LK 3.1 Best Practice
LK 3.1 Best Practice
LK 3.1 Best Practice
Pd
2024
AUTHOR BIOGRAPHICAL DATA,
Education Personnel
NIP : 197602192014121001
Gender Male
Educational Qualification : S1
Home address : Jombang Street RT. 03 / 04 No. 9 East Lengkong Gudang Village
Serpong Districts, South Tangerang City, Banten
School / Place of Work Unit
d. National School
The author would like to express his gratitude to the presence of Allah SWT for His blessings, gifts and
guidance so that the author can complete the preparation of a best practice scientific work entitled "
Improving Student’s Speaking Ability Through "problem based learning model (PBL) With The Help Of
Powerpoint Based Spin And Speak Wheel Media" In Grade VII SMPN 22 South Tangerang City
With all humility, the author would like to thank the various parties who have helped in the
implementation and preparation of this best practice scientific work, especially to::
DAMIANUS, S. Pd.
LIST OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE
TOP VALIDATION SHEET
AUTHOR BIODATA
FOREWORD
LIST OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
1.2 Objectives
LK 3.1 BEST PRACTICE
1. Location
2. Scope of Education
3. Goals to be achieved
4. Author
5. Date
6. Situation
7. Challenges
8. Action
9. Reflection on Final Results and Impact
Appendix List
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
English subjects have different characteristics from other subjects. This difference lies in the function of language as a
communication tool. Apart from requiring mastery of vocabulary and grammar, skills in communication activities,
both oral and written, are also very necessary in English subjects. In learning English, one of the competencies that
students must master is speaking skills. So, by the end of the learning My Study Habits Material, students are able to
interact and exchange ideas, experiences, interests, opinions and views with teachers, peers and others in an increasing
with variety contexts of Study Habits. With some repetition and rewording, they comprehend the main ideas and
relevant details of discussions and presentations on a variety of Study Habits. They engage in discussion such as giving
opinions, making comparisons and stating preferences. They explain and clarify their answers using basic sentence
structure and verb tenses of Study Habits correctly and fluently in their real life.
Most students find it difficult to learn English, especially in the speaking aspect. This is because so far the majority of
students consider English to be a difficult and uninteresting subject. Therefore students tend to dislike it, are lazy and
want to avoid it. In the writing aspect, there are several things that hinder students in developing their ideas so that the
results of students' writing are not in accordance with the goals they want to achieve in the learning process. So it can
be concluded that not optimal student writing results are a problem that requires appropriate solutions and methods.
Based on the problems mentioned abovevthe author found that the students learning process and outcomes increased.
Better than previous learning. When this PBL model was applied to another class VII, it turned out that the students
learning process and results were just as good. The author concludes this learning practice which has worked well as a
best practice (good practice) for HOTS-oriented learning with the PBL model., especially in this competency or
speaking aspect.
1. Teacher has not yet used varied innovative learning models and media in classroom
learning activities
2. The teacher was not optimal in managing the class, so it was monotonous.
3. Social and family environmental factors that were not yet supportive
4. Students' mindset to the English subject was a difficult and scary subject.
5. Lack of speaking practice habits.
B. Why was this practice important to share?
1. This practice is very important so that the learning carried out by teachers in
the classroom becomes an example of learning that could increase students'
interest learning English, especially speaking skills on material My Study
Habits, as well as being an effort to provide meaningful learning to students.
Apart from that, it is important because it increased teacher competence in
using innovative learning models in classroom learning and also My role and
responsibility in this practice is that as a teacher I am very responsible for
being able to carry out learning activities in an innovative, effective, creative
manner so that the goal of the learning itself is to increase student learning
activities and student learning outcomes can be achieved as expected. The way
to achieve this goal is by implementing appropriate methods, media and
learning models
2. appropriate and innovative according to indicators and learning objectives
3. This best practice is important to share because it contains a description of the
teacher's best experience in successfully solving problems during the learning
process. Because most teachers experience the same problems, namely low
student motivation in learning English and students being less active in
speaking English. Apart from that, this best practice contains creative and
innovative learning so that it can make it easier for teachers to create fun and
meaningful learning for students.
Action:
2. Teacher implemented innovatie media that was PowerPoint Based Spin and
Speak Wheel Media on powerpoint, as following:
5. PowerPoint-Based Spin and Speak Wheel Media is not only Game but also
contains is a teaching method that involves all Wheel Utilized Students
learning speaking thought My Study Habits
6. Students in order to make them more active, engaged, and to improve and
enjoy the learning
I. Introduction
1. The teacher enters the class and says greeting and asks about the students' condition
(PPK: Caring)
2. The teacher directs students to pray together first. (PPK: Religious)
3. Teacher and students sing the song of Garuda Pancasila to foster a spirit of
nationalism (PPK: Caring and Nationalist)
4. The teacher asks students to do Ice Breaking with "Sing and dance (monkey Dance
and Sing and dance (Tangan Di Putar Putar)"
Preparation/ 5. The teacher checks the students' attendance. (Discipline), (communication)
Orientation 6. The teacher displays a picture of questions related to non-cognitive diagnostic
aspects: to check students' feelings via powerpoint (PPK: Caring, 6. nationalist)
Apperception 1. The teacher shows a video related to the material to be taught (adverb of Frequency
for Study Habits) though PowerPoint Based Spin and Speak Wheel Media with the
stimulus of several trigger questions in an effort to determine students' initial
competencies. (4C: Critical thinking, Collaboration) (HOTS)
2. The teacher provides motivation to students (in the form of motivational words) to
be enthusiastic about learning and also always asks about their readiness and
enthusiasm for learning.
3. The teacher asks about material that has been studied previously and is linked to
current learning. (Critical Thinking)
1. First, the teacher divides students into 5 groups. One group consists of 5-6
students. Each Group is divided heterogeneously by looking at the abilities and
Phase 2: talents of students consisting of audio, visual and kinesthetic students
2. The teacher facilitates each group to determine the chairman and secretary
Organizing democratically, and describes the respective duties of each group member. (4C;
students Collaboration, Critical thinking)
3. The teacher explains assignment project to design simple descriptions of Study
Habit and study tips then present in front of the class and upload to Youtobe or
Instagram
4. Teachers conducts discussion the rules of the game to be mutually agreed upon in
the project completion process. (4C; Collaboration, Critical thinking)
1. Teacher asks student volunteers to spin the spin and speak-spinning wheel media,
then see where the wheel stops on the specified needle, and after that press the
button on the game board then press again the project number that will be done
based on the needle that was spun previously to get .
Phase 3: 1. The teacher monitors students’ activities while completing the project by
scaffolding (providing assistance) if a group experiences difficulty in completing
the project. (4C: Collaboration, Critical thinking)
Guiding 2. The teacher reminds students to pay attention to vocabulary, sentence structure or
Individual and text and tips for study habits
Group
Investigations/ 3. Teacher reminds students to analyze speaking errors together
Monitoring 4. Teacher reminds students to prepare materials for presentations.
Teacher carries out assessments during monitoring by referring to the
assessment rubric. (Assess the Outcome)
Phase 4: 1. The teacher encourages students to think critically by developing the information
they obtain and then creating a presentation scenario (short spoken presentation).
Develop and
present results 2. The teacher encourages students to present short spoken conversations from each
group.
3. Teachers provides feedback and asks students from other groups give feedback
regarding the results of the presentation. (Critical Thinking) (Collaboration)
(Communication)
The teacher carries out assessments during the presentation by referring to the
assessment rubric. (Assess the Outcome)
Phase 5: 1. Students together with the teacher conduct class discussions to analyze the results of
answers and equate perceptions about the material being studied. (Collaboration)
Analyze and (Communication)
evaluate the
problem solving 2. Teachers provide assessments and rewards in various forms to study groups that are
process most appropriate in carrying out assignments.
4. The teacher gives a test in the form of 10 short essay questions using the Quiziz
application as an individual assessment. (TPACK)
Teachers provide feedback on individual assessment results.
III. Closing
A. Conclusion 1. Teacher with students make conclusions together regarding the material describing
people that has been studied. (Collaboration), (Critical thinking).
1. Students and teachers reflect on the learning process by asking several questions
by Filling the reflection sheet (Attached Reflection Sheet)
B. Reflection 2. The teacher conveys the material that will be studied at the next meeting
The teacher ends the meeting by praying with the students and saying closing
greetings.
D. Who is involved?
Reflection on A. What is the impact of the actions of these steps? steps taken?
Results and
impact The impact of the actions of the steps taken between
other:
What is the impact
of the actions 1. Using the PJBL learning model where the activities were student-centred,
taken? Are the making students more active, able to think analytically and creatively
results effective? compared to when they were still using monotonous models and methods.
Or ineffective?
Apart from that, during learning, students were divided into several groups and
Why? How do
other people each group answers the questions given by the teacher
respond regarding
the strategy carried 2. The use of PowerPoint Based Spin and Speak Wheel Media learning media
out? What are the made it easier for students to learn and understand the material, became more
factors for the enthusiastic, fun and not get bored quickly. So that students' activeness and
success or failure analytical thinking abilities was able to improved.
of the strategy
carried out? What During the learning process, by using this strategy the response from the
was the learning
surrounding environment, namely from students, headmaster and peers
from the whole
process gave positive responses including the following:
1. Involved and the activities were interesting, fun and easy to understand. This
can be proven by reflection activities during learning activities.
2. From the principal and colleagues for overall the class has been able to be
condition well and students were able to be actively involved.
3. The success factor for this learning is determined by the teacher's mastery of
learning models and methods, learning media and implementation steps
module design that has been created.
4. Learning that can be taken from the processes and activities that have been
carried out by teachers can make teachers more creative and innovative in
choosing and using learning models that are in accordance with the learning
material indicators so that learning objectives can be achieved well.
5. Increased teacher competence in designing meaningful, interesting and
innovative learning.
6. Improved teacher skills in operating various applications
7. Increasing teacher competence in managing the class so that students were
always active in learning.
8. Students felt happy with the learning process because they were able to
actively
9. Students were more enthusiastic and active during the learning process.
10. Increasing students' interest in learning English, especially speaking skills,
thought My Study Habits material. Apart from that, students' understanding of
the material experienced better improvement.
B. Were the results effective? Or ineffective? Why?
Overall learning outcomes were done by applying the model PBL learning was very
effective because it was able to solve problems faced. This can be seen from the
conclusion, namely:
1. The results of the action plan that has been carried out were very effective. This
is because it was supported by interesting learning model, innovative learning
media, and learning activities that involve student activity.
2. It was increasing students' interest in speaking English,
3. Evaluation test results was increasing the completeness of student learning
outcomes
C. How did other people respond regarding the strategy carried out?
1. Students said that, they felt happy and fun because the learning process applied
varied and interesting media and models used by teachers to overcome their
learning difficulties and speaking anxiety. They became more confident and okay
to talk to others, as well as being tested by teachers on how to talk. They also
stated that the presentation strategy made them very cool because they could
speak English to a large audience without hesitation and nervousness.
2. The principal responds by providing positive feedback, providing input so that the
action plan implemented became a more meaningful learning action plan, always
apply varied learning models and media and becomes a motivation and example
for other teachers.
3. The response from my colleagues was also very supportive and responded
positively to the actions I took. The success factor for this learning is determined
by the teacher's mastery of the learning media, methods, models and steps in the
learning implementation plan that has been created.
D. What were the factors for the success or failure of the strategy carried out?
1. The success factor for this learning was largely determined by the teacher's
mastery of learning media, methods, models and steps in the learning
implementation plan that has been made.
2. The indicator of success for each strategy implemented was the achievement of
each goal to be achieved at the beginning of the activity design. These
objectives then outlined in each learning activity process so that the whole
process could be assessed as successful or not. At the end of the lesson,
reflection is also carried out so that teachers and students could jointly assess
whether the learning activities at the meeting was successful or not from the
beginning of the lesson to the end.
7
1. Do pray before study 2. Do Ice breaking
3. Trigger question by asking essential questions based on the video, as reinforcement for students
Guidance
Guidance Presentation
Presentation
Presentation
Presentation
Presentation Analyze the results Individual Assessments
Reflection
By the end of Phase D, students use English to interact and exchange ideas, experiences,
interests, opinions and views with teachers, peers and others in an increasing variety of
Learning Achievement
familiar formal and informal contexts. With some repetition and rewording, they
Phase comprehend the main ideas and relevant details of discussions or presentations on a
variety of general interest topics. They engage in discussion such as giving opinions,
making comparisons and stating preferences. They explain and clarify their answers
using basic sentence structure and verb tenses
3. INITIAL COMPETENCIES
Through learning activities using the Problem Based Learning modelwith the help
Criteria for Measuring of PowerPoint Based Spin and Speak Wheel Media, it is hoped that:
Achievement of Learning
Goals and Assessment 1. Identify (C1) the vocabulary of study habits, related to a Adverb of frequency,
(Formative Assessment) study area, lesson review, study buddy and time management which are
presented in multimodal form within the family and classroom environment
appropriately
2. Classify (C2) the vocabulary of study habits, related to a Adverb of frequency,
study area, lesson review,study buddy and time management which are presented
in multimodal form within the family and classroom environment appropriately
3. Apply (C3) the vocabulary of study habits, related to a Adverb of frequency, study
area, lesson review,study buddy and time management which are presented in
multimodal form within the family and classroom environment appropriately
Through learning activities using the Problem Based Learning modelwith the help
of PowerPoint Based Spin and Speak Wheel Media, it is hoped that:
2. Analyze (C4) the sentence structure used regarding study habits which is presented
in multimodal form in different contexts within the family and classroom
appropriately
1. Critical reasoning Identify detailed information well both factual and conceptual in study habits.
Modules and other sources relevant to the teaching materials that have been
created in several applications such as (PPT, Google Drive)
Learning Media
The Book of Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the
Republic of Indonesia, 2022, English for the Archipelago for SMP/MTs Class
VII, Author: Ika Lestari Damayanti, et al. ISBN 978-602-244-885-3 (vol.
Reflection sheet, students, Observation sheet, other assessment instruments
Innovative Instructional
PowerPoint Based Spin and Speak Wheel Media
Media
6. TARGET STUDENTS
Class VII.5 students of Stated Junior High School 22, South Tangerang City as
fallowing;
Student Category 1. Students with special intelligence (complete understanding)
2. Regular students (Students partially understand)
3. Students with learning obstacles (anxiety is intensive and long-lasting,
such as lack of self-confidence and high nervous tension)
Number of Students 25 students
7. LEARNING MODEL
The design and implementation of this learning uses a scientific approach with a problem-based learning
model with the help of PowerPoint Based Spin and Speak Wheel Media, and uses observation, discussion,
assignment and question and answer methods.
8. ASESMEN
Diagnostic Assessment:
9. LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Through the Problem Based Learning (PBL) Model With The Help Of PowerPoint based Spin and Speak
Wheel media, students can:
Through learning activities using the Problem Based Learning modelwith the help of
PowerPoint Based Spin and Speak Wheel Media, it is hoped that:
4. Students are able to identify (C1) the vocabulary of study habits, related to a Adverb of
frequency, study area, lesson review, study buddy and time management which are
presented in multimodal form within the family and classroom environment
appropriately at the end of learning.
5. Students are able to classify (C2) the vocabulary of study habits, related to a Adverb of
frequency, study area, lesson review,study buddy and time management which are
presented in multimodal form within the family and classroom environment
appropriately at the end of learning.
Competency or 6. Students are able to apply (C3) the vocabulary of study habits, related to a Adverb of
frequency, study area, lesson review,study buddy and time management which are
Ability and
presented in multimodal form within the family and classroom environment
Knowledge appropriately at the end of learning.
Assessment Through learning activities using the Problem Based Learning modelwith the help of
PowerPoint Based Spin and Speak Wheel Media, it is hoped that:
5. Students are able to analyze (C4) the sentence structure used regarding study habits
which is presented in multimodal form in different contexts within the family and
classroom appropriately at the end of learning.
6. At the end of the lesson, students are able to present (C5) a simple description of a
person's study habits in paragraph form creatively and correctly.
7. At the end of the lesson, students are able to design (C6) simple descriptions of Study
Habit and study tips then upload to Youtobe or Instagram.
1. LEARNING ACTIVITIES
SECOND MEETING (2X 30 MINUTES)
Learning Stages Teacher Activities Student Activities Tmime
Introduction
7. The teacher enters the class and says 1. Students answer greetings and
greeting and asks about the students' their condition (PPK: Caring)
condition (PPK: Caring)
Preparation/ 8. The teacher directs students to pray 2. Students pray according to the 5 menit
Orientation together first. (PPK: Religious) teacher's direction. (PPK:
Religious)
9. Teacher and students sing the song of 3. Students with the teacher do
Garuda Pancasila to foster a spirit of icebraking. each (PPK: Caring,
nationalism (PPK: Caring and Nationalist) collaboration)
10. The teacher asks students to do Ice
Breaking with "Sing and dance (monkey 4. Students answer according to
Dance)" student attendance. (Discipline),
11. The teacher checks the students' (communication)
attendance. (Discipline),
(communication) 5. Students answer according to their
individual feelings (PPK: Caring,
12. The teacher displays a picture of nationalist)
questions related to non-cognitive
diagnostic aspects: to check students'
feelings via powerpoint (PPK: Caring, 6.
nationalist)
Apperception 2. The teacher shows a video related to the 1. Students observe the video shown 3 menit
material to be taught (adverb of and answer questions given by the
Frequency for Study Habits) though teacher (4C:Critical thinking,
PowerPoint Based Spin and Speak Wheel Collaboration) (HOTS)
Media with the stimulus of several
trigger questions in an effort to
determine students' initial competencies.
(4C: Critical thinking, Collaboration)
(HOTS)
2. CORE ACTIVITIES
The teacher uses English and Indonesian according to the level of English
Phase 1: proficiency of class VII.5 students in the following sections of this chapter. Time
Student orientation to
the problem 4. The teacher presents and explains the 1. Students identify information
material through Powerpointe Based Spin from text and images related to 10 menit
and Speak Media related to Study Habits study habits. (Critical Thinking),
related to determining topics, data (collaboration)
collection techniques, preparing report
frameworks, developing frameworks, and
editing Study Habits. (Critical Thinking),
(collaboration)
5. The teacher conducts discussions related
to the material presented by asking 2. Students and teachers together
essential questions, as reinforcement for discuss the material presented
students in studying the material which (4C: Critical thinking,
culminates in assigning students to carry Collaboration, Communication)
out an activity as follows; (Critical (HOTS)
Thinking), (collaboration)
C. What are the Adverb of Frequency,
text of study habits?
D. How to design text from the table
into paragraph form?
6. Teacher asks students to analyze speaking
errors in the picture and text together (4C:
Critical thinking, Collaboration,
Communication) (HOTS)
3. Students and teachers together
7. Teacher carries out assessments during
analyze writing errors in images
orientation by referring to the assessment
and text (4C: Critical thinking,
rubric. (Assess the Outcome)
Collaboration, Communication)
(HOTS)
8. The teacher gives a test in the form of 10 short essay questions using the Quiziz
application as an individual assessment. (TPACK)
9. Teachers provide feedback on individual assessment results.
3. CLOSING
1. 1. Teacher with students make conclusions together regarding the material
Conclusion 5
describing people that has been studied. (Collaboration), (Critical thinking). menit
Reflection 3. Students and teachers reflect on the learning process by asking several questions
by Filling the reflection sheet (Attached Reflection Sheet)
4. The teacher conveys the material that will be studied at the next meeting
5. The teacher ends the meeting by praying with the students and saying closing
greetings.
REFERENCE AND EDUCATIONAL READING MATERIALS
I am shy to ask for help Bed is the best and The following activities
when I am in class. suitable place to stud will also help improve
To save the environment, good study habits
I do not want to make a
study timetable.
a) yes b) no
4. Which of the following will help you improve your study skills?
5. The following activities will also help improve good study habits except (kecuali) for?
12. Scheduling your study time & organizing your class materials will help you focus during
studying.
a. True
b. False
13. Which of the following is not an effective study tip?
a. Study for the exams while watching TV and playing video game.
a) True
b) False
https://quizizz.com/media/resource/gs/quizizz-media/quizzes/57bc57f9-322b-4c75-9434-
2739f93dd0d4?w=200&h=200
a) False
b) True
20. I can tell the difference between material I know very well and material I do not know very
well.
a. Never
b. Always
c. Sometimes
d. Usually
https://quizizz.com/admin/quiz/65a8ea4e6e498c14f73011f0/edit?at=65a92db91cf92eddcaba5786
LIST OF ASSESSMENT, QUESTIONNAIRE AND OBSERVATION
DESCRIPTIONS
Never Sometimes Always
0 1 1
School Name : SMPN 22 South Tangerang City
Class/Semester : VII.5/II
Subjects : English
Questions
NO Student Name Total Value
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 AHMAD YUSUF M 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 19
2 AKHTAR L 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 18
3 ARTHUR RAFHAEL T. 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 18
4 ARYA ZAQY NUGRAHA 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 18
5 BMABANG N 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 19
6 CALEB BENEDICT LEONARDO 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 20
7 ARYA ZAQY NUGRAHA 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 19
8 CHIKA PUTRI WAN UTAMI 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 20
9 DAFFA EKA PUTRA 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 18
10 DEVID FEBRIYANA 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 20
11 GENDIS R 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 20
12 GEOVANA RAMADHANNIA 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 19
13 IKHSAN 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 16
14 JOSHUA BENJAMIN L 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 19
15 MELANI PUTRI 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 20
16 MUHAMMAD FAHRI 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 16
17 MUHAMMAD RAFIF R. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 19
18 NATANIA PEIRCILA 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 15
19 NURUL ASYIFA 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 18
20 PRILA PUTRI BERLIANY 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 20
21 RAIHAN RIZKI MUSYAFFA 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 20
22 RAIHAN RIZKI MUSYAFFA 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 19
23 RIFQI ADITYA PRATAMA 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 19
24 SYAHIRA DINDA NOPRIA 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 20
25 ZISKIND RADINKA FAUSTIN 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 19
Number of Values 47 48 44 48 50 40 49 50 44 48 468
Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
The highest score 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 15
Lowest Score 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 20
EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
Student Self-Assessment Sheet (Likert Scale)
EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE RECAP
Student Self-Assessment Sheet (Likert Scale)
Teacher’s Name : Damianus, S. Pd
DESCRIPTIONS
Very Rare Rare Often Always
1 2 3 4
EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE ASSESSMENT
Student Self-Assessment Sheet (Likert Scale)
Class/Semester : VII.5/II
Subjects : English
Questions
NO Student Name Total Value
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 AHMAD YUSUF M 3 3 3 4 3 4 4 24
2 AKHTAR L 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 27
3 ARTHUR RAFHAEL T. 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 25
4 ARYA ZAQY NUGRAHA 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 26
5 BMABANG N 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 26
6 CALEB BENEDICT LEONARDO 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 26
7 ARYA ZAQY NUGRAHA 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 26
8 CHIKA PUTRI WAN UTAMI 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 26
9 DAFFA EKA PUTRA 3 3 3 4 4 3 4 24
10 DEVID FEBRIYANA 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 26
11 GENDIS R 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 26
12 GEOVANA RAMADHANNIA 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 26
13 IKHSAN 3 2 3 2 3 2 4 19
14 JOSHUA BENJAMIN L 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 25
15 MELANI PUTRI 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 26
16 MUHAMMAD FAHRI 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 26
17 MUHAMMAD RAFIF R. 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 16
18 NATANIA PEIRCILA 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 19
19 NURUL ASYIFA 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 26
20 PRILA PUTRI BERLIANY 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 26
21 RAIHAN RIZKI MUSYAFFA 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 27
22 RAIHAN RIZKI MUSYAFFA 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 26
23 RIFQI ADITYA PRATAMA 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 26
24 SYAHIRA DINDA NOPRIA 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 27
25 ZISKIND RADINKA FAUSTIN 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 26
Number of Values 90 73 82 94 94 92 98 626
Average 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 89,43
The highest score 3 2 2 1 1 2 3 73
Lowest Score 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 98
Score 90 73 82 97 94 92 98 89,4
EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE RECAP
Average 2 1,83 1,5 1,7 1,7 1,7 2 2 2 2 2 2 1,3 1,5 2 2 2 1,3 1,7 1,7 1,5 2 1,7 1,7 1,8 44,5 89
Lowest Score 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 37 74
SCORE 100 91 75 83 83 83 100 100 100 100 100 100 66 75 100 100 100 66 83 100 75 100 83 83 91 2237 89,48
DESCRIPTIONS
Unacceptable Answer Acceptable Answer
1 2
School Name : SMPN 22 South Tangerang City
Class/Semester : VII.5/II
Subjects : English
NO Student Name Number of Values SCORE
1 AHMAD YUSUF M 12 100
2 AKHTAR L 11 91
3 ARTHUR RAFHAEL T. 9 75
4 ARYA ZAQY NUGRAHA 10 83
5 BMABANG N 10 83
6 CALEB BENEDICT LEONARDO 10 83
7 ARYA ZAQY NUGRAHA 12 100
8 CHIKA PUTRI WAN UTAMI 12 100
9 DAFFA EKA PUTRA 12 100
10 DEVID FEBRIYANA 12 100
11 GENDIS R 12 100
12 GEOVANA RAMADHANNIA 12 100
13 IKHSAN 8 66
14 JOSHUA BENJAMIN L 9 75
15 MELANI PUTRI 12 100
16 MUHAMMAD FAHRI 12 100
17 MUHAMMAD RAFIF R. 12 100
18 NATANIA PEIRCILA 8 66
19 NURUL ASYIFA 10 83
20 PRILA PUTRI BERLIANY 10 100
21 RAIHAN RIZKI MUSYAFFA 9 75
22 RAIHAN RIZKI MUSYAFFA 12 100
23 RIFQI ADITYA PRATAMA 10 83
24 SYAHIRA DINDA NOPRIA 10 83
25 ZISKIND RADINKA FAUSTIN 11 91
DESCRIPTIONS
Unacceptable Evaluation Acceptable Evaluation
1 2
School Name : SMPN 22 South Tangerang City
Class/Semester : VII.5/II
Subjects : English
NO Student Name Number of Values SCORE
1 AHMAD YUSUF M 10 100
2 AKHTAR L 10 100
3 ARTHUR RAFHAEL T. 9 90
4 ARYA ZAQY NUGRAHA 10 100
5 BMABANG N 9 90
6 CALEB BENEDICT LEONARDO 10 100
7 ARYA ZAQY NUGRAHA 10 100
8 CHIKA PUTRI WAN UTAMI 10 100
9 DAFFA EKA PUTRA 10 100
10 DEVID FEBRIYANA 10 100
11 GENDIS R 10 100
12 GEOVANA RAMADHANNIA 10 100
13 IKHSAN 8 80
14 JOSHUA BENJAMIN L 10 100
15 MELANI PUTRI 9 90
16 MUHAMMAD FAHRI 10 100
17 MUHAMMAD RAFIF R. 10 100
18 NATANIA PEIRCILA 7 70
19 NURUL ASYIFA 9 90
20 PRILA PUTRI BERLIANY 10 100
21 RAIHAN RIZKI MUSYAFFA 9 90
22 RAIHAN RIZKI MUSYAFFA 10 100
23 RIFQI ADITYA PRATAMA 9 90
24 SYAHIRA DINDA NOPRIA 10 100
25 ZISKIND RADINKA FAUSTIN 9 90
2. Accuracy Excellent grammar Very few mistakes in Few mistakes in Several mistakes in Very poor diction
(complex noun grammar with grammar with very grammar withvery and grammar whivh
phrase)with various enough varietyof sufficient limited vocabulary lead to
words used vocabulary vocabulary but still but still misunderstanding
(Correctness80%- (Correctness 61%- understandabl understandabl (correctness 0%-
100%) 80%) e (Correctness41%- e (Correctness41%- 39%)
60%) 60%)
3. Clarity Very clear Good pronunciation Few mistakes in Several mistakes in Many mistakes in
articulation with with very few pronunciation with pronunciationwith pronunciation with
good pronunciation mistakes and clear inconsistent inconsistent unclear articulation
articulation articulation but still articulation which and difficult to
understandable lead todifficult understand.
understanding
4. Intonation Correct Very few mistakes in Few mistakesin Several mistakes in No difference of
intonation/ton e for intonation/ton e for intonation/tone intonation/tone intonation/ton e for
the words/phrases/ the words/phrases/ which interfere the which lead to the words/phrases/
sentences withlead to sentences withlead to intended meaning misunderstanding of sentences which lead
appropriate the appropriate the the intended meaning to misunderstanding
intended meaning intended meaning of the intended
meaning
5. Volume Speak very loudly Speak loudlythat Only audiencefrom Speak softly that Speak very softly
that theaudience in most of the the middle to the only veryfew the that theaudience
the class canhear audience front row canhear audience canhear cannot hear
in the classcan the voice clearly
hear
6. Content The content ofthe The content ofthe The content ofthe The content ofthe The content ofthe
presentation contains presentation contains presentation contains presentation contains presentation contains
very complete complete sufficient little information very little
information (physical information information (physical (physical description) information (physical
description) about (physical description) about about the person description) about
the person being description) about the person being being described and the person being
described and meet the person being described and fairly almost does not meet described and does
the purpose of the described and meet meet thepurpose of the purpose of the not meet the purpose
function of thespoken the purpose of the thefunction of the function of thespoken ofthe function ofthe
text function of the spoken text text spoken
spoken text text
PRESENTATION ASSESSMENT OF STUDY HABIT
GUIDENCE
Class/Semester : VII.5/II
Subjects : English
Qualitative of
NO ASPECT DESCRIPTION VALUE
Score
5 Excellent Easy to understand and has a native speaker's accent 81 - 100
Pronunciation
61 - 80
2 3 Fair Often makes grammatical errors that affect meaning 41 - 60
2 Poor Many grammatical errors hinder meaning and often rearrange sentences 21 - 40
1 Very Poor Grammatical errors are so severe that they are difficult to understand 0 - 20
5 Excellent Uses vocabulary and expressions like a native speaker 81 - 100
Sometimes uses inappropriate vocabulary and has to explain ideas because vocabulary is
4 Good 61 - 80
Vocabulary
inadequate
3 Often using inappropriate vocabulary, conversations become limited due to limited
3 Fair 41 - 60
vocabulary
2 Poor Using vocabulary incorrectly and vocabulary is limited so it is difficult to understand 21 - 40
1 Very Poor Vocabulary is so limited that conversation is impossible 0 - 20
5 Excellent Fluent like a native speaker 81 - 100
4 Good Fluency seemed slightly impaired by language problems 61 - 80
Fluency
Understands most of what is said when speaking is somewhat slowed down despite
3 Fair 41 - 60
5 repetition
Difficult to follow what is being said. Only understand socializing conversations with slow
2 Poor 21 - 40
speech and lots of repetition
1 Very Poor Can't understand even simple conversations 0 - 20
DESCRIPTION
Score 5 4 3 2 1
Qualitative of Score Excellent Good Fair Poor Very Poor
Range of Score 81 - 100 61 - 80 41 - 60 21 - 40 0 - 20
PRESENTATION ASSESSMENT
School Name : SMPN 22 South Tangerang City
Class/Semester : VII.5/II
Acadzemic Year : 2023-2024
Subjects : English
Pronun Compre
No Student name Grammar Vocabulary Fluency Value Score
ciation hension
DESCRIPTION
Score 5 4 3 2 1
Qualitative of Score Excellent Good Fair Poor Very Poor
Range of Score 81 - 100 61 - 80 41 - 60 21 - 40 0 - 20
School Name : SMPN 22 South Tangerang City
Class/Semester : VII.5/II
Subjects : English
Answer
Amoun
Score
No Student Name
t
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
1 AHMAD YUSUF M 5 5 5 0 5 5 0 0 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 15 75
2 AKHTAR L 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 18 90
3 ARTHUR RAFHAEL T. 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 0 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 17 85
4 ARYA ZAQY N 5 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 16 80
5 BMABANG N 5 0 5 5 5 5 0 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 16 80
6 CALEB BENEDICT L 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 90 90
ARYA ZAQY 80
7 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 0 5 16
NUGRAHA
8 CHIKA PUTRI WAN U 5 0 5 0 5 5 0 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 15 75
10 DEVID FEBRIYANA 5 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 16 80
11 GENDIS R 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 19 95
12 GEOVANA R 5 0 5 5 5 5 0 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 0 5 16 80
13 IKHSAN 5 5 5 0 5 5 0 0 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 15 75
14 JOSHUA BENJAMIN L 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 0 5 16 80
15 MELANI PUTRI 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 0 5 16 80
16 MUHAMMAD FAHRI 5 0 5 0 5 5 0 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 15 75
17 MUH. RAFIF R. 5 0 5 0 5 5 0 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 15 75
18 NATANIA PEIRCILA 5 5 5 0 5 5 0 0 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 15 75
19 NURUL ASYIFA 5 0 5 5 5 5 0 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 0 5 16 80
PRILA PUTRI 85
20 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 17
BERLIANY
21 RAIHAN RIZKI M 5 5 5 0 5 5 0 0 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 16 80
22 RAIHAN RIZKI M 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 19 95
23 RIFQI ADITYA P 5 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 17 85
24 SYAHIRA DINDA N 5 0 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 19 95
25 ZISKIND RADINKA F 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 18 90
Jumlah Nilai 25 19 25 12 25 25 5 8 15 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 15 25 16 25
Salah 0 1 0 13 0 0 20 17 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 9 0
Assessment indicators
Aspects assessed Value
5 4 3 2 1
81%-100%) 61%-80%) 41%-60%) 21%-40%) 0%-20%)
Score 5 4 3 2 1
Qualitative of Score Excellent Good Fair Poor Very Poor
Range of Score 81 - 100 61 - 80 41 - 60 21 - 40 0 - 20
C. Terampil
A. Active in B. Skilled in finding D. Terampil dalam
dalam
No Student name group project completion mengkomunikasikan Score
value
Total
menyajikan
discussions concepts hasil diskusi
Project
1 AHMAD YUSUF M 4 3 3 2 10 60
2 AKHTAR L 5 4 4 3 16 80
3 ARTHUR RAFHAEL T. 5 4 3 3 15 75
4 ARYA ZAQY NUGRAHA 5 4 3 3 16 80
5 BMABANG N 5 5 5 4 19 95
6 CALEB BENEDICT L 5 5 5 5 20 100
7 ARYA ZAQY NUGRAHA 5 4 4 3 16 80
8 CHIKA PUTRI WAN U 5 5 4 3 17 85
9 DAFFA EKA PUTRA 5 5 3 3 16 80
10 DEVID FEBRIYANA 4 4 3 3 14 70
11 GENDIS R 5 4 3 3 15 75
12 GEOVANA R 5 5 4 3 17 85
13 IKHSAN 4 3 3 2 12 60
14 JOSHUA BENJAMIN L 5 3 3 3 14 75
15 MELANI PUTRI 5 5 3 3 16 80
16 MUHAMMAD FAHRI 5 4 4 3 16 80
17 MUHAMMAD RAFIF R. 5 4 4 4 17 85
18 NATANIA PEIRCILA 5 5 5 5 20 100
19 NURUL ASYIFA 5 5 5 5 20 100
20 PRILA PUTRI BERLIANY 5 5 4 4 18 90
21 RAIHAN RIZKI MUSYAFFA 5 5 5 4 19 95
22 RAIHAN RIZKI M 4 4 3 3 14 70
23 RIFQI ADITYA PRATAMA 5 5 4 4 18 90
24 SYAHIRA DINDA N 4 4 3 3 14 70
25 ZISKIND RADINKA F 5 5 5 5 20 100
Number of Values 120 109 95 86 409 2060
Average 4,8 4,36 3,8 3,44 16,36 82,4
The highest score 5 5 5 5 20 100
Lowest Score 4 3 3 2 10 60
DESCRIPTION
Score 5 4 3 2 1
Qualitative of Score Excellent Good Fair Poor Very Poor
Range of Score 81 - 100 61 - 80 41 - 60 21 - 40 0 - 20
A. INSTRUMENT FOR ASSESSING PANCASILA STUDENT
PROFILE ATTITUDE IN ON PROJECT
As Expected
Not Yet Start Developing As
Expected Very Exactly
Dimensions Instrument Developing Developing
Develop
1 2 3 4
Students build Students are not Students build Students build Students build
Mutual teams yet able to build teams
teams well teams very well
adequately well
Cooperation teams
Aspect
Global Total
No Student name Mutual Critical Amount
Diversity creative Value
Cooperation Reasoning
1 AHMAD YUSUF M 5 4 3 1 14 70
2 AKHTAR L 5 5 5 4 20 100
3 ARTHUR RAFHAEL T. 5 4 3 2 16 80
4 ARYA ZAQY NUGRAHA 5 4 3 2 16 80
5 BMABANG N 5 5 5 4 19 95
6 CALEB BENEDICT L 5 5 5 4 19 95
7 ARYA ZAQY NUGRAHA 5 4 4 3 16 80
8 CHIKA PUTRI WAN U 5 5 4 3 18 90
9 DAFFA EKA PUTRA 5 5 3 3 18 90
10 DEVID FEBRIYANA 5 4 3 2 16 80
11 GENDIS R 5 4 3 2 16 80
12 GEOVANA R 5 5 4 3 18 90
13 IKHSAN 5 3 2 2 12 60
14 JOSHUA BENJAMIN L 5 3 3 2 14 70
15 MELANI PUTRI 5 5 3 3 18 90
16 MUHAMMAD FAHRI 5 4 4 3 16 80
17 MUHAMMAD RAFIF R. 5 4 4 3 17 85
18 NATANIA PEIRCILA 5 5 5 4 20 100
19 NURUL ASYIFA 5 5 5 4 20 100
20 PRILA PUTRI BERLIANY 5 5 4 3 19 95
21 RAIHAN RIZKI MUSYAFFA 5 5 5 4 19 95
22 RAIHAN RIZKI M 5 4 3 2 16 80
23 RIFQI ADITYA PRATAMA 5 5 4 3 19 95
24 SYAHIRA DINDA N 5 4 3 2 16 80
25 ZISKIND RADINKA F 5 5 5 4 20 100
Number of Values 125 111 95 72 432 2160
Average 5 4,44 3,8 2,88 17,28 86,4
The highest score 5 5 5 4 20 100
Lowest Score 5 3 2 1 12 60
DESCRIPTION SCORE
1. Not yet developed 1
2. Starting to develop 2
3. Developing according to expectations 3
4. Highly developed 4 4
ATTITUDE SPIRITUAL AND SOCIAL OBSERVATION GUIDENCE
School Name : SMPN 22 South Tangerang City
Class/Semester : VII.5/II
Acadzemic Year : 2023-2024
Subjects : English
Domain
Form
No Attitude Indicator
Affective Rubric
teacher
Mutual Carry out the roles that have been divided into the
A5
cooperation group
5
Demonstrate a courageous attitude to convey A2
Critical
opinion
Reasoning
Demonstrate a brave attitude in giving and answering
A2
questions
Score
Trying Need
Trying Well Need Guidance
No Attitude Indicator Good reminded
Very Good Good Fair Poor
4 3 2 1
Do prayers before and after Showing Already Showing a Showing
learning consistent showing little effort Absolutely no
effort effort effort
1.
Faith Always give thanks for the Showing Already Showing a Showing
knowledge and value gained in consistent showing little effort Absolutely no
learning. effort effort effort
DESCRIPTION
Score 5 4 3 2 1
Qualitative of Score Very Good Good Fair Poor Very Good
Range of Score 81 - 100 61 - 80 41 - 60 21 - 40 0 - 20
Instructions:
1. This sheet is filled in by the teacher to assess students' affective/attitudes
2. Affective/attitude observations are based on the indicators for each attitude contained in
athe assessment rubric.
2 19 -01 Second Meeting 1. The cause they are not 1. The teacher in the classroom
2024 used to practice public provides tips on mastering
1. Some students were still not confident
speaking and lack vocabulary and increasing
enough to present in front of the class
support speaking practice in class and
2. Lack of vocabulary made some conducts reading habits
2. The cause lack of
students did not dare to speak
speaking practice and 2. The teacher will motivate by
lack of motivation to find giving tips for students who
the meaning of are less confident in
words/vocabulary speaking in front of the class
DISSEMINATION EXPOSURE MATERIAL
Findings of problems that occured while teaching on January r 19th ,2024
Teacher found problem in the learning process is that students are not ready to receive learning due
to a lack of interest in speaking and literacy. Students often receive learning without any preparation
from home by reading the material before receiving learning in class. Teachers also often find that
students have low proficiency in the prerequisite material that students must master before receiving
new main material.