PROJECT BITS - Proposal

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 12

PROJECT BITS (BRAINTEASERS IN TEACHING SCIENCE):

INTERVENTION TOWARDS LEARNERS'


ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT

A Research Proposal
Submitted to
DR. KATHRYN M. CARLS
Division Planning and Research Unit

MARY JANE L. DAVE


I. CONTEXT AND RATIONALE

In order to stay abreast of scientific advances, learners, particularly

grade seven pupils, must be taught fundamental, intermediate, and

advanced concepts correctly and effectively. These learners will later be

confronted with competency challenges in the higher years. Teaching

strategies that address various gaps and problems in the classroom must go

hand in hand with scientific advancement. (Ruday & Jacobson, 2021)

The motivational gap, for instance, is an illustration of this. Students,

according to the researcher, find Science a challenging subject to learn and

comprehend. Grade five pupils, according to the researcher, have a short

attention span and are unable to sit passively for an extended period of time

due to their difficulty remembering scientific concepts. As can be seen from

the assessment results in Science, this has a significant impact on students'

academic achievement. A harsh reality confronts Salitran Elementary

teachers.

If the problem is not addressed promptly, the researcher, who also

happens to be a subject-teacher, is quite concerned that the gap will place

students at a competitive disadvantage. The achievement gap, as measured

by the Mean Percentage Score (MPS), must be closed by any means

necessary in order to enhance students' academic performance. It will also

provide guidance to teachers on how to pique kids' interests and engage

them in a variety of engaging activities.

To close the gap, researchers will attempt to close it by incorporating

meaningful and productive fun-filled mind games such as brainteasers into

the lesson, which will aid in the improvement of learning while also
increasing student engagement and, ultimately, improving learners'

academic achievement.

II. RELATED LITERARTURE

In order to provide pupils with a positive learning experience, new

teaching methods and strategies are required. Teachers must find ways to

increase their students' enthusiasm for learning while also decreasing their

own boredom. (Blakemore, 2021)

Educators seek ways to meet the demands put upon the educational

system in today's world of rapid changes. Educators should adopt changes

in teaching by applying varieties of teaching methodologies and strategies

that will guide in planning a smooth operation and management of all the

elements contributory to students' learning and to improve the quality of

education (Pham, 2020)

Games and simulations have established themselves as an

established educational approach and a popular teaching tool. "Games and

simulations can be used as motivational aids to encourage students to

participate in educational courses. Simulations and games are teaching and

learning approaches in which students make decisions and then learn from

the consequences of their decisions. (Demirbilek, 2021)


When games are incorporated in a science lesson, learning becomes

more meaningful and productive while still being pleasant. It has been found

that incorporating activities that teach and increase critical thinking skills,

such as word games, puzzles, problem-solving, or even the popular

Brainteasers, into the curriculum is one of the most effective approaches to

address the issue. (Bowkett, 2014)

III. RESEARCH QUESTION

This research study aimed to determine the effectiveness of

brainteasers in the academic achievement of Grade 5 pupils ODL Pupils of

Salitran Elementary School, Cluster VI of City Schools Division of

Dasmariñas for S.Y. 2021-2022.

Specifically, this study sought answers to the following:

1. What was the Mean Percentage Score (MPS) of the participants before

the brainteasers was incorporated in their Science class?

2. What is the Mean Percentage Score (MPS) of the participants after the

brainteasers were incorporated in their Science class?

3. Is there a significant difference in the participants' MPS after the

brainteasers were incorporated in their Science class?


IV. SCOPE AND LIMITATION

This study will be limited only to the Grade 5 ODL pupils of Salitran

Elementary School belonging to Cluter VI of City Schools Division of

Dsamriñas where the researcher is teaching. The focus of this study :

PROJECT BITS (BRAINTEASERS IN TEACHING SCIENCE):

INTERVENTION TOWARDS LEARNERS' ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT .

V. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Action Research Design

A. Participants and other sources of data and information

The study participants shall be 40 non- randomly selected Grade 5

bonafide learners of Salitran Elementary School, Cluster VI, officially

enrolled in the Learner Information System for School Year (S.Y.) 2021-

2022.

The researchers anchor the study in Pre Experimental research

design, particularly the one-group pretest-posttest design. This research

design is pre-experimental, whereby a single case is observed two times

before and after. It further adds that changes in the outcome of Interest are

presumed to result from the intervention or treatment where no control or

comparison group is employed. (Administration for Children and Families

(ACF) of the United States Department of Health and Human Services

(HHS), 2021)

Pretest MPS will be used to measure the participants' mastery level in

the competencies and the post-test MPS was used to measure their mastery

level after the approach was implemented.


.

B. Sampling Design

The Grade 5 ODL enrollees for S.Y. 2021-2022 are selected because

they are the Grade level and modality that was found to have low academic

performance as evidenced by their MPS in Science, based on presumption

and observation. With these reasons aforementioned, the chosen

population is considered fit for the study.

Due to a large population, researchers opted to use the purposive

sampling method to narrow down the number of participants but still develop

the minimum sample size necessary to achieve an acceptable level of

statistical power. (AI-Therapy | Statistics for Psychologists | Sample Size

Calculator, 2021)

C. Description of Instrument, Data Gathering Focus

Researchers will use data collection instruments such as a teacher-

made Mean Percentage Score pretest and post-test, composed of 20-item

multiple-choice types of test, based on the Most Essential Competencies off

Science Grade Five, First quarter, crafted with Table of Specification( TOS)

subjects for validity, and reliability tests.

Three professionals, whose experts in Science and

Research/Educational Management shall validate the instrument mentioned

above. The instrument's reliability shall be tested using the test-retest

method to lessen errors caused by specific changes over time


D. Data Analysis Plan

The researchers will use different methods of data analysis that

include descriptive statistics and tests of significance.

VI. TIME TABLE

WORK AND FINANCIAL PLAN

The action research work plan and timelines are shown below during
this study's pre-implementation, implementation, and post-implementation
phases.

Plan of Action

Objectives Strategies/ Time Persons Resource Means of


Activities Frame Involved Requiremen Verification
ts/ Source of
funds
Pre-Implementation Phase
Secure Securing 2nd Researcher Letter of Approved
permissio permission week of permission letter of
n to to conduct ______ School permission
conduct the study 2022 Head
the study
Draft a Drafting a 2nd Researcher Research The
researcher researcher- week of instrument research
-made made ______ Panel of validation instrument
instrument instrument 2022 experts result was
to be to be validated
validated validated by and
by Master Master obtained
Teachers Teachers
Submit the Administer 3rd week Researcher Established The
instrument the of reliability research
for instrument ______ index of the instrument
reliability to a group 2022 Sample instrument obtained a
test of participants high-
participants reliability
to obtain the index
reliability of
the
instrument
Reproduc Reproducin 3rd week Researcher Reproduced Researcher
e the g the of researcher- -made
instrument researcher- ______ made instrument
made 2022 questionnair
questionnair e
e
Implementation Phase
Conduct Conducting 4th week Researcher An Pre-
pre- the pre- of accomplishe assessment
assessme assessment ______ Students d conducted
nt to to identified 2022 researcher-
identified participants made
participant instrument
s with scores
Gather, Gathering, 4th week Researcher Recorded Pretest
record, recording, of data result was
and and ______ gathered
interpret interpreting 2022 and
the data the data recorded
Orient Conducting 2nd Researcher Gathered Written
parents parents’ week of parents’ consent
and orientation ______ Parents consent from each
secure and 2022 parent was
informed securing gathered
consent informed
consent
Prepare or Preparing or 2nd Researcher Intervention Prepared
obtain obtaining week of materials intervention
interventio intervention ______ Stakeholder materials
n materials 2022 – s
the third
materials
week of
______
2022
Administer Administerin 3rd Researcher Successful The
the g the week of administratio
intervention
interventio intervention ______ Students n of the program
n program program 2022 – program was
the second
administere
week of d
______ successfully
2022 .
Conduct Conducting 3rd week Researcher Accomplishe Post-
post- post- of d post- assessment
assessme assessment ______ Students assessment was
nt 2022 conducted
Collect Collecting 3rd week Researcher Recorded Post-
and record and of data assessment
results of recording ______ results were
the post- results of 2022 gathered
assessme the post- and
nt assessment recorded
Analyze Analysis 3rd week Researcher Analyzed Results
and and of and were
interpret interpretatio ______ interpreted analyzed
the data n of data 2022 data and
interpreted

Post-Implementation Phase
Finalize Finalization 4th week Researcher Final paper Bounded
the paper of the paper of ready for action
for binding for binding ______ binding paper
2022
Dissemina Disseminati 4th week Researcher Disseminate Results
te results ng the of Teacher d research were
results ______ School results disseminate
2022 Head d

VII. COST ESTIMATE


To sustain the research expenditure the researchers estimated to

allot 5,000 pesos for this research.

VIII. PLANS FOR DISSEMINATION AND ADVOCACY

The researcher be certain of that this research work will raise the

intellectual achievement of pupils. Results and recommendations of this will

proposed innovation, intervention, and approach, particularly during the New

Normal set-up. It will also encourage teachers to create engaging and game-

based activities that will improve student’s critical thinking skills and shall

elicit attention at the beginning and middle of the class. If printed modular

approach, the motivation brainteasers must be imprinted before the activity


and discussion and within the discussion to follow the principle of Project

BITS.

IX. REFERENCES

Administration for Children and Families (ACF) of the United States

Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). (2021). Pre-

Experimental Designs. Researchconnections.Org. Retrieved October

20, 2021, from

https://www.researchconnections.org/research-tools/study-design-

and-analysis/pre-experimental-designs

AI-Therapy | Statistics for Psychologists | Sample size calculator. (2021). Ai-

Theraphy.Com. Retrieved October 21, 2021, from https://www.ai-

therapy.com/psychology-statistics/sample-size-calculator

Blakemore, S. (2021). When the pandemic ends we will need to find ways to

improve staff morale. Nursing Management, 28(3), 5.

https://doi.org/10.7748/nm.28.3.5.s1

Bowkett, S. (2014). Jumpstart thinking and problem solving in science (1st

edition). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315768731-9

Demirbilek, M. (2021). The Use of Electronic Games in Distance Learning as

a Tool for Teaching and Learning. IGI Global.

https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-195-9.ch421
Gressick, J., & Langston, J. (2019). CARD GAME TO IMPROVE CRITICAL

THINKING. Journal of Global Engagement and Transformation, 3(1).

https://doi.org/10.52553/30001b

Pham, T. N. (2020). Change the Teaching Methodologies to Improve E-

Learning Quality. MDPI AG.

https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202008.0380.v1

Ruday, S., & Jacobson, T. (2021). Remote Teaching and Learning in the

Elementary ELA Classroom (1st edition, Vol. 1). Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/97810031563

You might also like