learning system is
very useful.
Impact of HCI Content and information
on Learning available in the e-
content learning system is easy
quality to understand.
The visual and design of
the learning resources in
the learning process is
acceptable.
PERSONAL INFORMATION
MALE
GENDER
FEMALE
1st YEAR
3rd YEAR
4th YEAR
COMPUTER
SCIENCE
SCIENTIFIC MAJOR SOFTWARE
ENGINEERING
The questionnaire was meticulously designed, drawing insights from previous studies and categorized
into two distinct groups: demographic information (personal details) and the measurement factors
group, outlined in Tables 2 and 3. Utilizing the Likert scale, a commonly employed psychological
measure in questionnaire-based research, respondents express their agreement or disagreement with a
series of questions on a comparable scale. In this study, a standard five-level Likert element format
(Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Neutral, Agree, and Strongly Agree) is employed. The measurement factors
group is further subdivided into three sections, focusing on teacher quality, learning management
system (LMS) quality, and learning content quality. The questionnaire comprises inquiries requiring
students to assess their comprehension of the influence of human-computer interaction on e-learning
quality.
COMPUTER 65%
SCIENCE
SCIENTIFIC MAJOR SOFTWARE 35%
ENGINEERING
Based on the data collected, it is evident that both genders. However, there was a noticeable
the field of study has an impact on the use of difference in the distribution of respondents
Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) in e- across different student levels, with the
learning. A majority of the respondents (65%) majority (35%) being third-year students, while
pursuing a Computer Science major first-year, second-year, and fourth-year
demonstrated a positive response towards HCI students accounted for 25.5%, 19.5%, and 20%,
in e-learning, highlighting its significance in respectively. This distribution may be attributed
enhancing their learning experience. Similarly, a to the varying levels of exposure to e-learning
significant proportion of Software Engineering platforms and HCI concepts throughout their
majors (35%) also showed support for HCI in e-- academic journey. Overall, these findings
learning. In contrast, there was no suggest that HCI has a significant impact on e-
representation from other scientific majors, learning experiences, particularly for those
indicating a potential gap in the implementation pursuing Computer Science and Software
of HCI in e-learning for those fields. Engineering majors. Further research is
Furthermore, the gender distribution of the necessary to explore how HCI can be effectively
respondents was relatively balanced, with implemented in e-learning for a more diverse
55.6% being male and 44.4% being female, range of scientific majors and student levels.
suggesting that HCI in e-learning is appealing to
MEASUREMENT FACTORS
DOMAIN OF AGREE DISAGREE DISAGREE
SURVEY ITEMS AGREE NEUTRAL
THE ITEM STRONGLY STRONGLY
The presence of
classroom discussions
such as chatting 44.4% 33.3% 11.1% 0% 11.1%
Impact of HCI characterizes the e-
on teacher learning process.
quality
Learning process has
reliability and has good 44.4% 44.4% 0% 11.1% 0%
interactivity.
Available documents,
related training courses
and other information 55.6% 33.3% 0% 11.1% 0%
can be shared and
downloaded.
[1] Giannakos, M. N., Mikalef, P., & Pappas, I. O. (2021). Systematic literature review of e-learning
capabilities to enhance organizational learning. Information Systems Frontiers,1–17.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10097-2iJIM ‒ Vol. 16, No. 04, 202267
[2] Yuan, B., Wang, M., Kushniruk, A. W., & Peng, J. (2017). Deep learning towards expertise
development in a visualization-based learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology &
Society, 20(4), 233–246.
[3] Gowda, R. S., & Suma, V. (2017, February). A comparative analysis of traditional edu-cation system
vs. e-Learning. In 2017 International Conference on Innovative Mecha-nisms for Industry Applications
(ICIMIA) (pp. 567–571). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMIA.2017.7975524
[4] Borba, M. C., de Souza Chiari, A. S., & de Almeida, H. R. F. L. (2018). Interactions in virtual learning
environments: new roles for digital technology. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 98(3), 269–286.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9812-9
[5] Seta, H. B., Hidayanto, A. N., & Abidin, Z. (2020). Variables affecting e-learning services quality in
Indonesian higher education: students’ perspectives. Journal of Information Technology Education, 19,
259–286. https://doi.org/10.28945/4489
[6] Nassuora, A. B. (2012), Students acceptance of mobile learning for higher education in Saudi Arabia.
American Academic & Scholarly Research Journal, 4(2), 24–30.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371461231_The_Lived_Experience_of_the_Fac
ulty_of_Polytechnic_University_of_the_Philippines_in_the_Implementation_of_Flexible_T echnology-
_Enhanced_Learning_Flextel
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376298332_Adaptive_Learning_Using_Artifici
al_Intelligence_in_e-Learning_A_Literature_Review
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369998660_Design_And_Implementation_Of_
A_User-Centric_Departmental_Micro_E-
Library_Portal_Evaluating_Usability_And_Learning_Outcomes_For_Enhanced_Student_ Experience
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370899496_Evaluating_humancomputer_interaction_education_
based_on_active_learning_methods_using_the_CRITIC_ and_TOPSIS_approach
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335569897_E-learning_article