Color Version Lecture 01 - Introduction 3
Color Version Lecture 01 - Introduction 3
CE 416
Reinforced Concrete Design – II
By:
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali
Civil Engineering Department
UET Peshawar
[email protected]
www.drqaisarali.com
Course Contents
Grading Policy
Breakdown of Grading
Weightage
Mid Term Final Term Assignments (3) Quizzes (3) CEP (1)
25% 50% 08% 10% 07%
Teaching Plan
Teaching Plan
Lecture Availability
https://drqaisarali.com/lectures/.
Lecture 01
Introduction
By:
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali
Civil Engineering Department
UET Peshawar
[email protected]
www.drqaisarali.com
Learning Outcomes
Analyze and Design Beams for flexure and shear using ACI
Recommendations
Lecture Contents
A Glimpse of RCD – I
Load Combinations and Strength Reduction Factors
References
Appendix
Demand
Demand on a structure refers to all external actions.
Capacity
Capacity refers to the overall ability of a structure to carry an imposed
demand.
Failure
Failure occurs when Capacity is less than Demand.
Failure
An Experimental Test on Beam’s Capacity under Point load
Failure
About Ton
Ton is the name which basically describes the unit of weight.
Different types of Ton are tabulated below.
Example 1.1
Calculate demand in the form of stresses or load effects on the given
concrete pad of size 12″ × 12″.
50 Tons
Concrete pad
12″
12″
Solution
Given Data
Required Data
Solution
Based on convenience either the loads or the load effects as demand
are compared to the load carrying capacity of the structure in the
relevant units.
As we know that
Solution
For safety, Capacity should be equal to or greater than demand.
For ;
Example 1.2
Determine capacity to demand ratio for the pad of example 1.1 for the
following capacities given in the form of compressive strength of
concrete. Comment on the results
50 Tons
i. 500 psi
12″
Solution
In (iii) and (iv), there is some margin of safety normally called as factor of
safety.
Factor of Safety
The factor by which the capacity exceeds the demand is known as
Factor of Safety.
Factor of Safety
For certain reasons, however, let say we insist on a factor of safety
such that capacity to demand ratio remains 1.0. Then there are three
ways of doing this:
1. Take an increased demand instead of actual demand (load), e.g., 70 ton
instead of 50 ton in the previous example,
2. Take a reduced capacity instead of actual capacity such as 1500 psi for
concrete whose actual strength is 3000 psi
3. Doing both.
Factor of Safety
Following are the two methods of achieving appropriates factor of
safety in Design.
Example 1.3
Design the 12″ × 12″ pad to carry a load of 200 tons. The area of the
pad cannot be increased for some reasons. Take Concrete
compressive strength, fc′ = 3 ksi.
200 Tons
Concrete pad
12″
12″
Solution
Given Data
Concrete Strength,
Required Data
Solution
First calculate Demand in the form of load effect
Solution
There are three possible options to resolve this problem:
The first option is not possible as the size of pad is restricted in the
given example.
Solution
For Demand = Capacity; and using Working Stress Method
Example 1.4
Check the capacity of the plain concrete beam given in figure below
against flexural stresses within the linear elastic range. Concrete
compressive strength (fc′) = 3 ksi. Consider Self weight of the beam.
𝑤 = 2𝑘/𝑓𝑡
Solution
Given Data
Width, b = 12″
Depth, h = 20″
Concrete Strength,
Required Data
Solution
Step 1: Calculate Demand Moment on Beam
Solution
Step 2: Calculate Flexural Capacity of beam
Where;
and
Solution
Step 2: Calculate Flexural Capacity of beam
Now,
A Glimpse of RCD – I
A Glimpse of RCD – I
Load Combinations
U = 1.4D
U = 0.9D + 1.0E
A Glimpse of RCD – I
3 Shear 0.75
4 Torsion 0.75
A Glimpse of RCD – I
, ,
A Glimpse of RCD – I
, ,
A Glimpse of RCD – I
and
a a
A Glimpse of RCD – I
A Glimpse of RCD – I
A Glimpse of RCD – I
A Glimpse of RCD – I
∅𝑉
∅𝑉 /2
For use
For , use
Example 1.5
A simply supported beam with given cross sectional dimensions is
subjected to a uniformly distributed factored load of 2.37 kip/ft as
shown in the figure below.
Analyze and Design the beam for flexure and shear in accordance
with ACI 318-19. Take and
18"
20'
12"
9ʺ thick masonry wall
45
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II
Updated: Sept 28, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan
Solution
Step 1: Selection of sizes
Assuming
46
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II
Updated: Sept 28, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan
Solution
Step 3: Analysis
47
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II
Updated: Sept 28, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan
Solution
Step 4: Determination of flexural steel area
48
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II
Updated: Sept 28, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan
Solution
Step 5: Check for flexural steel area
, ,
49
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II
Updated: Sept 28, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan
Solution
Step 6: Detailing of flexural reinforcement
(3+2),#8 bars
12″
50
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II
Updated: Sept 28, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan
Solution
Step 7: Check for requirement of Shear reinforcement
51
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II
Updated: Sept 28, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan
Solution
Step 8: Determination of stirrup spacing
52
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II
Updated: Sept 28, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan
Solution
Step 8: Determination of stirrup spacing
53
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II
Updated: Sept 28, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan
Solution
Step 9: Apply necessary checks
Solution
Step 10: Detailing of shear reinforcement
20.64𝑘𝑖𝑝
15.28𝑘𝑖𝑝
𝑆 7.64𝑘𝑖𝑝
= 3.8"
Provide first stirrup at 2
from the face of support 𝑠 region 𝑠 region No stirrups region
𝑑 𝑙
− 𝑑 = 8.71′
1.29′ 2
∅𝑉 𝑙 𝑙
𝑙 = −𝑑 , 𝑙 =𝑙 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑙 = − 𝑑 − 2𝑙
2𝑉 , 2 2
Solution
Step 11: Drafting
A B C
S/2 = 3.8" #3 @ 7.5"c/c 2 #4 bars 3# @ 12"c/c #3 @ 7.5"c/c S/2 = 3.8"
18"
18"
#3 @ 7.5"c/c #3 @ 7.5"c/c #3 @ 12"c/c
References
Appendix
Appendix
L1 L1 L2 L2
4 3 3 3
L1 L2 L2
8 8 8
L1 L2
Cutoff for bars in approximately equal spans with uniformly distributed loads for
50% curtailment