The Expert Witness April 2022 For Website
The Expert Witness April 2022 For Website
The Expert Witness April 2022 For Website
Delay and Disruption are often confusing to Project and that the Employer is responsible for such
differentiate between. But there is a significant dis- delay;
tinction between the two. Nonetheless both may re- ➢ That the delay affected the critical path;
sult in cost and time overruns in the Project but the
process of quantifying effect of delay and disruption is ➢ That the delay qualifies for time and cost as per the
quite distinct. More attention is paid to claims conditions stipulated in the Contract;
regarding delays, still disruption claims can also be ➢ That the Contractor suffered additional expenses
substantial. which were not envisaged at the time it entered into
the Contractual framework with the Employer
The Society of Construction Law Delay and
Disruption Protocol, 2nd Edition, February 2017 The Contractor should maintain detailed and
(SCL Protocol), defines Delay as: accurate contemporaneous record such as the base-
“In referring to ‘delay’, the Protocol is concerned with line and updated/impacted/as-built programmes, joint
time – work activities taking longer than planned. In record of delay events, correspondences exchanged
large part, the focus is on delay to the completion of between the parties etc. in order to support his Claim.
the works – in other words, critical delay. Hence, The Contractor should also present a detailed foren-
‘delay’ is concerned with an analysis of time..” sic delay analysis to support its claim for Extension of
time by demonstrating the extent of critical delays
The SCL Protocol defines Disruption as: faced on the Project. There are various delay analysis
“In referring to ‘disruption’, the Protocol is concerned with techniques prevailing globally in the Construction
disturbance, hindrance or interruption to a Contractor’s nor- sector namely,
mal working methods, resulting in lower productivity or effi- ➢ Impacted As-Planned Analysis;
ciency in the execution of particular work activities. If the ➢ Time Impact Analysis;
Contractor is prevented from following what was its reason- ➢ Time Slice Windows Analysis;
able plan at the time of entering into the contract for carrying
➢ As-Planned versus As-Built;
out the works or a part of them (i.e. it is disrupted), the likeli-
hood is that its resources will accomplish a lower productivity ➢ Retrospective Longest Path Analysis;
rate than planned on the impacted work activities such that, ➢ Collapsed As-Built Analysis.
overall, those work activities will cost more to complete and the
The choice of delay analysis to be deployed should be
Contractor’s profitability will be lower than anticipated”
determined by multiple factors such as the governing
Delay as defined by the SCL is concerned with time, conditions of the Contract, nature of the causative
whereas disruption is concerned with the productiv- events, nature of the Project, quality of construction
ity. Delay may have a direct impact on the contractual programme and extent of records etc.
date of completion of the Project, depending upon its
criticality. The delay caused can be claimed in the form For the cost claim pertaining to compensation of time,
of EOT or LD based on the party responsible for delay the Contractor should claim time related indirect ex-
(i.e., Employer or the Contractor). While in case of penses at the time critical delays were faced on the
disruption, it may not affect the date of completion Project. Whereas, the Employer’s cost claim generally
directly but still lead to monetary losses. Also, there contains the Liquidated Damages expressly stipulated
may be no explicit contractual provision for claiming in the Contract.
compensation for a disruption event. Presenting a claim of Disruption
Presenting a Claim of Delay In order to claim disruption in a Project, the
For instance, delays emanating from an Employer’s Contractor needs to prove that its productivity has
risk event were faced on a Project. In order to claim suffered due to impediments for instance, non-avail-
the time and cost owing to such delay, the Contractor ability of proper access to reach Project site, Physical
would need to demonstrate the following: conditions encountered at site being different from
➢ That the delay has genuinely occurred on the what was envisaged at the time of bid etc. resulting in
analysis the focus is on loss of productivity, both l Budget Control RAID Management Project Planning Project Lifecycle Management
resulting in financial damages. Project documentation implementation and management Stakeholder Management
l Trouble shooting problamatic and distressed and schemes and programmes.
In conclusion, knowing the distinction between delay Contact Name: Construction Boffin
and disruption will enable you to differentiate your Tel: 07426 805 967
Email: tom@constructionboffin.com
claims in a better way, resulting in a better chance at
Website: www.constructionboffin.com
getting them approved. Area of Work: Nationwide and Worldwide