Design and Simulation of Remote Monitoring of The Intelligent Automatic Control System in The Production Line
Design and Simulation of Remote Monitoring of The Intelligent Automatic Control System in The Production Line
Corresponding Author:
Amal Ibrahim Nasser
Department of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Mustansiriyah University
Baghdad, Iraq
Email: [email protected]
1. INTRODUCTION
Automation has taken a vital role in industrial systems. To speed up industrial operations, almost all
industries perform operations remotely through supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems
[1], [2]. Every industry aims to achieve a significant increase in productivity by decrease operational cost and
tolerance fault [3]. SCADA system is a centralized platform that controls and monitors entire zones, or a
compound of systems covering larger zones. Control decision are executed automatically using a
programmable logic controller (PLC). Local controls are traditionally limited to only the supervisory
intervention and/or principle overriding.
Production and industrial lines are primarily of a conventional design, which is not of a high
technology standard. How to transform such lines into high technology lines, which are produced utilizing a
built-in monitoring system, is challenging. Our method aims to advance such lines by implementing cutting-
edge technology to make industrial process safer, quicker, and more affordable. The developers and
researchers must be aware of the current status of the different stages of work for making an acceptable
implementation decision. They need to disseminate various sorts of sensors/transducers throughout the
industrial decision-making line in order to learn more about this issue [4], [5]. PLC should also be capable of
understanding the signals arriving from sensors/transducers and issue orders to players in accordance with the
software that is specifically created to carry out the required operation. There are typically two ways for
transferring signals from the sensors/transducers to the controller and the other way around wired or
wirelessly. Each method has benefits and drawbacks. The benefit of adopting wireless technology is the ease
with which a new production or industrial line may be added to the system. It is also simple to install and
upgrade, and has a lower cost than wire technology.
2. DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
To maintain appropriate operation and usefulness, control systems depend on a variety of parts and
equipment drivers. This section gives a general overview of the three main components that are typically
used in control systems: sensors/transducers, control units (such as programmable logic controllers PLCs),
and actuators. These components will be discussed in the next paragraphs, along with thorough explanations
of each one's roles and responsibilities:
a. Sensors/transducers: Although different industrial lines, they also need the same set of different
sensors/transducers in shapes but have the same principles of work [6], [7]. Application fields of the
sensors/transducers are: Acoustic, vibration, sound, electric current, magnetic, electric potential, radio,
transportation, automotive, chemical, environment, moisture, humidity, weather, subatomic particles,
ionizing radiation, navigation, angle, position, distance, speed, acceleration, displacement, flow, fluid
velocity, force, pressure, density, level, thermal, temperature, heat, light, optical, photons, imaging,
touch, and proximity. Basically, All the above sensors are categorized into digital and analog sensors.
However, there are specific category of sensors are frequently utilized for major automation
applications.
b. Actuators: In control systems that operate machinery and industrial processes, actuators are crucial
drivers [8]. They include a variety of industrial parts/components; such as heaters, lights, sirens/horns,
position/speed control drivers, solenoids, motors, cylinders, and valves. The movement, regulation, and
signaling needed in many industrial applications are made possible by these actuators' precision control
and manipulation capabilities. By transforming electrical energy into mechanical motion, producing
linear or rotational force, controlling fluid flow, producing heat, and providing visual indicators, they
are essential for attaining desired results. Basically, the actuators could be categorized into the
following categories: The electric actuators (such as motors and solenoids), the fluid pressure (hydraulic
actuators), and the air pressure (pneumatic actuators).
c. PLC: Depending on the main power supply of the PLC, PLCs are categorized into main two categories,
External and built-in internal main power supply. There are many types of programable logic controllers
(PLCs), which are found in electronic word stores those contain various software and hardware versions
[9]. PLCs could be selected depending on the following electrical, environmental, chemical and
mechanical specifications:
− Compatibility with the project's controls, machines and control devices.
− The surroundings and working conditions, like noise, temperature, dust, and humidity, among others.
− PLC functions utilized. As some companies, provide a few extra features and built-in peripherals (e.g.,
counters and timers) in specific version(s).
− Number of sensors/transducers, engines, and types.
− Future expansion capability.
− SCADA program compatible with PLC.
− Communication ability with other types PLC or HMI.
This paper system will be the ADVANTIC ADAM series, because it has the compatibility with other parts
and components. The series covers the requirements of this paper research.
(a) (b)
Figure 1. The ADAM series (a) Wireless ADA and (b) Wired ADAM
Design and simulation of remote monitoring of the intelligent automatic control … (Amal Ibrahim Nasser)
136 ISSN: 2252-8938
4. CONTROL METHODOLOGY
The design of automatic control systems in manufacturing lines must be optimized through the use
of SCADA systems. These systems are a prerequisite for effective monitoring and management of industrial
processes. In the context of automatic control system design for production lines, the current research focuses
on two data gathering and transmission approaches that were used to improve the functioning of the SCADA
system.
save energy. The common wire (0V) should be connected to the same point in the case when power
source is not sufficient to supply load's requirement. Additional sources of the power could be utilized.
In the case when the power range is within the allowed range, the sensors' digital outputs are directly
connected to ADAM module's DI (i.e., digital input) ports. The relay files will subsequently be
connected to the digital data output (DO) of ADAM in order to receive the necessary actions through
their contacts. Since there is not a wireless ADAM module that deals with analog data specifically,
there is no need to utilize input and/or output analog data while using this option. Since they support
IEEE802.11b, ADAM-6051W, ADAM-6050-W, and ADAM-6060-W could connect to majority of
wireless LAN access points. The ADAM-6051W, ADAM-6050-W, and ADAM-6060-W support
Modbus/UDP and TCP protocols much like other ADAM-6000 modules. Through Modbus/TCP,
HMI/SCADA could connect to ADAM modules. For real and critical responses, the UDP protocol
includes pre-built event playback and data stream features.
− The second way: Systems that need the usage of analog data for output and/or input employ this option.
The following method is used for transferring such signals from industrial line to control room because
there is not a wireless ADAM module that can handle analog data. With the use of ADAM 5000 (or any
other modules), data will be collected and after that transformed to an Ethernet signal. Additionally, the
signal is transmitted wirelessly with the use of ADAM 4571W or ADAM 4570W. An access point
could be used to receive this data in the control room, as can be seen in Figure 4(b). Cost-effective data
porters between the RS232/422/485 and 802.11b WLAN interfaces are the ADAM-4571-W and
ADAM-4570. It offers a quick and inexpensive solution for connecting any RS232/422/485 device to an
802.11-b wireless LAN. The ADAM-4571W and ADAM-4570W are cost-efficient in the case when
continue using existing software and hardware since they are transparent and functionally effective. For
thousands of the RS-232/422/485 devices that cannot connect to network, the ADAM-4571W and
ADAM-4570W offer remote management and data access functionalities.
(a) (b)
Figure 4. Data collection and transmission (a) the first way and (b) the second way
Design and simulation of remote monitoring of the intelligent automatic control … (Amal Ibrahim Nasser)
138 ISSN: 2252-8938
d. Digital Inputs:
− Channels: 12
− Dry Contacts: Logic lvl0: Close to the Ground; Logic lvl1: Open
− Wet Contact: Logic lvl0: 0 ~ 3VDC Logic lvl1: 10 ~ 30VDC
− Support 3kHz counter input (32bit + 1bit)
− Support 3kHz frequency inputs
e. Relay Outputs:
− Channels: 6
− Contact rating (Resistive): AC: 120V, 0.5A DC: 30V, 1A
− Relay on time: 7ms
− Relay off time: 3ms
− Breakdown voltage: 500VAC (50/60Hz)
− Total switching time: 10ms
− Maximum Switching Rate: 20 operations/min. (at rated load)
− Insulation Resistance: 1GΩ minimal at 500VDC
− Supports pulse output (max 3Hz)
− Isolation Protection: 2000VDC
− Built-in Watchdog Timer
− Power Input: Unregulated 10 ~ 30VDC
− Power Consumption: 2W, 24VDC
− Power Reversal Protection
− Storage Humidity: 5~95% RH (non-condensing)
− Operating Humidity: 5~95% RH (non-condensing)
− Storage Temperature: -20 °C~80 °C
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The researchers thank the Electrical Engineering Department; Engineering College, Mustansiriyah
University/Baghdad/Iraq “www.uomustansiriyah.edu.iq”/Iraqi MoHEandSR; for their supports.
REFERENCES
[1] Y. Cherdantseva et al., “A review of cyber security risk assessment methods for SCADA systems,” Computers & Security,
vol. 56, pp. 1–27, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2015.09.009.
[2] B. S. Rao and C. Chakravarthi, “Industrial control systems security and supervisory control and data acquisition SCADA,”
International Journal for Modern Trends in Science and Technology, vol. 03, no. 10, pp. 109–118, 2017.
[3] TechNavio, “Global lactic zcid market 2017-2021,” TechNavio. p. 81, 2017.
[4] A. Nechibvute and C. Mudzingwa, “Wireless sensor networks for SCADA and industrial control systems,” International Journal
of Engineering and Technology, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 1025–1035, 2013.
[5] D. Culler, D. Estrin, and M. Srivastava, “Guest Editors’ introduction: overview of sensor networks,” Computer, vol. 37, no. 8,
pp. 41–49, Aug. 2004, doi: 10.1109/MC.2004.93.
[6] H. Liu, Z. Meng, and S. Cui, “A wireless sensor network prototype for environmental monitoring in greenhouses,” in 2007
International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, Sep. 2007, pp. 2344–2347,
doi: 10.1109/WICOM.2007.584.
[7] S. Petersen, P. Doyle, S. Vatland, C. Salbu Aasland, T. M. Andersen, and D. Sjong, “Requirements, drivers and analysis of
wireless sensor network solutions for the Oil & Gas industry,” in 2007 IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory
Automation (EFTA 2007), Sep. 2007, pp. 219–226, doi: 10.1109/EFTA.2007.4416773.
[8] D. Xie, L. Chen, L. Liu, L. Chen, and H. Wang, “Actuators and sensors for application in agricultural robots: A review,”
Machines, vol. 10, no. 10, p. 913, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.3390/machines10100913.
[9] Y. Zhang et al., “All your PLCs belong to Me: ICS ransomware is realistic,” in 2020 IEEE 19th International Conference on
Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom), Dec. 2020, pp. 502–509, doi: 10.1109/
TrustCom50675.2020.00074.
[10] W. Han, N. Zhang, and Y. Zhang, “A two-layer wireless sensor network for remote sediment monitoring,” in 2008 Providence,
Rhode Island, June 29-July 2, 2008, Mar. 2008, vol. 18, no. 3, p. 820, doi: 10.13031/2013.25011.
[11] D. Upadhyay and S. Sampalli, “SCADA (supervisory control and data acquisition) systems: Vulnerability assessment and security
recommendations,” Computers & Security, vol. 89, p. 101666, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2019.101666.
[12] H. Kim, “Security and vulnerability of SCADA systems over IP based wireless sensor networks,” International Journal of
Distributed Sensor Networks, vol. 8, no. 11, p. 268478, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1155/2012/268478.
[13] I. González and A. Calderón, “Development of final projects in engineering degrees around an industry 4.0-oriented flexible
manufacturing system: Preliminary outcomes and some initial considerations,” Education Sciences, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 214, Dec.
2018, doi: 10.3390/educsci8040214.
Design and simulation of remote monitoring of the intelligent automatic control … (Amal Ibrahim Nasser)
142 ISSN: 2252-8938
[14] Liao Zhang, “An implementation of SCADA network security testbed,” Computer Science > Cryptography and Security,
vol. 151, pp. 10–17, 2015, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1701.05323.
[15] D. Bailey and E. Wright, “Practical SCADA for industry,” Practical SCADA for Industry, 2003, doi: 10.1016/b978-0-7506-5805-
8.x5000-4.
[16] A. F. Molisch et al., “IEEE 802.15.4a channel model-final report,” IEEE 802, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 802.1504--0662, 2006.
[17] L.-H. Yen and W.-T. Tsai, “The room shortage problem of tree-based ZigBee/IEEE 802.15.4 wireless networks,” Computer
Communications, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 454–462, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.comcom.2009.10.013.
[18] N. Baker, “ZigBee and Bluetooth: strengths and weaknesses for industrial applications,” Computing and Control Engineering,
vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 20–25, Apr. 2005, doi: 10.1049/cce:20050204.
[19] V. M. Mishra and A. Kumar, “FPGA integrated IEEE 802.15.4 ZigBee wireless sensor nodes performance for industrial plant
monitoring and automation,” Nuclear Engineering and Technology, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 2444–2452, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.net.
2022.01.011.
[20] G. A. Naidu and J. Kumar, “Wireless protocols: Wi-Fi SON, Bluetooth, ZigBee, Z-Wave, and Wi-Fi,” in Lecture Notes in
Networks and Systems, Springer Singapore, 2019, pp. 229–239.
[21] Q. Wu, Z. Xu, and Z. Han, “PLC simulation control of assembly line,” Computer Simulation in Application, vol. 1, no. 1,
pp. 13–23, 2017.
[22] Q. Bai, B. Jin, D. Wang, Y. Wang, and X. Liu, “Compact Modbus TCP/IP protocol for data acquisition systems based on limited
hardware resources,” Journal of Instrumentation, vol. 13, no. 04, pp. T04004–T04004, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/13/04/
T04004.
[23] J. Nivethan and M. Papa, “Dynamic rule generation for SCADA intrusion detection,” in 2016 IEEE Symposium on Technologies
for Homeland Security (HST), May 2016, pp. 1–5, doi: 10.1109/THS.2016.7568964.
[24] N. P. DeGuglielmo, S. M. S. Basnet, and D. E. Dow, “Introduce Ladder Logic and Programmable Logic Controller (PLC),” in
2020 Annual Conference Northeast Section (ASEE-NE), Oct. 2020, pp. 1–5, doi: 10.1109/ASEENE51624.2020.9292646.
[25] R. A. Taha, M. M. Mustafa, and M. K. Hamad, “Controlling system of an elevator with aid of PLC (Ladder diagram),” no. May,
2022.
BIOGRAPHIES OF AUTHORS
Amal Ibrahim Nasser received the BSc. degree in electrical engineering from
the University of Baghdad, Iraq on 1994, the MSc. degree in Electrical Engineering/Electronic
and Telecommunications/Mustansiriyah University in 2000., and the Ph.D. degree in
control/control and computers/University of Technology Engineering in Baghdad, Iraq in
2007. Currently "Lecturer Dr." at the College of Engineering, Mustansiriya University, Iraq,
Baghdad. Interested in the field of scientific research for automatic control systems and
intelligence systems and their simulation in Matlab programs. She can be contacted at email:
[email protected].