Setting Up Incremental and Long Term Deflection Check in SAFE
Setting Up Incremental and Long Term Deflection Check in SAFE
Long-Term Deflection
Checks in SAFE per
CSI Recommendation
O N N O V E M B E R 2 8 , 2 0 19 B Y E N G R D E N N I S M E RC AD O I N AN AL Y S I S , E L E M E N T D E S I G N , R C
S L AB , S AF E , S AF E M O DE L L I N G , S L AB DE S I G N , S O F T W AR E
If we are to maximize the full potential of SAFE, we ought to take advantage of its
This has something to do with the floor system’s nonlinear behavior with respect to
transient and sustained gravity loads. If you are still at a loss why the heck do we
need to check such condition, it is because codes and local authorities stipulate the
of the few serviceability criteria that we as structural engineers must ensure are met.
All good?
But before we proceed, let us first delimit our discussion to conventional reinforced
tensioned slab, composite construction, and proprietary slab systems such as hollow
cores have different deflection mechanics compared to conventional ones. But then
If you’re new to this topic and you want to know more theoretical background on
what happens after a loaded slab exceeds its modulus of rupture during bending,
please refer to this link. After which, you can come back here to finish the rest of this
article.
Let’s now proceed with how are we going to define nonlinear and cracked load cases
in SAFE.
1. When flexural stresses exceed a certain threshold, it cracks. That threshold is what
we call the modulus of rupture. In ACI, that is 62 percent of the square root of
concrete’s compressive strength (clause 9.5.2.3 of ACI 318-11) Consult your
structural bibles or local authorities if you’re using non-American codes.
2. Creep coefficient and shrinkage strain. Again, the values of which vary accordingly.
If I’m not mistaken, American codes adopted values for shrinkage strain from either
CIRIA or British Standards. I could be wrong so please do some research.
3. Finally, the typical reinforcement required for our software to be able to iterate
results. Inasmuch as the reinforcement varies across the slab area (e.g. required
additional top bars on supports, and additional bottom bars at midspan) minimum
mesh depending on the slab thickness is sufficient for initial iterations.
With the required parameters checked, let us now define 4 nonlinear load cases
Advertisement
LL = live loads
Case 1 is the nonlinear immediate action of all loads where Case 1 = SW + SDL + LL
0.25*LL
Case 3 is the long-term
term reduced loads where Case 3 = SW + SDL + 0.25*LL. Note
that you can have different values for creep coefficient and shrinkage strain
incremental
cremental deflection. Of the two, the one with the more stringent requirement is
the incremental deflection check since this is what is usually used to check
railings. The usual limit for incremental deflection is L/500 while it’s L/250 for long
term deflections. Again, this can vary depending on the code used so better check
your limits.
Advertisement
Finally, we just have to show the deflection using the 2 load combinations to check
In the title, I mentioned that this was per recommendation of Computers and
Structures Inc. Below is the link from CSIWiki in case you’re wondering where in the
https://wiki.csiamerica.com/display/safe/Cracked-section+analysis
https://engrdennisbmercado.wordpress.com/2019/11/28/setting-up-incremental-and-long-term-
deflection-checks-in-safe-per-csi-recommendation/