Assignment 4
Assignment 4
Assignment 4
Questions:
Q1: Was it a right decision to lay-off around 50% of the workforce?
Q2: What steps a company should take to tackle the technological and global forces which
dictate extreme measures to the company?
Q3: What is the role of HR department at the time of mergers?
Q4: What should be an excellent severance policy and the manner in which it is communicated
to the employees?
Page 1 of 1 Assignment 4
Executive Summary
The 2015 merger of VimpelCom's subsidiaries, Mobilink and Warid, under the banner of "Jazz,"
was undertaken with the strategic goal of enhancing telecommunications services, expanding
coverage, and introducing new products. However, the ambitious restructuring resulted in a
substantial reduction in the workforce, with Mobilink and Warid experiencing layoffs of 55%
and 35%, respectively, alongside the closure of numerous customer service centers. This
corporate decision raised concerns about the societal impact, particularly regarding
unemployment and the sudden disruption of family income. The implementation of a voluntary
separation scheme (VSS) attempted to ease the transition for terminated employees, offering
severance benefits, yet elicited mixed responses, underscoring dissatisfaction and a perceived
lack of fairness in the process.
The communication gap became evident as employees reported a lack of clarity regarding their
job security until late 2016, highlighting an organizational failure in effectively communicating
the evolving circumstances. This uncertainty generated anxiety among the workforce,
compounded by ambiguous messages from the HR department, which admitted a lack of
foresight about the impending changes. The majority of employees opted for the VSS, despite
expressing dissatisfaction with its fairness, emphasizing the need for more transparent and
employee-friendly practices during corporate transitions.
As of March 2017, approximately six months after the layoffs, the aftermath reveals a diverse
range of outcomes for terminated employees. While some remained unemployed, others ventured
into entrepreneurship or found new opportunities in the private sector. The negative sentiment
expressed by ex-employees underscores the societal cost incurred during the merger, prompting
reflection on the need for a more balanced approach that considers not only the financial gains
but also the social ramifications of such strategic corporate decisions. The case reveals a critical
juncture for organizations to reassess their human resource management strategies, emphasizing
the importance of clear communication, fair transition practices, and a holistic approach to
mitigating the broader impact of mergers on the workforce and society at large.
Q1: Was it a right decision to lay-off around 50% of the workforce?
It was the right decision that new company downsized the workforce because of the merger. the
layoffs were conducted through a combination of voluntary separation schemes, percentage-
based workforce reduction, and termination of franchisees. The reasons behind the layoffs
include addressing redundancy, cost-cutting, and strategic adjustments in response to the
merger's goals.
To minimize the negative effect they introduced polices and strategies like The companies
introduced VSS, offering employees one gross salary x 1.5 x the number of years with Mobilink
or Warid. Additional benefits included free medical insurance for one year and any provident
fund. It is also said that The use of "Voluntary Separation Scheme" is noted as a softer term
compared to retrenching or laying off, potentially used to manage the company's public image
and reputation. This also showed their concern towards their employees.
The aims of the merger are touted to be upgrading services including higher quality national
voice and data coverage for high definition audios and videos for entertainment, faster
downloads, and an availability of much broader portfolio of products and services including 3G
and 4G services for customers, expanding to the rural areas and revamping online banking. So
cutting cost was an important factor for the expansion of portfolio . The statement from the CEO
showed how they cared about personnel and aimed to face of long-term corporate strategy and
fierce competition.
So in conclusion The post-merger workforce downsizing was strategic, driven by cost-cutting
and aligning with expansion goals. The Voluntary Separation Scheme, accompanied by
additional benefits, aimed to mitigate the impact on employees and manage public perception.
Balancing long-term strategy and personnel concerns is crucial for the merger's success amid
fierce competition.
Q2: What steps a company should take to tackle the technological and global
forces which dictate extreme measures to the company?
To effectively navigate technological and global forces, companies should implement a proactive
strategy incorporating the following steps:
By proactively addressing technological and global forces through these steps, companies can
position themselves to thrive in a rapidly evolving business landscape while minimizing potential
disruptions and maximizing opportunities for growth.
In short, HR acts as a guide, ensuring everyone is on the same page, feeling supported, and
moving forward positively during a merger.
Q4: What should be an excellent severance policy and the manner in which it
is communicated to the employees?
An excellent severance policy should be comprehensive, fair, and transparent, considering both
the needs of the company and the well-being of employees. The communication of such a policy
is crucial and should follow these principles:
Communication Strategy
i. Direct and Timely Communication:
Communicate the severance policy directly and promptly to affected employees, transparently
explaining the decision-making process and reasons behind it.
ii. Personalized Meetings:
Conduct one-on-one or small group meetings to explain the severance policy individually,
addressing questions and concerns to ensure understanding.
iii. Written Documentation:
Provide written documentation outlining severance policy details, making resources available
for employees to review independently.
iv. Open Door for Questions:
Establish an open-door policy for employees to ask questions or seek clarification, encouraging
communication to address individual concerns.
v. Compassionate Tone:
Communicate with empathy and sensitivity, acknowledging the impact on employees and
expressing gratitude for their contributions.
vi. Internal Communication Plan:
Develop an internal communication plan to keep employees informed throughout the process,
providing updates on severance policy implementation and additional support services.
By integrating these elements into both the severance policy and communication strategy, a
company can demonstrate a commitment to fairness, transparency, and employee well-being
during challenging times