Document A

Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 1
‘Gulumer Suapert fG0p/ D°M Jobson lepary Engr Fning/ 4627085703 IN THE DISCIPLINARY ENQUIRY BETWEEN - KHULUMANI SUPPORT GROUP Employer And DR MARJORIE JOBSON Employee DISCIPLINARY ENQUIRY FINDING 1 Adisciplinary enquiry was convened on 28 May 2019. 2 Both parties were legally represented. ‘The employee was represented by Fluxmans Attorneys and the employer was represented by Cheadle Thompson & Hayson Inc. Preliminary Matter 3 Before the disciplinary enquiry began, the employee's legal representatives, Fluxmans, raised a preliminary point in relation to the permissibility of convening the enquiry against the employee, in circumstances where, it was alleged that a new board of directors of the employer had been elected and had exonerated the employee of all allegations of misconduct and had uplifted her suspension, The employer opposes the preliminary point, alleging that there had been no new election of board members and that the enquiry had been properly convened, 4 It was common cause that T did not have the authority to determine the legitimacy of the constitution of either board. In these circumstances, and given that I have been appointed to chair the disciplinary enguiry by the employer of the employee, I found that the disciplinary enquiry was to proceed, subject to a court order directing otherwise (“preliminary point finding").

You might also like