Impacted As-Planned Analysis Topic 6

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 13

Impacted As-Planned

Analysis for Delay Evaluation


Presentation by
- Ayman Abd AL-Shafey
- Ahmed Mohamed Mahmoud Moubark
Presentation contents :

 Introduction and definition .

 Steps .

 How to Perform the Impacted As Planned Delay Analysis.

 How to Perform the Impacted As Planned Delay Analysis in Primavera P6.

 Reasons to perform this type of analysis.

 Common problems with this type of analysis.

 Strengths and weakness .


Introduction

Construction projects are frequently delayed for a variety


of reasons, which can have a significant financial impact
on the project. As a result, claims for delay may be filed.
One of the most difficult types of claims analysis is the
analysis of the delay impact, the causes, and effects of the
delaying activities. To conduct the analysis, an expert with
extensive knowledge of construction projects, means and
methods, scheduling, and the ability to develop a sound
methodology is needed.
What is the impacted As-Planned
Delay Analysis Method ?
- The impacted as-planned method of delay analysis is a
technique that predicts or predicts the delay in the
completion date of the project. This delay analysis method
involves the inclusion or addition of activities that represent
delays or changes to the baseline schedule in order to
determine the impact of these delay activities.
- The use of the method of analysis of the impacted
schedule as planned is generally limited to the
quantification of delays for contemporary time extension
requests.
Steps

▪ Step 1: establish the baseline program .

▪ Step 2: model the actual duration of the selected delay


event and impact the as-planned program .

▪ Step 3: measure the change in completion date, which


is said to be the critical delay caused by each delay
event.
How to Perform the Impacted As Planned
Delay Analysis.

1. The contractor has to establish that the baseline schedule has been
achievable. When that is not true then the calculated delay may not be
right, since some or all of the calculated delay is inevitable.
2. The contractor must ensure that the program is appropriate for dynamic
simulation. This means that it will involve the calculation of the schedule
by simulation using computers and software. If the schedule is not capable
of dynamic simulation, the contractor must make adjustments to the logic
of the schedule and, in particular, replace the constraints applied in order
for the activities to react appropriately during the analysis.
3. The contractor must determine the nature, extent, and relationship of the
delay event to be established so that it can be properly linked to the
schedule.
How to Perform the Impacted As Planned
Delay Analysis in (Primavera P6)

 Following is the As Planned Schedule (Baseline Schedule)


• We will insert the Delay event into our schedule. Enter the Original
Duration of the delay, then Assign the right successor (which activity
the delay will affect).

For example, the Original Duration of the “Design Changes” delay is


10 days. And it will affect the “Activity D”. and add a Constraint for
the event date and here the delay event date is 18 July 2020
Then, you can calculate the total Extension of Time which will be 39–
30= 9 days.

The formula used is (Original Duration of Impacted Schedule – Original


Duration of the Baseline) or (Project Finish Date of Impacted Schedule
– Project Finish Date of Baseline)
Reasons to perform this type of analysis

There is insufficient as-built progress information


in order to understand what actually happened.

The delay event is relatively straightforward and


occurs at or near the commencement of the
works (i.e., delay to site access).
Common problems with this type of analysis
 This analysis requires a reasonable and fully logic-linked baseline program
Any changes required to meet these criteria will be subjective and possibly
open to criticism.
 This analysis provides a prospective determination of the effect of the delay
event which, if performed after the actual effects become known, may be
inconsistent with what actually happened.
 The results of this analysis are typically biased towards the party whose
interest lies in maximizing the impact of the delay event, as the introduction
of any significant delay is likely to delay the completion date regardless if it
is actually critical or not.
 This analysis only considers selected delay events and may ignore other
more critical delay events. In this regard, this analysis favours the party
selecting the events to be modelled.
 This type of analysis cannot be used to determine the existence of
concurrent delays and/or their true effect on the critical path.
 In summary, this type of analysis takes no account of progress, resources,
changing logic and is unlikely to be reliable in dispute resolution.
Strengths and weakness

You might also like