Cartload of details in BRSR

- A challenge ahead for elaborate reporting

[Updated as on: 7th May, 2021]

- By CS Pammy Jaiswal and CS Megha Saraf

- [email protected]

Business Responsibility Reporting (“BRR”) is a reporting which is currently done by a certain

selected group of listed companies. The philosophy behind is to remain accountable towards
stakeholders, and also at the same time environmentally sustainable. There have been
several developments seen globally in this aspect. With a view to align the same with the
globally set principles, it was felt desired to revamp the framework of BRR under the Indian
laws. As a result, MCA issued a Report1 of the Committee on the Business Responsibility
Reporting on 11th August, 2020 where it has recommended several additions with an aim
to make BRR a “one-stop source for all non-financial disclosures”. Further, it has also
widened the scope of BRR to “Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting (“BRSR”).
Details on employee benefits, complaints on bribery, plant/office location near a protected
area, penalty or fine for violation of principles or competition laws, payment of minimum
wages, etc. are some of the few additions recommended. Further, the applicability is
proposed to be extended to all companies and even LLPs in a span of 5 years starting from
2021-2022.
Soon after this Report, SEBI had also placed its Consultation Paper2 on 18th August, 2020
open for public comments wherein it has sought inputs from public on the comprehensive
format of BRSR put forward by the Committee.
Based on the same, SEBI in its Board meeting held on 25th March, 2021, discussed on the
broad base structure of BRSR and how the same will be a leap for enhanced disclosures in
the ESG space in India. The Committee recommended that the BRSR is structured around
disclosures on the nine principles laid down by the NGRBCs. The disclosure requirement
under each of the nine principles has been divided into 2 sections: Essential (mandatory)
and Leadership (voluntary)
Subsequently, SEBI vide Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and
Disclosure Requirements) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 20213 substituted the existing
Regulation 34 which required top 1000 listed entities by market capitalization to submit a
BRR. The requirement has been discontinued from FY 2021-22 onwards.

1
http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/pdf/BRR_11082020.pdf
2
https://www.sebi.gov.in/reports-and-statistics/reports/aug-2020/consultation-paper-on-the-format-for-
business-responsibility-and-sustainability-reporting_47345.html
3
https://egazette.nic.in/WriteReadData/2021/226859.pdf
For FY 2021-22, the top 1000 listed entities may voluntarily submit BRSR and from FY 2022-
23 onwards, the same has to be submitted mandatorily.
Another interesting thing to note about the amendment is that from now onwards any
compliance that gets triggered due to meeting of the threshold based on market
capitalization (like in the case of BRR), the same will continue to apply even if the company
in question falls below the specific threshold thereafter any time in future. This would mean
once BRR becomes applicable, companies will have to comply and report on the same always
irrespective of whether the company subsequently falls below the threshold of top 1000
listed companies based on market capitalization.
The Article briefly captures the key takeaways of the Report and the questions revolving
around it. For a detailed analysis on the topic, our Article on the same can be referred here.

Necessity of BRSR
It was seen that the while the large business houses Completeness of
were complying with the extant BRR requirements, information
however, there was a lack of parity in this. A sample
study of 490 listed companies was done by the Indian Accuracy of
information
Institute of Corporate Affairs (“IICA”) for examining
the need of a comprehensive format of reporting. Clarity of
During the study, it was observed that due to an information
absence of standard guidelines, companies were
making their own set of disclosures and had multiple
interpretations on a same point. While, some of the Figure: Need for BRSR
reports contained a few quantitative data, few were
only providing qualitative data. Hence, these issues
gave rise to the need for a standardized framework
of BRSR.

Purpose behind the Report

The purpose behind the Report is mainly to provide all stakeholders with “one-stop source
on non-financial disclosure”. Not only the larger companies, BRSR shall also be required to
be done by smaller unlisted companies will be required to make such disclosure. Further,
along with this, the disclosure under BRSR shall be utilized by several credit rating agencies,
banks, financial institutions, that will use the disclosures made for data analytics and
ascertaining the credibility of the company. This information will be then used by
Government for procurement purposes and such businesses will be preferred that
demonstrate good business conduct.
 Guidance Note
on each format

Comprehensive
and Lite
Data Analytics
version of e-
formats

Standardized Applicability on
framework all companies

Figure: Key takeaways from the Report

Key Points on the BRSR Format

The format of the BRSR is substantially different from the existing BRR. It lays considerable emphasis on
quantifiable metrics, which will enable better measurement and comparability. Disclosures on climate
and social like employees, consumers and communities related issues have been enhanced and made
more granular in BRSR in comparison to the disclosure requirements under BRR.

The structure has been segregated into two indicators: Essential (“mandatory”) and Leadership
(“voluntary”).

The disclosures are set to bring in more standardization and enable companies to engage more
meaningfully with their stakeholders, by encouraging them to look beyond financials and towards social
and environmental impacts. It will allow for easy measurement and comparability across companies,
sectors and time period.

The Extra Cartload

Quantitative data

SECTION A –GENERAL DISCLOSURES

Employee/ workmen details-

Top 3 Product details-
 brand % contribution to turnover  Employees on the basis of
 export % contribution to turnover classification by gender, time-
basis, ability/ disability
Plant/ Office locations (national & international)  Workmen on the basis of gender,
• Total number skill, time involvement,
• Top 3 locations % contribution to turnover ability/disability
• Location of top 3 Markets % contribution to turnover  Female representation (incl.
differently abled) in the Board
and management
 PRINCIPLE- 2

R&D and Capex Sourcing and input material

• % sourced adhering to national and
 % of R&D and capital expenditure (capex) internal codes/certifications/
investments in specific technologies to improve the standards/etc.
environmental and social impacts of product and • % sourced adhering to internal standards
processes to total R&D and capex investments. • % sourced from MSME/small producers
• % sources from nearby districts

Use of recycled /reused inputs

 % of recycled or reused input material to total raw

material (by value) used in production.
 Quantity of collection/re-used/re-cycled/disposal of
plastic, e-waste and others

PRINCIPLE- 3 Measures for well-being of employee & workmen (all

categories)
 % covered by health and accident insurance,
maternity and paternity benefits and day care
facilities
 Number of employees and workmen covered by PF/
Gratuity/ ESI
Payment of minimum wages  Number of complaints and their status
 .
 Number and % of employees or
workmen given equal to or more
than min wages Association / Union(s)

Number of safety related incidents during  % of membership of employees or

a FY workmen with association(s)/ Union(s)

Training to employee & workmen Assessment

 Number and % covered on health  % of plants/ offices assessed for child

and safety issues labour, sexual harassment, forced labour
 Number and % covered on skill up or health and safety practices (incl. that of
gradation value chain partners)
 PRINCIPLE- 5 PRINCIPLE- 6

Training on human rights to employees Air and liquid emission details

and workmen
 Unit , permitted and actual emission level
 Number and % covered by the
same Solid waste generation and management

 Quantum generated
Details of remuneration/ salary/wages  % of the same recycled and sent to landfill
 Number of person in the Bod,  % of non-biodegradable waste to total waste
KMPs, Employees (other than  % of recyclable waste to total waste
BoD and KMPs) and workmen  % of hazardous waste to total waste
 Avg payment made gender wise

Number of human rights complaints  Carbon emission details for each major product
 % of renewable energy consumed to total energy

PRINCIPLE- 7 Energy and water consumption details

 Unit of energy and water consumed on turnover

Affiliation with chambers/ associations
 % of water consumed from recycled & harvested
 Number of such affiliations sources
 Listing top 10 associations  % of water consumed from groundwater
resources

CSR beneficiaries
PRINCIPLE- 8  % of beneficiaries from vulnerable and
marginalised groups

Informative products
PRINCIPLE- 9
 % of products and services carrying information
on environmental and social parameters, safe
and responsible usage, recycling and safe
disposal

Number of consumer complaints in respect of data

privacy, advertising, delivery of essential services, RTP or
UTP
Qualitative Data

Section A Section C
 Issues on high priority P-1
responsible business
 Details of non-disputed fines/penalties available on public
conduct
domain

P-2
Section B
 Details of actions taken to mitigate adverse environmental and
• Process of identification of
social impacts in production and disposal
stakeholder groups
P-3
• Channels used for
communication  Measures taken for safe and healthy work place
 Corrective actions taken for children/adolescents/forced or
involuntary labour
 Action taken for preventing discrimination and harassment
P-8
cases
 Mechanism for receiving P-4
and redressing
grievances of  Details of engagement with vulnerable marginalized
community and actions stakeholder groups
taken to mitigate
P-5
negative social impact
and cases of intellectual  Internal mechanism for addressing human rights
property  Scope and coverage of human rights due diligence conducted
including value chain
P-9
P-6
 Mechanisms in place to
receive and respond to  Strategies w.r.t. resource scarcity, health pandemics, natural
consumer complaints disaster
and feedback  Environmental risks identified and measures taken against it
 Channels where incl. solid waste management practices adopted, strategy for
information on products reducing usage of hazardous/ toxic chemicals
and services of the
company can be P-7
accessed  Details of adverse judicial or regulatory orders for anti-
 Steps taken to educate competitive conduct and corrective action taken against it
consumers
 Corrective actions taken
in respect of complaints
received on data
privacy, advertising etc.
Reporting Authority – SEBI or MCA?

Regulation 34(2) of the SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015 provides for BRR for top 1000 listed
entities by market capitalization. Further, the current format is also prescribed by SEBI,
however, considering the recommendations to make BRSR an electronic form on MCA21
portal, the question that arises is whether the companies shall report to both MCA and SEBI
(where the company is listed and gets covered under the threshold?
Since, the Report has been recommended by MCA, it is most likely that the form will be filed
in the MCA21 portal. Having said that, since current reporting authority, is SEBI, therefor,
certain listed companies will also parallelly report to SEBI under Regulation 34. Further,
besides section135, there is no other section under the Companies Act, which deals with
social or environmental concerns.
Accordingly, it is expected that the rules will be amended at any appropriate place under the
Act, 2013 or may be a specific provision may be added. Having said that, please note that
currently the same has not been made clear.
Further, since it will be an electronic based filing, it may no longer be a part of Annual Report
and therefore, an inspection of the e-Form will required to be done after payment of a
nominal fee with MCA.

Conclusion
While the recommendations spell out elaborate contents for companies which were already
covered, the real challenge will also be for those who are absolutely new to this reporting
requirement. The modalities of actual filling and filing of BRSR with the MCA is yet to be
addressed while SEBI has rolled out the dates. Therefore, it is very likely that MCA may also
insert the requisite amendments under the Companies Act so that other companies as
intended, are also set to start working on the same. Looking at the cartload of details, the
same surely poses a challenge for companies to quantify and qualify its data to suit the
reporting format.

Our other resources on BRR can be referred at:

1. http://vinodkothari.com/wp-
content/uploads/2020/04/note_on_annual_business_responsibility_report_will_this_m
ake_companies_responsible.pdf
2. http://vinodkothari.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/FAQs_on_BRR-1.pdf
3. http://vinodkothari.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Global_overview_of_BRR-1.pdf
4. http://vinodkothari.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Presentation_on_BRR.pdf

To view our other articles, click here

To subscribe to our YouTube channel, click here