0% found this document useful (0 votes)
29 views91 pages

Lashing Forces - 2

The document discusses theories of ship motion and lashing forces, including a review of rules from BV for calculating forces from ship movement, wind, and container specifications. It also presents the Easecon lashing module software for optimizing container bay plans and displays calculations of lashing forces. Examples are provided of determining lashing forces based on ship parameters like length, speed, and acceleration.

Uploaded by

Danylo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
29 views91 pages

Lashing Forces - 2

The document discusses theories of ship motion and lashing forces, including a review of rules from BV for calculating forces from ship movement, wind, and container specifications. It also presents the Easecon lashing module software for optimizing container bay plans and displays calculations of lashing forces. Examples are provided of determining lashing forces based on ship parameters like length, speed, and acceleration.

Uploaded by

Danylo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 91

LASHING FORCES - EASEACON LASHING MODULE

Faculty of Maritime Studies - SPLIT

Prepared by : Capt.Goran
Capt Goran Belamaric,
Belamaric Mag.
Mag Eng.
Eng
Master Mariner

Split, listopad.2011.
SUMMARY

> 1. Theoritic Approach of ship’s motion and lashing forces.


> a. Review of the basic parameter & forces based on BV rules
> b. Deck securing
> c. Cargo Holds Stowage
> 2. Lashing module on Easecon
> a. Presentation of calculation display
> b. Example of optimisation of bay plan

.
Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng
> 1. Theoritic Approach of ship’s motion and lashing forces.
> a. Review of the basic parameter & forces based on BV rules
> Rules
> Forces calculation
> Container damages

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


ISO Standards & BV Rules

Securing of containers on board ships – NI 186 – June 1984


Rules for the classification of steel ships – December 2003
Part B : Hull and Stability
Chapter 5 : Design Loads
Part E : Additional Class Notations
Chapter 10 – Section 5 : Container Lashing
Equipment

ISO 1496 – Series 1 freight container – Specification and testing

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Additional class notation LASHING

Assigned to mobile lashing equipment following :


>The approval of the lashing plans and mobile lashing equipment
>Type tests of the mobile lashing equipment and the issuance of
Type Approval Certificates for the equipment concerned
>Inspection at the works during manufacture of the mobile lashing
equipment and the issuance of Inspection Certificates for the
equipment concerned
>General survey on board of mobile lashing equipment and sample
test of mounting of equipment
Pt F, Ch 9, Sec 5, [1]

Reception on board of the mobile lashing equipment :


The mobile lashing equipment is to have an Inspection Certificate
>The
>The equipment, however, will not be verified any longer at the
periodical class surveys to which the ship is submitted
Pt F,
F Ch 9,
9 Sec 5,
5 [1]
Pt F, Ch 9, Sec 5, [3.4]

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


> 1. Theoritic Approach of ship’s motion and lashing forces.
> a. Review of the basic parameter & forces based on BV rules
> Rules
> Forces calculation
> Ship’s motion
> Wind

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Forces applied to containers

L d to
Loads t be
b considered
id d in
i lashing
l hi system
t calculation
l l ti :

>wind loads
>forces imposed by lashing and securing arrangements
>buoyancy force for fore part of the ship
>still water and inertial forces
– ship absolute motions and accelerations
– stowage onboard : relative motions and accelerations

Absolute accelerations are given with a level of probability of 10-5


R l i accelerations
Relative l i are a calculated
l l d combination
bi i off absolute
b l accelerations
l i
Relative loads : – relative acceleration applied to a ponderous point
– overestimated to a level of p
probability
y of 10-8

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


METHOD TO CALCULATE FORCES

U i ht condition
Upright diti FX = 1.4
1 4 β M aX1 β = 11.22 if x > 0.75
0 75 L
β = 1 in other cases
FZ = 1.4 M aZ1

Inclined condition FY = 1.4 M aX2


FZ = 1.4 M aZ2

coefficient 1.4
14 Level of probability upgraded to 10-88
Simulation of roll amplitude increased to # 30°
Li it off th
Limit the model
d l:
Roll amplitude shall remain below 30° to keep the model certain

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Ship absolute motions

Absolute motions applied to the ship :

aSU : Surge (Cavalement) in m/s²


aSW : Sway (depl. Latéral) in m/s²
aH : Heave (pilonnement) in m/s²
αR : Roll (roulis) in rad/s²
rad/s
αP : Pitch (tangage) in rad/s²
αY : Yaw (embardée) in rad/s²
p
These values depend on Acceleration p
parameter ab

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Symbols and units

Designation Usual symbol Units

Rule length L m

Moulded breadth B m

Acceleration due to gravity g m/s²

Roll radius of giration δ m

Initial metacentric height GM m

Block coefficient CB -

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Acceleration parameter aB

Acceleration parameter

Froude's number F  0.514 V


gL

Wave parameter

Navigation coeff. n = 1 (unrestricted navigation)

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Acceleration parameter aB

1.20

1.00

0.80

0.60

0 40
0.40

0.20 30 kt
24 kt
18 kt
0.00 12 kt Speed
50 m
100 m 6 kt
150 m
200 m
250 m 0 kt
300 m
350 m
Length 400 m

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Surge

Acceleration aSU = 0.5 m/s²

.
Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng
Sway

Acceleration (m/s²) aSW = 0.775 aB g

Period ((s)) TSW =

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Length & Speed – Sway

14.0 s 7.0 m/s²

12.0 s 6.0 m/s²

10.0 s 5.0 m/s²

8.0 s 4.0 m/s²

6.0 s 3.0 m/s²

4.0 s 2.0 m/s²


Period TSW
2.0 s 1.0 m/s²
Acceleration aSW
0.0 s 0.0 m/s²
60 m 100 m 140 m 180 m 220 m 260 m 300 m 340 m 380 m

Length

12 0 s
12.0 3 5 m/s²
3.5 / ²

10.0 s 3.0 m/s²

2.5 m/s²
8.0 s
2.0 m/s²
60s
6.0
1.5 m/s²
4.0 s
1.0 m/s²
2.0 s Period TSW
0.5 m/s²
Acceleration aSW
00s
0.0 0 0 m/s²
0.0 / ²
0 kt 5 kt 10 kt 15 kt 20 kt 25 kt 30 kt

Speed

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Heave

Acceleration (m/s²) aH = aB g

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Roll

fR  1
TR

Acceleration (rad/s²) αR =

Period (s) TR =

Amplitude (rad) AR = with AR < 0.35

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


GM & breadth influence – Roll

0.10 rad/s² 45 s
0.09 rad/s² Acceleration αR 40 s
0.08 rad/s² Period TR 35 s
0.07 rad/s²
30 s
0.06 rad/s²
25 s
0.05 rad/s²
20 s
0.04 rad/s²
15 s
0.03 rad/s²
0.02 rad/s² 10 s
0.01 rad/s² 5s
0.00 rad/s² 0s
0.6 m 1.4 m 2.2 m 3.0 m 3.8 m 4.6 m 5.4 m

GM

0 14 rad/s²
0.14 25 0 s
25.0

0.12 rad/s² Acceleration αR


Period TR 20.0 s
0.10 rad/s²

0.08 rad/s² 15.0 s

0.06 rad/s² 10.0 s


0.04 rad/s²
5.0 s
0.02 rad/s²

0 00 rad/s²
0.00 00s
0.0
10 m 18 m 26 m 34 m 42 m 50 m 58 m

Breadth

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Pitch

Acceleration (rad/s²) αP =

Period (s) TP =

Amplitude (rad) AP =

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Yaw

Acceleration (rad/s²) αP =

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Length & Speed – Yaw

0 25 rad/s
0.25 rad/s²

Acceleration αY
0.20 rad/s²

0.15 rad/s²

0.10 rad/s²

0.05 rad/s²

0.00 rad/s
rad/s²
60 m 100 m 140 m 180 m 220 m 260 m 300 m 340 m 380 m

Length

0 04 rad/s
0.04 rad/s²

0.03 rad/s²

0.03 rad/s²

0.02 rad/s²

0.02 rad/s²

0.01 rad/s²
Acceleration αY
0.01 rad/s²

0 00 rad/s
0.00 rad/s²
0 kt 5 kt 10 kt 15 kt 20 kt 25 kt 30 kt

Speed

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Length & Speed – Pitch


8 0.25 rad/s
rad/s² 14.0 s
Amplitude AP Period TP
7° 12.0 s
Acceleration αP 0.20 rad/s²
6° 10.0 s
5° 0.15 rad/s² 8.0 s

6.0 s
3° 0.10 rad/s²
4.0 s

0.05 rad/s² 2.0 s

0.0 s
0° 0.00 rad/s² 60 m 100 m 140 m 180 m 220 m 260 m 300 m 340 m 380 m
60 m 100 m 140 m 180 m 220 m 260 m 300 m 340 m 380 m
Length
Length


9 0 12 rad/s
0.12 rad/s²
8° Amplitude AP
0.10 rad/s²
7° Acceleration αP
6° 0.08 rad/s²

0 06 rad/s²
0.06 d/ ²

3° 0.04 rad/s²

0.02 rad/s²

0° 0.00 rad/s²
0 kt 5 kt 10 kt 15 kt 20 kt 25 kt 30 kt

Speed

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


FORMULAS

Motion Acceleration Period Amplitude


SURGE aSU = 0.5
0 5 m/s²
SWAY aSW = 0.775 aB g
HEAVE aH = aB g
ROLL aR=
R AAr (2*Pi/T)²
PITCH aP= App (2*Pi/T)²
( )
YAW aY= 1.581 aB g / L

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Acceleration summary

V
L
V
L

constant
V
GM
L
B
V V
L L

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Relative motions

Relations between stow location


and accelerations
Reference co-ordinate system {X,Y,Z}
aX longitudinal acceleration
aY transverse acceleration
aZ vertical acceleration

Upright
g ship condition Inclined ship condition
X-Z plane Y-Z plane
Vertical acceleration survey Transverse acceleration survey

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Upright ship condition

f ll pitch
full it h andd hheave amplitude
lit d
no roll

• longitudinal acceleration

• transverse acceleration aY1 = 0

• vertical acceleration

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Inclined ship condition

no pitch
50% of heave amplitude
full roll amplitude

• longitudinal
g acceleration aX2 = 0

• transverse acceleration

• vertical acceleration

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Length & Speed - relative motions

10 m/s²

aX1
8 m/s² aZ1
aY2
6 m/s² aZ2

4 m/s²

2 m/s²

0 m/s
m/s²
60 m 100 m 140 m 180 m 220 m 260 m 300 m 340 m 380 m

Length

6 m/s²
aX1
aZ1

4 m/s² aY2
aZ2

2 m/s²

0 m/s²
0 kt 5 kt 10 kt 15 kt 20 kt 25 kt 30 kt

Speed

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Stowage - relative motions

9 m/s² 1 5500 m/s²


1.5500
8 m/s²
1.5000 m/s²
7 m/s²
6 m/s² 1.4500 m/s²
5 m/s²
1 4000 m/s²
1.4000
4 m/s²
3 m/s² 1.3500 m/s²
2 m/s² aZ1
1.3000 m/s² aZ2
1 m/s² aY2
0 m/s² 1 2500 m/s²
1.2500
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 0m 2m 4m 6m 8m 10 m 12 m 14 m 16 m 18 m 20 m

X/L relative stowage Transverse distance / CL

5.0 m/s²
4.5 m/s²
4.0 m/s²
3.5 m/s²
3.0 m/s²
2 5 m/s²
2.5 / ²
2.0 m/s²
1.5 m/s²
aX1
1.0 m/s²
aY2
0.5 m/s²
0 0 m/s²
0.0 / ²
0m 5 m 10 m 15 m 20 m 25 m 30 m 35 m 40 m 45 m 50 m 55 m 60 m

Vertical stowage

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Relative acceleration aY2 (transverse accelaration)

4.6 m/s²

4.4 m/s²

4.2 m/s²

4.0 m/s²

3.8 m/s²

3.6 m/s²

3.4 m/s
m/s²

3.2 m/s²
60 m
50 m
3.0 m/s² 40 m
30 m
0% 10%
%
20% 20 m V i l stowage
Vertical
30%
40% 10 m
50%
60%
70% 0m
80%
X/L relative stowage 90%
100%

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


> 1. Theoritic Approach of ship’s motion and lashing forces.
> a. Review of the basic parameter & forces based on BV rules
> Rules
> Forces calculation
> Ship’s motion
> Wind

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Wind force

Wind force applied to a


plane surface
F = 0.5 ρ Cx V² S

Standard Force
FY = 1.2 S (kN)
Equivalent
q Wind Force :
64 knots Beaufort 12 + 37 %

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Wind force applied
pp to containers

FY = 11.22 S (kN)
( )

P = 120 kg/m²

ISO Containers
20' 16 m² 1.9 t
40' 32 m² 3.8 t
HC +12%
45' +26%

Wind forces are not symmetrical for an individual stack


Calculations are processed within 2 cases : port load and stbd load

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


> 1. Theoritic Approach of ship’s motion and lashing forces.
> a. Review of the basic parameter & forces based on BV rules
> Rules
> Forces calculation
> Container damages

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Typical damages

Toppling Racking Container collapse Structural failure

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Standard container description

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Container admissible load

Twistlocks Tension SWL (0.5 MBL)

German Lashing 250 kN

MacGregor 250 kN

Peck & Hale 25 MT

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Maximum racking
g load

Twistlocks Shear SWL (0.5 MBL)

G
German Lashing 210 kN

MacGregor 210 kN

Peck & Hale 25 MT

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


> 1. Theoritic Approach of ship’s motion and lashing forces.
> a. Review of the basic parameter & forces based on BV rules
> b. Deck securing
> c. Cargo Holds Stowage
> 2. Lashing module on Easecon
> a. Presentation of calculation display
> b. Example of optimisation of bay plan

.
Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng
> 1. Theoritic Approach of ship’s motion and lashing forces.
> a. Review of the basic parameter & forces based on BV rules
> b. Deck securing
> Material
> Container lashing
> Lashing bridge
> Lashing bars stress

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .
Loading:
> Independant Hatch covers
> Container stool

Container stool on
Deck

.
Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng
Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .
Le règlement OSHA
depuis été 1999
> semi
automatiques
(SAT) ou
complètement
automatiques au
chargement
(Midl k)
(Midlock).
> Le futur ?

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Le Futur : « magic lock »

Exemple : le T-4 de German Lashing

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


FIXED FITTING ARRANGEMENT ON HATCH
COVER

40’ socket 40’ socket

20’ 20’
socket 20’ socket socket

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


> 1. Theoritic Approach of ship’s motion and lashing forces.
> a. Review of the basic parameter & forces based on BV rules
> b. Deck securing
> Material
> Container lashing
> Lashing bridge
> Lashing bars stress

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


LOOSE FITTING ARRANGEMENT -
TWISTLOCK

Twistlock
CMU : 25 t

Bottom Twistlock
CMU : 25 t

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


LOOSE FITTING ARRANGEMENT – LASHING
RODS

Long rod
Short rod CMU: 18 t ou 25 t
Allowable range (Turnbuckle
+ knots on rod) = abt 850 mm

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


RUSSIAN STOWAGE or MIXED STOWAGE 20’ /
40’

As per cargo hold


arrangement, mixed
stowage will give higher
dynamic loads and result
is a lower weight
distribution
Automatic fixed cone

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


> 1. Theoritic Approach of ship’s motion and lashing forces.
> a. Review of the basic parameter & forces based on BV rules
> b. Deck securing
> Material
> Container lashing
> Lashing bridge
> Lashing bars stress

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


LASHING ON LASHING BRIDGE

Long rod
Short rod

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


CMA CGM BERLIOZ CMA CGM BALZAC
(CMA CGM) ( NSB )

Lashing bridge Strengthened Standard

Lashing system

short + long rods Short rods

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


CMA CGM BERLIOZ CMA CGM BALZAC
(CMA CGM) ( NSB )

Weight distribution 3.5


60
6.0
On 40’ typical 14.0
12.0

7 tiers bay 14.0


14.0
14 5
14.5
( SW : 105 t ) 14.0
14.5
14.0
21.0
21.0
25 5
25.5
22.0

Weight distribution
15.0 10.0
On 40’ typical
15.0 12.0
6 tiers bay
15.0 14.0
( SW: 105t )
15.0 20.0

22.0 24.0

23.0 25.0

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


CMA CGM BERLIOZ CMA CGM BALZAC
(CMA CGM) ( NSB )

3.5 2.5

7.0 5.5
Weight
g distribution
7.5 80
8.0
On 20’ typical 10.0 8.5
7 tiers bay 13.5 11.5
( SW : 80 t ) 16.0 20.0

22.5 24.0

Weight distribution
6.5 7.0
On 20’ typical
11.0 8.0
6 tiers bay
13.5 9.0
( SW: 80 t )
13.5 10.0

14.0 23.0

21.5 23.0

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Racking incidence on lashing

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Balance of forces

Ri = di Ki
Ti+1 = Ti + Ri – Fi
Ti = (di – di-1) K0

F Transverse force applied to the stack


R Horizontal lashing reaction
T Racking reaction of the frame
d Frame transverse buckling
K0 Racking stiffness of the container
Ki Horizontal stiffness of the lashing

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Balance of moments

Mi = a.(R-R')i = a.(R-R')i+1 + b.Ri + a.ti.Si + a.Zi – b.Fi – b.Ti+1

Tipping moment in O

(R R'))i+1
(R-R Upper container vertical reaction
(R+R')i+1
Ti Racking reaction of the frame
Zi Weight of the container
R Horizontal lashing reaction
S Vertical lashing reaction
ti Tilt code {0;1}
F Transverse force applied to the stack

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


> 1. Theoritic Approach of ship’s motion and lashing forces.
> a. Review of the basic parameter & forces based on BV rules
> b. Deck securing
> Material
> Container lashing
> Lashing bridge
> Lashing bars stress

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Lashing bar stresses

Tension stress in the lashing bar Q  R l


y
R  dK
l  x2  y 2  z2
y2
K  0 .1 E aAl 3
l

R Horizontal lashing reaction


l Length of the bar
d Frame transverse buckling
E0 Modulus of elasticity of the bar
Al Section
Sect o of
o the
t e bar
ba (cm²)
(c )

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


> 1. Theoritic Approach of ship’s motion and lashing forces.
> a. Review of the basic parameter & forces based on BV rules
> b. Deck securing
> c. Cargo Holds Stowage
> 2. Lashing module on Easecon
> a. Presentation of calculation display
> b. Example of optimisation of bay plan

.
Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng
> 1. Theoritic Approach of ship’s motion and lashing forces.
> a. Review of the basic parameter & forces based on BV rules
> b. Deck securing
> c. Cargo Holds Stowage
> Material
> Securing in Cargo Holds
> Problems in Cargo Holds
> How to avoid problems

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


LOADING OF CONTAINER IN HOLD

CELL GUIDES

STACKING CONES

WELDED CONES

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Stacking cone

Max Shear : 42 t

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


WELDED CONE

M Sh
Max Shear : 42 t

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


> 1. Theoritic Approach of ship’s motion and lashing forces.
> a. Review of the basic parameter & forces based on BV rules
> b. Deck securing
> c. Cargo Holds Stowage
> Material
> Securing in Cargo Holds
> Problems in Cargo Holds
> How to avoid problems

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


CELL GUIDES

CELL GUIDES

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


ENTRY CELL GUIDE IN CORNER

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


GUIDE FITTING ON TANK TOP

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


STACKING CONES ARRANGEMENT

STACKING CONES

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .
WELDED CONE IN HOLD BOTTOM

WELDED CONES

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


WELDED CONE

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


> 1. Theoritic Approach of ship’s motion and lashing forces.
> a. Review of the basic parameter & forces based on BV rules
> b. Deck securing
> c. Cargo Holds Stowage
> Material
> Securing in Cargo Holds
> Problems in Cargo Holds
> How to avoid problems

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


LOADING PROBLEMS IN HOLD

-Twisting of 20
20’ Container in 40
40’ CELL GUIDES.
GUIDES

-Maximum
Maximum supporting weight of:

- Bottom structure

- Container itself

.
Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng
Twisting of 20’ Container in 40’ bay.

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Twisting of 20’ Container in 40’ bay.

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Twisting of 20’ Container in 40’ bay.

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Twisting of 20’ Container in 40’ bay.

Displacement

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Twisting of 20’ Container with 40’ on top

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Twisting of 20’ Container with 40’ on top

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Twisting of 20’ Container with 40’ on top

Smaller
S ll
displacement

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Stackweight limit in hold

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Max stackweight of lower container is exceeded.

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Max satckweight of bottom structure is exceeded

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


> 1. Theoritic Approach of ship’s motion and lashing forces.
> a. Review of the basic parameter & forces based on BV rules
> b. Deck securing
> c. Cargo Holds Stowage
> Material
> Securing in Cargo Holds
> Problems in Cargo Holds
> How to avoid problems

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Les limits :
Le règlement OSHA depuis été 1999
•Stackweight
Weight distribution
•Weight

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Loading 20' in cell guides

Russian stowage
Maximum average weight (t) of each 20'
20 container

Q  590
1.4 aY2 N

20' feet container stack


Maximum average weight (t) of each 20' container

Q  500
1.4 aY2 N

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


cas des piles mixtes 20'/40' 20 t

20 t

20 t 20 t

20 t 20 t

20 t 20 t

Max stack load 20


20' 64 t 64 t
Max stack load 40' 102 t
Max load pper end of container 51 t 32 t 32 t 51 t
Actual weight 20' + ½ 40' 80 t 80 t
Actual weight per end of container 50 t 30 t 30 t 50 t

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .


Répartitions de poids
> Calcul selon règlement de la Classe
> 40’ : 30.5 t / ctr
> Cas des 20’ :
> avec ou sans 40’
> 7x20' + 1 ou 2x40'.
> Octobre 2003 : Les Stés de classe
viennent d’autoriser de charger les 20’
jusqu’à 9 plans, et les poids moyens
ont été augmentés.

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng.


Example of loading limits in Cargo Holds

Capt.Goran Belamaric, Mag. Eng .

You might also like