2007 The Role of Inter Event Time Definition
2007 The Role of Inter Event Time Definition
2007 The Role of Inter Event Time Definition
net/publication/233613081
The role of inter-event time definition and recovery of initial/depression loss for
the accuracy in quantitative simulations of highway runoff
CITATIONS READS
16 89
4 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Analysis of pathogenic distribution during inundation using model XP-SWMM for the old city of Hue View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Rupak Aryal on 22 July 2015.
{Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kathmandu University, Dhulikhel, Kavre, Nepal
{Department of Urban Engineering, University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8656 Tokyo, Japan
xEnvironmental Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology (RCAST), University of Tokyo,
Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, 113-0033 Tokyo, Japan
{National Water supply and Drainage Board, New Road, Bandarawela, Sri Lanka
behaviour of runoff water makes the model deeply rely on sedimentation and two retention ponds), and in the case
the accurate field monitoring data. Among the data, the that the runoff flow rate exceeds 500 l/s, the excess flow is
inter-event time definition (IETD) and the recovery of discharged from the outfall O2.
depression loss are very important along with the rainfall A long-term continuous runoff monitoring was con-
and runoff data in obtaining the accuracy in the runoff ducted from September to December 2000 at the study
modelling. The data are more sensitive to road/highway area. Recorded rainfall height was from 0.8 mm to 67 mm
runoff where the pollutants load are very high in less runoff during the monitoring period. The runoff flow rate was
volume compared with other non-point sources and the measured every minute at the outfall. During the monitor-
surface becomes dry more quickly owing to traffic activities. ing, the runoff flowrate did not exceed 500 l/s and the
However, both the IETD and the recovery of depression runoff flowrate was measured only at outfall O1. The water
Downloaded By: [Tokodai Kinokunya Co] At: 03:59 26 February 2007
loss have been paid less attention. Adams et al. (1986) sampler was programmed to initialize when flowrate
found IETD between 1 and 6 h appropriate for typical exceeded 8 l/s (0.34 mm/h) and then to stop when flow-
urban catchments in Canada. Hijioka et al. (2001) roughly rate decreased to 5 l/s based on the measured base flowrate
applied the IETD for 8 h when applied in road runoff in 0.7 l/s. Rainfall signal was recorded in every 10 min at a
Japan. Merz et al. (2006) selected IETD lasting 3 – 6 h rainfall monitoring station located near the highway
based on trial and error based on work in 337 catchments [figure 1(left)]. The road surface was made of asphalt.
in Austria. Chen and Adams (2006) applied IETD up to 6 h Surface type was considered all as impervious. The long-
for urban catchment in Toronto Bloor Street. term simulation was carried out with the distributed model
In the current study, we carried out highway runoff software InfoWorks-CS (version 4.5). The drainage net-
quantity simulation with a distributed model (InfoWorks work file was constructed based on the highway design data
CS) based on long-term field monitoring data. We cal- except for the ramp area (data not available). In the
culated the IETD and applied for the quantity runoff sections of the routes A1 and A4, the manholes were
simulation. Finally, we identified the critical role of inter- situated in 80 m intervals. Since the road in the ramp area
event time definition and the recovery of initial/depression was wider than other parts, each manhole was allocated in
loss for precise explanation of runoff quantity in simulation. 20 m intervals so that the subcatchment area was similar to
the main route sections. Figure 1(right) shows a simple
schematic diagram of the drainage network and runoff flow
2. Materials and method
direction.
The study area is a highway drainage system covering an
area of 8.4 ha in Winterthur, Switzerland [figure 1(left)].
The drainage area contained 67 manholes/nodes and 280 3. Results and discussion
gully pots. The study section of the highway was divided
3.1 Estimation of initial/depression loss
into two routes A1 and A4 with a length of 1.8 and 1.2 km
covering an area of 5.5 and 2.0 ha, respectively. The routes Initial/depression loss is one of the most sensitive para-
A1 and A4 are connected by a ramp with the length of meters in runoff simulations in frequently occurring light
0.6 km with the area of 0.9 ha. The drainage system has rainfall events. The initial loss plays an important role,
two outfalls O1 in the route A4 and O2 in the route A1. especially, in the road/highway runoff where the surface
Most of the runoff is discharged through the outfall O1 dryness occurs rapidly after the rainfall owing to high
connected to a treatment facility (oil floatation and traffic volume. Thus, a calibration by a single runoff event
Figure 1. Study area (left) and schematic diagram of drainage system (right).
Inter-event time definition and recovery of initial/depression loss 55
may not be sufficient to verify the value of initial loss. quantity model as precise as possible before proceeding to
Figure 2 shows a relationship between the rainfall height the quality model that we precede in the next phase. In the
and the runoff height calculated from 25 events at the study runoff quantity model, initial/depression loss and base
area where each event was separated from another by flowrate should be given. Base flowrate was determined as
applying enter-event time definition 8. From the intercept 0.7 l/s from the field monitoring data during dry weather
of the x-axis, it is seen that the runoff occurs once the period. Similarly, the initial loss 0.7 mm and the inter-event
rainfall exceeds 0.7 mm. So, we considered 0.7 mm as the 8 h was applied for the quantitative simulations for number
initial loss for the runoff. of events.
Quantity runoff simulations for 18 rainfall events carried
out with 1 min step are shown in table 1. The degree of
3.2 Runoff quantity simulation
Downloaded By: [Tokodai Kinokunya Co] At: 03:59 26 February 2007
Figure 2. Rainfall-runoff relationship during the mon- Figure 3. Determination of inter-event time definition
itoring period. (IETD).
56 R. K. Aryal et al.
*Note: RV ¼ total rainfall height, MRI ¼ Maximum rainfall intensity in the event (measured at 10 min interval), PRV ¼ previous rainfall height,
ADWP ¼ Antecedent dry weather period, T ¼ rainfall duration, RH ¼ rainfall halting (43 h), Y ¼ Yes, N ¼ No, Peak H/T ¼ Peak height/timing,
M ¼ Matching, G ¼ Good matching (Outflow 5 +15%, peak H/T 5 5 mins), B ¼ Bad matching (Outflow +15%, peak H/T 5 mins).
Figure 4. Hydrographs of runoff events on 5 October (left top), 24 October (right top) and 31 October (left bottom) and
14 November (right bottom).
activities. The ignorance of such a recovery of depression To rectify the simulation result we introduced the
loss might have caused to increase the simulated peak height recovery of depression loss to the model by descritizing
as well as runoff volume. the event into two periods (i) before halting period
Inter-event time definition and recovery of initial/depression loss 57
and (ii) after halting period. We simulated each period top and bottom) shows the simulation after introduction
considering it as a separate event and introduced of the recovery of depression loss. The introduction
recovery/depression loss in each event. Figure 5 (right of recovered depression loss decreased the simulated
Downloaded By: [Tokodai Kinokunya Co] At: 03:59 26 February 2007
Figure 5. Hydrographs of runoff event on 2 September and 26 October before (left top and bottom) and after accounting
the recovery of depression loss (right top and bottom) respectively.
Figure 6. Hydrographs of rainfall events on 4 September (left top), 14 September (right top) and 20 September (bottom).
58 R. K. Aryal et al.
peak height and difference in outflow became less depression loss to explain runoff volume during the
than 5%. rainfall halting. It is necessary to consider the recovery
This indicated that the accounting of recovered loss is of depression loss for better estimation of hydrograph
very important for runoff simulation with on-and-off type in on-and-off type rainfall events.
rainfalls in the highway drainage. We categorized these (5) The runoff simulation of strong rainfall events failed to
events into the second group. match the measured and occurred always less runoff
The remaining five simulation results (4 September, volume than the measured indicating the possibility
14 September, 20 September, 6 October and 11 October) of spot/localized rainfall and/or runoff encroachment
showed difference in peak height/timing. These events from the side of the highway.
characterized by strong rainfall intensity (having intensity
Downloaded By: [Tokodai Kinokunya Co] At: 03:59 26 February 2007