Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology - September 1954 - Ekeblad - Non Aqueous Acid Base Titrations in Pharmaceutical
Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology - September 1954 - Ekeblad - Non Aqueous Acid Base Titrations in Pharmaceutical
Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology - September 1954 - Ekeblad - Non Aqueous Acid Base Titrations in Pharmaceutical
REAGENTS
0.1 M Sodium methoxide
Dissolve 3 g. of freshly cut sodium metal in 50 ml. of dry methanol
protecting the vessel from carbon dioxide, add 100 ml. of methanol and
then 750 ml. of benzene. The solution is stored in alkali resistant glass
and is protected from carbon dioxide.
Thymol blue
0.3 per cent. solution in methanol.
Procedure
To 10 to 20 ml. of a suitable solvent add 2 drops of thymol blue and
bubble nitrogen gas through for 10 minutes. Then titrate to a blue colour
with the methoxide. Add the sample corresponding to about 1 m-equiv.
and titrate to the same colour change. During the titration nitrogen gas
is led into the solution whereby the latter is both stirred and protected
from carbon dioxide and moisture. The titrant is standardised in the
same manner against benzoic acid. The titre is rather sensitive to temper-
ature on account of the high thermal expansion of benzene-methanol and,
therefore, frequent restandardisation is advisable.
With this technique it is possible to determine a great many substances
of importance in pharmacy. Carboxylic acids and other moderately
acidic compounds may be titrated in neutral or basic solvents but the
sharpest end-points are obtained in mixed solvents such as benzene-
methanol. Thymol blue is a good indicator31.
. In “sulpha” drugs the amide hydrogen is sufficiently acidic to permit of
ready titration in dimethylformamide with thymol blue as the indica-
tor34136. The same technique applies to the barbiturate^^^ but butylamine
and ~ y r i d i n eare
~ ~also good solvents.
The acidic moiety of ammonium salts and salts of aliphatic amines is
amenable to titration in dimethylformamide or ethylenediamine (thymol
blue or azo violet)33. Likewise negatively substituted phenols possess
sufficient acidic character to be titrated in dimethylformamide, azo violet
being a suitable indicator. Phenol and alkyl phenols are weaker acids and
require a more basic solvent such as ethylenediamine ( o - n i t r ~ a n i l i n e ) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .
Numerous other compounds of very slight acidity such as enols,
mercaptans and imides may be titratcd in bulylarniiie or eth~lenediamine~~.
In all these cases the water content of the system should be kept at a
minimum because of the acidic properties of water. Besides, as the
solvents often contain acidic contaminants, it is a good rule always to
neutralise the solvent prior to the titration of the sample.
Our thanks are due to Dr. T. Canback, head of this Laboratory, for
valuable discussions during the preparation of this review.
438
20427158, 1954, 1, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2042-7158.1954.tb10969.x, Wiley Online Library on [31/01/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
NON-AQUEOUS ACID-BASE TITRATIONS
REFERENCES
1. Riddick, Analyt. Chem., 1952, 24, 41.
2. Riddick, ibid, 1954, 26, 77.
3. Hall and Conant, J. Amer. chem. SOC.,1927, 49, 3047.
4. Conant and Hall, ibid., 1927, 49, 3062.
5. Hall and Werner, ibid., 1928, 50, 2367.
6. Conant and Werner, ibid., 1930, 52, 4436.
7. Hall, ibid., 1930, 52, 5115.
8. Kolthoff and Willman, ibid., 1934, 56, 1007.
9. Kolthoff and Willman, ibid., 1934, 56, 1014.
10. Fritz, Analyt. Chem., 1950, 22, 1028.
11. Pifer and Wollish, J. Amer. pharm. Ass., Sci. Ed., 1951, 40, 609.
12. Pifer and Wollish, Analyt. Chem., 1952, 24, 300.
13. Pifer and Wollish, ibid., 1952, 24, 519.
14. Fritz, ibid., 1953, 25, 407.
15. Spengler and Kaelin, Pharm. Acta Helvet., 1943, 18, 542.
16. Auerbach, Drug Standards, 1951, 19, 127.
17. Beckett, Camp and Martin, J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 1952, 4, 399.
18. Apotekens Kontrollaboratoriums Monografsamling, 1953.
19. Ekeblad, Svensk. Farm. Tidskr., 1952, 56, 191.
20. Ekeblad, ibid., 1953, 57, 185.
21. Ekeblad, J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 1952, 4, 636.
22. Nadeau and Branchen, J. Amer. chem. SOC.,1935, 57, 1363.
23. Seaman and Allen, Analyt. Chem., 1951, 23, 592.
24. Tomicek, Coll. Czech. Chem. Comm., 1948, 13, 116.
25. Blumrich and Bandel, Angew. Chem., 1941, 54, 374.
26. Toennis and Callan, J . biol. Chem., 1935, 125, 259.
27. Higuchi and Concha, J. Amer. pharm. Ass., Sci. Ed., 1951, 40, 173.
28. Pifer, Wollish and Schmall, ibid., 1953, 42, 509.
29. Folin and Wentworth, J. biol. Chem., 1909-10, 7, 421.
30. La Mer and Downs, J. Amer. chem. SOC.,1931, 53, 888.
31. Moss, Elliot and Hall, Analyt. Chem., 1948, 20, 784.
32. Fritz and Lisicki, ibid., 1951, 23, 589.
33. Fritz, ibid., 1952, 24, 306.
34. Fritz and Keen, ibid., 1952, 24, 308.
35. Fritz and Keen, ibid., 1953, 25, 179.
36. Vespe and Fritz, J . Amer. pharm. Ass., Sci. Ed., 1952, 41, 197.
37. Hammett, J. Amer. chem. SOC.,1928, 50, 2666.
38. Higuchi, Concha and Kuramoto, Analyt. Chem., 1952, 24, 685.
39. Corwin and Ellingson, J. Amer. chem. SOC.,1942, 64, 2098.
40. Wooten and Ruehle, Zndustr. Engng Chem. (Anal.), 1934, 6, 449.
41. Davis and Hetzer, J . Research Nut. Bur. Stand., 1952, 48, 381.
42. Davis and McDonald, ibid., 1949, 42, 595.
43. Davis and Schumann, ibid., 1947, 39, 221.
44. Heiz, Dansk Tidsskr. Farm., 1952, 26, 69.
439