A Fast
A Fast
Abstract
This report is elaborating the application of hypothesis testing of the statement which
declared by the restaurant manager of a fast-food restaurant by claiming out the average
waiting time for a drive-thru order is 03 minutes. The hypothesis testing has applied for
checking out the significance difference of this claimed statement by fostering the null
hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. The probability value is used to get the decision of
accept or reject of the hypothesis testing with comparison of the significance level. The critical
value also plays a crucial role in hypothesis testing and the comparison between calculated
critical value and z value determines the accept or rejection of the hypothesis testing.
Moreover, the report emphazies the use of hypothesis testing and confidence intervals in the
industries in different situation to make their decisions by reducing the uncertainty of their
Introduction
The fast-food restaurant declared that the average time for a drive thru order is 03
minutes and the restaurant manager requires to claim his observation result with based on the
selected sample and to find out the reliability of the observation result using the statistical data
of z-value, p-value, critical value and the significance level. Moreover, the main objectives of this
report are to find out the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis with based on the above
statement and build up a consistent 02 hypothesis to get the reliable conclusion at the end.
Further to test the z-value and calculate the probability value based on the z-value and compare
the p-value with significance level of 0.05 and build up a reliable data to reject or accept the
hypothesis secondly. Third objective is to determine the calculated critical value for a one tailed
test with the significance value of 0.05 and compare it with z-value to evaluate the hypothesis
test with rejection or acceptance next objective is find out the influence of when reduce the
sample size by highlighting major drawbacks and introducing the major industries and situations
which hypothesis testing and confidential intervals are applying and how that 02 concepts are
playing major roles in the market to provide reliable and more consistency information which
relationship to examine the enough evidence for reject the hypothesis. The alternative
hypothesis is emphasizing the relationship and significant differences by aiming to find out the
enough evidence to support the alternative hypothesis. According to the statement, Null
4
hypothesis can be stated as, the average time for a drive-thru order is 03 minutes as the fast-
H0: μ = 3
Alternative hypothesis is, as stated by fast-food restaurant the average time for a drive-
thru is not 03 minutes by presenting there is a difference in between the declared hours and the
Ha: μ ≠ 3
If a random sample of 50 customers produces a sample mean wait time of 2.8 minutes with a
population standard deviation of 0.4 minutes, calculate the test statistics using a z-value.
The z-test is main component in the hypothesis testing and it emphasizes if there is a
relationship or significant effect, difference between the sample mean and population mean by
making decisions about population details based on the sample details and it highly affect on
the accuracy of the decision. Specially for the market research, quality assurance and etc.
Z-Test equation
Z-value = (x̄ - μ)
( σ / √n)
n : Sample size
5
Calculation
(0.4 /√50)
Z= -3.537
Calculate the p-value for this test and interpret the results at a significance level of 0.05.
The p-value is a measurement in statistics which analyzes the proof against the null
probability. The p-value is compared with the significance level of 0.05 and the results can be
indicated as high p-value and low p-value. Low p-value indicates the observation results are
improbable and it leads to reject the null hypothesis. The high p value declares the observed
results is distinctly possible by random chance and there is no powerful evidence to reject the
null hypothesis.
According to this situation, this is a two tailed test since we are finding the significant difference
of the above situation. For an example we are finding, whether the fast-food restaurants’
average time for a drive-thru order is 3 minutes or not and it is directing to the both sides to use
By comparing with the standard distribution table, we can find out the probability of
calculated Z-value -3. 537.According to table approximate p-value is 0. 0002.This is a two tailed
P-value = 2(0.0002)
= 0.0004
6
Interpretation
According to this situation, the determined significant level is 0.05 and if p-value is less
than or equal to significance level we reject the null hypothesis since low value indicates the
p ≤ 0.05
if p-value is higher than the significance level we accept the null hypothesis since
p > 0.05
In this scenario, the probability value is less than the significance level (0.0004 ≤ 0.05)
and the null hypothesis is rejecting. There is powerful evidence to suggest that observation
result is not true, the average time for a drive-thru order is not 03 minutes and the sample data
has provided support to prove the claim made by fast-food restaurant is incorrect. According to
sample data the average waiting time is significantly different from 03 minutes.
Determine the critical value for a one-tailed test with a significance level of 0.05 and compare
Critical value is determined by the based-on significance value and degree of freedom or
distribution of sample. According to this in one-tailed test significant value is 0.05 and we
require to find critical value for comparison with the z-value and it leads to determine whether
to reject the null hypothesis. The critical value can be calculated by using standard distribution
The distribution is left tailed and the critical value in one-tailed test at a 0.05 significance
Interpretation
Since the calculated z-value farther in the left side of the distribution curve than the
critical value (-1.645), we have powerful evidence to reject the null hypothesis and the
calculation proves that, the average time for a drive-thru order is less than 03 minutes.
In conclude, we reject null hypothesis based on the critical value for a one-tailed test at a
significance level 0.05 this statistic analysis strongly evident that the average wait time for a
drive-thru order is less than 03 minutes by supporting sample data to reject the null hypothesis.
How would decreasing the sample size from 50 to 25 affect your conclusion? Explain.
Sample size is playing a major role in the statistical analyzing since sample size indicates the
essential factors in an analyzing and directly affect to the conclusion as well. The decreasing of
01. Reduce the accuracy of analyzing: The ultimate result or conclusion which you gain from
the smaller sample size may leads to the incorrect directions and the target data with
the smaller sample, your observation result may be father away from the real data with
02. Enhanced the variability: The smaller sample size generates the high inconsistency and
unsteadiness in the data and it become more influential in the analyzing. The results are
making less confidence since the standard deviation creates more influenced by creating
8
the less representation of the actual standard deviation of population. Essentially, high
03. Reduce statistical power: The smaller sample size is heading to the high z value and
changes in the p-value. It directly affects to the hypothesis final decision and the
reducing of the sample size leads to decrease the power of statistical analyzing z-value is
influencing by sample size, mean, standard deviation. Thus, with the reducing of sample
size it enhances the higher z-test results (-2.5 Z value) and leads to high extreme test
results as well and the real effect or difference in the population may not explained and
04. Make exceptional effect on outliers: When sample size is small it is affected greater to
the extreme values in the data set and it creates a deceptive conclusion.
Provide two other examples of situations or industries where hypothesis testing and
In the statistics analysis, hypothesis testing and confidence intervals are significantly
guided views for all the researchers and decision makers to analyze their observation results in a
panoramic view. The hypothesis testing is providing the direct validity of the observation results
and confidence intervals provides the range of value that we observe in the sample and for
which we expect to find the value that accurately reflects the population. ( Confidence Intervals -
Statistics Teaching Tools). Together both concepts provide panoramic overview of the statistical
data for all the researchers and some industries are widely using this statistic findings to present
and the hypothesis testing and confidence intervals are playing major role in quality control.
The consistency and stability of the production process of each product is directly affect to the
quality of the each and every product and ensuring the steadiness of production process is
significant in quality control. Thus, the quality controllers in organization hypothesis testing are
widely use for navigate the data on product quality before and after using the new production
process and finding out whether the hypothesis testing is allowing to reject or accept the null
hypothesis and it helps to review if the production process significantly effect to the production
quality. In addition, confidence intervals give the panoramic, boarder perspective to data
analyst for making decisions by showing the uncertainty and instability inherent in the statistical
evaluation and potential strength of the true effect. All manufacturing companies can be used
the confidence interval to assess whether the production process has addressed all the required
product quality characteristics in the process and if not, how they can convert the process in to
In the investment industry, investors and finance analyst are highly using hypothesis
testing and confidence intervals as a statistical tool to analyze data to making decisions, assess
the particular projects, authenticating presumptions and absorbing more reliable and more
healthy investment opportunities in the market. Investors are using hypothesis basically in
investment analysis to accept or reject the investment assumptions. For an example investor
can assume the particular investment project is making more profit in the market through
hypothesis testing. By analyzing the data related particular investment investors can determine
the observation results is significant or not significant by accepting or rejecting. The interest rate
10
is the main risk which faced by investors and they can hypothesize whether there is an effect of
interest rate to the investment projects and there is no effect to the investment project. By
analyzing the data relate with statistical analysis investors can be make a judgement regard the
uncertainty and risk management. Moreover, the investors are using confidence intervals in the
analysis of investment project as well. For an example, when calculating the expected return
after a period of time subject to the investment project, the financial analysts have to navigate
the range of possible return on investment with a particular data range and address to the
In overall, both situations indicate that hypothesis testing and confidence intervals are
playing major roles in the statistical data analysis to acquire the most reliable results at the end.
Conclusion
There is powerful evidence to suggest that observation result is not true, the average
time for a drive-thru order is not 03 minutes and the sample data has provided support to prove
the claim made by fast-food restaurant is incorrect. The probability value is less than the
significance level (0.0004 ≤ 0.05) and the null hypothesis is rejecting. Because according to
sample data the average waiting time is significantly different from 03 minutes. Further we
reject the null hypothesis based on the critical value for a one-tailed test at a significance level
0.05 this statistic analysis strongly evident that the average wait time for a drive-thru order is
less than 03 minutes by supporting sample data to reject the null hypothesis. Moreover, this
report is emphasizing the reducing of sample size effect directly to reduce accuracy of the
analyzing, enhance the variability, reduce statistical power and make exceptional effort on
11
outliers as well. Finally, the report shows how manufacturing industry and investment market
using data analyzing for their statistical use to obtain the reliable results.
12
References
Mackowiak, P. A., Wasserman, S.S., and Levine, M.M. (1992). A Critical Appraisal of 98.6
Degrees F, the Upper Limit of the Normal Body Temperature, and Other Legacies of Carl
Reinhold August Wunderlich. Journal of the American Medical Association, 268, 1578-1580.
http://www.stat.yale.edu/Courses/1997-98/101/confint.htm