The document provides an evaluation rubric for an assignment report with criteria assessed on a scale from excellent to poor. The criteria include an executive summary, introduction, process description, assessment methodology, findings, discussion, recommendations, references, and appendices. For each criterion, descriptors are given for excellent, good, satisfactory, needs improvement, and poor levels of achievement. The total marks awarded are 25% of the overall assessment.
The document provides an evaluation rubric for an assignment report with criteria assessed on a scale from excellent to poor. The criteria include an executive summary, introduction, process description, assessment methodology, findings, discussion, recommendations, references, and appendices. For each criterion, descriptors are given for excellent, good, satisfactory, needs improvement, and poor levels of achievement. The total marks awarded are 25% of the overall assessment.
The document provides an evaluation rubric for an assignment report with criteria assessed on a scale from excellent to poor. The criteria include an executive summary, introduction, process description, assessment methodology, findings, discussion, recommendations, references, and appendices. For each criterion, descriptors are given for excellent, good, satisfactory, needs improvement, and poor levels of achievement. The total marks awarded are 25% of the overall assessment.
The document provides an evaluation rubric for an assignment report with criteria assessed on a scale from excellent to poor. The criteria include an executive summary, introduction, process description, assessment methodology, findings, discussion, recommendations, references, and appendices. For each criterion, descriptors are given for excellent, good, satisfactory, needs improvement, and poor levels of achievement. The total marks awarded are 25% of the overall assessment.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3
Assignment Report Evaluation Rubric
Criteria Excellent Good (4) Satisfactor Needs Poor (1) Marks
(5) y (3) Improvem Awarded ent (2) (Out of 5) Executive Provides a Provides a Provides a Summary No Summary clear, clear basic is vague summary concise, summary summary and lacks provided and with with some clarity. or it fails comprehe minor omissions to outline nsive omissions. or unclear main summary points. points. of the report's main points. Introducti Provides Provides a Provides a Introducti No on an good basic on lacks introducti engaging introducti introducti engageme on introducti on with on with nt and provided on, setting clear some clear or fails to a clear context. context. context. set any context context. for the report. Process Thorough Good Adequate Poor No and Work and descriptio descriptio descriptio descriptio Unit detailed n with n but lacks n with n or Descriptio descriptio some detail. little irrelevant n n of the detail of detail. informatio process the n and work process provided. unit. and work unit. Assessme Methodolo Methodolo Methodolo Methodolo No nt gy is gy is well- gy is gy is methodol Methodolo comprehe explained explained poorly ogy gy nsive, and but lacks explained provided well- mostly some and not or is explained, appropriat appropriat clearly completel and e. eness or appropriat y appropriat clarity. e. inappropr e for the iate. assessmen t. Assessme Findings Findings Findings Findings No nt are are clear are are vague findings Findings detailed, and present or poorly presented insightful, support but lack detailed. or they and the some are effectively objectives clarity or irrelevant support of the detail. to the the assessmen assessmen objectives t. t. of the assessmen t. Discussion Discussion Discussion Discussion Discussion No is integrates makes is discussion insightful, findings some superficial or fails to integrates with attempt to and lacks relate to findings literature integrate integratio the with and findings n of findings. literature, demonstr but lacks findings. and ates depth. demonstr understan ates deep ding. understan ding. Recomme Recomme Recomme Recomme Recomme No ndations ndations ndations ndations ndations recommen on Action are clear, are are are vague dations to Be directly sensible provided or not provided Taken derived and but not actionable or they from derived fully . are findings, from practical irrelevant. and findings. or derived thoroughl from y findings. practical. Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference No s s are s are s are s are references comprehe mostly present limited, provided nsive, comprehe but may poorly or they correctly nsive and have formatted, are formatted, correctly formatting or largely completel and formatted. errors or irrelevant. y relevant. some irrelevant. irrelevanc e. Appendice Appendice Appendice Appendice Appendice No s s are well- s are s are s are appendice organized, organized somewhat disorganiz s provided relevant, and organized ed or or they and relevant. but may somewhat are enhance lack full irrelevant. completel the relevance. y content of irrelevant. the report. Total Marks: 25% of the total assessment (100%)
Action Research by Ben B.K. Ayawli (2008) - Improving The Performance of HND SMS 2 Students of Sunyani Polytechnic in Database Application Programs (MS Access)