GOTO IJ - MNC Sekuritas Equity Report (170323)
GOTO IJ - MNC Sekuritas Equity Report (170323)
GOTO IJ - MNC Sekuritas Equity Report (170323)
REPORT CONTENTS
GOTO At a Glance…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…3
Understanding GOTO……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…5
The Promise : Fast-Tracking Profitability…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...7
Answering Concern : A Closer Look at Cash (Liquidity)……………………………………………………………………………………………………..16
Valuation……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………………………………………………….19
Key Investment Thesis: 4 Reasons We Like GOTO…………………………………………………………………………………..........…………………..21
Thinking About Risk…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..24
GOTO at a Glance
PT GoTo Gojek Tokopedia Tbk (GOTO) was established after the 2021 merger of Indonesia's two
largest tech startups, Gojek and Tokopedia. GOTO’s establishment also marked the birth of largest
digital ecosystem in Indonesia with 3 main businesses : 1) on-demand; 2) e-commerce and 3) fintech.
On April 11, 2022, GOTO officially listed on the IDX receiving IDR13.7tn (~USD1bn) of fresh funds
after issuing 40bn shares (~3.4% outstanding shares). It was the largest IPO by size in 2022. Worth-
noting that GOTO successfully managed an IPO even with the challenging market backdrop during
the early phase of monetary tightening.
Understanding GOTO
GOTO: a super-app provider
GOTO aspires to be a super-app, interestingly, there is no firm definition of super-app and thus it
should be arbitrary and vary from one and another. Here we define super-app to be an app or
platform by which provide all customer’ needs (one stop solution in a platform). A super app must
convey a set of products/services portfolio from basic to additional which related to experience and
entertainment needs. Based on our assessment, GOTO is by far a company which resembles a super-
app. The detail about our super-app framework can be seen as follow:
Exhibit 5. GOTO by far has met MNCS super-app model framework given its comprehensive products/services offering that meet
customers’ needs along their journey and experiences
Availability in GOTO's Platform
Type of Consumer Needs Notes
On-Demand E-commerce GoTo Financial
Consumption Needs
Food-Delivery ✓ gofood is a food-delivery service within Gojek app with 1.4mn merchants (99% are MSME)
Food-Purchase ✓ Tokopedia facilitate consumers to buy food & ingredients from its merchants which offer a wide-range of product (19 product category)
Shoping Experiences
Electronics ✓ Tokopedia platform offers a wide-range of electronics product from audio, camera, HP and PC/laptop
Kitchen-related ✓ Consumers can purchase a kitchen-related product such as food-processing to storage apparatus in Tokopedia platform
Fashion & Clothing ✓ All fashion styles (kids, male & female wear) are available in the Tokopedia platform
Mom & Kids ✓ Mom & kids care are also available in the Tokopedia platform
Health & Medical ✓ ✓ Health and medical products can be accessed either from Gojek or Tokopedia depends on consumer needs
Basic Stationary ✓ Consumers can buy office & stationery products from Tokopedia
Automotive ✓ Accessories & sparepart are available on Tokopedia
Carpentry & Appliances ✓ Consumer can easily find and buy carpentry and appliances from Tokopedia
Property ✓ Tokopedia also provides property services such as booking fee, full payment property and property rent
Mobility ✓ Through Gojek app, user can access 2/4-wheeler ride hailing services (goride, gocar, gobluebird, and now gotransit)
Logistics ✓ To facilitate goods mobility, Gojek also provide gosend (a more limited size of goods) and gobox (larger size of goods/freight)
Payment/transactional ✓ ✓ Tokopedia also facilitate bill payments (electricity, gas, internet, etc)
Payment tools/solution ✓ ✓ ✓ GoPay is embedded within Gojek and Tokopedia platform, while for merchant GoTo Financials provide Midtrans (gateway) and Moka (POS)
Financing needs ✓ ✓ ✓ GoPaylater is embedded within Gojek app, while GoPaylater Cicil is a BNPL product for selected Tokopedia users
Financial protection ✓ Insurance-related products (health, life, gadget, travel and disaster) are available
Knowledge-Based
Books ✓ To accommodate customers needs for knowledge, Tokopedia also provide books and magazines
Entertainment-Based
Film & Music ✓ ✓ GoTix & Goplay from Gojek and this service is also provided by Tokopedia
Gaming ✓ Gaming products (console, mobile, VR) and accessories are available in Tokopedia
Party & Craft ✓ All parties need and craft can be found and purchased from Tokopedia
Additional/Advance Wedding ✓ A comprehensive wedding needs (from fashion, souvenir, WO, planning & stylist) are offered by Tokopedia
Lifestyle-Centric
Beauty & Personal Care ✓ A comprehensive offering of beuaty & personal care products are provided in Tokopedia platform
Pet Care ✓ Grooming and care products for customers needs are also available on Tokopedia platform
Tour & Travel ✓ Tokopedia provides travel document, tour package, international sim card & wifi, ticket & voucher travel
Investment
Gold ✓ Investors can now buy Gold from Tokopedia
Net Revenue
Gross Revenue
A net revenue
(Take Rate)
collected on the (13,715) (5,746)
A commission received by
platform
the platform from
16,630 customers, merchants & 6,401
Contribution Margin
drivers (CM) (12,671)
Increase monetization
Take rate is a commonly used metric to depict how much money a platform provider company like
GOTO generate revenues. It simply indicates the commission fee company can collect from
customers, merchants and driver partners. GOTO is so far having the largest digital ecosystem in
Indonesia compared to its closest competitors such as Grab and Sea. As of 3Q22, GOTO’s GTV was
USD10.8bn, the second largest after Sea (Shopee), nonetheless, GOTO’s net take rate (net
revenue/GTV) was the lowest as it only accounted 2.8% from GTV (Grab 7.5%; Shopee 9.9%).
Exhibit 8. Currently, GOTO’s ecosystem monetization still lag behind its closest competitors
19,100
% to GMV
Gross revenue :
N/A
Promotion : N/A
Net revenue : 10,755
9.9%
% to GTV
Gross revenue : % to GMV
3.7% Gross revenue :
Promotion : 0.9% 17.3%
Net revenue : 2.8% 5,080 Promotion : 9.8%
Net revenue : 7.5%
1,900
299 382
Se a GoT o Gra b
Notes : as of 3Q22 and the values are the total of its business segments. Sources : Company, Grab, Sea, MNCS
Research
Current Condition
When looking at each GOTO’s business segment, the take rate differed significantly with the on-
demand services (Gojek) has the highest and fintech business became the lowest. The on-demand
GTV has risen 31.9% YoY in 9M22 and at the same time, on-demand’s GTV increased by +160 bps
YoY to 21.6%. Gojek successfully managed to increase the take rate on average by +50 bps QoQ
since 1Q21-3Q22. On the other hand, Tokopedia (e-commerce) take rate increased cumulatively +70
bps during 1Q21-3Q22 or averaging +10 bps in every quarter along with its GTV growth reaching
+20.7% YoY in 9M22. Yet the fastest growing fintech business, unfortunately experiencing a decline
on its monetization at the same time. As such, overall GOTO’s take rate was steady at 3.7%. We think
GOTO’s will focus to further increase take rate in e-commerce and fintech business given its large
contribution to group’s GTV.
Exhibit 9. Quarterly GTV growth moderation post economic activities pick-up after Covid-19
30.0%
25.0%
20.0%
QoQ GTV growth
15.0%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
2Q21 3Q21 4Q21 1Q22 2Q22 3Q22
-5.0%
-10.0%
Exhibit 10. Quarterly GTV growth moderation post economic activities pick-up after Covid-19
E-commerce On-demand
3.5% +70 bps 23.5% +300 bps
3.2% 22.2%
22.0%
3.0%
20.5%
2.5% 2.5%
19.0% 19.2%
2.0% 17.5%
1Q21 2Q21 3Q21 4Q21 1Q22 2Q22 3Q22 1Q21 2Q21 3Q21 4Q21 1Q22 2Q22 3Q22
Fintech
GOTO
0.7% -20 bps
4.0% +20 bps
0.6%
3.8%
0.6%
3.7%
3.6% 3.5%
0.5%
3.4%
0.4%
0.4% 3.2%
1Q21 2Q21 3Q21 4Q21 1Q22 2Q22 3Q22 1Q21 2Q21 3Q21 4Q21 1Q22 2Q22 3Q22
Exhibit 11. GOTO’s fintech business turned out to be the lowest monetized segment
Future Outlook Sustaining High Quality Growth with a More Rational Cost
We projected GTV to grow +22.1% CAGR FY20-25F and likely to experience a moderation from
FY23F onwards. GOTO has stated to focus on its loyal customers rather than continuously burning
money to attract more customers. Gross take rate is likely to increase +30 bps annually under our
base assumption. Furthermore, we expect GOTO to continue to revamp its customers engagement
policy by leveraging data analytics and focus more on cost cutting enabled by continued penetration
of GoPay Coins across platform. Hence, this would result in promotion/GTV cut by at least to a half
causing promotion/GTV to be 1.0% by FY25F and bringing gross revenue/net revenue conversion to
78% by FY25F from only ~50% in FY22E based on our base-scenario.
850,000
700,000
550,000
400,000
250,000
100,000
FY20 FY21 FY22E FY23F FY24F FY25F
Exhibit 13. GOTO’s Take Rate is Estimated to Increase at Least 30 bps Annually
5.0%
4.0%
3.0%
2.0%
1.0%
0.0%
FY20 FY21 FY22E FY23F FY24F FY25F
Sources : Company, MNCS Research
Exhibit 14. GOTO gross/net revenue is projected to grow at +28.0%/56.8% CAGR FY20-25F
77.5%
60.0%
32,500
27,500 49.7%
22,500 26.7%
17,500
28.1%
12,500
7,500
2,500
FY20 FY21 FY22E FY23F FY24F FY25F
Throughout 9M22, GOTO’s promotion to platform size has declined by -220 bps, while Grab
experienced a sharper drop of -270 bps. However, Grab’s platform size/ATU fell 2.2% at the same
time giving a stark contrast to GOTO’s platform size/ATU (Annual Transacting Users) increased by
15.4%. Indeed, in order to give an apple-to-apple benchmark is quite tricky as we also need to
consider that Grab operation rely on deliveries, mobility and fintech, whilst GOTO has a more
comprehensive portfolio with the existence of e-commerce business. Yet, given GOTO’s unrivaled
ecosystem completeness should benefit the company to lever it for further monetization, even
compared to Sea which compete in e-commerce universe. By having a comprehensive portfolio
across its digital ecosystem, we believe GOTO is far better in maintaining customers stickiness.
Exhibit 15. Comprehensive Portfolio should Benefit GOTO’s Customers Loyalty and Thus
Sustaining a High-Quality Growth with A More Rational Promotion Cost
GOTO Grab
Period Platform size/users Promotion (% Platform size/users Promotion (%
(IDR mn) platform size) (USD) platform size)
1Q21 6.6 1.2% 130.1 5.1%
2Q21 7.0 2.4% 133.3 6.3%
3Q21 8.0 2.5% 155.9 6.7%
4Q21 7.8 3.0% 152.1 8.1%
1Q22 7.8 2.7% 155.5 7.2%
2Q22 8.0 2.4% 155.1 6.2%
3Q22 9.0 0.8% 151.6 5.5%
Notes : platform size refers to GMV/GTV by which company reported, while users indicates transacting users of
platform. Sources : GOTO, Grab, MNCS Research
Cost Optimization
GOTO aspiration to build a lean, agile and productive organization is also tightly linked to its
operational efficiency. In Nov-22, GOTO followed an opex cost optimization approach mainly
through downsizing its headcount. According to the available information, company’s measure
impacted 1,300 employees. This measure continues in Mar-23 which is said to impact 600
roles/employees. Based on 9M22 financial report, GOTO spent IDR11.3tn for salaries and employee
benefits that accounted 39.7% of direct cost linked to company’s operation. GOTO’s total headcounts
was 10,541 as of Sep-22 meaning that GOTO’s expense for salaries and employee benefits was
IDR119mn/month. Yet, one should be noted that some of employee benefit is share-based
compensation (SBC) and could not be treated as a cash paid to employee. Thus, we believe using
operating cash flow to employee to better reflect cash spent for its talents which based on our
calculation GOTO paid employees averagely IDR48mn/month. Taking into account the downsizing
headcount measures in Nov-22 and Mar-23, we expect GOTO could save IDR91bn/month or
IDR274bn/quarter and IDR1.1tn/year. Note that this is not include pay severance, which could lead a
result to be more conservative, yet still have sizeable impact on company’s operating cash flow.
Exhibit 16. GOTO could save IDR3.3tn annually after downsizing its headcount.
FY20 FY21 9M22
Operating cash to employee 2,633 4,097 4,558
Employee opex 3,647 8,734 11,288
Non-cash 1,014 4,637 6,731
No of employee 4,895 9,044 10,541
GoPayLater Cicil is payment Alternative payment solution A high margin fintech business
solution (post-paid) for for customers and better that could increase not only
selected Tokopedia customers customers experience and GTV but also revenue
platform engagement
Customers could convert their payment from cash to periodic installment charged with 2.0-3.3% fee
based on tenure chosen. The scheme for BNPL could be achieved through credit channeling and
GOTO will record a net revenue after deducting from Cost of Fund (CoF) and Cost of Credit (CoC).
We believe that GoPayLater Cicil would be GOTO’s next growth engine and next game changer
driven by several reasons :
• Sizeable Tokopedia users. Based on our discussion with management, currently there are ~4mn
customers eligible to access this product.
• Higher average order value (AOV). Tokopedia is by far also known for its association with
electronic product leading to higher AOV and thus customers may prefer an installment payment
rather than cash given the price is quite expensive. This should open up higher probability of
BNPL adoption.
• Lending business is lucrative as it gives high margin. Lending, particularly in consumer segment
has attractive margin. OJK decided to cap fintech lending interest rates at 0.4% for short-term
maturity.
• A close relation with prominent digital bank in Indonesia. As we know, GOTO has 21.4% stake in
Bank Jago (ARTO IJ), a leading and already profitable digital bank in Indonesia. Despite the
cooperation is not exclusive, yet, nurturing collaboration between two entities is worth the effort.
• Data driven decision-making to be core risk management strategy. Every transaction in GOTO’s
platform will generate customers data that could be empowered through analytic approach and
brings business insights on customers behavior such as preference. This could also be employed
to generate a credit scoring that will optimize risk-adjusted return for credit portfolio.
Assuming that blended BNPL portfolio has 35% gross annual interest rates, with CoF of 5%, LDR
100% and CoC at 5%, the risk adjusted NIM for GoPayLater Cicil would be 25%. It is indeed
promising, such a margin is even higher than current on-demand gross take rate at 22% and given
huge Tokopedia GTV. In addition, we also believe CoC could be reduced if appropriate credit scoring
framework is undertaken.
Garibaldi Thohir
Co-Chairman Andre Soelistyo
CEO
Agus D. W. Martowardojo
Commissioner Wei-Jye Jacky Lo
CFO
Winato Kartono
Commissioner
Pablo Malay
Dirk Van den Berghe Chief Corporate Officer
Independent Commissioner
Companies such as GOTO which carry a sizeable goodwill value will need to conduct periodic
impairment test. Given unfavorable macro-condition and challenging market environment in FY22,
there will be adjustment on Tokopedia value which under our estimate could result in impairment of
its value driven by lower market valuation of tech companies across the globe. Notes that peer like
Sea Group also reported a goodwill impairment of USD178mn in 4Q22. Yet this would not impact on
GOTO’s cash flow.
We believe GOTO’s profit acceleration will be observed in FY23F. Under the scenario of at least
+25bps increase in overall take rate and discipline cost saving approach positive adjusted EBITDA in
4Q23F is achievable. Expect FY24F GOTO’s adjusted EBITDA to be IDR3.4tn.
Exhibit 21. GOTO’s positive adjusted EBITDA in 4Q23F is achievable if take rate improvement
continue and company follow a discipline cost optimization approach
10,000
5,000
(5,000)
(10,000)
(15,000)
(20,000)
FY20 FY21 FY22E FY23F FY24F FY25F
What matters more than just guidance is execution. Our model showed that for every +25bps
increase in overall take rate will improve GOTO’s adjusted EBITDA by IDR1.8tn if all else are equal
using assumption that total cost (cost of revenues + opex) at 194% of net revenue. While for every
increase of +2.5 percentage point in opex would result in IDR423bn lower of adjusted EBITDA.
Exhibit 22. Sensitivity model of take rate improvement and its impact on GOTO’s adjusted EBITDA
Exhibit 23. Sensitivity model of total cost under different scenario and its impact on GOTO’s adjusted EBITDA
Notes: Total cost = cost of revenue + opex / net revenue. Sources : Company, MNCS Research
Compared to Sea and Grab, GOTO is generally considered to have the shortest cash runway and is
only able to support its operation for up to 7 quarters. However, looking at startup liquidity condition
needs to be carefully taken with a more comprehensive approach, especially with regard to source of
liquidity. This is important considering the cash obtained from the funding round with will have an
impact on future business performance and further funding needs. Apart from the general view that
GOTO has the shortest cash runway, we see that there are several interesting points that are worth
understanding.
• Funding history & momentum. GOTO, Sea and Grab are public companies that clearly receive
funding from the capital market. Of the three, Sea was the first to go public in the US market by
issuing ADSs and managed to raise ~USD1bn in 2017, followed by Grab, that went public Nasdaq
with the SPAC scheme at the end of 2021 and managed to raise USD4.5bn. The last was GOTO,
that undertook IPO corporate action in the domestic stock exchange and raised funding from
investors of USD1bn. Historically, Sea is one of the most active in conducting post-IPO funding
rounds. Since FY17-21 Sea has obtained additional liquidity of up to USD16bn and this is what
makes Sea Group having the thickest pocket. However, Sea is benefited due to high investors'
appetite for startups at that time. It was clearly in stark contrast to Grab and GOTO, which faced
unfavorable conditions when inflation increased followed by aggressive rate hikes causing
funding with premium valuations is less likely.
• Funding scheme. Historically, particularly since the IPO, Sea has received funding through equity
and debt financing. Of the USD16bn raised in those 5 years, 60% came from debt instruments-
convertible notes which have interest bearing characteristics offering annual interest rates of
0.25-2.375%. Unlike Sea, most of Grab's funding is in the form of equity, largely coming from IPO
through SPAC. However, in 1Q21 Grab issued USD2bn worth of non-convertible bonds and has
repurchased around USD0.85bn. On the other hand, GOTO has successfully managed funding
through equity financing and thus in our view, in the current situation, GOTO is superior. We
further conducted analysis by calculating the net cash liquidity approach (cash & cash equivalent
+ short-term investment - interest bearing liability and after excluding restricted cash). The results
showed that the three startups possess a similar cash runway. In our opinion, this metric is far
better and more credible in explaining a company's liquidity condition as funding model clearly
impact on whether cash received from funding will result in liabilities in the future.
Exhibit 24. After taking a look at net liquidity, the 3 startups (GOTO, Sea and Grab) would
have a quite similar runway.
Liquidity Comparison GOTO Sea Group Grab Holdings
Cash & cash equivalent 2.1 6.3 2.3
Short-term investment & deposits 0.0 1.0 4.1
Gross liquidity 2.1 7.3 6.4
Interest bearing liabilities 0.1 4.2 2.1
Net liquidity 2.0 3.1 4.3
Quarterly cash burn 0.3 0.5 0.3
Cash & cash equivalent runway 6.8 13.6 9.0
Gross liquidity runway 6.8 15.9 25.2
Net liquidity runway 6.5 6.7 16.9
Notes : the data as of 9M22, all values in USD bn except for runway in quarters, restricted cash is excluded and
quarterly cash burn is calculated using quarterly operating cash flow. Sources : GOTO, Grab, Sea, MNCS Research.
We further look at Sea Group as it provides funding details. In Sea's case, there will be USD575mn
convertible notes issued in 2018 maturing on July 2023 with a 2.25% coupon rate. Most of bond
holders have converted it, leaving only USD31.3 million as of FY21. Most of principal amount was
converted due to the lower conversion price than the current market price of USD19.8bn. Further in
2024 there is USD1.15bn of convertible bond maturing with a coupon rate of 1.00% p.a and most of
them have been converted to equity due to lower conversion price at USD50.1/share. However, Sea’s
convertible notes that are mature in 2026 worth of USD 2.88bn have a premium conversion price of
USD 477.1/share. Furthermore, coupled with Sea's anti-dilution policy, we see the probability for
conversion to be small and hence the liquidity space to be allocated expansion has become more
limited. After all, GOTO's ability to maximize funding through equity instruments is ultimately
superior given recent hostile environment. On top of lower interest rate risk, GOTO does not
necessarily experience earnings volatility due to changes in the fair value of the debt instruments
recorded in the P&L.
7.5
6.9
6.5
5.5 2.8
4.5 4.1
USD bn
3.5 1.1
2.6
2.5
4.1
1.6 1.1
3.0
1.5
0.7
0.6 1.5
1.0
0.5 0.6
FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21
• Tapping into fintech businesses and digital banks will require startups to have more
restricted cash. As we all know, GOTO, Sea and Grab have fintech and digital banking businesses.
GOTO has a 21.4% stake in Bank Jago (ARTO). Sea Group acquired PT Bank Kesejahteraan
Ekonomi (BKE) in 2021 and Grab partnered with Emtek Group and Singtel by acquiring Bank
Fama. All of them operate in Indonesia as a promising market in the digital banking business with
a large underbanked and unbanked population. However, in Indonesia, banking sector is a
capital-intensive industry, as with OJK policies that seek to consolidate and strengthen banking
capital. In comparison, Grab turned out to be the laggard in tapping in to the digital banking
business while GOTO is a pioneer. Grab's journey to form a digital bank must go through at least
the initial phase which is costly, a portfolio clean-up phase before it turns to be digital bank. The
clean-up stage is expensive due to high probability of additional capital requirement given the
considerable losses borne during the process plus the initial investment in technology. Both Sea
Bank and Bank Fama have met the OJK capital requirements of at least IDR3tn. Yet, in contrast to
Bank Jago, Sea Bank and Bank Fama capital still relatively small and categorized as KBMI I bank. In
terms of capital size, under the scenario of OJK encouraging KBMI I banks to achieve a core
capital of IDR6tn, both Sea Bank and Bank Fama still need at least IDR3tn additional capital or in
other cases to reached the size of the already profitable Bank Jago.
After taking a careful assessment we believe that GOTO’s cash and liquidity position could not be
underestimated. Moreover, GOTO pledges to deliver positive adjusted EBITDA positive by the end of
this year indicating that GOTO could fund operation using its own cash without external funding
needs. Management also reiterated that any external funding would be opportunistic.
Valuation
We approach our valuation by separating GOTO into its three pillars of business, namely on-demand,
e-commerce, and financial technology, and assess its intrinsic value by using SOTP. For each line of
business, we use EV/revenue by comparing GOTO to its global and domestic peers as many of the
companies are pursuing towards profitability. With most of the tech companies have shifted its focus
away from growth, using GTV as a metric of valuation does not seem to be appropriate as it only
measures the size of platforms, rather than the revenue generated from the business. Back to our
model, based on our findings, we assess GOTO's EV by:
• On-Demand: We found that the segment is traded at the range 0.3x-6.3x EV/sales, yet we found
GRAB has the most similar business model, ecosystem, platform growth, and take rate with
GOTO. Therefore, we use GRAB's forward FY23F EV/sales of 3.2x for GOTO's valuation in the on-
demand segment.
Exhibit 27. GOTO’s On-Demand EV using Comparables
120 ,000
100 ,000
80, 000
60, 000
40, 000
20, 000
0
UBER US LYFT US DASH US GRAB US ZOMATO ROO LN TKWY NA DHE R GR DIDIY US 369 0 HK SE US BABA US Average Me dian
EQUITY EQUITY EQUITY EQUITY IN EQUITY EQUITY EQUITY EQUITY EQUITY EQUITY EQUITY
EQUITY
• E-Commerce: We found that the segment is traded at the range 0.2x-8.5x EV/sales. From the
merger of Gojek and Tokopedia in FY21, Tokopedia's valuation with EV/revenue during the period
was comparable with Shopify who had a metric of 33.9x. Currently, in our model, we give a
premium valuation for GOTO’s e-commerce segment (Tokopedia) with 14% higher than the
forward FY23F EV/revenue of 8.5x as Tokopedia's projected revenue growth is higher than
Shopify with 22.6% YoY.
Exhibit 28. GOTO’s E-Commerce EV using Comparables
100 ,000
90, 000
80, 000
70, 000
60, 000
50, 000
40, 000
30, 000
20, 000
10, 000
0
BU KA IJ BELI IJ AMZN EBAY US BABA US SHOP MELI U S JD US 475 5 JT PD D U S SE US CPNG ETSY US Average Me dian
EQUITY EQUITY US EQUITY EQUITY US EQUITY EQUITY EQUITY EQUITY EQUITY US EQUITY
EQUITY EQUITY EQUITY
• Fintech: We found that the segment is traded at the range 0.2x-21.4x EV/sales, however we
found that Sea Group has similar business model with GOTO in terms of the availability of e-
wallet, digital bank, and both recorded a significant growth in revenue in FY22E. Yet, going
forward, we expect GOTO's fintech lending to be more premium with the addition of GoPayLater
Cicil, as well as high average order value of Tokopedia, thus making GOTO's ecosystem to be
more comprehensive compared to Sea.
80, 000
70, 000
60, 000
50, 000
40, 000
30, 000
20, 000
10, 000
0
PY PL US SQ US MA US V US INTU US BABA US 700 H K PAY TM 475 5 JT SE US ADYEN MELI U S Average Me dian
EQUITY EQUITY EQUITY EQUITY EQUITY EQUITY EQUITY IN EQUITY EQUITY NA EQUITY
EQUITY EQUITY
In total, GOTO's implied EV/sales is recorded at 6.3x in FY23F, while in FY24F, it is recorded at 5.3x,
with ARTO included in our calculation. This valuation deemed to be more premium than its peers due
to its comprehensive portfolio, customer stickiness, and its domination in Indonesia. With the
expected net cash of IDR19.7tn in FY23F, GOTO's share price is targeted at IDR168/share (+43.6%
upside).
Exhibit 30. GOTO’s Domestic and Foreign Ownership Before and After the Lockup Period
Feb-23
Jan-23
Dec-22
Nov-22
Liquidity
GOTO's liquidity has been affected by the lock up period imposed on some of its pre-IPO
shareholders. From the prospectus, GOTO has two classes of shares: series A and series B, where up
to Dec-2022, these shares can be traded freely in the secondary market. Therefore, after the lockup
period expired, GOTO's free float rose to 60.7% free float (vs 4.4% during IPO), thus increasing the
liquidity, as seen in graph below. This increased of liquidity can act as a positive catalyst for the
company as GOTO becomes top 10 most actively traded stocks in the JCI.
Exhibit 31. GOTO’s Average Trading Volume Shows that the Stock is Actively Traded On Dec-
22 after the Expiration of the Lockup Period
4,000
3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
-
Apr-22 May-22 Jun-22 Jul-22 Aug -22 Sep-22 Oc t-22 Nov-22 Dec-22 Jan-23 Feb-23 Mar-23
CAGR FY20-FY25F:
50 Indonesia: 27.2%
Southeast Asia: 26.2%
Indonesia
40
Southeast Asia
30
20
10
0
FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22E FY23F FY24F FY25F
300
CAGR FY20-FY25F:
Indonesia: 25.3%
250 Southeast Asia: 26.6%
Indonesia
200 Southeast Asia
150
100
50
0
FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22E FY23F FY24F FY25F
80
60
40
20
0
FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22E FY23F FY24F FY25F
450
A month later GOTO stock prices rebounded sharply by +108.2% from
the previous low reaching IDR404/share
400
300
250
50
Apr-22 Jun-22 Aug -22 Oc t-22 Dec-22 Feb-23
Another macro risk that we closely monitor is the development of SVB collapse due to liquidity and
solvency problems. SVB is recognized as startups banks which unlike other banks that raise funding
from traditional retailers, its balance sheet is dominated by institutional and VC funds from its
USD177bn funding. On the other hand, SVB also recorded a huge losses on securities investment
(~USD17bn as of 4Q22). SVB bank run and regulator’s closure cause market volatility. We believe the
contagion risk to Asia and Indonesia is likely to be minimal as domestic banking sector remains
healthy characterized by strong CAR (~25%) and high CASA ratio from retail funding invested in loan
and a more resilient bond market supported by monetary & fiscal authority stabilization policy. Yet,
SVB collapse impact on startups could not be underestimated as some of VC funds having a liquidity
problem. Given such a circumstance, startups may experience a significant funding squeeze and they
need to think carefully on liquidity management by focusing on investment/project that could
generate cash flow to reduce external funding dependence. As such we also think that investors are
likely demanding a lower valuation for growth companies and tech startups. Again, this should result
in the possibility of de-rating.
On the other side, we also believe that key risk for GOTO is on fundamental side. Slower than
expected execution to increase monetization particularly on a high margin business such as lending
may trigger GOTO’s valuation de-rating. We have performed an assessment of GOTO’s valuation
sensitivity that tightly linked to its monetization under different scenario of systematic risk and
strategy execution.
Exhibit 36. Sensitivity model of take rate and valuation multiple and its impact on GOTO’s
target price
Take Rate
-10bps 134 149 164 179 193
Base 137 153 168 183 198
+10bps 141 156 171 187 202
+20bps 144 159 175 191 207
As mentioned before, take rate affects GOTO’s ability to generate sales, meaning that the higher the
take rate is, the higher the sales after each transaction, hence accelerating the company’s path
towards profitability. Valuation multiple or the EV/sales also plays a significant role in determining
the company’s target price as the higher the ratio is, the more people are willing to pay premium for
the company’s future growth prospect. As seen in the table above, the lower the take rate and the
valuation multiple, the lower the target price is, implying that the company is seen to have limited
growth prospect. In the take rate, we use the base case at 4.0%, while in the valuation multiple, the
base case is set at 6.3x. When the take rate is lower by 20bps while its valuation multiple is kept
lower by 20%, the target price for GOTO is at IDR131/share. Meanwhile, when the take rate is
increased by +20bps from the base case with EV/sales greater by 20%, the target price is higher at
IDR207/share (58.0% disparity).
Profitability (%)
Gross profit margin 26.7% 16.8% 54.0% 70.9% 79.9%
EBIT margin -305.5% -493.5% -225.5% -94.1% -34.3%
EBITDA margin -268.0% -440.2% -203.1% -76.6% -20.7%
Net profit margin -427.0% -471.6% -372.1% -97.8% -38.6%
Leverage (x)
Debt/Equity 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Debt/Asset 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Debt/EBITDA (0.3) (0.1) (0.1) (0.2) (0.5)
Net gearing (0.6) (0.2) (0.2) (0.2) (0.2)
Valuation (x)
P/GTV 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2
P/sales 43.1 31.6 12.6 8.5 6.0
P/B 6.9 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.3
EV/GTV 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1
EV/revenue(gross) 10.3 7.2 5.3 4.3 3.6
EV/revenue(net) 36.6 26.9 10.7 7.2 5.1
PT MNC SEKURITAS
MNC Financial Center Lt. 14 – 16
Jl. Kebon Sirih No. 21 - 27, Jakarta Pusat 10340
Telp : (021) 2980 3111
Fax : (021) 3983 6899
Call Center : 1500 899
Disclaimer
This research report has been issued by PT MNC Sekuritas, It may not be reproduced or further distributed or published, in whole or in
part, for any purpose. PT MNC Sekuritas has based this document on information obtained from sources it believes to be reliable but
which it has not independently verified; PT MNC Sekuritas makes no guarantee, representation or warranty and accepts no responsibility
to liability as to its accuracy or completeness. Expression of opinion herein are those of the research department only and are subject to
change without notice. This document is not and should not be construed as an offer or the solicitation of an offer to purchase or
subscribe or sell any investment. PT MNC Sekuritas and its affiliates and/or their offices, director and employees may own or have
positions in any investment mentioned herein or any investment related thereto and may from time to time add to or dispose of any
such investment. PT MNC Sekuritas and its affiliates may act as market maker or have assumed an underwriting position in the securities
of companies discusses herein (or investment related thereto) and may sell them to or buy them from customers on a principal basis and
may also perform or seek to perform investment banking or underwriting services for or relating to those companies.