Ethics Module 1
Ethics Module 1
This module will serve as an Introduction to Philosophy for students who never had an
encounter with philosophy before, or serves as a re-view of what philosophy is, for those
who have either only a faint memory of it or whose memory is starting to fade.
Learning Outcomes:
At the end of Module 1, you should be able to:
1. differentiate the main concerns of the different branches of Philosophy;
2. elaborate on the basic themes and perennial questions dealt with in philosophy;
and
3. articulate what it really means to “love wisdom.”
DISCUSSION
1. Understanding Philosophy
Etymologically, the term “Philosophy” is derived from two Greek words; namely,
„philos‟ and „sophia which means love and wisdom, respectively. Literally, philosophy
means the “Love of Wisdom,” and so „philosophers‟ are considered to be” lovers of
wisdom.”
Every aspect of human experience brings out questions to which its techniques
and theories apply, and its methods may be used in the study of any subject or the
pursuit of any vocation. Indeed, Philosophy is in a sense inescapable since life confronts
every thoughtful person with some philosophical questions, and nearly everyone is
guided by philosophical assumptions. To a large extent one can choose how reflective
one will be in clarifying and developing one's philosophical assumptions, and how well
prepared one is for the philosophical questions life presents. Philosophical training
enhances our problem-solving capacities, our abilities to understand and express ideas,
and our persuasive powers. It also develops understanding and enjoyment of things
whose absence impoverishes many lives such things as aesthetic experience,
communication with many different kinds of people, lively discussion of current issues,
the discerning observation of human behavior, and intellectual zest. In these and other
ways, the study of philosophy contributes immeasurably in both academic and other
endeavors in life.
From the Ionians to Socratic Greek world, it was always about the amazement
and wonder of how to live in relation to the environment. As such, these thinkers were
then cosmocentric because they were reflecting on the relation of man to nature.
Medieval life was focused on the relation of man to God thus were theocentric
because they were proving God as the beginning and end of man‟s life. Modern
thinkers were focused on the use of human reasoning and human abilities thus from
then on, the main concern of doing things was anthropocentric because everything is
centered on the human person. Contemporary life or human endeavor today integrate
the moral experience of cosmocentrism, theocentrism, and anthropocentrism. In short,
we cannot deny our human need for nature, interpretation of human experience in
relation to faith towards the Mystery, the Sacred or the Divine Being; and, the need to
bring back the glory of humanity as the center of all human experiences. Practically,
there is no denial of ethical life so that it is important to consider why are there moral
standards and how do they differ from rules of lives. What are moral dilemmas? Why is
freedom crucial in our ability to make moral decisions? What are the advantages of
owning moral standards over merely abiding by moral standards? Let us now look into
the following moral versus non-moral standards, moral dilemmas, three levels of moral
dilemmas and, foundation of morality.